-Caveat Lector- FREE ENERGY, ANTIGRAVITY and TIME TRAVEL EXPLAINED ? By Andrew Hennessey. In mathematical topology, the 'pathological' form known as 'Schifflers Horns' displays a 'natural and healthy' truth - that the Cosmos is physically non-linear. In the alleged pathogen - the 'perfect circle' has become deformed to a homeomorph that appears to break rules and be paradoxical by demonstrating fractal properties. In reality, there is no pathogenicity or paradox with this topology - because; There is NO absolutely perfect circle delineated in any physical reality; from the mathematically unsatisfying imperfection of PI to the fractal nature of any physical rendering of the circle, whether electronically or more physically. The most perfect line Mankind can draw whether electronically or more 'physically' has a close-up edge resembling the coastline of Norway [ie. Fractal]. Terms such as equidistant, equivalent etc, are in reality, absolutely, physically impossible to delineate. They represent psychological wishes rooted in the stresses of the organic interaction with the innately disordered Cosmos. We may say that 1 = 1 In reality, these labels pertaining to the equivalence of 1, identify 1 of something - and its relationship to something that is similar, but not absolutely physically identical. We are, in fact, dealing with the set of all ones of something in relation to some factor in common, in context. In manufacturing Tripartite Essentialism [Hennessey 1991], the Octal Arithmetic is generated Boolean-fashion around the validity of 2 systems in exchange/relationship through a common medium. [a basic exchange in 3 dimensions with 3 components at time t1] There are, essentially, eight Logically Real models of that transaction at any given time t1, and, 64 at time t2. A Logically Complete and closed set of 64 can describe all the varieties of logically real activity and exchange within the three dimensional Cosmos between t1 and t2. This closed set of 64 'activity states' is analogous to the activity relationships within the periodic table of Chemistry. Current beliefs held by Science [paradigm] have it that atoms of the same kind are 'absolutely' equivalent, subject to the paradoxes of Superstrings and Quantum Physics eg. the Collapsing Wave paradox - particle/wave duality paradox. However, these theories do not perform in their 11 or 26 dimensions [eg Superstrings] and in terms of their internal consistency, cannot Unify the forces they represent with the labels they possess [eg. gravity and electroweak]. However, certain of the mechanics of the atomic processes that have been observed and quantified, possess consistent mechanics from which predictions can be made. These observed properties, perform around certain fundamentals of reality. [eg 3 part quark, or 8 electrons per shell in the Pauli exclusion principle, or Regge Resonances.] The current Physics Theories extemporising from the facts do not perform well enough to attain a final physical theory without reference to paradox or extremely dimensional, complicated, yet strangely inadequate mathematics. Perhaps in the current paradigm, the true nature of reality is unattainable, rendering Occam's Razor a pathological idea rather than a healthy one. The reality is however, that the three dimensions of space and one of time in which we exist - [its Energy, Matter and Time] is Absolutely Non-Linear [cf. Chaos] An archetypal property of Chaotic Systems is their capacity to emerge new 'ordered' states. [eg. from the weather systems of Jupiter emerges the 'Red Spot'] - the spot is inseparable from the weather system. It is hypothesised that from the sub-atomic energies of the Cosmos, emerges a particle [red spot]. The continuous nature of the particles existence is its continuous and complex relationship to its sub-atomic patronage. The mathematical process which describes this particle relativity can only be, at its most basic, a relativity of eightness derived from three dimensions of space and 1 of time - [which maximises the efficacy of Occam's Razor]. The observed particles appear isolated to our methods of observation, but the most apt analogy would be that the sub-atomic background is a continuously bowed violin - and the emerged note - which is the particle - is in a state invisible to our methods of observation - ie. We cannot 'see' musical sounds, but the relativity of the invisible sound to the visible musical instrument is consistent. A Particle is in effect a three-dimensional standing wave - in a different state from its continuous source. All the mathematics of wave theory, resonance and harmony apply to its physicality. [this fits with the eightness of observed data.] The Quantum particle/wave duality which is currently a physically unexplained paradox, now has a rational model. Taking the implications of non-linearity further, it can be said that atoms belong to observed groups with similarly classifed properties. [Class Atomism : Hennessey 1991], and that no two similarly classified 'atoms' are absolutely identical due to their Chaos Ontology. This theory predicts that if a particle is analogous to a note, that on a Cosmic Scale the qualities and properties within and between Classes of atoms will vary. Eg. relative textures, tones, attack and decay [cf. Music in vivo] with each particle/note will mean that some matter can be relatively more 'audible' in the local Cosmic Energy mix. Ie. Some matter may not co-operate with expectations ie. Have a different perspective to the relative observer in time and space. This matter may be able to drift through other matter - and that would hold whether the states were relatively similar eg. metals, or different. These properties are dependent on the state of the invisible sub-atomic weather system from which the particle emerges. Eg 'transparent' iron could pass through dense iron. [see below] There may be 3 classes of these atomic properties; 1. Dense Matter which would be relatively sub-atomically stable 2. Transparent Matter which would be relatively sub-atomically unstable. 3. Opaque Matter - a relative state between 1 & 2 As the physical Cosmos has no absolute properties, due to its ontological non-linearity and chaos, the status of constants must be challenged - eg. it is predicted that the speed of light is not an absolute Universal constant. In conclusion - a new Paradigm is possible which has no pathologies and paradoxes and which completely revises the beliefs of the current Cosmologists in Physics and Maths. The Reality of the Non-Linear Cosmos Part 2. A very brief History of Time by Andrew Hennessey WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Einstein has been proved right yet again, an international team of researchers said Thursday. They said observations of U.S. satellites orbiting Earth showed that a spinning body can curve space -- something Albert Einstein predicted in his general theory of relativity. Einstein said the spin of a body must change the geometry of the universe by generating space-time curvature. He called it ``frame dragging'' but it is also known as the Lense-Thirring effect, after Austrian physicists Josef Lense and Hans Thirring, who said celestial bodies that rotate, such as the Sun, create a force that pulls space towards them. The effect is so strong it should affect a clock rotating slowly around a spinning body. Ignazio Ciufolini of the Universita di Roma ``La Sapienza'' and colleagues tested and measured the effect by analyzing the orbits of two NASA satellites, LAGEOS and LAGEOSII. They used lasers to measure tiny changes in the orbits of the satellites and concluded the Earth was affecting them in a way that could not be accounted for by gravity or tidal forces.`` Based on the analysis of the orbits of the ... satellites LAGEOS and LAGEOS II, we conclude that the Lense-Thirring effect exists,'' they wrote in a report in the journal Science. ``This direct measurement of the Lense-Thirring effect confirms one of the remaining fundamental predictions of general relativity, that a current of mass-energy, such as a spinning mass, as a result of its mass motion changes the geometry of the universe by generating space-time curvature.'' In much the same way as an electric current passing along a wire generates heat, light and radio - the same principles apply to the energies focussed in mass. The difference between a Gravity Field and a Time Wave is down to the scale of the locality and the observer. It's all a matter of scale - for if we were a small enough and resilient non-human being, living within the heat of our human electric fire - what is heat to the human would be time to that being. Mass is directly proportional to the strength of the gravity field, and as a direct consequence of the focus of the mass, other emissions, direct and indirect energy [akin to heat, light, sound, radio in the electric fire analogy] would be observed relative to the ability of the observer. [eg. the human eye or senses cannot detect the radio waves from the electric fire.] In the same way, a time wave is a direct consequence of a body of mass. However, this time wave would have innate, internal inconsistencies [cf. Chaos] - where time would be an overall product of mass - having wave mechanics and structure, but natural and internal turbulence. [cf. Fluid Dynamics/Chaos] eg. gravity and space-time anomalies - black hole etc. If time is a wave, it is a wave propagated [in sufficient quantity] in and around the mass of the observer [and the observers components and context.] Atoms - [mass etc] are the emerged product of other chaotic 'sub-atomic particles/energies' and are themselves dynamic standing waves. They produce a time wave in relation to the observer but this time and its timescales are entirely local, and somewhat arbitrarily imposed. Mass will also produce harmonic images or dimensions of itself, not necessarily as discernible to the observer as the passage of time. [cf. Heavens/Planes/Spheres/Continuum etc] Time is a wave propagated through the relativity of local mass - and a 'timescale' may be 'imposed' in relation to some standard of lowest common denominator - LCD - of mass - common to all observed systems. We choose the photon - but make the mistake in assuming that the photon is a Universally Constant LCD for mass and time. Much in the same way that water is the LCD and standard for life on Earth - we know that it does not flow about from place to place at the same rate. Ie. The cycling of water on this planet is not 'universally constant' or consistent due to gradients, climate, weather, metabolism, rate of uptake etc and by the same token, the cycling of photons through the Cosmos cannot be constant. Humanity, however, utilises a photon-based interpretation of time - ie. It is what we 'see'. Though there may be a better standard particle that we haven't detected yet. Given that a body of mass is a lump of dynamic standing waves - an analogy would be a symphony. A spinning mass would distort the relativity of space-time in relation to the observer. If space-time relativity is hearing this symphony - and if a hifi speaker was sitting on a turntable and the table was still - there would be no disruption of the observed relativity - but if the turntable was set in motion - observation of sound waves 'time and gravity' would be disrupted. [as Einstein predicted] Two parallel plates of equal size and mass, one spinning clockwise and the other counterclockwise with a massive potential difference in Volts between them would disrupt the field/wave relativity in the gap between the plates. There the integrity of the structure and mechanics of; gravity, time and electromagnetic wave relativity would be compromised. The matter and spacetime fabric between the two plates is rather like a physical dam, behind which is the subatomic reservoir. The sub-atomic reservoir has a natural pressure, caused by the energy of the sub-atomic 'waters' pushing out and creating the 'concrete' atoms. Matter [the dam] is a product of sub-atomic activity and emergence. The two spinning plates and ultra high voltage are opening a sluice gate like a turbine in the 'concrete' of the dam - driving matter into a state of high energy. These plates negate the properties of the 'concrete' in that area, and The water[energies] pushes through the new artificial equilibrium caused by this process - generating an excess of energy. For people living inside and part of the concrete [light matter] of the dam - that may be a good thing - hotter concrete. The amount of excess energy which becomes available is directly related to the mechanics/size of the 'sluice gate' One spinning plate of high voltage - potential difference in relation to the Earth would negate planetary gravity at some point. [cf. Antigravity] A Three-Dimensional apparatus 'golf ball' comprised of spinning high voltage segments/plates would produce internally - a 3 dimensional standing wave - analogous to a particle. This would be a Temporal & Gravitational standing wave - analogous in structure to an atom as defined by Hennessey [1991] A particle/temporal standing wave with a great many 'layers' or shells well defined is in chemistry a heavier particle - analogous to 'slower time' - and may roughly correspond either to some future - or some past. Each moment in time in our 3D of space is unique and the past can never be recreated - as the relative factors which comprise 'one moment' are infinitesmally complex. Therefore the notion of going back in time is probably not a physical prospect as we understand it. Eg. we may have certain parameters concerning an area of the past which we could visit, but without specific knowledge of those it may be extremely difficult to overcome the inertia in that time space system in a way which would influence its evolution. Predicting matter and energy parameters that may yet generally occur and then creating a temporal standing wave inside the apparatus that structurally matched a predicted future of local space-time - we could project into the local future, 'strange attractors' which would seed and mould the evolution of specifics of our future worlds. The Unifying Theory - which is called Tripartite Essentialism is more fully explained at: http://easyweb.easynet.co.uk/~pegasus/ Where it continues to make progress in Phil of Science, Mind, 5th Generation Artificial Intelligence, and Cosmology. Andrew Hennessey Outshore R&D 24/2 Burgess Street Edinburgh EH6 6RD Scotland UK Tel [00 44] (0) 131 554 4486 email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
