-Caveat Lector-

 SAVE THIS | EMAIL THIS | Close

http://www.antiwar.com/orig/sava1.html

UNMIK's Potemkin Villages*
Commentary on the editorial by Simon Haselock, head of UNMIK�s
information service
by Fr. Sava Janjic
January 21, 2003

Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appelant.

("They make a wilderness and call it peace," Tacitus: The Life of Gnaeus
Julius Agricola, Chapter 30)

In his editorial, published on January 10, 2003 in the Belgrade daily Blic,
Simon Haselock, the director of UNMIK�s public information service,
openly criticized the view of His Eminence Bishop Artemije of Raska and
Prizren that "little has changed" in Kosovo and openly accused the
representatives of the Kosovo Serbs of unconstructive behavior.

In his commentary, unfortunately, Mr. Haselock failed to present a single
convincing argument proving Bishop Artemije wrong. What is more, the
UNMIK information chief�s words only serve to confirm that his
comprehension of reality regrettably rests on highly subjective reports
and analyses, not on direct contact with flesh-and-blood
representatives of the Serb people whose everyday suffering and
problems are well known to Bishop Artemije as well as many well
minded internationals.

CHANGES FOR THE BETTER FOR ONLY ONE COMMUNITY

Truly, in Kosovo and Metohija much has changed for the better in the
last three years but only for Albanian community. Under UNMIK�s rule,
however, changes are only slightly or not at all reflected in Serb areas
where the 100,000 remaining Serbs are hard pressed to see any
essential improvements since the end of the war. While it is true that
many hospitals have been restored, Serbs cannot seek treatment in
them; numerous roads have been paved but Serbs lack the freedom to
travel on them; tens of thousands of houses have been renovated but
only about one hundred of them are owned by Serbs. After the war, all
mosques were repaired and many new ones built while over one
hundred Serbian churches still lie in ruins and not one has been
reconstructed; there are many new supermarkets, gas stations and
restaurants but what use are they to Serbs when only Albanians and
foreigners can safely enter them. In short, based on his first-hand
experience, the average Serb feels that UNMIK has come to help only
one community while Serbs appear fated to live as second-class citizens
on the margins of society. Are these indeed the "sterile debates" to
which Mr. Haselock refers or are they the reality, which he cannot or
does not wish to see?

Nevertheless, the greatest failure of UNMIK is that in three years it has
not managed to stop the negative development of creating an ethnically
pure and divided society where citizens are divided into the privileged
and those who lack basic human rights. This atavistic system is being
perpetrated largely due to the fact that UNMIK is simply not ready to
implement the basic provisions of Resolution 1244. The overwhelming
majority of Kosovo Serbs still lack civil freedoms and rights, as well as
free access to public institutions in urban centers: hospitals, schools and
cultural institutions. The cities and towns of Kosovo and Metohija, except
in the north of the Province, have been left almost entirely without their
Serb population. In Pristina today there are only about 250 Serbs
remaining; an equal number are in Gnjilane; in Orahovac, there are
about 450; in Prizren, 65; in Djakovica, 5; in Pec there are none, with
the exception of some 20 elderly nuns in the Pec Patriarchate. Towns
such as Urosevac, Srbica, Glogovac and Klina have already become
ethnically pure Albanian settlements. All assessments suggest that these
small Serb communities in urban centers will quickly be extinguished
unless the provisions of Resolution 1244 are implemented.

Kosovo institutions and settlements are decorated with flags of the
Republic of Albania and posters of Adem Jashari; monuments to new
heroes from "the war of national liberation" are springing up everywhere,
along with kitschy statues of Bill Clinton and Madeleine Albright. At the
same time, Serb cemeteries are being transformed into public garbage
dumps and the ruins of destroyed churches are overgrown with weeds.
Everywhere signs in the Serb language have been obliterated, and towns
are being given new fangled names which have never existed before in
history. History itself is being falsified with the goal of creating a new
artificial identity in order to destroy centuries of history and cultural
development. So exactly what kind of multiethnicity and free society are
we talking about here, Mr. Haselock?

UNMIK AND ITS VIRTUAL REALITY

Of course, from UNMIK�s comfortable and well-protected headquarters
one cannot see the Serb ghetto in Pristina�s "YU Program" building nor
the forgotten Serb villages near Obilic where every day brings
uncertainty and Serb children live in daily fear. From his virtual reality as
a well-paid international bureaucrat, Simon Haselock does not (want to)
see the hospitals, schools, movie theaters and restaurants which have
been inaccessible to Serbs for the past three years despite the presence
of UN and NATO forces. After all, how important can all this be when the
" truth" is only that which is disseminated from UNMIK�s information
service?

Following this logic, Pec is a safe city for Serbs. That is why a few months
ago, international caretakers hurried to take a group of 50 elderly Serb
pensioners from the Osojane enclave to that city to claim their pensions.
Of course, they barely managed to get them out alive under a hail of
Molotov cocktails and stones from the local Albanians. "But how can this
be?" the international bureaucrats asked themselves. "According to our
assessments Pec is a safe city for Serbs; not a single Serb has been
killed there in the past two years." What they neglected to take into
account is that there are no more Serbs remaining in Pec since the war.
According to the same logic, the city is equally safe for Eskimos and
Chinese. Statistics and real life do differ considerably, don�t they?

RETURNS ONLY ON PAPER

The second greatest failure of the UNMIK mission is the lack of returns
by the Serb population. Only a few hundred Serbs have been returned
to their homes, most of them elderly people whose names were first
listed and carefully filtered by local Albanian staff and KLA veterans.
UNMIK�s inflated figures of thousands of Serb returnees are inaccurate
and refer to returnees of other at-risk communities, primarily Roma.
Frequently even those who come to visit their relatives from Serbia are
registered as returnees, while those who leave Kosovo in the meantime
are not. Despite all efforts and programs, the returnee villages of
Osojane and Bica near Istok continue to live under siege, surrounded by
KFOR protective forces. Are 30,000 KFOR troops and several thousand
UNMIK police really unable to ensure the return of expelled persons to
their homes? Obviously they are not since this would not meet with the
approval of Albanian extremists, and UNMIK and KFOR have no intention
of getting involved in a conflict with them and endangering the safety of
their own personnel.

This is a witches� brew where UNMIK is increasingly becoming the
passive sponsor of an ethnically cleansed society in the eyes of the
Serbs; the very kind of society (according to the official interpretation)
the international community sought to prevent by dropping tons of
bombs on Serbia in 1999 and killing thousands of innocent men, women
and children.

Since judge and prosecutor in Kosovo are one and the same, the blame
for these problems apparently falls again on Serbs such as Bishop
Artemije, who, it appears, stubbornly refuses to acknowledge what a
good life his people are living. Perhaps we should blame the last
remaining Serb grannies in Djakovica. According to a "lucid"
interpretation of an arrogant international bureaucrat, they are
"provoking the Albanian population by their isolation, consequently
justifying their refusal to accept them"? Thus five old ladies are
provoking 100,000 Albanians who on the other hand refuse to allow
them to buy bread in the store, let alone to live the last years of their
lives in peace.

During just the past year, Kosovo Serbs were exposed to hundreds of
various extremist attacks, and thousands of provocations and threats.
Houses were blown up, land mines exploded, people were killed and
wounded. The destruction of Orthodox Christian churches and Serbian
cultural monuments continues and their restoration is prohibited. Not
one member of the former KLA has been brought to justice for any of
the crimes committed against Serbs during the war. A few have been
arrested but only for crimes against their own Albanian compatriots.
Despite all this, UNMIK insists that Serbs accept this new reality and
become integrated in a society where there is no room for them. There
is so much irony and injustice in this claim by which UNMIK�s helplessly
tries to hide its own responsibility for failure.

SERBS WITHOUT ECONOMIC PROSPECT

While enormous financial resources have been invested to meet the
needs of the Kosovo Albanians, Serb villages and enclaves continue to
live in poverty and misery. People are without jobs; thousands of
hectares of Serb-owned land remain uncultivated due to lack of security.
Grazing one�s livestock in a meadow represents a serious safety risk, let
alone contemplating the sale of farm products at the local farmers�
market. Daily pressure continues on the remaining Serbs to sell their
property, especially in cities and towns where the Albanians have
illegally occupied thousands of Serb-owned private houses, apartments
and businesses. They make free use of this usurped property without
any compensation to the owners under UNMIK�s very eyes and
sometimes with its tacit approval.

At the same time, thousands of hectares of state-owned land and
forests have been devastated by looting and illegal lumbering. Every
appeal to the court is condemned to fail from the start because the
justice system in the Province is a tragic parody of law and (dis)order.
Due to a lack of witnesses, who are under enormous fear from Albanian
extremists, not one major incident against the Serbs has been positively
resolved. At the same time, dozens of Serbs are wasting away in the
interrogative jails of UNMIK, completely against all existing laws,
because the courts lack evidence to sentence them as war criminals.

Restitution of property is a near impossibility; in the few cases where, by
some miracle, a Serb manages to get back his confiscated house, he is
immediately forced to sell it because it is not safe for him to return with
his family to live in it. UNMIK has an explanation for this, too. Recently
the deputy civil administrator for Pristina stated nonchalantly that the
Serbs in fact "do not want to return to their homes at all despite UNMIK�s
invitation to do so". How are they supposed to return to constant
danger, uncertainty, injustice and poverty? What kind of success do we
have here, Mr. Haselock, and what kind of justice and progress?

INSTITUTIONS A SMOKE-SCREEN FOR FALSE MULTIETHNICITY

However, the greatest misconception in Kosovo and Metohija is that the
constitutional framework, supposedly free elections and institution-
building will enable the Serbs to improve their position by working
through the institutions of the system. For a year representatives of the
Serb Return (Povratak) Coalition participated in the work of the Kosovo
parliament without achieving a single tangible result.

Is Kosovo any closer to being a multiethnic society? Have better
conditions been created for the return of expelled persons, the goal
from which the Coalition took its name? Is Resolution 1244 being more
effectively implemented? The answer to all three questions is no.

Incidents continue to occur and Kosovo does not even remotely
resemble a multiethnic society; instead, it has become a classic model of
institutionalized apartheid and intolerance. Only a few hundred out of
about 200,000 expelled persons have a roof over their head in their
isolated enclaves. And as far as Resolution 1244 is concerned, it has
never been more trampled on and disregarded. Kosovo Albanians are
using institutions that Serbs have joined to prove that Kosovo is indeed
"multiethnic" and that it should become independent. Occasionally their
leaders, accompanied by UNMIK officials, take a stroll through a Serb
enclave, snap a few photographs and immediately run to Washington to
show pictures that supposedly prove their concern for "the Serb
minority". In fact, hiding behind this false fa�ade of the UN mission and
the new Kosovo institutions is a tragic reality of unbridled violence,
organized crime, corruption and bureaucratic chaos. The UNMIK mission
has not only tarnished the moral reputation of the international
community in the Balkans but is now consciously feigning blindness to
the destruction of an entire people and its culture for no other reason
but to rationalize its own failure.

FALSIFICATION OF REALITY

Despite all difficulties and problems which they endure from the local
Albanians, what pains the Kosovo Serbs the most is the unscrupulous
propaganda conducted by UNMIK which rudely falsifies the real situation
in Kosovo and Metohija. The goal of this campaign is to rationalize the
tremendous failures of this mission, whose purported "successes" are
coming under increased fire in New York and Brussels.

The current unofficial primary goal of the mission appears to be to
finally implement an effective exit strategy to include transferring all
authority to the local authorities, i.e., institutions overwhelmingly
dominated by the Albanian majority, prior to the withdrawal of the
international community from the Province and the pronouncement of
the successful conclusion of the mission. As the logical consequence of
this strategy, local Albanians and some international circles are
expecting recognition of an independent Kosovo, i.e., a second ethnic
Albanian state in the Balkans, which will supposedly guarantee Serbs all
rights "according to the highest European standards". Taking into
account that areas inhabited by Albanians are the most ethnically clean
territories in the Balkans, it is difficult to expect an exception to the rule
in an independent Kosovo where ethnic and religious tolerance are out
of the question. Such a creation would be in fundamental contradiction
with everything that contemporary Europe represents and wishes to
achieve today.

It is not necessary to comment on the economic sustainability of a society
largely based on smuggling and illegal activities. Without friendship with
their closest neighbors, Serbs and the Macedonians, the Kosovo
Albanians can depend only on poverty- stricken Albania, which has
enough problems of its own.

It is very important to emphasize that the active presence of Serb
deputies in provincial institutions is seen as a key element for a
successful exit strategy and the ultimate secession of the Province from
the union of Serbia and Montenegro because this would be the strongest
argument before the world that the Serbs have a real capability to
independently, freely and effectively shape their future through the
multiethnic institutions of a future independent state. Of course, these
Serb deputies, who commute to parliamentary sessions in armored
police vans and who do not dare to step outside the building for a
simple coffee break, are themselves beginning to understand what and
whom they are in fact serving. This is why further participation in such
institutions, under extremely discriminatory and humiliating conditions is
not possible any longer. Without essential changes in the institutional
system, which must be brought to compliance with the UNSC Resolution
1244, Serb participation in the Parliament will only make additional
damage to the position of the Serb people and help Kosovo Albanians
create their independent state.

Despite everything above, the Serb people still live in the hope that
UNMIK will finally abandon the policy of double standards and begin
building a truly free and multiethnic society in accordance with
Resolution 1244 and international law. In the institutions of such a
society, where all citizens regardless of religion and ethnicity will have a
right to a dignified and free life, the Serb people will be quite ready to
participate with all other citizens and to offer their constructive
contribution. However, if UNMIK intends to continue building a new
ethnic Albanian state in which Serbs would continue to live as second-
class citizens or disappear completely, it is illusory on the part of the
international community to expect Serb cooperation and support for
such a project.

Instead of the determined efforts of Mr. Haselock and his colleagues to
whitewash reality and to deceive the unwitting international community, it
is time to turn words into deeds. Empty words without concrete
improvements on the ground cannot convince anyone of that which not
even UNMIK officials believe any longer.

Note: * Potemkin, Grigori Aleksandrovich

Potemkin, Grigori Aleksandrovich , 1739�91, Russian field marshal and
favorite of Empress Catherine II. As governor of the new province, he
organized Catherine�s fabulous Crimean tour of 1787. Potemkin is
perhaps best remembered for the legendary "Potemkin Villages" he is
said to have created for her benefit as she embarked on a grand tour of
all the newly Russianized lands he had conquered for her. These
"villages," it was said, were little more than elaborate stage sets of
prosperous towns, populated by cheerful serfs, all of which were quickly
collapsed and set up again at the next stop on Catherine�s carefully
plotted itinerary. The artificiality of the Potemkin Villages came to
represent in the minds of many, Catherine�s superficial and halfhearted
attempts to reform and liberalize her kingdom.

comments on this article?

send them to backtalk!
[visit backtalk!]






Find this article at:
http://www.antiwar.com/orig/sava1.html



 SAVE THIS | EMAIL THIS | Close

 Check the box to include the list of links referenced in the article.



Forwarded for your information.  The text and intent of the article
have to stand on their own merits.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do
not believe simply because it has been handed down for many genera-
tions.  Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and
rumoured by many.  Do not believe in anything simply because it is
written in Holy Scriptures.  Do not believe in anything merely on
the authority of teachers, elders or wise men.  Believe only after
careful observation and analysis, when you find that it agrees with
reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it." The Buddha on Belief,
from the Kalama Sut

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to