-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 99-04-10 10:42:06 EDT, June writes:
<< >There's nothing wrong with wealth or glamour or their enjoyment. This,
>to me, is living life to its fullest. I admire those traits.
< Then you admire materialism and surface image over substance...>
No, I see that they can enhance life and admire those who enjoy what they
have -- whatever it is.
> >I expected her to be a superficial, materialistc figurehead who spewed
> >the Royal Party Line. She wasn't.
> No, she was a superficial, materialistic figurehead who opposed the Royal
> Party Line...
I don't share your view. I have never seen her as a hero, but as a young
woman who accomplished personal growth in a hostile climate. How many
nineteen-year-olds can face such pressure and lack of privacy and develop a
healthy sense of self? No, she wasn't forced into marriage, and there
certainly were perks, but she couldn't have understood what she was getting
into at that age. She couldn't have accurately predicted the full
consequences of fame. I sympathize with how difficult it must have been for
her -- especially to find herself facing an insatiable press without the
support of a loving marriage.
> >She was sensitive and caring and human.
> Sensitive to the IMAGE she presented to the public, and to which end she
PRETENDED to be caring, and interested in humanitarian causes...
Well, how remarkable for you that you know her innermost heart.
> >She was beautiful and enjoyed her beauty.
>You fanatical devotees are really keen on that, aren't you? Thereby
proving the superficiality of the Diana cult, as superficial as she
herself was...
I'm observant. But you can call me what you like. Personally, I think
she made great strides in finding her own humanity. I was saddened by her
death, and am suspicious that she was murdered. I am a devotee of some
Kennedy's (current and former), of the author Alex Constantine, and usually
of the late Jim Garrison. I'm not fanatical about anything except the
safety, protection and respect of children.
> >IMHO that's what counts -- warmth and the absence of crippling envy.
> And you think she DIDN'T envy the Windsors? ;-)
Actually, it wasn't her envy I was alluding to.
Samm
June
>>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
