-Caveat Lector-

"I pledge Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to
the REPUBLIC for which it stands,  one Nation under God,indivisible,with
liberty and justice for all."

 visit my web site at
http://www.voicenet.com/~wbacon My ICQ# is 79071904
for a precise list of the powers of the Federal Government linkto:
http://www.voicenet.com/~wbacon/Enumerated.html

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 01:43:58 -0700
From: Media Research Center <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MRC Alert: Jennings Covers Up Agenda of Left-Wing Saddam
    Interviewer

             ***Media Research Center CyberAlert***
   5:40am EST, Wednesday February 5, 2003 (Vol. Eight; No. 22)
  The 1,429th CyberAlert. Tracking Liberal Media Bias Since 1996

> Jennings Covers Up Agenda of Left-Wing Saddam Interviewer
> Brokaw Again Cites "Huge Tax Cuts" in the Bush Budget
> Rather Depicts NASA Budget Cuts as Continuous Since Nixon
> Columbia Disaster Stirs Bush-Despising Letters to SF Chronicle
> Ted Turner to Be Interviewed on CBS's 60 Minutes II
> "Top Ten Cool Things About Living on an Aircraft Carrier"

    #### Distributed to more than 11,600 recipients by the Media
Research Center, bringing political balance to the news media
since 1987. The MRC is the leader in documenting, exposing and
neutralizing liberal media bias. Visit the MRC on the Web:
http://www.mediaresearch.org. CyberAlerts from this year are at:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/archive/cyber/welcome.asp For 2002:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/archive/cyber/archive02.asp
    Subscribe/unsubscribe information, as well as a link to the
MRC donations page, are at the end of this message.
    When posted, this CyberAlert will be readable at:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2003/cyb20030205.asp ####

1) ABC, CBS and NBC on Tuesday night ran clips from a British TV
interview with Saddam Hussein conducted by Tony Benn, a former
member of the British Parliament. But while NBC identified Benn as
"anti-war" and CBS tagged him as a "lifelong left-wing activist,"
ABC's Peter Jennings described him as simply "one of Britain's
most famous politicians." CBS's Bob Simon relayed how Hussein said
he thinks "the Bush administration is after Iraq's oil and wants
to use that oil as an instrument to dominate the world." Benn
asked Hussein "about how you see the enormous oil reserves of Iraq
being developed, first for the benefit of the people of Iraq and
secondly for the needs of mankind?"

2) Tax cuts and deficits are "huge" to NBC's Tom Brokaw, but not
the much larger amount in the budget dedicated to spending. On
Monday's Nightly News, Brokaw referred to Bush's proposed "huge
tax cuts." On Tuesday night, Brokaw stated that the Bush budget
features "huge new tax cuts" and that "Democrats said the
administration is making huge debt."

3) NASA suffered 30-plus straight years of budget reductions that
"resulted in safety cutting," Dan Rather suggested during CBS News
live coverage of Tuesday afternoon's memorial service for the
Columbia crew. Rather proposed that "the attitude of a succession
of Presidents beginning with President Nixon, running through
Carter, Reagan, Bush first and President Clinton and now President
George W. Bush, there's been more cost cutting that has resulted
in safety cutting."

4) After running America-hating and Bush-despising letters about
the space shuttle disaster, the San Francisco Chronicle's
editorial page editor acknowledged "the cynical, even hateful,
tone of many of the letters." But, he amazingly reported, "the
outtakes were considerably harsher...than the selection we
printed." One printed letter spewed: "Throughout the Biblical
Scriptures, God has often acted like a supernatural terrorist,
unleashing unexplained calamities against enemies. Could it be
that God is trying to send a strong message with this latest
tragedy to the lying, two-faced hypocrites in the White House?"

5) Wednesday night's 60 Minutes II on CBS will feature an
interview with Ted Turner conducted by Mike Wallace. Turner, who
last week announced he plans to resign from the AOL Time Warner
board, laments to Wallace that he can't afford to buy back CNN and
explains why he described the 9-11 terrorists as "brave."

6) As announced by ten crew members on the USS John C. Stennis,
Letterman's "Top Ten Cool Things About Living on an Aircraft
Carrier."


    > 1) "Anti-war" and a "lifelong left-wing activist" or simply
"one of Britain's most famous politicians"? ABC, CBS and NBC on
Tuesday night all ran clips from a British TV interview with
Saddam Hussein conducted by Tony Benn, a former member of the
British Parliament. But while both NBC and CBS informed viewers up
front of Benn's political agenda, Peter Jennings made it hard for
ABC viewers to realize Benn's political bent as Jennings reported
the interview "was conducted by a former member of the British
Parliament, Tony Benn, one of Britain's most famous and outspoken
politicians."

    Only deep in the subsequent story did viewers get a clue about
Benn's agenda when Dan Harris noted: "Tony Benn said he conducted
this interview to stop the war."

    In contrast, in setting up a clip on the NBC Nightly News,
Andrea Mitchell observed that in Hussein's "first interview in 12
years, airing tonight on British TV, he told an anti-war British
politician he has no links to al Qaeda and no illegal weapons."

    CBS's Bob Simon, during a story ridiculously touted on screen
as a "CBS News Exclusive" when ABC and NBC were nearly
simultaneously showing soundbites from it, described Benn as "a
79-year-old British politician and lifelong left-wing activist."
You've got to be pretty far left for CBS News to describe you as
"left-wing."

    None of the stories exposed just how Saddam-friendly Benn was
during the interview. A transcript shows that he "asked" Hussein
"about how you see the enormous oil reserves of Iraq being
developed, first for the benefit of the people of Iraq and
secondly for the needs of mankind?" And, Benn urged Hussein to
"say something yourself directly through this interview to the
peace movement of the world that might help to advance the cause
they have in mind."

    Maybe we'll see some of that in Simon's story on Benn's
interview set to air Wednesday night on 60 Minutes II, which is
probably the "exclusive" CBS was misleadingly touting on the
Evening News. For the 60 Minutes II plug for its February 5
interview with Benn about his Hussein interview:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/02/04/60II/main539324.shtml

    > Back to Tuesday night, Simon reported on the February 4 CBS
Evening News: "Dan, Saddam had not given an interview to anyone
from the West for 12 years until Sunday. Anthony Wedgwood Benn, a
79-year-old British politician and lifelong left-wing activist,
was invited to Baghdad to talk to the Iraqi President. Benn said
he had come to explore the possibilities for peace and asked
Saddam the two key questions."
    Anthony Wedgwood Benn: "Do you have links with al-Qaeda?"
    Saddam Hussein, through translator: "If we had relations with
the organization of al-Qaeda, we would not be ashamed to admit it.
Therefore, I would like to tell you directly that we have no
relationships with al-Qaeda."
    Simon continued, as taken down by MRC analyst Brad Wilmouth:
"But beyond any links to al-Qaeda, the Bush administration claims
Saddam may be close to building nuclear weapons and probably has
chemical and biological weapons, charges he continues to deny."
    Hussein: "These weapons are not aspirin pills that one can
hide in his pockets. And it's easy to work out if Iraq has weapons
or does not have weapons -- chemical, nuclear and biological. And
we have said many times before, and we say it again today, that
Iraq is free of such weapons."
    Simon: "But Saddam told Benn he does not believe weapons have
very much to do with President Bush's designs against Iraq. Saddam
said he believes the Bush administration is after Iraq's oil and
wants to use that oil as an instrument to dominate the world."

    Very illuminating.

    ABC avoided Benn's left-wing perspective as World News Tonight
anchor Peter Jennings intoned: "The Iraqi President, Saddam
Hussein, has given his first television interview today, to a non-
Iraqi, in 12 years. It was conducted by a former member of the
British Parliament, Tony Benn, one of Britain's most famous and
outspoken politicians. It's also been broadcast in the Middle East
and in Britain. And our man in Baghdad, Dan Harris, has the
details."

    Harris began reverentially: "Speaking slowly and calmly,
alternately sipping his coffee and playing with his pen, Saddam
Hussein rejected the central allegation the U.S. has leveled
against him."

    Hussein, through an interpreter, maintained Iraq has no
weapons of mass destruction and denied any connection to al Qaeda.

    Only after Harris pointed out how Hussein did not address the
complaints from inspectors about the lack of access to scientists,
did Harris acknowledge: "Tony Benn said he conducted this
interview to stop the war."

    Judging by Benn's Web site (http://www.tonybenn.com/ ), the
long-time Labour Party renegade is very far to the left. Here's
how he opened a June, 2002 article about "The Left" in America:
    "One of the most dangerous examples of censorship in the media
is the virtual absence in our newspapers and on TV of any serious
reporting of the activities of the Left in America and many people
assume that almost all Americans support President Bush and his
policies which were discussed, last weekend, at a Conference in
Washington organized by the International Democrat Union the
Thinktank of the world's Right."

    Reminds you of Phil Donahue.

    I must have been taken off the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy's
mailing list. I've never heard of the "International Democrat
Union" which Benn claims is the "Thinktank of the world's Right."

    For Benn's polemic in full: http://www.tonybenn.com/left.html

    The Web site also features a transcript of his Hussein
interview which aired on ITV's "Channel 4." Three of Benn's
inquiries in the form of tributes to Hussein's wisdom:

    -- "I come for one reason only -- to see whether in a talk we
can explore, or you can help me to see, what the paths to peace
may be. My only reason, I remember the war because I lost a
brother. I never want to see another war.
    "There are millions of people all over the world who don't
want a war, and by agreeing to this interview, which is very
historic for all of us, I hope you will be able to help me be able
to say something to the world that is significant and positive."

    -- "There are people who believe this present conflict is
about oil, and I wonder if you would say something about how you
see the enormous oil reserves of Iraq being developed, first for
the benefit of the people of Iraq and secondly for the needs of
mankind."

    -- "There are tens of millions, maybe hundreds of millions of
people in Britain and America, in Europe and worldwide, who want
to see a peaceful outcome to this problem, and they are the real
Americans in my opinion, the real British, the real French, the
real Germans, because they think of the world in terms of their
children. I have 10 grandchildren and in my family there is
English, Scottish, American, French, Irish, Jewish and Indian
blood, and for me politics is about their future, their survival.
And I wonder whether you could say something yourself directly
through this interview to the peace movement of the world that
might help to advance the cause they have in mind?"

    For the entire transcript:
http://www.tonybenn.com/interview.html



    > 2) Tax cuts and deficits are "huge" to NBC's Tom Brokaw, but
not the much larger amount dedicated to spending. On Monday's
Nightly News, as noted in the February 4 CyberAlert, Brokaw
referred to Bush's proposed "huge tax cuts." On Tuesday night,
Brokaw stated that the Bush budget features "huge new tax cuts"
and that "Democrats said the administration is making huge debt."

    Brokaw read this short item on the February 4 NBC Nightly
News: "President Bush's budget director was on Capitol Hill today
taking heat from members of both political parties over the 2004
budget. Mitch Daniels told lawmakers the President's $2.2 trillion
budget, with its call for huge new tax cuts, are the right
remedies for a struggling economy. But Democrats said the
administration is making huge debt, $300 billion deficits this
year and next, to future generations. And some Republicans said
they cannot defend the size of the tax cut given the size of the
deficits."

    Democrats and numerous media reports describe the expected
$300 billion deficits as a "record" size, but as MRC analyst
Patrick Gregory caught, on Monday's Fox Report, FNC's Major
Garrett pointed that "today's deficits are smaller as a percentage
of the entire U.S. economy than the startlingly high deficits of
1992 and 1983, as these numbers clearly indicate." An on-screen
table related how the expected 2004 deficit would be 2.7 percent
of GDP while the 1992 one consumed 4.7 percent of GDP and the 1983
deficit ate up 6 percent of GDP.



    > 3) NASA suffered 30-plus straight years of budget reductions
that "resulted in safety cutting," Dan Rather suggested during CBS
News live coverage of Tuesday afternoon's memorial service for the
Columbia crew. Rather proposed: "There's certainly been talk that
in recent years that Congress's attitude and, for that matter, the
attitude of a succession of Presidents beginning with President
Nixon, running through Carter, Reagan, Bush first and President
Clinton and now President George W. Bush, there's been more cost
cutting that has resulted in safety cutting."

    If the budget was reduced continually for 30 years how could
there have been enough spending left in each succeeding year to
sustain cut?

    But CBS News space expert Bill Harwood quickly corrected
Rather's misperception.

    About ten minutes before the 1pm EST service began, Rather,
who was inside the Johnson Space Center with Harwood in front of a
shuttle mock up, presented Harwood with a supposition:
     "There's been a lot of talk in recent days, certainly not as
much as there has been and should have been about the astronauts,
the loss to their families and to the nation, there's certainly
been talk that in recent years that Congress's attitude and, for
that matter, the attitude of a succession of Presidents beginning
with President Nixon, running through Carter, Reagan, Bush first
and President Clinton and now President George W. Bush, there's
been more cost cutting that has resulted in safety cutting. Is
that the sense you've had of the people who actually have to run
NASA?"

    Harwood put the budget numbers and connection to safety in
proper context: "I get the sense Dan that after Challenger the
budgets really ramped up, as they really made a major effort to
fix the problem that doomed that shuttle. But it reached a peak.
And then over the years, as the flight record continued to be
flawless, and they had mission after mission successful, as in any
other thing, the interest drops off a bit but the funding level
went down too. It's a slow and steady decline. Some of that's
natural. It's a mature program now. They've launched, this was the
113th launch, you understand how it works better. You don't
necessarily need the same level of hands on operation of a system
like that.
    "But obviously in anything like this there comes a point when
if you cut it too far you're eating into the safety. That's what
the debate is about. And the recent reports of folks concerned
about that funding drop over recent years, I don't know that that
would manifest itself in a mission like Columbia's, that concern
is more long-range because NASA plans to fly this vehicle for
another ten to 20 years...."

    Harwood shows it's a lot more nuanced than a lot of TV
reporting suggests.



    > 4) Is the San Francisco area part of the United States or
has it joined France? After running a bunch of very far-left,
America-hating and Bush-despising letters on Sunday and Monday
commenting on the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster, the San
Francisco Chronicle's editorial page editor, John Diaz,
acknowledged "the cynical, even hateful, tone of many of the
letters." But, he amazingly reported, "the outtakes were
considerably harsher and more jaded than the selection we
printed."

    Even "harsher"? Wow. The letters he ran included one which
declared: "I fear that the illegitimate Bush administration will
use this tragedy just as they cynically have used 9/11. They have
manipulated us into war with Iraq." Another asserted that with
Bush in office "Washington is awash with evil." And one woman
spewed this venom: "Throughout the Biblical Scriptures, God has
often acted like a supernatural terrorist, unleashing unexplained
calamities against enemies. Could it be that God is trying to send
a strong message with this latest tragedy to the lying, two-faced
hypocrites in the White House?"

    In OpinionJournal.com's Best of the Web column
(www.opinionjournal.com/best ), James Taranto has highlighted a
couple of the wackiest letters and Diaz's realization of their
extremism.

    Here are the wackier letters run by the San Francisco
Chronicle:

    -- Published on February 2:

MISSION TOO FAR

Editor -- The loss of the space shuttle is indeed tragic. This was
the mission too far. These vehicles just can't tolerate 20-plus
years of extreme stress. I fear that the illegitimate Bush
administration will use this tragedy just as they cynically have
used 9/11. They have manipulated us into war with Iraq. What's
next? Have they no shame, no honor?

PAUL H. TAYLOR
San Francisco

    For all of the February 2 letters:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/02/02/ED312.DTL


    -- Published on February 3:

WATCH OUT

Editor -- Another tragedy, another day of mourning.

When the space shuttle Challenger blew up, I cried. With Columbia
blowing up, I wonder, instead, of the timing regarding Bush's war
schedule, and I wonder about the first flight to carry an Israeli.
I know, just pure coincidence.

Cynical? You bet. Cold and heartless? After two years of false
terrorist warnings, why not? The White House does not have an
exclusive right to speculate outside the box.

Facts will not interfere with President Bush making political hay
out of this, just as he did with 9/11. Washington is awash with
evil. Watch and listen to the administration's responses,
especially Karl Rove.

GARY HUYGEN
Petaluma


GOD'S PLAN

Editor -- I was wondering if anyone ever considered that God might
just well be a kind of supernatural terrorist, intervening in
things such as the space shuttle exploding over Texas, President
Bush's home state.

Throughout the Biblical Scriptures, God has often acted like a
supernatural terrorist, unleashing unexplained calamities against
enemies. Could it be that God is trying to send a strong message
with this latest tragedy to the lying, two-faced hypocrites in the
White House? Is Bush going to declare war on God?

CHERYL MERRILL
San Francisco

    For all of the February 3 letters:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/02/03/ED112522.DTL

    In a February 4 column titled, "About those letters...,"
Chronicle editorial page editor John Diaz admitted the letters
were a bit "startling." An excerpt:

Several readers have called or written to complain about the
selection of letters we have printed about the space shuttle
Columbia tragedy.

Where, they asked, was the universal outpouring of grief for the
seven brave astronauts and their families? Why were so many of the
letters tinged with gratuitous bitterness toward President Bush or
otherwise infused with cynicism or conspiracy theories?

Frankly, my colleagues and I were asking the same questions
Saturday as we sorted through the several dozen e-mails and faxes
that came in after the disastrous breakup of the shuttle on its
final descent home.

It's always perilous to try to make any generalizations out of the
composition of letters sent to a newspaper. They are not
necessarily a representative sampling of the readership,
especially when they are arriving on a sunny Saturday morning in
early February.

Still, two things struck me about the first waves of letters. One,
they were coming in relatively small numbers for a news event of
this magnitude, even taking the weekend into account....

Even more startling was the cynical, even hateful, tone of many of
the letters. The outtakes were considerably harsher and more jaded
than the selection we printed.

One letter writer flat-out accused the government of a secret plot
to "sabotage the mission to direct future finances away from NASA
to further the military industrial complex." A recurring theme was
resentment that Bush would somehow exploit the tragedy for
political gain.

One letter speculated that Palestinians would be "dancing in the
streets" upon hearing of the deaths of the U.S. and Israeli
astronauts. Another wondered why television was showing "so much
empathy" for the deaths of agents of two countries who were
responsible for "uncounted Palestinian deaths, every day" in the
occupied territories....

For all the readers who asked, we do want to print more letters
that pay "tribute to the memory" of the Columbia crew, as we have
today. But we can only choose from among the letters we receive.

    END of Excerpt

    For the column in full:
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/02/04/ED59224.DTL

    For the more reasonable February 4 letters:
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/02/04/ED79189.DTL



    > 5) Wednesday night's 60 Minutes II on CBS will feature an
interview with Ted Turner conducted by Mike Wallace. Turner, who
last week announced he plans to resign from the AOL Time Warner
board, laments to Wallace that he can't afford to buy back CNN
from AOL Time Warner.

     An excerpt from CBS's page plugging the segment, including
how Turner explained why he described the 9-11 terrorists as
"brave." The excerpt:

During the candid interview, Turner talks about his past, his
future and his last role at AOL Time Warner, a position he calls
"a title without portfolio...like the emperor of Japan."

Just before he quit his job as a vice chairman at AOL Time Warner,
Turner told Wallace that he doesn't have much to do.

"I have one foot in the door and one on the sidewalk," he says.
Turner doesn't even have a voice in the running of CNN, the
network he founded.

"I think basically that CNN is doing a pretty good job," says
Turner. "I mean there are some things, obviously, that I don't
like, but I'm the old fuddy-duddy that -- that it reported to for
22 or 23 years, so, I mean, obviously, any changes are going
to...give me some trouble."

Some of the things that have come out of Turner's self-described
"big fat mouth" have also given him trouble over the years.

During a speech after the World Trade Center disaster, he told an
audience he thought the terrorists were brave. "Brave...was a bad
word," Turner tells Wallace. "My father committed suicide and he
was not a coward. He was very brave when he shot himself, in my
opinion, so that's why, to a degree, I said that."...

    END of Excerpt

    For the entire CBS plug for the segment:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/1999/05/24/60II/main48284.shtml

    Actually Turner said more than that the terrorists were
"brave." In February 11, 2002 remarks at Brown University, as
reported by Gerald Carbone in the February 12 Providence Journal,
Turner rationalized the actions of the terrorists: "The reason
that the World Trade Center got hit is because there are a lot of
people living in abject poverty out there who don't have any hope
for a better life....I think they [the 19 hijackers] were brave at
the very least."

    The next day, Turner issued a statement: "The attacks of Sept.
11 were despicable acts. I in no way meant to convey otherwise."

    Let's see if Wallace presses him about his 'poverty caused the
terrorist attacks' reasoning. 60 Minutes II airs at 9pm EST/PST,
8pm CST/MST on Wednesday night, February 5.



    > 6) From the February 3 Late Show with David Letterman, as
announced by ten crew members on the USS John C. Stennis aircraft
carrier in San Diego, the "Top Ten Cool Things About Living on an
Aircraft Carrier." Late Show Web page:
http://www.cbs.com/latenight/lateshow/

10. It combines all the excitement of going on a cruise with the
fun of living at the airport
(Nuclear Machinist's Mate First Class Billy Eatmon)

9. There's no more pleasant wake-up call than the roar of an F-18
Super Hornet
(Operations Specialist Sherona Peterson)

8. On weekends we turn the deck into the world's largest roller
disco
(Mess Management Specialist Anthony Sacro)

7. Feel like lasagna? Send a pilot to Italy for takeout
(Dental Technician First Class Pete Espinoza)

6. When everyone's asleep, you can climb in one of the planes and
pretend you're Tom Cruise
(Aviation Ordnanceman First Class Matt Wright)

5. Who else gets to describe their home as "Nimitz-class"?
(Personelman Third Class Shelly Glascoe)

4. The weekly shuffleboard tournaments
(Information Systems Technician Third Class Taquann McKinney)

3. All-you-can-drink jet fuel
(Hull Technician Second Class Joshua Chelnick)

2. If you ever have an aircraft that needs carrying, you're in
luck
(Photographer's Mate Second Class Bryan Dunn)

1. You can get both seasick and airsick at the same time
(Boatswain's Mate Third Class Leanne Connelly)


    > Tonight NBC will run the first of a two-part West Wing about
the inauguration of re-elected liberal Democratic President Jeb
Bartlet.

-- Brent Baker


    >>> Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon
contributions which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-
deductible donation. Be sure to fill in "CyberAlert" in the field
which asks: "What led you to become a member or donate today?" For
the secure donations page:
https://secure.mediaresearch.org/Donation/Order/MediaResearch25-27/mck-cgi/mrcdonate.asp

    To subscribe to CyberAlert, send a blank e-mail to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

    To unsubscribe, use the link at the very bottom of this
message.

    Send problems and comments to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

    You can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web
site by subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every
weekday afternoon. To subscribe, go to:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/cybersub.asp#webnews <<<

====================================================================
Update your profile here:
http://topica.email-publisher.com/survey/?bUrD57.bWm5xk.d2JhY29u

Unsubscribe here:
http://topica.email-publisher.com/survey/?bUrD57.bWm5xk.d2JhY29u.u

Delivered by Topica Email Publisher, http://topica.email-publisher.com/

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to