-Caveat Lector-

Edward Ford wrote:

>  -Caveat Lector-
>
> Hey let's do this, apply the authors logic to God. I have not seen Him/Her display
> any responsibility for His/Her creation. Given His/Her track record, I certainly
> wouldn't want Him/Her in a foxhole next to me. Not only do I not know His/Her
> sexuality, He/She has shown no interest what so ever in the workings of mankind,
> all the way up to and including the death of his/her own son!
>

Is it possible to teach people to read?  I DID no say that they had or Should leave
or be kicked out!!!

> The authors bias is appalling and an insult to every person on the planet. You
> just gave it the name "homosexual".
>

Many Homosexuals have a level of self discipline that makes the pope look like a
goof off.  OK.  Maybe I should not go - Quite - that far, but have you seen what
it takes for a woman to get dressed up.  Think of what it takes for a cross dresser.
Many managed to look better than I did when I was in my twenties!


> If you, 1lls0081 wrote this piece, I urge you to get help. It is bigoted concepts
> like these that lead to young black men  being dragged behind cars, and young gay
> men to be murdered. Their blood is own your hands.

It is people like you that would have the blood of homosexuals on your hands.  The
ones that would kill homosexuals to make this kind of point are the ones
that want the homosexuals to run point for them.  The kind of people that
"might" read
Hustler.

> God help you, but then again given your logic, there's a fat chance of that. But
> in this case, I don't blame Him/Her!

Now for the regular, run of the mill person that has a same sex orientation.
They are normally not a sadist, or controlling.  Well, not any more so than a man
that has complete control of a female when he is lying on top of her.  Would
you call the missionary position - Sadistic or controlling?  That testosterone
should be good for something (up, down - you get the idea) for my view point I think
it is workable.

Some have been lead to believe that they should have been born the opposite
sex because of the fact that many animals can switch sexes.  Take a laying hen,
there have been some that have gone from a fertile hen to a fertile rooster.  Many
fish are capable of changing sex as well.  Males that produce eggs in their testes,
and think that they should have been born female.  This can be cause by
Organophosphates.

    Then to the current scoop on chemicals (New 2 Nov 98)
         http://www.enn.com/news/enn-stories/1998/10/102998/chemical.asp
"Concerned that endocrine disrupters were causing fetal development
                     problems and adversely affecting male sperm counts, in 1996
Congress
                     passed the Food Quality Protection Act and amendments to the Safe

                     Drinking Water Act. In part, that legislation required EPA to
develop new
                     chemical testing techniques. "
"As an example, LeBlanc points to incidents such as the discovery of
                     demasculinized alligators in Florida's Lake Apopka. The
demasculinization
                     may be caused by accidental spills or improper disposal of
chemicals and
                     may not indicate an exposure problem of the general population. "



    http://biology.usgs.gov/frog.html(New 17 Nov 98)
take a look at the map and think of couples that are trying to have children.
    http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/narcam/reports/reports.htm
Men that wear underwear that they can put ICE in so that their testicles will
be cool enough to produce sperm.
    and wonder...

    World Wildlife Fund - chemicals in the environment -
http://www.worldwildlife.org/toxics/(New 17 Nov 98)

"In the end we will only love what we know
    and we will only protect what we love"

    Find more about Health Canada's perspective on antibacterial soaps at (New 04 Nov
98)
         http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb/lcdc/publicat/ccdr/97vol23/vol23s7/index.html

I like the fact that there are males on this planet.  Companies do not want to be sued

and foresee the fact that they will just clone your child IF you want one.

This current war on a small "mainly" agricultural country, that will have to take
loans from the world bank and will probably have to import food now instead
of being able to grow "possibly" (organic) food?

Are we going to hide our heads in the sand?  If this comes out the even the KKK
will lay of homosexuals, consider these chemicals are going to de - masculinate the
KKK too.  Wonder what a KKK'er sounds like in Sapporo?

Just thoughts-
Yours,
Laura - ex-NCO of the United States Air Force
aka The Pied Piper

PS - Just between you and me.  I was more worried about getting raped
by a cilivian MALE then worrying about any of the females in the barracks.
Difference?  I knew I was a female and that my orientation was Heterosexual
it would have been the same as if a male had propositioned me that I did not
want - he would be slapped.  You imply that homosexuals do not have brains
or manners.

-- Did you visualize that Sapporo KKK'er yet, the one producing
eggs in his testes? Did I happen to mention that it appears that
the Bush's support Monsanto, and Clinton has made his support
clear.  Wonder how much of a kick back they have received and
just why they are waging that war?

> eeford
>
> 1lls0081 wrote:
>
> >  -Caveat Lector-
> >
> > http://freeweb.digiweb.com/science_fiction/ThePiedPiper/sci_fi.htm
> > http://freeweb.digiweb.com/science_fiction/ThePiedPiper/homo.htm
> >
> > Homosexuals in the Military
> > OR Homosexual, Control Fiend, Pedophile
> >
> >              Homosexuals: Who or What is Really Hiding in the Closet?
> >                           (The Military as an Example)
> >
> > Many people would define the homosexual lifestyle
> > as one of promiscuity. The reason for this is that
> > homosexuals seem to be like the legendary "Peter Pan."
> > By refusing to commit to someone of the
> > opposite sex, they normally do not have to worry
> > about the responsibility of children, much less the
> > responsibility of a commitment. Also if they do
> > decide to break off the relationship they normally do
> > not have to worry about the legal tangles of divorce.
> > Should admitted homosexuals that are seen as
> > promiscuous, unable to make commitments, and
> > unwilling to take on responsibility for other people
> > be allowed to serve in the military?
> >
> > In the military you have to trust that the person next
> > to you is Reliable enough that they won't get you
> > killed. The military oath is a promise to defend the
> > country. The contract that you are required to
> > sign upon being accepted into the military is a commitment.
> > Being in the military, means that you are
> > responsible for the people you work with and that they
> > are responsible for you. What kind of person
> > do you want to depend on? Would you rather
> > depend on someone that is willing to take on
> > commitments of religion and family, or would
> > you rather have to depend on someone that has a
> > noncommittal lifestyle. By signing up in the military,
> > you are signing an agreement that allows other
> > people to control your life. So if the people that
> > you are allowing to tell you what to do with your life
> > were to require that you have to live with a person
> > that doesn't seem to care about anything other
> > than themselves, it seems as if the concept of trust
> > and teamwork might get lost.
> >
> > Those same concepts of trust and teamwork are
> > concepts the military can not afford to lose. Often
> > the military is a large part of the first contact that
> > the United States will have with other cultures.
> > Since they often have the responsibility of dealing
> > with people from other cultures, they need to be
> > perceived as stable and responsible. If people in
> > the military, are perceived by other countries as
> > allowed to have idiosyncrasies such as this, will
> > the other countries be enthusiastic about allowing
> > our military to help when they have problems.
> > The military image requires that the people of the
> > military be true to the most stringent standards
> > that their culture has. If you can not take pride
> > yourself and your own culture, how can you
> > understand the pride that someone else has in their
> > culture.
> >
> > True homosexuals have decided what sex they
> > are and what life style they want to follow. True
> > homosexuals have seldom if ever been known
> > to rape a heterosexual. This is usually, if not always
> > done by those that use sex as a control feature.
> > These controlling personalities are really in the
> > closet! Because if the real truth were known,
> > they usually are willing to have sex with any person -
> > male or female of any age. These control fiends
> > are the type to have a physical relationship with a
> > single or divorce mother and also think nothing
> > of having a relationship with here male OR female
> > child. These control fiends are the ones that think
> > that a child (as young as six) is old enough to
> > decide their sexual orientation and to have a
> > physical relationship, at six, based on that design. They
> > refer to the child's parents, as people that have
> > a slave mentality, and that want to keep the child
> > from making an immediate choice. They are the
> > main ones that would like to see homosexuals
> > completely accepted since it will be harder to
> > question these control fiends at that time.
> >
> > Some countries have been sympathetic to the
> > American Homosexual. Iceland has an
> > overwhelmingly female population - I think the
> > current ratio is five females births to every one male
> > birth, and parts of the Orient have five male
> > births for every female birth. This leads to same sex
> > dancing predominating in their clubs their clubs.
> > The biggest difference that these countries have,
> > particularly in the Orient is the family obligation
> > to have children. They are usually not homosexual
> > from choice, and they grow up knowing that they
> > have a commitment to their family. The American
> > homosexual has usually decided that they want
> > few, if any commitments.
> >
> > Our constitution guaranties us the right to live
> > our lives, as we want, as long as we do not infringe
> > upon someone else's right. The constitution is a
> > commitment between this country and it's people.
> > The Constitution is also a commitment between
> > the leaders of this country and the people. This
> > nation was created by many different people,
> > and different cultures. All of these people and cultures
> > have a right to live in their own ways. But the
> > military is suppose to be reliable, trustworthy, and to
> > live by a strict American standard. Have you
> > thought what it would be like if the military didn't have
> > a standard. The people in these other countries
> > may not really understand us to begin with, so do
> > you think they would want us in their country if they
> > couldn't rely on us at all. So for now it seems as
> > if the military homosexual needs to stay in the
> > closet, or else run the risk of allowing these control
> > fiends out with them and undermining all that
> > they have taken an oath to protect.
> >
> > (c) 1997 by Laura Lee Lanning-Shipton
> > AKA The Pied Piper
> > You are welcome to forward this for
> > non profit purposes, with the copyright intact.
> >
>

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to