-Caveat Lector-

http://www.sunspot.net/news/opinion/oped/bal-
pe.column02mar02,0,4600392.story?coll=bal%2Doped%2Dheadlines

Negroponte knows a lie when he hears one

By G. Jefferson Price III
Perspective Editor

March 2, 2003

JOHN Dimitri Negroponte, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, has
been appearing a lot these days to accuse Saddam Hussein of hiding the
truth and covering up the threat he poses to the world.

Whenever Negroponte speaks of lies and deceptions, I can't help thinking
there's something wrong with this picture.

Not that Hussein isn't dangerous and lying about what he has and where it
is. I'm sure he's lying and concealing and dangerous.

What's wrong with the picture is Negroponte, who has engaged in
deception and covering up in his time. A veteran of the U.S. Foreign
Service, the British-born Negroponte's career seemed to have gone dry
after three ambassadorships, but was miraculously revived after George W.
Bush became president. Negroponte and a few others from the Reagan
administration's cahoots with bad guys in Central America two decades ago
have been restored to power.

One is Elliott Abrams, now serving on the National Security Council. Abrams
pleaded guilty in 1991 to two misdemeanor charges of withholding
information from Congress about a secret U.S. campaign to support the
Nicaraguan contra rebels at a time that Congress had banned it. Bush's
father pardoned him in 1992.

Another is Otto Reich, also on Bush's National Security Council, who was
tied to the contra rebel scandal while he was in the Reagan
administration.

Negroponte has been compared to Reich and Abrams as a hard-line
ideologue. But he is different from them. They were so provocative that
neither of them could get Senate confirmation, even in a Republican-
controlled Senate, for jobs that require confirmation. Bush tried, but
failed on both of them.

Negroponte was confirmed and sworn in Sept. 18, 2001, as the U.S.
representative to the United Nations a week after the terrorist attacks.
His rescue from the private sector, where he had gone after retiring in
1997, is the reward for loyalty and willingness to follow orders.

And follow them he did when he arrived in Honduras as a new ambassador
from the Reagan administration in 1981.

Honduras was the staging ground for the Reagan administration's war
against communism in the 1980s. When Negroponte arrived, he was handed
a briefing book by the embassy staff telling him that Honduran government
security forces were kidnapping, torturing and killing people to "control a
perceived subversive threat."

Negroponte's predecessor, an appointee of President Jimmy Carter named
Jack Binns, sent complaints to headquarters about human rights abuses by
the government forces.

After Reagan took office, Binns was summoned to Washington and told to
stop reporting these abuses through regular State Department channels.
The Reagan administration needed the Honduran government. The CIA
trained and equipped a security squad that kidnapped, tortured and
executed suspected subversives. All this in the name of bringing freedom
and democracy to Central America. There was no room for talk of how evil
and brutal their methods were.

Sun reporters Ginger Thompson and Gary Cohn spent 14 months in 1994
and 1995 tracking down U.S. and Honduran officials and secret documents,
and talking to Honduran victims and their families, - some of whom, to this
day, are trying to find out what happened to relatives who "disappeared."
Their articles were published in June 1995.

One of Negroponte's tasks, they found, was to make sure that what was
happening in Honduras did not get to Congress. So the Honduras section
of the annual State Department report on human rights was carefully
crafted to make it seem as if people were not being kidnapped, tortured
or killed.

The 1982 report, prepared under Negroponte's authority, quoted the head
of the Honduran armed forces, Gen. Gustavo Alvarez, as denying that
torture was used and noted that Alvarez put out an order forbidding it.
Alvarez, The Sun said, was the founder of a CIA-trained and CIA-equipped
squad that was torturing and killing people. It was impossible that
Negroponte did not know this. Honduran officials, victims of the security
forces and the local press confronted him with the evidence day in and
day out.

In a letter to The Sun, Negroponte denied there had been a coverup or
that the embassy had condoned or concealed human rights violations. The
letter was as carefully crafted as the human rights reports. Perhaps
someone was told what was happening, but no one who cared to do
anything about it.

Rick Chidester, a former embassy staffer who worked on the 1982 human
rights report, told The Sun reporters that his information about abuses
was deleted. Chidester said the report was such a whitewash, that he
joked, "What is this, the human rights report for Norway?"

The evidence is overwhelming that Negroponte knew exactly what was
going on. The record shows that he denied it over and over, and that he
made sure reports to Congress denied what was happening. As Thomas
Enders, then assistant secretary of state for Inter-American Affairs,
confirmed telling Jack Binns, "whereas human rights abuses had been the
single most important focus of the previous administration's policy in Latin
America, the Reagan administration had broader interests."

Now these folks from the Reagan administration are back, with another
place to direct their broader interests.

Negroponte was just doing his job, of course, back in the 1980s. He went
on to become ambassador to Mexico and the Philippines. But this may be
the best job for him. He knows a lie when he hears one.

Copyright © 2003, The Baltimore Sun
Forwarded for your information.  The text and intent of the article
have to stand on their own merits.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do
not believe simply because it has been handed down for many genera-
tions.  Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and
rumoured by many.  Do not believe in anything simply because it is
written in Holy Scriptures.  Do not believe in anything merely on
the authority of teachers, elders or wise men.  Believe only after
careful observation and analysis, when you find that it agrees with
reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it." The Buddha on Belief,
from the Kalama Sutra

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to