[Only the first part of this message is displayed. The entire message has been
turned into a text attachment, which you can retrieve by selecting Download.
Once downloaded, open it with a word processor or text editor for reading.]
Author's contact info and list of over 70 references including Cheryl Welsh
are at end of this article in two parts (1/2 & 2/2)
fwd: Author= [Lloyd Miller, Research Director for A-albionic Research ]
"Neuroscience is being increasingly recognized as posing potential threat to
human
rights" (from the article on the annual public meeting of the French
National
Bioethics Committee in magazine Nature, volume 391, January 22, 1998)
PSYCHOELECTRONIC THREAT TO DEMOCRACY - THE SECRET ARMS RACE
THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND THE USA BUILT RADAR SYSTEMS THAT COULD
ENABLE THEM TO CONTROL THE MINDS OF WHOLE POPULATIONS
SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION, MILITARY DOCUMENTS,
WARNINGS BY CIVILIAN AND MILITARY RESEARCHERS
CONTENTS
1. The History � the scandal in the USA and electrical stimulation of
the brain.
2. Mind stimulating devices can alter our psyche
3. Scientific experiments and patents - effects of electromagnetism on
animal and human organisms and brains
4. American military documents on the development of radiofrequency
weapons �the nervous system function is not much different from the
radio receiver
5. The Secret arms race and hushed up scandal in the USSR
6. Thought control and the invention of Igor Smirnov
7. American radar system HAARP could be used for the global control of
human minds
8. A secret conference organized by the American National Laboratory in
Los Alamos
9. Have the radiofrequency weapons been put to use yet?
10. The Revolution in military affairs may result in the destruction of
democracy
11. Warnings by civil and military scientists
The missing parts and chapters and the list of those who support the ban of
radiofrequency weapons controling the functions of human brain you can find
at the address:
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm
HISTORY - THE SCANDAL IN THE USA IN THE SEVENTIES AND
Author's contact info and list of over 70 references including Cheryl Welsh
are at end of this article in two parts (1/2 & 2/2)
fwd: Author= [Lloyd Miller, Research Director for A-albionic Research ]
"Neuroscience is being increasingly recognized as posing potential threat to
human
rights" (from the article on the annual public meeting of the French
National
Bioethics Committee in magazine Nature, volume 391, January 22, 1998)
PSYCHOELECTRONIC THREAT TO DEMOCRACY - THE SECRET ARMS RACE
THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND THE USA BUILT RADAR SYSTEMS THAT COULD
ENABLE THEM TO CONTROL THE MINDS OF WHOLE POPULATIONS
SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION, MILITARY DOCUMENTS,
WARNINGS BY CIVILIAN AND MILITARY RESEARCHERS
CONTENTS
1. The History � the scandal in the USA and electrical stimulation of
the brain.
2. Mind stimulating devices can alter our psyche
3. Scientific experiments and patents - effects of electromagnetism on
animal and human organisms and brains
4. American military documents on the development of radiofrequency
weapons �the nervous system function is not much different from the
radio receiver
5. The Secret arms race and hushed up scandal in the USSR
6. Thought control and the invention of Igor Smirnov
7. American radar system HAARP could be used for the global control of
human minds
8. A secret conference organized by the American National Laboratory in
Los Alamos
9. Have the radiofrequency weapons been put to use yet?
10. The Revolution in military affairs may result in the destruction of
democracy
11. Warnings by civil and military scientists
The missing parts and chapters and the list of those who support the ban of
radiofrequency weapons controling the functions of human brain you can find
at the address:
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm
HISTORY - THE SCANDAL IN THE USA IN THE SEVENTIES AND THE ELECTRICAL BRAIN
STIMULATION
When in 1951 American secret services started work on the project
Artichoke they have
set their goals as follows: �Evolution and development of any method by
which we can get
information from a person against his will and without his knowledge... Can
we get control of
an individual to the point where he will do our bidding against his will and
even against such
fundamental laws of nature such as self preservation?�
The signals in the nerves, in the brain and the whole body are
carried by weak electrical
impulses. The scientists who experimented since 1930 with the electrical
stimulation of the
brain inserted tiny wires (electrodes) into the brains of animals and humans
and stimulated the
nerves in different points of the brain by impulses of weak electrical
current. In this way they
produced reactions normally aroused by sensory perceptions or events
inside of the
organism. Jose Delgado, who wrote, in 1969, the book (5) resuming this
research, quotes
there a man with whom the bending of the arm was stimulated. When asked to
straighten it up,
he said: "Your electricity is stronger than my willpower." Women, with whom
the pleasure
centers were stimulated, offered their therapists marriage. The author of
another book on this
topic, of 1990, John Stanton Yeomans (6), writes that by electrical
stimulation of the brain
even the complex thoughts were aroused.
In 1986 the United States Attorney General held a conference on the
Less than Lethal
Weapons. In the report on this conference is stated: �Participants also
discussed the use of
various wave lengths and forms of administration of electromagnetic energy
as a non-lethal
weapon. A substantial amount of preliminary research has been conducted in
this area... One
conference participant noted that scientific knowledge of human physiology
is progressing to
the point where it may soon be possible to target specific physiologic
systems with specific
frequencies of electromagnetic radiation to produce much more subtle and
fine-tuned effects
than those produced by photic driving (9).�
SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTS AND PATENTS - EFFECTS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION ON
ANIMAL
AND HUMAN ORGANISMS AND BRAINS
The evidence for the effects of electromagnetic signals on isolated
neurons published in
1975 H. Wachtel in the Annals of New York Academy of Sciences (10). The
whole volume
of this issue (over 500 pages) is dedicated to the Conference on �Biological
Effects on Non-
ionizing Radiation�. The introductory lecture was delivered by captain Paul
Tyler, director of
the U.S. Navy Electromagnetic Radiation Project between 1970 and 1977.
Among the
reasons for his presence at the conference was an effort to persuade the
scientists to hire
psychologists on the research teams. In the experiment of H. Wachtel the
microwaves in the
frequencies of 1,5 and 2,45 Ghz, pulsed and not pulsed induced the activity
of isolated
neurons.
In the experiment by McAffee (13) the microwaves pulsed at 300, 600 and
1000 Hz
produced uneasiness to breath (leading even to suffocation) in rats. Capt.
Tyler in his
contribution to the book �Low Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology�
writes: �It has also
been shown that normal breathing takes place at certain frequencies and
amplitudes and not at
others. Animals forced to breath at certain unnatural frequencies develop
severe respiratory
distress.� In the context of his paper those are rather the effects on
people that are in question.
In 1968, the Russian academician A.S. Presman published a book
�Electromagnetic Fields
and Life� (23) where he presented theory that electromagnetic signals have
for the living matter
the meaning of information, e.g. that they exert control over its intrinsic
processes. In his book
he mentions the experiment of S. Turlygin from the year 1937 where
centimeter waves induced
in people feelings of sleepiness and feebleness. The list of literary
sources at the end of the
book of A.S. Presman is already 28 pages long.
One of the highly respected experts working in this field, Ross Adey,
who admits that he is
working in military research, published in 1974 the results of experiments
with microwaves at
frequency 147 MHz pulsed at 6 - 10 Hz and 450 MHz pulsed at 16 Hz. Those
signals
increased the efflux of calcium ions from nerve cells (25).
Robert Becker, who has been twice nominated for the Nobel prize for the
work in this field
of science, writes in the book �Body Electric� (26) that Ross Adey have
publicly expressed his
expectation that this efflux of calcium ions would interfere with
concentration on complex tasks,
disrupt sleep patterns, and change brain function in other ways that can
not be predicted yet.�
(The calcium ions play a key role in the transmission of nerve impulses).
In 1962 published Allan H. Frey in the �Journal of Applied Physiology�
(27) the results of
experiments with transmission of sounds into the brain by electromagnetic
radiation at a
distance of up to 1000 feet. The �electromagnetic� sounds were heard by
deaf as well as
sound people. The radiofrequency sound was �described as being buzz,
clicking, hiss or
knocking, depending on several transmitter parameters, i.e. pulse width and
pulse repetition
rate� (frequency) . In his report A. Frey writes that so far only the
visual system has been
shown to respond to electromagnetic energy and he notices that �With
somewhat different
transmission parameters we can induce the perception of severe buffeting of
the head..� and
�Changing ... parameters again, one can induce a �pins-and-needles�
sensation.�
His experiment was replicated several times by other scientists (28).
Another, more
advanced, experiment with the transmission of radiofrequency sounds into the
brain was
published only inadvertently. Don R. Justesen used, in the article on
"Microwaves and
Behavior" (30), the result of an experiment described to him over the
telephone conversation
by his colleague J. C. Sharp, who worked on a military project. Joseph C.
Sharp was
employed on the project Pandora of the American Navy, officially designed to
research of the
radiofrequency radiation emitted on the American Embassy in Moscow from the
60s until the
begining of 80s. At the Walter Reed Army Institute he improved the method
of A. Frey to the
point that he transmitted into his brain words which he could understand.
The scientific personality, which was apparently on the cutting edge at
this time, was Patrick
Flanagan. An independent researcher who in 1958, in 14 years of his age,
presented to the
United States Patent Office a neurophone, the invention which made it
possible for deaf people
to hear (31). The device converts sound into electrical impulses that
propagate along the skin
into the brain. For the employees of the patent office the invention was
incredible and Patrick
Flanagan managed to persuade them that the invention could work only after 6
years when he
demonstrated it making a deaf employee of the Office hear the first time
after 15 years. But
even then the invention did not get to the deaf people. Patrick Flanagan
improved the invention
technically and submitted it under a new patent number 3,647,970. Though his
device emitted
radiofrequency waves into the brain through the skin, he added to the
accompanying text the
sentences: "The simplified speech waveform can be transmitted directly
through the earth or
water and be understood either directly from the medium or after simple
amplification. The
simplified waveform can easily be encoded by scrambling to provide secure
voice
communications." Patrick Flanagan believes that it was due to those lines
that the United States
Defense Intelligence Agency placed his invention under a secrecy order as a
matter of national
security. Patrick Flanagan was forbidden from conducting further research or
even talking
about his technology for another four years. In the 1990s the American
company Earthpulse
who was selling neurophones had set up its business representation in
Germany. In 1996, all
the same, evidently out of the fear that the secret military technology
could get understood by
the general public, the neurophone was put under a secrecy order by the U.S.
Defense
Intelligence agency (the news was published in Earthpulse Flashpoints No1,
Earthpulse,
Alaska, USA, 1996). In the accompanying text to his patent P. Flanagan also
writes: "The
present invention involves discovery that certain electromagnetic waves
induce reponses in the
nervous system of mammals... Each individual nervous system is at least
somewhat selective in
respect to the frequencies to which it is most responsive."
There are other four patents registered with the U.S. Patent Office
using the microwave
hearing phenomenon. The patent #4877027 http://www.patents.usptogov./cgi-
bin/ilink4?INDEX+0+4877027+F (this patent was bought by the IBM
corporation - see
http://patent.womplex.ibm.com/details?patent_number=__4877027 ) with the
title "Hearing syst�m" by
Wayne B. Brunkan, issued on October 31, 1989. In the abstract we read:
"Sound is induced
in the head of a person by radiating the head with microwaves in the range
of 100 MHz to
10.000 MHz that are modulated with particular waveform." The patent #
4858612 by Philip L.
Stocklin, issued on August 22, 1989 entitled "Hearing
device"http://patents.uspto.gov/cgi-
bin/ilink4?INDEX+0+4858612+F. In the abstract we read: "A method and
apparatus for simulation
of hearing in mammals by introduction of a plurality of microwaves into the
region of the
auditory cortex." The patent # 3766331 by Zink, issued on October 10, 1973 -
"Hearing aid
for producing sensations in the brain" and patent # 3629521 by Andrija
Puharich, December
1971, "Hearing systems".
Robert Becker, in his book "Body Electric" writes about an experiment
by J. F. Schapitz in
1974. It was released voluntarily on basis of Freedom of Information Act
and for that matter
R. Becker takes it "with a pillar of salt". J. F. Schapitz stated: "In this
investigation it will be
shown that the spoken word of hypnotist may also be conveyed by modulated
electromagnetic
energy directly into the subconcscious parts of the human brain - i. e.
without employing any
technical devices for receiving or transcoding the messages and without the
person exposed to
such influence having a chance to control the information input
consciously." In one of the four
experiments subjects should have been given a test of hundred questions,
ranging from easy to
technical ones. Later, not knowing they were being irradiated they would be
subjected to
information beams suggesting the answers to the questions they had left
blank, amnesia for
some of their correct answers and memory falsification of their correct
answers. After 2 weeks
they had to pass the test again.The results of those experiments were never
published. Later on
we will discuss the possiblities how this could be done.
AMERICAN MILITARY DOCUMENTS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF RADIOFREQUENCY WEAPONS
- THE NERVOUS SYSTEM CAN BE COMPARED TO A RADIO RECEIVER
In the 1986 the American Air Force issued a book �Low Intensity
Conflict and Modern
Technology� (19). In the foreword Newt Gingrich, member of the U.S. House
of
Representatives writes: �The United States is on the verge of a dramatic
change in its ability to
cope with low-intensity conflict... This book is a serious effort to make
thinking about and
working on low-intensity conflict easier, more understandable and more
effective.� The chapter
on the �Electromagnetic Spectrum in Low Intensity Conflict� wrote Capt.
Paul Tyler. At the
beginning he quotes �Final Report on Biotechnology Research Requirements for
Aeronautical
Systems Through the Year 2000� issued by American Air Force in 1982:
�Currently available
data allow the projection that specially generated radiofrequency radiation
(RFR) fields may
pose a powerful and revolutionary antipersonnel military threats... the
increasing understanding
of the brain as an electrically mediated organ suggested the serious
probability that impressed
electromagnetic fields can be disruptive to purposeful behavior and may be
capable of directing
and or interrogating such behavior. Further, the passage of approximately
100 miliamperes
through the myocardium can lead to cardiac standstill and death... A rapidly
scanning RFR
system could provide an effective stun or kill capability over a large
area. System effectiveness
will be a function of wave form, field intensity, pulse width, repetition
frequency, and carrier
frequency.�
The last line defines the technical principle of the control of
cerebral functions. Though it is
too short to provide the understanding of how such a technology may work. It
is generally
known that the information inside of the brain is �translated� and
transferred by a number and
frequency of nerve impulses, while the intensity of the feeling or
perception usually corresponds
to the intensity of electrical current. Another phenomenon generally
accepted in the modern
scientific literature is a synchronization of frequencies of emitted nerve
impulses in different
parts of the brain in reaction to the stimuli which catch the attention of
the brain (34). Per E.
Roland from the Laboratory for Brain Research and Positron Emission
Tomography at the
Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden, engaged in the research of
brain activation in
reaction to different stimuli. He studied the influx of blood, bringing the
nutrition to the activated
areas of the brain. In this way he was finding the different areas or
columns of neurons which
got activated in reaction to different stimuli. He writes that looking at
the distribution of those
activated areas in the brain, he can tell what is the subject a person is
thinking about. Then he
asks a question whether those so called �metabolical columns� have common
electrophysiological properties, e.g. whether their electrical activity is
identical. The reply to this
question he finds in the work of German scientists Schopman and Stryker from
1981 who
�showed that in the visual cortex of the cat, the metabolic columns
corresponded with
electrophysiologically defined columns in which the neurons had orientation
specificity for the
stimulus used.� This means that different stimuli produce in the brain
different electrical events.
In the opposite direction Whitsel and Juliano (1989) found that �metabolic
columns only
occurred at cortical locations where the neurons possessed
electrophysiologically defined
functional properties related to the stimulus.� Skarda and Freeman (1987)
and Singer (1990)
�advanced the concept that neurons in different active columns synchronize
their electrical
oscillatory activity in response to optimal inputs� (35).
Wolf Singer (36) describes an experiment where two different stimuli
produced at the
same time are observed in the brain. They were �represented by two
independently oscillating
assemblies of cells�. According to Wolf Singer the differences in brain
activity in reaction to
different stimuli are represented by different groups of neurons
oscillating in different
frequencies. Walter J. Freeman, who has already for years measured the
brain activity in
reaction to different stimuli by many microelectrodes at the same time,
presented already in
1975 a hypothesis �that a novel external stimulus is broadly transmitted
from the primary
sensory cortex or thalamus to other parts of the cortex... transmission
occurs at some
characteristic frequency, and... reception occurs in... sets tuned to that
frequency� (37).
(Electroencephalographers have no doubt that those are those
synchronizations which appear
on the EEG recordings and are already capable to recognize the speech
frequencies - see
Continuous Wave-Form Analysis, journal: Electroencephalography and Clinical
Neurophysiology, supplement no. 45, 1996).
And what happens when an external electromagnetic frequency is applied
to the brain? H.
Frolich from the Department of Physics at the University of Liverpool,
England, writes:
oscillations produced by coherent excitation of a single polar mode �yield
long range,
frequency selective, interactions between systems with equal excitation
frequencies� (38). In
other words it is basically the frequency of nerve impulses e.g. frequency
of electrical currents
e.g. - from military point of view - frequency of electromagnetic waves that
defines the activity
of the brain, and we can always bypass the physical perception by
electromagnetic signals
which will produce, in the brain, the same electrophysiological events as
would be produced by
the perception. It means the events in the brain can be produced
�synthetically� from the
outside. Those findings are supported as well by the experiments of Allan
Frey and W. Guy
where electromagnetic �acoustic� signals , when tuned to the
electrophysiological properties of
cochlea or to its natural frequencies and pulse widths, produced in the
brain the same events
as a normal sound. When the parameters of the transmitter (i.e. frequency,
pulse width etc.)
were changed, it was another brain area which resonated with the
electromagnetic signals and
so the feeling of severe buffeting on the head or pins and needles sensation
was induced. The
changed transmitter parameters resonated with another receiver in the brain,
which caused
there different type of frequency synchronizations. The same effect reflects
also the note of
Capt. Tyler that �normal breathing takes place at certain frequencies and
amplitudes but not at
others.� The radiofrequency radiation, when tuned to its frequencies and
amplitudes, hits the
part of the brain which controls the breathing and imposes another rhythm of
breathing or even
stops it (remember that Jose Delgado could produce the same effect by means
of electric
stimulation of the brain). So the Patrick Flanagan�s neurophone works in pr
etty much the same
way as a radio transmitter whose broadcasting is adjusted to the �receiver
picking up the
signal which, in this case, appears to be cochlea. If we want to broadcast
for another
�receiver� in the nervous system, we only need to know its parameters to be
able to broadcast
the information or frequency to which the receiver is tuned up. Just like
when tuning our radio
receiver we choose the frequency at which its internal circuits will
resonate and the result is that
we listen to the radio station which we have chosen. John Marks, in his book
on CIA mind
control research quotes one of CIA research veterans recalling a colleague�s
joke: �If you
could find the natural radio frequency of a person�s sphincter, you could
make him run out of
the room real fast. (43)� Different frequencies used in his experiments with
animals also Jose
Delgado. But this time the only case when the results of his work were
presented to public was
the article by Kathleen McAuliffe in OMNI magazine. Robert Becker, since
she is friend of
his, instructed her before her trip to Spain, what questions she should ask
Jose Delgado (17).
One of those questions was whether, aside of frequencies, other parameters
of the transmitter
can make difference. Probably being bound by national security information
law, Jose
Delgado did not answer most of the questions prepared by R. Becker. Anyway
the
waveforms, intensity of the electric current, the pulse width and carrier
frequency are being
quoted in the scientific papers on experiments.
From the paper of captain Tyler we did not learn anything about the
projects of the
American Navy he was working for. Robert Becker, in his book Cross Currents
presents the
report coming from the Microwave Research Department at the Walter Reed Army
Institute,
where J.C. Sharp carried out his experiment with the transmission of words
into the brain by
radiofrequency radiation. The report deals with the effects of pulsed
microwaves on nervous
system and describes the division of testing program into four parts: 1)
prompt debilitating
effects, 2) prompt stimulation auditory effects (remember J.C. Sharp one
more time) 3) work
interference (stoppage effects) 4) effects on stimulus controlled behavior.
The report presents
this conclusion: �Microwave pulses appear to couple to the central nervous
system and
produce stimulation similar to electrical stimulation unrelated to heat
(42). The idea that with
the electromagnetic stimulation of the brain the same effects can be
produced as with electric
stimulation, as Jose Delgado described it, is dismaying, but apparently
true.
American Air Force, according to the Final Report on Biotechnology
Research
Requirements for Aeronautical Systems Through the Year 2000, divided the
research of
radiofrequency weapons into three areas:
1) Pulsed RFR Effects� - projected research since 1980 until 1995
2) �Mechanisms of RFR with Living Systems� referred to as
�continuation of ongoing research� beginning in 1980 and forecast
to
conclude around 1997
3) �RFR forced disruptive phenomena� - starting around 1986 with the
projected
continuation until 2010. In the second volume of this report it is stated
that the work on the
project is progressing according to the schedule or in advance. The last
area of research is in
the second volume redefined: �While initial attention should be toward
degradation of human
performance through thermal loading and electromagnetic field effects,
subsequent work should
address the possibilities of directing and interrogating mental functioning,
using externally
applied fields...� (44). This formulation is probably not clear on purpose,
but the message
looks clear - the intent of the project should be to collect electromagnetic
waves emanating
from the brain and to transmit them into another brain that would read a
person�s thoughts or
to use the same procedure in order to impose somebody else�s thoughts on
another person�s
brain and in this way direct his actions. If it is true what Wolf Singer
tells about brain events
always differing by frequencies of synchronizations among different brain
cells then it is not
impossible to find the thoughts frequencies. To pick them up would probably
require some
kind of passive radar and the transmission would require the transcoding of
the slow waves
emanating from the brain into the electromagnetic pulses of microwaves on an
active radar
which does not appear to be that difficult of a technical task (the
individual difference of the
thought brain frequencies should be probbly handled by computerized
translation). From the
layman�s point of view the most difficult task is to pick up the brain
waves. But according to
Gordon Thomas (3) the U.S. intelligence services, during the taking of
hostages in Lebanon,
eavesdropped the conversations on the streets of Beirut from satellites and
computers
searched there for clues that could lead to a liberation of hostages. The
capabilities of military
technology go far beyond the understanding of common sense. For sure it is
interesting that the
Czech Republic is officially the unique producer of the spying passive radar
Tamara and the
United States has never ordered it from them.
The military documents quoted here are accessible to the public though
they are not
published in the newspapers. Our guess is that they are there in order to
get the public ready
to accept the use of the technology that is already at hand and sometimes
in use. If you will
just only read this text, without following up with an action, you will
support this course of
events.
Some idea of how such manipulation can feel we can get from the
lecture of Friedman
Kaiser, from the Department of Theoretical Physics in Stuttgart, Germany.
At the conference
on Nonlinear Electrodynamics in Biological Systems (70), in his lecture he
described how does
the �entrainment� of biological system (including the brain) to the external
stimulation develop:
�Regular external perturbations interact with the internal oscillations, the
system can be
synchronized to the external drives (entrainment). A sharp frequency
response results,
exhibiting... rather irregular behavior near the entrainment region. On the
route from the free to
the forced oscillations one finds near the region of entrainment a nonlinear
superposition of free
and forced oscillations... the occurrence of strongly periodic states with
submultiples of the
external frequency enables the system to couple to other frequencies or to
decouple partially
from the driving field.� In simple words a man or woman who will fall victim
to complex
manipulation of the type of �strategic personality simulation� which we will
talk about in the
next chapter, will live in the condition comparable to military occupation
of a state. if this
radiation hits the whole population, it should be about the same situation.
Paul Tyler in his
paper on Electromagnetic Spectrum in Low Intensity Conflict writes that
electromagnetic
systems �are silent and countermeasures to them may be difficult to
develop.�
**************************************************************
MINDCONTROL-L Mind Control and Psyops Mailing List
To unsubscribe or subscribe: send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the following text: "unsubscribe MINDCONTROL-L" or "subscribe
MINDCONTROL-L". Post to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wes Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, list moderator
