-Caveat Lector-

Why We Lost:
The Madness Of Liberalism

By: Alan Stang

As this commentary goes to press, we are routinely bombing Iraq, American troops are 
being ferried to bases in the Middle East en masse, and the next phase of the 
continuing illegal (because it is undeclared) war is about to begin. That means the 
already inflamed political dialogue will explode, as it did in Vietnam, so it could 
perhaps be helpful to take another look at what we are up against.

"Liberalism" is a modern species of insanity. Like all kinds of madness, it is 
characterized by a willful refusal to recognize facts. The difference between 
liberalism and other kinds of insanity is that the liberal is able to function outside 
the walls of an institution because he refuses to recognize only certain kinds of 
facts; in other kinds of insanity, the madness is more generalized, so the victim must 
be confined. For instance, the liberal can recognize that things fall down, not up. 
Other lunatics cannot and wind up walking upside down (they think).

The reason for this difference is that the more generalized versions of insanity 
happen by themselves for medical reasons; liberalism, on the other hand is 
deliberately induced. Indeed, one paradoxical symptom that may indicate the presence 
of liberal insanity is an inability to recognize the presence of liberal insanity. 
Many times in these commentaries (see the etherzone.com archives on page two), your 
obedient servant has shown that, for many decades, the "change agents" who run the 
nation�s government schools have deliberately used them not nearly so much to educate 
as to turn children into willing tools of der new vorld order, in which the United 
States and all other countries would be submerged in a totalitarian Socialist world 
government.

As one of my readers, you can profit from my mistakes and save precious time. No doubt 
the biggest mistake I made for years when talking to such people was to assume that 
they didn�t understand what I was talking about because they didn�t have the facts. 
This was easy to believe, because there was a time, long ago in the previous century, 
when I didn�t have the facts and other people educated me. For instance, I blush now 
to confess that I used to think Franklin Roosevelt was an American; that the Japanese 
alone were to blame for Pearl Harbor; that Cuba fell to Castro by itself. Later, after 
others had educated me, I realized it was my turn to educate. Now, I was the keeper of 
the flame.

Needless to say, it didn�t happen. Despite my best efforts, liberals persisted in 
disagreement and could not understand. The mistake I was making was my assumption that 
they were as interested in facts as I was. Time after time, I would come away from 
such a confrontation thinking that the fault was mine. Maybe I had not presented the 
facts properly. Maybe the facts I had presented were off point. Or, maybe I had 
presented them properly and on point, but hadn�t done enough.

So, I would do more research and go back again. Needless to say, however much I 
studied, and however well I set forth the facts, the result would always be the same 
mocking cackle, the same belligerent ignorance, the worst kind. What I failed to 
understand at the time was that to the insane liberal mentality, facts are an 
irrelevant nuisance, not even a nuisance, because they don�t exist. The result of 
course was that your obedient servant would come away from such conversations 
intensely frustrated; the other man would feel no ill effects, because he was insane.

Once I realized that, once I understood that whatever facts I set forth would make no 
difference, once I realized where the fault lay, I remember feeling intense relief. 
Now, I present the facts. As soon as it becomes clear that the man I am talking with 
has no interest in facts, I move on, or, if I�m momentarily trapped, at least I shut 
up or talk about J. Lo. There are literally millions of other Americans out there who 
are wondering what is really going on, and would be overjoyed were someone who knows 
to tell them.

Here are a couple of examples of what I am talking about. One response to my recent 
commentary about Martin Luther King, Jr., was that your Intrepid Correspondent must be 
a "racist." No mention was made of the facts I had cited. The facts were irrelevant. I 
hadn�t said a word about Senator Joe McCarthy, but another reader wrote that he was 
sure I was one of his fans. Again, nobody challenged my facts. In the world these 
lunatics inhabit, there are no such things.

In my experience, the prognosis for victims of liberal insanity is not hopeful. 
Because the disorder is constantly reinforced after the victim is handed a "high 
school diploma" from the mental institution to which he has been bused, reinforced 
mostly by television and the movies, there is little chance for recovery. Yes, I have 
seen a couple of remarkable remissions, but, sadly, not many. Your experience may be 
different.

But, surely, in a case such as this, where our very existence is threatened, reality 
will kick in. Surely, in a kill-or-be-killed situation like the war we are entering, 
liberals will recover at least sufficiently to save themselves. Not necessarily. 
Robert Fisk is an English journalist, who was beaten by a mob of refugees in 
Afghanistan in the early days of the war on the Taliban. Fisk wrote later, "If I were 
the Afghan refugees, I would have done the same to Robert Fisk. Or any other Westerner 
I could find."

Clearly, Robert Fisk is not a normal human being. If that is really what he thinks, 
one wonders why he does not put a bullet in his head to save someone else the trouble. 
We are talking here about a species of insanity that has existed nowhere else in the 
recorded history I have searched. Many countries have suffered treason by their 
leaders. Nowhere else have I found leaders who deliberately inculcated self-loathing 
in their subjects to the point of self-destruction, by means of a comprehensive 
program including the latest scientific enhancements.

Because of that self-loathing, for instance, our borders are no more. Our country is 
literally being dismantled with the acquiescence of our leaders, in the face of 
overwhelming opposition from our people. Again, nothing like this has happened in the 
history of the world.

I have entitled these comments, "Why We Lost." So total has been the victory of these 
conspirators (so far), that the madness we are discussing includes not just the usual 
charlatans on the left; it also includes people who are allegedly on the right. It 
includes anyone trained from earliest childhood to endorse blind belief in government, 
whether that belief looks to government for the solution to every problem from asthma 
to zits, or whether it demands military intervention around the world.

For just one example, there is Sean Hannity. He is inordinately handsome, he is full 
of characteristically delightful Irish charm, and every time I see him in action I ask 
myself, "Can this man really be this stupid? Can he really be this ignorant?" Or is 
his belligerent stupidity nothing but a show-business shtick? Maybe it is. Some years 
ago, your Intrepid Correspondent guested for a few hours on a radio show in Miami run 
by a man named Al Rantel. Al was a liberal then. He was also a sodomite, but that fact 
was undercover at the time (not a pun). Now, Al turns up in Los Angeles and he�s a 
"conservative," which is so au courant, don�t you know, and now that sodomy is so 
popular, everyone is allowed to know what he is.

There apparently is no government press release, especially about the war, so 
preposterous that Hannity will not trumpet its veracity and belligerently take on all 
comers. George Bush, a total factotum of the conspiracy for world government, can 
apparently tell no lie, however blatant, that Hannity will not applaud. He skillfully 
conceals his disdain for the facts with a superficial concern for the facts. Needless 
to say, he is just one of many like him on the "right."

Certainly one of the most destructive elements of liberal insanity is its implacable 
insistence that there is no such thing as evil. "There�s some good in the worst of 
us." Presumably, this means there�s some good in Osama bin Laden and Saddam. Patrick 
Henry, maybe my favorite Founding Father, said he wanted to know the truth however bad 
it was; on the other hand, Bush loves to say Islam is a religion of "peace." Firearms 
enthusiasts, who know "incoming" when they see it, might call it a religion of 
"piece," as we shall see in coming weeks.

In my opinion, the best thing we can do right now is salvage the remnant. It cannot be 
said too often that that means taking the children out of government mental 
institutions and either schooling them at home (the best solution) or in a Christian 
environment. Salvaging the remnant also means spreading the word. The more people who 
do bow before facts, the more people who do understand what is happening and who�s 
whose, the easier it will be to take the country back when the Lord of hosts decides 
He has had enough and intervenes.

------------------
"Published originally at EtherZone.com : republication allowed with this notice and 
hyperlink intact."
Alan Stang has been a network radio talk show host and was one of Mike Wallace's first 
writers.  He was a senior writer for American Opinion magazine and has lectured around 
the world for more than 30 years. He is also the author of ten books, including, most 
recently, Perestroika Sunset, surrounding our Government's deception in the POW/MIA 
arena. If you would like him to address your group, please email what you have in 
mind. He is a regular columnist for Ether Zone.
Alan Stang can be reached at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Published in the February 14, 2003 issue of  Ether Zone. Copyright � 1997 - 2003 Ether 
Zone.
-----------------
-iNFoWaRZ
The "Left" Liberals were written off a long time ago.
It's the "Right" Liberals, like Bush, Limbaugh, Hannity, Boortz, that present the 
deception and danger to America's freedom.  They have succeeded so far in Bamboozling 
and Brainwashing a large percentage of those who consider themselves conservative, 
Christian, and constitutionalists.
Break your conditioning.  Come out of the box.
Reject the phoney left-right paradigm and stand up like Americans and defend your 
Liberty from tyranny in government.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to