-Caveat Lector-

Tracking The Tarim Mummies

        A solution to the puzzle of Indo-European origins?

        Archaeological and linguistic evidence places the Indo-European homeland in 
the North Pontic region. Members of one Indo-European group (the Yamnaya culture) that 
migrated to the western Altai Mountains, where they are identifiable as the Afanasievo 
culture, may have later moved into the Tarim Basin of what is now western China.

        The Indo-European problem is one of archaeology's oldest, most contentious 
questions. More than 200 years ago, in 1786, English jurist and scholar Sir William 
Jones realized that Latin and Greek shared a common origin with Sanskrit, the ancient 
language of Hindu law and religion. These three languages, he proposed, had developed 
from a single ultimate parent language, now called Proto-Indo-European.

        Linguists soon added most of the languages of Europe (including English), 
Iran, and northern India- Pakistan to the family, and eventually discovered several 
extinct cousins, including Hittite, spoken in Anatolia about 2000-1000 B.C., and 
Tocharian, a group of two (or possibly three) languages spoken about A.D. 500-800 in 
the Buddhist monasteries and caravan cities of the Tarim Basin in what is now western 
China.

        All of these languages still display telltale traces of the same 
Proto-Indo-European grammar and vocabulary. But where and when was the elusive mother 
tongue spoken? And by what historical circumstances did it generate daughter tongues 
that became scattered from Scotland to China?

        In 1995, media reports brought to the public's attention astonishingly 
well-preserved remains of European-looking people, dressed in European- looking 
clothes, buried in the Tarim Basin between about 1800 B.C. and A.D. 500. This came 
about through the persistent efforts of Victor Mair, a professor of Chinese and 
Indo-Iranian literature and religion at the University of Pennsylvania.

        Long known to specialists but poorly understood and little studied, the Tarim 
mummies (not really mummies, but bodies preserved by dry conditions) quickly became 
the focus of intense interest and debate. Riveting photographs appeared in Archaeology 
(March/April 1995, pp. 28-35) and Discover.

        Academic papers on the mummies were edited by Mair for the 1995 Journal of 
Indo-European Studies. Film crews working for Nova and the Discovery channel soon 
followed Mair to the deserts of northwestern China; the Discovery show ("The Riddle of 
the Desert Mummies") was nominated for an Emmy. In 1996, Mair hosted a conference of 
50 international experts on the archaeology, linguistics, and physical anthropology of 
the Central Eurasian societies related to the mummies; the proceedings were published 
in two dense and informative volumes in 1998, and textile specialist Elizabeth Barber 
issued a book on the Tarim textiles.

        Now Mair has teamed with James Mallory, a distinguished Indo-European linguist 
and archaeologist at Queen's University in Belfast, to write The Tarim Mummies, which 
explores the difficult and controversial questions about the languages, identities, 
technologies, migrations, and physical traits of the mummies.

        It is a fascinating and readable account and presents a valuable compendium of 
recent research on a little-known region that has long been the focus of romantic 
speculation by travelers and explorers from Marco Polo to Aurel Stein. To determine 
the ethnic and linguistic identity of the Tarim mummies requires, as they say, "a feat 
of archaeological and linguistic legerdemain," but it is an intriguing game to follow, 
for it sheds light on the documentary, linguistic, archaeological, and skeletal 
evidence that must be used to attempt a linguistic and ethnic prehistory of eastern 
Central Asia.

        In the end, their "working hypothesis" is that the earliest Bronze Age 
colonists of the Tarim Basin were people of Caucasoid physical type who entered 
probably from the north and west, and probably spoke languages that could be 
classified as Pre- or Proto-Tocharian, ancestral to the Indo-European Tocharian 
languages documented later in the Tarim Basin.

        These early settlers occupied the northern and eastern parts of the Tarim 
Basin, where their graves have yielded mummies dated about 1800 B.C. They did not 
arrive from Europe, but probably had lived earlier near the Altai Mountains, where 
their ancestors had participated in a cultural world centered on the eastern steppes 
of central Eurasia, including modern northeastern Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and 
Tadjikistan.

        At the eastern end of the Tarim Basin, people of Mongoloid physical type began 
to be buried in cemeteries such as Yanbulaq some centuries later, during the later 
second or early first millennium B.C.

        About the same time, Iranian-speaking people moved into the Tarim Basin from 
the steppes to the west. Their linguistic heritage and perhaps their physical remains 
are found in the southern and western portions of the Tarim. These three populations 
interacted, as the linguistic and archaeological evidence reviewed by Mallory and Mair 
makes clear, and then Turkic peoples arrived and were added to the mix. (The Tarim 
Mummies, by J.P. Mallory and Victor Mair; New York: Thames and Hudson, 2000, $50.00 
(cloth); 352 pages, ISBN 0-500-05101-1; David W. Anthony is a professor of 
anthropology at Hartwick College in Oneonta, New York, and co-director of excavations 
for the Samara Valley Project in Russia.

        People used to think that Hebrew was the origin of all other tongues (because 
the Hebrew alphabet represents the foundation of all things, each letter being at the 
same time a number). What "is" probably is that, in Hebrew, we have a comparatively 
unchanged development of the one tongue of the early ages.








"Some people, once they adopt an idea, bury it in the ground
and go on the rest of their lives defending it, without ever
re-examining it to see whether time and the elements have
caused it to decay into a worthless handful of dust. In that
way you can be always consisten; and often wrong." (Raymond
Clapper)

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to