-Caveat Lector-

02-05-2003
http://www.sftt.org/cgi-bin/csNews/csNews.cgi?database=Insider%
20Notes%2edb&command=viewone&op=t&id=2&rnd=573.3642578125
Richard Perle and the Trouble with Goose-Stepping

Richard Perle is at it again. After laying low for several months, he emerges
to "accuse French


President Jacques Chirac of believing �deep in his soul� that Saddam
Hussein is preferable to any likely successor" and to pronounce gravely
that "France is no longer the ally it once was."

In addition to being a strategic genius, military hero, accomplished souffl�
chef and all-powerful Chairman of the Defense Policy Board here in the 3rd
Floor of the Pentagon � Richard Perle reads minds and knows exactly what
Chirac believes deep in his soul.

I am seriously impressed. We should all be humbled by this great man.

Even more importantly, you can bet your plane ticket to the war zone that
Perle�s view is shared by the Pentagon E-Ring, the Eliot Abram crowd at
the NSC, and the White House.

While the professional military/civilian versus political appointee rift in the
Pentagon is real, the constant river of public exclamations of Washington
groupthink brings to mind images of a goose-stepping National Socialist
parade. And we�re all in. Inspiring, isn�t it?

Don�t worry � the bloody, disastrous and Federal Reserve-breaking parts
come after the parade, with the rest of the cleanup.

It is one thing for the United States to attack other countries or
organizations, like al Qaeda, because they actually threaten our security
and well being.

It is another to label anyone who questions the United States President
(or Mr. Rumsfeld for that matter) as an enemy of the United States.

Now, Perle is just picking on France today. It is personal with him, and he
must feel so terribly betrayed, as a well-known francophile who often
enjoys the pleasures of Paris, French culture, and those wonderful
souffl�s.

But there are a host of commentators and government mouthpieces who
are also targeting American citizens or groups that have asked
inconvenient questions about the upcoming adventure in Iraq.

Take, for example, the accusations that the so-called "peace movement" in
this country is funded by communists and Saddam Hussein himself. First of
all, what peace movement? But suspend your disbelief for just a second,
and read on.

The fact that one of the founders of the Christian Right, Paul Weyrich, is
now calling for a congressional investigation into the funding sources for
pro-peace activities in this country and elsewhere is revealing. Correction
� Weyrich says it�s not really communists doing this�it�s neo- communists!

What the heck is a neo-communist? If the relationship between a
conservative and a neo- conservative is any model for deciphering this
modern day political dilemma � a neo- communist must be a pro-market
classical liberal who values democracy and individualism. But I digress.

Know this: the activities planned for Iraq � to the extent that major
annexes have yet to be written, even this late in the game � will come as a
surprise to most Americans, particularly parents, spouses and siblings of
soldiers. The expected liberation will not occur throughout Iraq evenly, if
it occurs at all, and the secure and happy demarcation between them and
us that we enjoy in Afghanistan hints at the nature of the upcoming Iraq
occupation.

Perle and the neo-conservative alliance of talk show warriors, soldiers of
the Washington Times and Wall Street Journal editorial pages, henchmen
of the Christian Right and our own pro-Israel vanguard in the E-Ring are
talking up the war. They are throwing homegrown bombs at those who ask
wise and thoughtful questions about motive, objective, cost, day-after
planning, and the ramifications of mistaken assumptions.

But just like in the X-Files, except scarier, the truth is out there.

Every major newspaper opinion page is increasingly giving a little column
space to the "challengers" of the Dubya-knows-all-and-trust-him-blindly
theorists. Why would they do that? Are they funded by neo-communists
and on Saddam�s payroll? Not likely.

We are seeing serious questions about the wisdom and motive and end-
state operations in the opinion pages of L.A. Times, the San Diego Union-
Tribune, the Washington Post and New York Times, -- even the Washington
Times. Read them � each published in the last two days and thoughtful,
patriotic, wise, putting America first.

What�s it all about?

Well, when you are goose-stepping with eyes right, you can�t see your ass
but you know it�s vulnerable, especially in that famous fully extended
position. You hope it�s covered, but you just can�t be sure.

So it has come to this � Perlotov cocktails slung wildly at anyone not fully
invested in the George W. Bush pick-up game, and major media outlets
starting to cover their backsides � just in case.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to