-Caveat Lector-
Seems that YEARS ago they thought cancer was caused by bacteria, then
abandoned that idea for a more radical approach to treatment, one involving
the use of complex chemicals that are often extremely costly, resulting in
more money for the pharmaceutical companies, as well as extremely toxic and
of dubious long term benefit. A more sensible and cost effective approach
would be one of treating it as an infection with the best antibiotics used
site specifically. HOWEVER the overuse (and I sometimes think it is done
deliberately so we have no recourse and can start to die off like "they" want
us to, even from such things as the cold and flu) of antibiotics in
everything means that even if cancer was caused by a bacteria there is
probably no drugs in use now that can fight them effectively.
Teo1000
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
