-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.aci.net/kalliste/
<A HREF="http://www.aci.net/kalliste/">The Home Page of J. Orlin Grabbe</A>
-----
Kosovo/Vietnam

Bill Clinton, Aggressor

by Ted Galen Carpenter

There are some occasions when one should not mince words, and the
spectacle of U.S.-led air strikes on Serbia is one. Put bluntly,
President Clinton's assault on Serbia is a flagrant, shameful act of
aggression. U.S. forces are attacking a country that has not attacked
the United States, a U.S. ally, or even a neighboring state. That is the
very definition of an aggressor.
Belgrade is guilty of nothing except attempting to put down a
secessionist rebellion in one of its own provinces. Nearly a dozen other
countries have done the same thing in this decade alone -- often with
far greater bloodshed. Russia's war in Chechnya, Sri Lanka's conflict
with Tamil rebels and Turkey's suppression of the Kurds are merely a few
examples.

The Clinton administration's spin meisters insist that Serbia is the
aggressor in the current confrontation, but that argument twists
language in a manner reminiscent of characters out of George Orwell's
novels 1984 and Animal Farm. "Aggression" is a long-standing concept in
international relations, and it has a very specific meaning: unprovoked
cross-border warfare -- an unwarranted attack by one state on another. A
country cannot commit aggression in its own territory any more than a
person can commit self-robbery.

The argument that Serbia has committed aggression in Kosovo, thereby
justifying military intervention by NATO, is not only an Orwellian
distortion, it sets an extremely dangerous precedent. The traditional
standard that developments within a country, however sad and tragic, do
not justify military intervention by outside powers is one that should
not be cast aside lightly. Without that limitation, weak and imperfect
as it may be, the floodgates are open to intervention by an assortment
of countries for any number of reasons -- or pretexts.

Before the proponents of NATO intervention in Kosovo cheer too loudly,
they ought to consider the potential ramifications. For example, might
Russia and its ally Belarus someday cite the Kosovo precedent for
attacking Ukraine because of the latter's alleged mistreatment of
Russian-speaking inhabitants in the Crimea? Could China and Pakistan
argue that India's suppression of secessionists in Kashmir is a
humanitarian tragedy and a threat to the peace of the region, justifying
joint military action against that "aggressor"?

Of course, the Clinton administration contends that the events in Kosovo
are not really an internal Serbian affair, because the conflict might
spread southward in the Balkans. According to that scenario, the
fighting threatens to draw in Albania and Macedonia and, eventually,
NATO members Greece and Turkey. That argument is a refurbished version
of the old domino theory, and it is dubious on two levels.

First, it is curious (if not nauseating) to see Clinton, Deputy
Secretary of State Strobe Talbott and other alumni of the
anti-VietnamWar movement make that argument. They ridiculed the domino
theory when Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon invoked it during the
conflict in Southeast Asia. They were even more scornful when Ronald
Reagan invoked it with regard to the communist insurgencies in Central
America and the Caribbean during the 1980s. Now, suddenly, they believe
the theory has indisputable validity in the Balkans in the 1990s. At the
very least, they owe the American people an explanation of their
dramatic change of perspective.

Second, even if one accepts the dubious domino theory, the
administration's policy is making the spread of the Balkan conflict more
rather than less likely. The Serbs are not the party with expansionist
ambitions in the southern Balkans; the Albanians are. Kosovo Liberation
Army commanders have stated that their ultimate goal is, not merely an
independent Kosovo, but the creation of a Greater Albania. Nationalist
groups in Albania openly circulate maps of Greater Albania -- an entity
that includes not merely Albania and Kosovo but an additional slice of
Serbia, all of western Macedonia and a large chunk of northern Greece.

By facilitating Kosovo's secession -- and the NATO-imposed peace
settlement is nothing more than Kosovo's independence on the installment
plan -- the United States and its allies would be strengthening the very
faction that is the most likely to stir up additional trouble in the
southern Balkans. Thus, the administration's policy lacks even internal
coherence.

War against Serbia is unwarranted on strategic, legal and moral grounds.
Serbia is the fourth country Bill Clinton has bombed in the past seven
months. That record is one of a trigger-happy administration that is
creating an image of America as the planetary bully. Decent Americans
need to make a stand when it has reached the point of a full-scale war
of aggression against a country that has done us no harm.

Ted Galen Carpenter is vice president for defense and foreign policy
studies at the Cato Institute in Washington, DC, and the author or
editor of 10 books on international affairs.

The Cato Institute


Kosovo/Vietnam

Fear of Wider Instability in Balkans on the Rise

Meanwhile, Aggressor Clinton amusingly cites "international law" & "war
crimes"

PARIS - The North Atlantic Treaty Organization vowed Thursday to grind
ahead with its air assault against Serbian forces, but there was growing
tension and concern in the region and inside the alliance, too, that the
massive human toll and refugee exodus from Kosovo could spread
instability to Balkan states.
Allied air strikes were taking their toll on Serbia's military strength,
said the NATO supreme military commander, General Wesley Clark, without
offering any detailed new evidence to back up these assertions.

Even as Washington repeated that the use of Western ground forces was
not being contemplated, General Clark conceded that ''air power alone
cannot stop paramilitary murder'' of the type that Western officials
accuse the Serbs of pursuing in Kosovo under orders from President
Slobodan Milosevic.

General Clark's grim determination in responding to reporters' questions
at NATO headquarters in Brussels set a somber tone, apparently shared in
Western capitals, about the difficulties the alliance has encountered in
breaking Serbian resistance, forcing concessions from Belgrade and
containing the Kosovo crisis.

That mood was not eased by the appearance on Serbian television of three
U.S. Army scouts seized late Wednesday near the border between Macedonia
and Yugoslavia. Serbian media reported that the three Americans were
going to be put on trial, perhaps this weekend, and the United States
immediately denounced the prospect as a violation of international law.

President Bill Clinton, reiterating threats from other Western leaders
about possible war crimes prosecutions against Serbian leaders and
commanders, warned Mr. Milosevic against any mistreatment of the airmen,
saying that he ''should make no mistake, we will hold him and his
government responsible for their safety and their well-being.''

Alliance officials said that they were still trying to clarify the
circumstances of the soldiers' capture, adding that the Serbian
leadership seemed to consider the soldiers as potential hostages during
the military escalation against Belgrade.

Belgrade television also reported a surprise meeting between Mr.
Milosevic and a Kosovo Albanian political leader, Ibrahim Rugova, who
had earlier told journalists that ''the bombing must stop'' and that
''Belgrade must help'' to end the conflict.

The NATO secretary-general, Javier Solana Madariaga, said that Mr.
Rugova, a political moderate well known personally by Western leaders,
appeared to be acting under duress in Belgrade. The BBC later reported
that the television interview may have been a fabrication using old
pictures. It cited diplomatic sources in Macedonia as saying that the
meeting had not taken place, and that the television broadcast had been
propaganda.

Prime Minister Massimo D'Alema of Italy, meanwhile, will fly to Albania
on Easter Sunday to visit refugee camps and show his ''solidarity'' with
those suffering from the war in Kosovo, his office said Thursday. Aides
to Mr. D'Alema said he spoke Thursday by telephone with Prime Ministers
Lionel Jospin of France and Jose Maria Aznar of Spain to ''investigate
the possibility of a cease-fire.''

As the human tide of refugees fleeing Kosovo passed the 150,000 mark,
scenes on television evoked harrowing memories of World War II, with
lengthening columns of women and children trudging along nameless roads
to escape the fighting and threats of enemy cruelty.

Crowds of ethnic Albanian civilians were said to be backed up at
border-crossing points as neighboring countries sought to slow the
influx, which threatened to swamp facilities and, much more alarming,
aggravate internal ethnic tensions and suspicions to a point of
political crisis.

As air strikes went into their eighth day, weather was expected to
improve in the Serbian skies, lifting the cloud ceiling that has
hampered U.S. and European warplanes' attacks against Serbian tanks and
other mobile military targets. NATO appeared to launch its biggest air
raids so far as witnesses reported that an estimated 100 planes had
taken off from bases in Italy on Thursday.

With improved flying conditions expected for several days, alliance
commanders had promised to hammer Serbian ground forces in Kosovo and
their supply routes in order to break their military presence in Kosovo.


But General Clark said that NATO was inhibited in launching air strikes
near civilians because the ground spotters who normally guide planes to
their targets in these circumstances were not available in Kosovo, where
NATO apparently has been unable to infiltrate its own commandos for this
purpose or to rely on Kosovo Liberation Army guerrillas trained for that
mission.

Meanwhile, questions were being pressed harder in Western capitals by
political leaders and media commentators about possible changes in the
alliance's tactics if Mr. Milosevic continued to hold the initiative and
the sophisticated Western arsenal failed to subdue his comparatively
rudimentary forces as they continued wreaking havoc on the ground.

Questions also surfaced about Western war aims, including suggestions
that Mr. Milosevic had already gone too far for the West to maintain its
avowed goal of making a political deal with him.

In a bid to deter Serbian leaders and perhaps aggravate dissidence in
the military, Western leaders vowed that those who committed war crimes
would face international prosecution.

But ignoring Western warnings, Mr. Milosevic intervened in the affairs
of Montenegro, dismissing the army commander there and replacing him
Wednesday with a close personal ally, General Milorad Obradovic. The
small republic, Serbia's partner in the Yugoslav Federation, has
distanced itself from Belgrade at Western urging.

Mr. Milosevic's action, reported by Tanjug, the official Yugoslav news
agency but not independently confirmed, could signal an imminent
military coup in the pro-Western republic despite warnings from
Britain's foreign secretary, Robin Cook, that Serbian interference there
would dangerously escalate the stakes and the risks to himself.

NATO air strikes have already destroyed military installations
controlled from Belgrade in Montenegro.

But Western officials offered no hint that any change in direction or
tactics was imminent, not even an airlift of weapons to the ethnic
Albanian guerrillas. A KLA spokesman said Thursday that the movement was
at the brink of total military defeat.

Western leaders brushed off a proposal from President Boris Yeltsin of
Russia, who called for a meeting of foreign ministers of the Group of
Seven leading industrial countries. They showed little interest in
Moscow's renewed efforts to broker a cease-fire in the conflict and
played down the dispatch of seven warships from Russia to the Adriatic
as a gesture intended to impress Russian domestic opinion and prevent
the government from being outflanked rhetorically by nationalists.

The other leading critic of NATO's offensive, China, signaled mounting
alarm Wednesday when officials in Beijing indicated that Prime Minister
Zhu Rongji might cancel his planned visit to the United States next
week.

International Herald Tribune, April 2, 1999


Kosovo/Vietnam

KLA Faces Collapse, as Guns & Men Run Out

But I thought Washington didn't like militia groups

THE Kosovo Liberation Army, the ethnic Albanian guerrilla group which
has come under sustained Serb attack, is on the verge of collapse,
Western diplomats and military analysts said yesterday.
Despite initial successes in holding back the advance of the Yugoslav
army, which launched a blistering attack against ethnic Albanian
strongholds two weeks ago, the guerrillas are running out of guns,
ammunition, soldiers, food and communications equipment.

Experts say that a last-ditch attempt by the KLA to unleash a
counter-offensive in the main cities has failed and urban guerrilla
units, though still holding out in a district of Pristina, have been
largely isolated. In several areas of Kosovo, including the southern
border region with Macedonia, the south-western area around Prizren and
Suva Reka and the far western regions around Pec, the KLA units are
reported to be in disarray and have been all but routed by the Yugoslav
army and Serb police.

Only in the central region of Drenica, near their fallen base of
Likovac, is the KLA still reported to be holding out. They are in the
Cicavica mountains to the south of Vucitrn and in the Lapp region near
the border with Serbia proper. There are also believed to be scattered
units operating around Malisevo. Even in these regions, traditionally
the areas of greatest resistance to the Serbs, KLA sources say that
ammunition and manpower are running low. While there is no word on
casualties, they will almost certainly be running into the hundreds. At
the last count the guerrillas had only 12 field hospitals and very few
have staff with basic medical training or even field dressings.

Serbia inherited a huge army when Yugoslavia broke up and has used its
firepower to effect against the lightly armed Albanians, pummelling
villages for days before sending in fresh and well-armed infantry to
over-run the battered defences.

The KLA, which numbered around 25,000 before the latest offensive, has
put up a harder fight than last summer when Serb forces took almost all
their strongholds without heavy resistance. Unconfirmed reports suggest
that dozens of Serb tanks may have been lost to the few anti-tank mines
and shoulder-held rocket launchers that the KLA possesses.

Before the latest offensive by the Serbs, the guerrillas had smuggled in
several Barrett sniper guns and a few modern rocket-propelled grenade
launchers but their lack of training means they have been unable to use
them to maximum effect. The KLA was hurriedly put together after Serb
special forces massacred dozens of innocent people in central Drenica
just over a year ago. Thousands of emigres flooded back from the West to
fight for an independent Kosovo.

Last summer the guerrillas were comprehensively beaten by Serb armour
and special forces who carried out massacres of women and children to
avenge their losses, eventually provoking Western bombing threats and
the intervention of unarmed monitors.

With the KLA now set to collapse for a second time in six months, the
West will have lost a de facto ally on the ground. Military experts have
suggested that only a vigorous last effort by the allies to arm the KLA
with effective anti-tank weapons can prevent that happening. But the
toughest KLA fighters are likely to survive as the Serbs do not have the
manpower to comb the mountains, hills and forests looking for them.

The London Telegraph, April 2, 1999
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
Kris

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to