-Caveat Lector-
>From wsws.org
WSWS : News & Analysis : Europe : The Balkan Crisis
Australian government twists and turns on Kosovar refugees--A case study in
duplicity
By Mike Head
9 April 1999
The Australian government's policy on offering shelter to refugees driven
out of Kosovo has changed every day this week. One backflip has followed the
other, as the calamity produced by NATO's bombing became increasingly
obvious.
On Monday, Immigration Minister Philip Ruddock faithfully adhered to the
Howard government's general anti-refugee policy. Even after days of
harrowing scenes of human misery in the Balkans, Ruddock flatly ruled out
taking any refugees. After consulting with Prime Minister John Howard's
office, Ruddock insisted that Australia was too far away to offer
assistance. "Flying planeloads of refugees into Australia would not be an
appropriate response," he declared.
And there would be "no increase in the humanitarian intake" this year, he
emphasised. It would remain at 10,000, with perhaps 4,500 coming from the
various war-ravaged parts of the former Yugoslavia.
Tens of thousands of asylum-seekers--mostly from Asia and Africa--are denied
entry to Australia every year. Thousands who succeed in entering the country
on temporary visas are rounded up by police, detained and deported. Ruddock
made it clear there would be no exception for the Kosovars.
For the next 24 hours, Ruddock pushed this line heavily in the media. He
confidently predicted that the Cabinet, due to meet that day, would endorse
his response. "I would think a considered response would not suggest we open
our doors in a temporary way to the movement of people with the expectation
that they would have to be returned." Just five hours later, Cabinet took
exactly that decision.
Undoubtedly, pressure was brought to bear from Washington, where the Clinton
administration had hurriedly drawn up plans to dump Kosovar refugees in
prison camp conditions at the US naval base on Cuba (after earlier proposing
Guam) and was urging its NATO allies to unveil similar schemes.
The Howard government's stance also provoked widespread outrage at home,
accompanied by nervous expressions of concern in the media. To many people,
there was an obvious contradiction. As soon as NATO began its assault on
Yugoslavia, the Howard government declared its full backing for the
bombardment, echoing the White House line that this was a war waged for
genuinely humanitarian purposes. Yet it would not provide safe haven for a
single victim of the war.
The contrast is all the more stark because Canberra is making a critical
contribution to the NATO operation via the so-called jointly operated US
bases on Australian soil. The Nurrungar base provides early warning of enemy
missiles and other military responses--helping to identify NATO targets;
Pine Gap is part of a global electronic eavesdropping network--needed to
monitor the Milosevic regime's plans; and North West Cape maintains
telecommunications and navigational facilities for US warships and
submarines.
Late on Tuesday, Prime Minister John Howard hastily convened a media
conference where, with Ruddock standing mutely by his side, he announced an
about-face. As a purely temporary measure, the government would admit up to
4,000 ethnic Albanians. They would be airlifted to Australia and provided
with food, health care and basic necessities, but only for three months.
Howard spoke of the need for an affluent country such as Australia to be
seen to be generous. In the same breath he said his government's offer of
safe haven had two conditions. The first was that none of the refugees would
be permitted to apply for permanent residency, or even for social security
benefits. The second condition was that the Labor Party opposition agree to
the passage of retrospective legislation to formalise those restrictions
once parliament resumes. The Labor leaders, who also back the NATO bombing,
readily agreed.
In effect, although this was not spelled out, the refugees will be permitted
to physically land on Australian soil, but will be stripped of all legal
rights, including the right to apply for refugee status and to obtain
welfare. After three months, they will be forcibly repatriated back to the
Balkans. How this will be achieved legally is yet to be seen. The courts
have in the past objected to individuals being locked up or deported unless
they have been proven guilty of a criminal offence (invoking the doctrine of
habeas corpus --no detention without trial). Presumably the Howard
government will extend the principle introduced by the former Labor
government of declaring unwanted refugees to be a special category of
"unlawful non-citizens" who have no legal or democratic rights whatsoever.
Asked if the refugees would be under some form of restraint or in effective
captivity, Howard did not deny the suggestion. He said the government was
still considering that issue. Initial reports in the media, citing Defence
Department sources, said the Kosovars--who are fleeing from tents and
military control--would be housed in tents at large or remote military
bases. As for the tens of thousands of refugees remaining in the Balkans,
Canberra would increase its aid contribution by just $4 million to a paltry
total of $6 million.
The government's proposals evoked images of traumatised refugees being
locked away in military barracks or, even worse, the notorious detention
centres used since the 1980s to imprison Asian and African asylum seekers at
Port Hedland, Villawood and Maribyrnong. There was further popular
consternation. Paul Nicolaou, chairman of the Ethnic Communities Council of
New South Wales, posed the question: "In remote areas, how are they going to
get access to trauma-related services, counsellors who understand their
culture, and interpreters? These people will not know a word of English.
What are they going to be doing for three months? They'll go mad."
To make matters worse for the government, the Australian-Albanian
Association firmly rejected the option of remote military camps. "The
Kosovars have already had too much of that kind of experience," commented
the Association's president Erik Lloga. Others pointed to the barbarity of
consigning families from the snow-capped valleys of Kosovo to the fierce
heat of northern Australia.
The next day saw another turn. Ruddock denied that the government had in
mind any form of detention. It might even allow some of the refugees to stay
with friends, relatives or other Albanian-speaking immigrants, he said. The
refugees would be "free to move" although the government was not keen to
have them spread throughout the community.
Only Peter Beattie, the Labor Party Premier of Queensland, advanced a more
callous attitude. He ruled out a Townsville military base as a refugee site,
on the grounds that it was not remote enough. Beattie said the
newly-established Scherger airforce base near Weipa on the far north York
Peninsula would be more acceptable.
Finally, on Thursday it was confirmed that the government would send the
refugees to remote military barracks and former migrant hostels around the
country, after initial processing at an army base near Sydney. About 500
would be housed at the country's first and largest post-war migrant
reception centre at Bonegilla, about 300 kilometres north of Melbourne. Even
when it was new, Bonegilla was a spartan camp for immigrant labourers.
The government's attempt to restore its credibility took a further blow when
David Oldfield, the New South Wales leader of the extreme right-wing One
Nation party, issued a statement. Oldfield, an unabashed "national
socialist," said the decision to accept the refugees on a strictly temporary
basis was a "direct application" of One Nation's immigration policy.
Oldfield said that when One Nation announced its policy (which essentially
calls for a return to the "White Australia" policy), "we were said to be
racist, discriminatory, uncaring and inhuman--so what is John Howard?"
The government's twists and turns are driven by two considerations. The
first is to ensure that no breach is made in the official policy of cutting
immigration quotas and stopping most refugees seeking entry to Australia.
The government's fear is that some of the destitute Kosovars, having been
uprooted and flown to the other side of the globe, may want to live and seek
work in Australia. The war victims are to be assisted--temporarily--but
denied the basic freedom to reside where they choose.
The second consideration is to use the Kosovar refugees as political pawns
in the war against Yugoslavia. Like other Western governments, notably the
Blair government in Britain and the D'Alema government in Italy, the Howard
government declares that to offer permanent refuge would help Belgrade drive
Albanian Kosovars from their homelands. But this decision is not to be left
to the refugees themselves. This only demonstrates that the primary purpose
of the relief operation is not their well-being, but the pursuit of the
offensive against Serbia.
Canberra's policy is on a par with that of NATO itself, which is bombing the
people of Kosovo whose interests it claims to defend, and that of the
NATO-backed Kosovo Liberation Army, which, as many media reports have now
confirmed, is systematically preventing young men from leaving Kosovo, in
order to conscript them into its depleted ranks. The Howard government's
clumsy policy shifts have only helped expose the sham of the humanitarian
mask donned by NATO and its apologists.
See Also:
Behind the war in the Balkans
A reply to a supporter of the US-NATO bombing of Serbia
[8 April 1999]
United States uses, and abuses, Kosovar refugees
[8 April 1999]
Top of page
Readers: The WSWS invites your comments. Please send e-mail.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Copyright 1998-99
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved
~~~~~~~~~~~~
A<>E<>R
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Every great advance in natural knowledge has involved
the absolute rejection of authority. -Thomas Huxley
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
