Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
--- Begin Message ----Caveat Lector- More about Fabianism(excerpt from) http://www.wso.net/kurios/eminence_front.htm Of Politics, Professional Wrestling, And the Hegelian Dialectic By David Brooks The political world is all pomp and circumstance anyway. It�s an imminence front: it�s a put-on. It�s all �smoke and mirrors,� designed to give an illusion and make it look real. As William Shakespeare wrote, �All the world�s a stage, and every one an actor.� He should know. Of Professional Wrestling� That brings us to the spectacle of modern professional wrestling. What in the world do politics and professional wrestling have in common? I�m glad you asked. One person I know, when caught watching wrestling on television, informed me that the plots closely resembled Greek mythology. I have to admit that my familiarity with Greek mythology is superficial, and my familiarity with the specifics of professional wrestling is less than that. Therefore, I can neither confirm nor refute that assertion. One thing I do know is that it does closely resemble politics. I don�t know who borrowed the premise from whom, which came first (the chicken or the egg), but the two are exactly the same sort of affair. In one they wear tights and capes and masks, in the other they wear business suits, but the sport is essentially the same. Both are more of an exhibition than a contest. Both are carefully scripted and planned out for the entire season. Both feature �good guys� and �bad guys� who can reverse their image as ratings dictate. Both feature shaky alliances that can also change drastically from week to week. Both feature long and loud confrontations, verbal assaults, and a barrage of threats, but no one ever really gets hurt. In both the most hated of rivals �at work� can be the best of drinking buddies after the show. They all know that they need each other to function, that really they are the same thing, and work for the same boss. The Bushster. Al 3:16. McCainamania. N.W.O. indeed. Of the Hegelian Dialectic� That now brings us to the principles that underwrite the big production. There are several philosophical principles that underlie modern social engineering in general, and modern politics in particular. One is the concept of Fabianism, or gradualism. This philosophy/process is named for the ancient Roman general Fabian, who won control of areas through attrition. Those who didn�t want to be �Romanized� would often fight passionately to defend their homelands and local culture. Therefore, he would utilize a superior support and logistical structure to engage his opponents in a series of hit and run skirmishes designed to wear them down over the long term, avoiding all-out confrontation which he feared he could lose. It was a sort of �death by a thousand small cuts� approach. This premise as applied to politics and social engineering is that ends are achieved by means of a relentless slow process of subtle pressure. It is a �bend but don�t break� approach. That is why we�ve had forty years of continual crisis, of protests and riots and upheavals of various kinds, always threatening the fabric of American life, but never quite exploding into full-blown chaos and anarchy. It is the philosophy of slow and steady �controlled revolution.� The second principle which coincides with this is known as the Hegelian Dialectic. This is the application of the principles of German philosopher Georg W.F. Hegel who lived from 1770-1831. He developed an �all-embracing philosophical system,� set forth in such works as Phenomenology of Mind (1807), Science of Logic (1812-16), and Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences (1817), which included �theories of ethics, aesthetics, history, politics, and religion.� The Hegelian method of logic was based on �the concept of advancing contradictory arguments, of thesis and antithesis, and seeking their resolution by synthesis.� (1) In other words, it is a continual process of conflict and compromise. Hegel may have believed this to be a naturally occurring phenomenon, but he was not oblivious to the fact that it seemed to be a guided process, by someone or something. In an age when academia favored pure naturalism, Hegel retained some spiritual element to his philosophy. �At the center of the universe Hegel posited an enveloping absolute spirit that guides all reality, including human reason. His absolute idealism envisages a world-soul, evident throughout history, that develops from, and is known through, a process of change and progress now known universally as the Hegelian dialectic. According to its laws, one concept (thesis) inevitably generates its opposite (antithesis); their interaction leads to a new concept (synthesis), which in turn becomes the thesis of a new triad.� (2) But his notion of spirituality is far from a traditional Judeo/Christian worldview. His �enveloping absolute spirit� is more akin to that of the occult, i.e., Luciferian or Satanic. Whether or not he studied and intentionally incorporated occult doctrine is not known for certain. Nevertheless, a Kabbalistic worldview has been perceived by some in his philosophy. Prof. Evgueni Tortchinov of the University of St. Petersburg in Moscow has said that he believes �similarities really exist� and goes on to say �we can find some very interesting similarities with Kabbalistic world-view not only in Hegel's philosophy but in other contemporary systems as well.� (3) In modern (and now post-modern) history this Hegelelian Dialectic principle is NOT a randomly occurring phenomenon. It is a tactic adopted by the engineers of the New World Order who manipulate it to give the appearance of social evolution. In truth, they have the ends all preconceived and then shape the needed thesis and antithesis to produce it. Brilliant, yes. Random, absolutely not. The practical real world outworking of this philosophy is clearly seen in the two party American political system. The continual �struggle� between two competing ideologies resulting in an unending state of compromise. �Checks and balances.� Sure. Another classic and graphic example of this dynamic at work was seen in the �Cold War� between western capitalism and Soviet communism. In the United States we were presented with the destruction of the Berlin Wall and the opening up of Russia and former Soviet occupied territories as being great �victories� of the west (through a Fabianistic approach). In actuality, it was a �victory� of the Hegelian Dialectic. It signified as much of a Fabianistic defeat for the traditional freedoms of the U.S. as it did for the communism of the U.S.S.R. Synthesis was completed. Time to begin a new triad. The two countries were now so much alike that our similarities were greater than our differences. The social engineers had reached ground zero. Both countries were now ready for the New World Order synthetic ideology: monopolistic capitalism at the top, and socialism for the masses. Religion had given way to materialism and spiritual tolerance. We were now morally pliable, ready to be shaped into virtually anything. Class structure had indeed been done away with. There are no longer different classes of people. However, there are now two different �species� of them: the handful of higher evolved elites who own everything and control everything (including presidents), and the rest of the world, the masses, who are considered almost as domestic animals, livestock to be herded, bred, controlled and exploited. Watch closely for the next triad of thesis and antithesis to shape up. It should be a doozy. http://www.icehouse.net/lmstuter/potp003.htm How can a simple person like me see holocaust at the door while powerful elitists see nothing tyrannical? When I look through the peephole of history, I see super-tyrants Hitler, Stalin, Tojo, Mao, Mussolini, and Pol Pot holding hands with Marx, Lenin, and George Bernard Shaw! Following Karl Marx�s death in 1883, his theories were made a world force by two developments � rise of the Fabian Society in England and Lenin�s Bolshevik movement. In 1884, a small group of English intellectuals formed the Fabian Society. Their goal was to establish the same classless, godless, socialistic, one-world society envisioned by Marx. Fabian leadership was assumed by Beatrice and Sidney Webb and George Bernard Shaw. {1} Shaw described himself as a "Communist," but differed with Marx over how the revolution would be accomplished and by whom � Shaw and the Fabians worked for world revolution not through an uprising of workers but through indoctrination of young scholars. Fabians believed that eventually these intellectual revolutionaries would acquire power and influence in the official and unofficial opinion-making and power-wielding agencies of the world. Then, they could quietly establish a socialistic, one world order � Fabian Socialists rejected all suggestions that they form a political movement of their own. They planned to spread their influence by penetrating existing educational institutions, political parties, the civil service, etc. http://www.attackthesystem.com/newclass.html Twentieth century liberalism, as an ideology of social control, goes back to the Progressive movement in this counry and Fabianism in Britain. Its primary base of support was the New Class of social engineers, planners, technocrats and "helping professionals" who saw themselves as divinely appointed to manage the lower orders for their own good. Although the term "New Class" was coined by Milovan Djilas to describe the bureaucratic collectivism of communist society, it is well suited for the ruling class under welfare state liberalism. Orwell's description of this class is as good as any. http://ww2.antiwar.com/justin/j102500.html The Hillary Rodham wing of the Democratic Party clearly looks to Tony Blair's Britain as a model of the Third Way socialism she seeks to import into the US: but then this is old-fashioned Fabianism, rather than Leninism, and in any case Hillary and her gang of left-Clintonians are loyal only to themselves. http://www.wsws.org/articles/1999/jul1999/benn-j07.shtml Benn's reference to the Webbs is significant. Sidney and Beatrice Webb were the founders of the Fabian Society, which Benn has been associated with ever since joining the Labour Party in 1942. Emerging in the mid-1880s, Fabianism has largely defined the political physiognomy of the Labour Party. It advocated a type of �evolutionary collectivism� carried out primarily by enlightened sections of the bourgeoisie, in direct opposition to Marxist socialism and the class struggle ideologies that dominated the European workers' movement. Speaking about British Fabianism, Leon Trotsky wrote: �Throughout the whole history of the British Labour movement there has been pressure by the bourgeoisie upon the proletariat through the agency of radicals, intellectuals, drawing-room and church socialists and Owenites who reject the class struggle and advocate the principle of social solidarity, preach collaboration with the bourgeoisie, bridle, enfeeble and politically debase the proletariat.� [ Writings on Britain, Volume 2, New Park, London 1974, p. 48] Please let us stay on topic and be civil. To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs -Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org OM Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om--- End Message ---
