-Caveat Lector- http://www.truthout.org/docs_02/12.27B.bush.slash.htm
(*Editors Note | This is what the rise to power of Bush & Co. really means. These policies would have no chance of coming pass were it not for the specter of war diverting attention away from them. As We The People remain hypnotized by the terrorism soap opera this is what the Bush administration is doing to the country. This is why they must have their war, this is why so many have died and why so many more may soon loose their lives. When will America call Mr. Bush and his friends to account? -- ma.) Go To Original White House Aides Push for 50% Cut in Dividend Taxes By Edmund L. Andrews New York Times Tuesday, 24 December, 2002 WASHINGTON, Dec. 24 � White House officials are urging President Bush to propose cutting taxes on corporate dividends for shareholders by about half, according to administration officials and Republicans close to the White House. The proposal, likely to be a crucial part of the tax-cutting plan Mr. Bush will announce in January, is intended to stimulate the economy and reduce what many economists say is an incentive in the current law for companies to avoid paying dividends and to run up debt. While many economists think it would do little to bolster the economy quickly, they say the proposal would give a boost to the stock market. The 50 percent cut would cost the Treasury more than $100 billion over 10 years, and the tax benefits would overwhelmingly flow to the nation's very wealthiest taxpayers. Mr. Bush is in favor of some kind of reduction in the tax on dividends, a White House official said, but has not settled on an amount. President Bush's entire tax package is expected to provide as much as $300 billion in reductions over 10 years. It is almost certain to speed up both tax cuts that were supposed to take effect over the next several years and corporate write-offs for investment in new equipment. Officials are also considering measures that benefit middle- or lower-income families, like a more rapid increase in the child-care tax credit. Administration officials contend that reducing dividend taxes would immediately increase the underlying value of companies and lower their cost of capital. The short-term political appeal is its potential effect on the stock market, because it would instantly make shares of any company that pays dividends more valuable than before. The long-term benefit of a cut in the dividend tax, the officials say, would be to greatly reduce the market distortions of taxing dividends twice � once as corporate profits and once as dividend income to shareholders � while granting tax deductions on debt interest payments. For shareholders, dividends are now taxed as ordinary income at rates of up to 38.6 percent. By comparison, the maximum tax rate on capital gains � the profit made from the increase in value of shares or other kinds of property � is 20 percent. Many economists are skeptical that a cut in dividend taxes would provide much immediate stimulus to the economy, which has been Mr. Bush's most important justification for new tax cuts. It would be at least a year before shareholders see any extra money, and the measure would not leave extra money in corporate coffers. "One wouldn't think of this as the first or second or even third measure to stimulate consumption or investment," said Alan Auerbach, an economist at the University of California at Berkeley who has studied the issue for years. While the tax on dividends has been a focus of White House discussions, there have been many proposals on how such a reduction could be structured. A White House official cautioned this week that Mr. Bush has not yet decided on exactly how much to reduce the tax on corporate dividends, but the official said advisers agreed in principle on the most logical proposal. As envisioned, a person would be able to exclude a substantial share of all stock dividends � probably about half � from taxation. There would be no upper limit on the dollar value of dividends that would be tax free, which means that most of the relief would flow to the largest investors. The Urban-Brooking Tax Policy Center, a research center here, recently calculated that, if the government completely eliminated taxes on corporate dividends, 42 percent of the tax benefits would flow to the wealthiest 1 percent of all taxpayers. Republicans close to the White House said there were several reasons why officials were attracted to the idea of letting taxpayers exclude about half of all dividend income from taxes. Eliminating all taxes on corporate dividends would drain so much money from the Treasury � about $300 billion over 10 years, according to some estimates � that President Bush would have no room for other tax cuts. Reducing dividend taxes by about half, to about 20 percent for people in the top tax bracket, would not only reduce the drain on revenue to the Treasury but also bring dividend taxes in line with those on capital gains. Tax analysts said that would eliminate one imbalance in the current tax system that favors fast-growing companies like Microsoft that pay no dividends but attract investors with the prospect of big increases in their stock prices. Administration officials have looked at ways to reduce dividend taxes that would primarily benefit small investors, but White House advisers say those would do little to correct distortions in the current system. One option would be to eliminate taxes on the first $1,000 or $3,000 in dividend income. But White House officials think that approach would do little to reduce the distortions in the system because it would not change incentives for the big investors who actually reap most dividends. Many outside economists agree. "There is a fundamental tension between the distributional effects of these measures and the incentive effect you are trying to achieve," said James Poterba, a professor of economics and public finance at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. That the tax cuts themselves would flow overwhelmingly to the nation's wealthiest taxpayers is a fact that Democrats are sure to cite as evidence that the administration wants to cut taxes only for the rich. Democratic lawmakers are pushing for tax measures that would benefit lower- and middle-income households, like a temporary "holiday" from Social Security taxes or a temporary exemption for the first several thousand dollars in taxable income. Robert S. McIntyre, director of Citizens for Tax Justice, a research group backed by labor unions, said the entire complaint about "double taxation" was dubious because corporations make such heavy use of legal tax shelters and loopholes. Although the top corporate tax rate is 35 percent, the average tax rate is only about 15 percent, Mr. McIntyre has estimated on the basis of analyzing corporate tax data. "Don't worry about the double tax," Mr. McIntyre said. "Worry about the half tax." But business groups have themselves often been lukewarm about cutting dividend taxes as well, pushing harder for more direct benefits like faster write-offs on new equipment or reductions in overall corporate tax rates. This year, business lobbyists say they support a cut in the dividend taxes � but not at the expense of other measures that would cut business taxes more directly. If President Bush has his way, the dividend tax cut will be a permanent change to the tax code. The only reason Mr. Bush may settle for less is that the Senate's complex rules on filibustering make it easier to pass a tax measure that has time limits. Go To Original Bush Seeks Increase in National Debt Limit By Edmund L. Andrews New York Times Tuesday, 24 December, 2002 WASHINGTON, Dec. 24 � The Bush administration asked Congress today to approve another increase in the limit on national debt, saying it will run out of the authority to borrow money by late February. The deputy Treasury secretary, Kenneth W. Dam, in a letter to the House speaker, J. Dennis Hastert, cited the cost of combating terrorism and the economic slowdown for the government's growing indebtedness. The federal government, which enjoyed a budget surplus as recently as two years ago, had a shortfall of $157 billion this year and is expected to have a larger one in 2003. Congress raised the government's debt limit in July by $450 billion, to a total of $6.4 trillion, but administration officials predicted even then that they would need to raise the limit again by some time next year. Though today's announcement was no surprise, it highlighted the sharp deterioration in the government's financial condition and provided fresh ammunition for Democratic lawmakers who want to thwart President Bush's plan to push additional tax cuts through Congress early next year. Mr. Dam said the government's debt had been swollen by needs for the Social Security and Medicare trust funds, the costs of fighting terrorism and the economic slowdown. But he made only oblique reference to the contribution made by the tax cuts that Mr. Bush pushed through last year, referring to the cost of "restoring economic performance." Senator Kent Conrad, Democrat of North Dakota and the senior Democrat on the Senate Budget Committee, seized on today's request to denounce Mr. Bush's campaign to make permanent last year's tax cuts. "By raising the debt ceiling to pay for the president's tax cuts and his other spending, the Bush administration is wanting our children and grandchildren to pay our bills," Mr. Conrad said in a statement. Treasury officials would not say how much they want to increase the debt ceiling, which will be subject to negotiation with Congressional leaders as the deadline approaches. The negotiations will have to take place at the same time that Mr. Bush will be campaigning for his next package of tax cuts aimed at stimulating the economy. Mr. Bush is expected to outline his package either in or before his State of the Union address in late January. Many people expect him to call for measures costing as much as $300 billion over 10 years. (In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.) � : t r u t h o u t 2002 | t r u t h o u t | forum | issues | editorial | letters | donate | contact | | voting rights | environment | budget | children | politics | indigenous survival | energy | | defense | health | economy | human rights | labor | trade | women | reform | global |~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Forwarded as information only; everything sent has to stand on its own merits, not on my recommendation. Dissenting ideas are the health of the American system. A<:>E<:>R + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without charge or profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + "Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men. Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all. Then accept it and live up to it." The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + "War is the health of the state. It automatically sets in motion throughout society these irresistible forces for uniformity, for passionate cooperation with the government in coercing into obedience the minority groups and individuals which lack the larger herd sense." RANDOLPH BOURNE (1886-1918) in War and the Intellectuals + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + "Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut." --- Ernest Hemingway <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
