-Caveat Lector-
What calamity (if any) was about to befall Geo Bush (Sr) when it was
originally decided to act against Iraq back in '90? It seems as though
when 'genderhood' is threatened, Hussein appears to be the one they try to
geld. I refer to this in view of the Sudan/Afghanistan strikes (following
Grand Jury testimony) and now this. The impetus for my comment stems in
part from an O'Reilly (Fox News) piece with Al Haig, during which Haig
referred to striking Iraq as being a way to prove 'manhood' ... is Willie
Clinton the only one to whom Haig may have referred?
>From wsws.org
WSWS : News & Analysis : Middle East : Iraq
Clinton's attack on Iraq
Military aggression and political diversion
By the Editorial Board
17 December 1998
The launching of US air and missile attacks on Iraq is a measure both of
the desperation of the Clinton administration and of the criminal
recklessness and bellicosity of American imperialism. Thousands of Iraqi
lives are to be sacrificed, for the short-term goal of preserving Clinton's
presidency, and for the long-term goal of maintaining US dominance in the
oil-rich Middle East.
The timing of the attack, on the eve of the impeachment debate and vote in
the House of Representatives, is clearly bound up with the political crisis
of the Clinton White House. As he has throughout this political crisis, at
every point when his presidency has been threatened, Clinton has sought to
appease his right-wing opponents with the threat or use of military force.
In February, after the eruption of the Lewinsky affair, amid a media
barrage aimed at forcing his resignation, Clinton seized on a conflict with
Iraq over the activity of United Nations weapons inspectors to go to the
brink of military action. In August, only three days after his testimony
before the grand jury convened by Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr,
Clinton launched cruise missile strikes on Sudan and Afghanistan.
After going to the brink with Iraq again on November 15, Clinton was widely
denounced by congressional Republicans when he called off planned air
strikes, with B-52s already in the air headed for Baghdad. Republican
senators openly called for the US government to set as its goal the
overthrow and murder of Saddam Hussein. Only a few days ago, House Majority
Whip Tom DeLay, who is spearheading the impeachment drive, baited the White
House over its failure to oust the Iraqi leader.
If the timing of the attack is based on political expediency, however, the
military action flows directly and inexorably from American policy in the
region. For nearly eight years, since the end of the Persian Gulf war, the
United States has maintained a death grip over this largely devastated and
militarily defenseless country. The sanctions regime imposed through the
United Nations has killed an estimated half a million children, depriving
them of food, medicine and other basic necessities.
The official pretext for the economic embargo, the claim that a country
largely without electric power and running water was nonetheless
stockpiling nuclear, chemical and biological weapons, is an utter fraud. No
evidence that Iraq currently possesses weapons of mass destruction has ever
been presented by the US or the US-controlled UNSCOM inspectors. Instead,
Iraq has been required to do the impossible--prove the nonexistence of such
weapons in a territory the size of Texas with a population of 20 million
people. There have even been demands that Iraq rid itself of the
"capability" of producing such weapons, which would mean, given the
flexibility of modern technology, that Iraq must revert to pre-industrial
conditions.
It is a measure of the cynicism of the American political establishment and
the corporate-controlled media that Clinton's lies about a trivial matter,
his affair with Monica Lewinsky, have been declared an impeachable offense,
while his repetition of gross, obvious and, in the full sense of the word,
criminal lies about Iraq is accepted and endorsed. Indeed, if any of
Clinton's Republican opponents were the occupant of the White House, the
lies would be just as brazen and the military aggression just as flagrant.
In the propaganda of 1998, "weapons of mass destruction" occupies the same
place that the "domino theory" and the Gulf of Tonkin resolution occupied
during the Vietnam War. And the former antiwar protester of the 1960s seeks
to save himself through the slaughter of innocent Iraqi people.
The latest confrontation with Iraq was deliberately instigated by UNSCOM,
which functions quite openly as an instrument of the US government,
regularly reporting on its spying activities to the American CIA. Its most
provocative action, taken last week, was an attempt to invade the Baghdad
headquarters of the ruling Ba'ath Party. Under conditions where the CIA is
seeking to organize both the overthrow of the Ba'athist regime in Iraq and
the assassination of Saddam Hussein, UNSCOM officials knew that Iraqi
authorities would block an inspection, thus creating the pretext for
American air strikes.
The real driving force of the US military intervention against Iraq is the
effort by American imperialism to assert its strategic interests in the
region. Joined only by its most loyal international stooge, the British
Labour Party government of Prime Minister Tony Blair, the US government is
seeking to secure for American corporate interests the lion's share of the
profits in the exploitation of the two greatest reservoirs of oil on the
planet, the Middle East and Central Asia.
There is an ominous logic to the American military moves against Iraq.
While little information is yet available, there have been reports of
"heavy and sustained bombing" and of air strikes against the positions
occupied by Iraq's Republican Guard, the principal conventional military
force which survived the gulf war onslaught. Such measures, which have
nothing to do with concern for "weapons of mass destruction," would be
carried out for the purpose of clearing the way for the invasion and
military occupation of Iraq by US ground troops. Indeed, no other military
action could be envisioned to carry out the declared goal of US foreign
policy, which Clinton reiterated in his Wednesday night speech, the
establishment of a new, US-dominated government in Baghdad.
In addition to the longstanding US designs on the Persian Gulf, which were
the basis for the Bush administration's decision to go to war over Kuwait
in 1990-91, the Clinton administration has been deeply involved in
jockeying for control of the breakaway republics of the former Soviet Union
that surround the Caspian Sea, which are believed to have the largest
untapped gas and oil reserves in the world.
A bitter struggle is raging between the major capitalist powers over the
location and control of the pipelines that will deliver these resources to
the world market. Seeing potential advantages in the dismemberment of Iraq
and the stationing of American troops so close to the new oilfields, both
the Clinton administration and its Republican adversaries now embrace the
goal of overthrowing and removing Saddam Hussein, which was rejected by
George Bush in 1991 as both unfeasible and undesirable from the standpoint
of US interests.
It is these fundamental economic and strategic considerations, and not
Clinton's political maneuvers, which are at the root of the aggression
against Iraq. Once again it is being made clear that the basic threat to
world peace is American imperialism, and its demented belief that with
B-52s and cruise missiles it can do as it pleases anywhere in the world.
Whatever the immediate outcome of the assault on Iraq--and there is no
doubt that what is unfolding is a colossal human tragedy--the drive by
American capitalism to war must lead ultimately to disaster, not only for
its victims overseas, but for the working class youth who will be mobilized
to kill or be killed for the profit interests of the corporate and
financial elite. Yet the latest US military actions proceed without a
single dissenting voice in the political establishment, without any
critical examination by the subservient mass media. Working people must
oppose these military strikes and demand an end both to the aggression
against Iraq and to the continued US/UN policy of starving the Iraqi
people.
See Also:
Political coup gathers strength
Clinton's groveling emboldens right-wing push for impeachment
[12 December 1998]
New threat of air strikes
US moves B-52s towards Iraq
[12 December 1998]
New Caspian oil interests fuel US war drive against Iraq
[16 November 1998]
Top of page
Readers: The WSWS invites your comments. Please send e-mail.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright 1998
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved
~~~~~~~~~~~~
A<>E<>R
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes
but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
