-Caveat Lector-

March 5, 2003

U.S. Budget Deficit Rising Fast

By EDMUND L. ANDREWS
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/05/politics/05ECON.html?ex=1047445200
&en=09eba9dcb9b9dab3&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE



ASHINGTON, March 4 — The federal deficit is growing much more quickly
than expected, even before Congress takes up President Bush's tax-cutting
proposals and without factoring in the costs of a war in Iraq, Congressional
analysts have concluded.

Analysts for the Republican-controlled House Budget Committee have
raised their estimates of this year's budget shortfall by about $30 billion,
some 15 percent beyond the forecast that the nonpartisan Congressional
Budget Office issued only five weeks ago.

The budget office itself has reached conclusions similar to the
committee's, House Republicans say, and is expected to reflect them in its
regularly scheduled reassessment of the budget outlook to be issued this
Friday.

The deterioration appears to stem from the continued weakness of the
economy and the stock market, and those problems could remain for a
while: many economists predict anemic growth for at least the first half of
2003.

The new projections mean that the government's 2003 shortfall could soar
to $400 billion if Mr. Bush's tax cuts are approved and if war costs this year
run into the tens of billions of dollars.

They also mean that Mr. Bush will face new pressure either to scale back
his proposals for cutting taxes by $1.5 trillion over 10 years, or to rein in
favored programs like a military buildup, domestic security and prescription
drugs for the elderly.

The White House has already estimated that the budget deficit this year
will hit a record $304 billion, a calculation that includes the effect of the
administration's tax-cutting proposals, though not the costs of a war with
Iraq.

But Congressional analysts say the outlook has grown considerably worse in
the last few months. From October through January, the first four months
of the current fiscal year, tax revenue plunged, and the deficit ballooned
to $94 billion.

By contrast, the government ran a surplus of $8 billion in the
corresponding period last year. That adds up to a $102 billion deterioration
from last year to this, and last year proved to be a bad year in its own
right.

Democrats are accusing Mr. Bush daily of being reckless in pushing tax
cuts so large and in his lack of concern about running deficits for at least
the next decade. But Republican lawmakers contend that the yawning
budget gap reflects the weak economy and so actually increases the
urgency of stimulating that economy with tax cuts.

"The tax code is not performing, and it's making a mess out of the
budget," said Representative Jim Nussle of Iowa, chairman of the House
Budget Committee. "Unless we get the economy growing again, we're going
to keep getting these kinds of corrections."

In testimony today before the House Ways and Means Committee, Treasury
Secretary John W. Snow reiterated the administration's argument that
budget deficits over the next several years posed little danger. The
deficits envisioned by the administration, Mr. Snow said as the committee
opened hearings on the tax-cut proposals, "are really modest and clearly
manageable and will not have any impact on long-term interest rates,
which is the real concern."

But some independent analysts say the administration and Congress alike
may be overly optimistic. Asked about House analysts' increasing their
estimate of this year's deficit by $30 billion, Edward McKelvey, an
economist at Goldman Sachs, said he thought the figure was too small.
Beyond the revenue shortfall from October through January, Mr. McKelvey
said, tax refunds during February ran about 10.9 percent higher than in
February of last year.

Administration officials know they face resistance from Democrats as well
as some moderate Senate Republicans to Mr. Bush's "jobs and growth"
package of tax cuts. The main fight is over the plan's proposal to eliminate
taxes on most stock dividends, a provision that the administration
estimates would cost the Treasury about $385 billion over 10 years.

To shore up wavering Republicans and bring at least a handful of
Democrats to the White House's side, top administration officials are
lobbying lawmakers, organizing business groups to lobby on their behalf
and barnstorming around the country.

The budget issues are already intensifying a behind-the-scenes battle in
Congress about the best way to calculate the cost of tax cuts. Republican
lawmakers want at least some projections based on "dynamic scoring,"
under which tax cuts can be portrayed as partly paying for themselves by
stimulating faster economic growth. Democrats generally oppose that
effort.

In its report this Friday, the Congressional Budget Office is expected to
evaluate the president's tax proposals the traditional way. But in the next
week or so the agency, headed by a new Republican director, Douglas
Holtz-Eakin, will also provide "dynamic" analyses of parts of Mr. Bush's plan.

Mr. Nussle, chairman of the House Budget Committee, voiced some
skepticism on dynamic scoring.

"I'd rather be conservative in my projections," he said, "and be surprised by
the positive rather than by the negative."


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy
Forwarded for your information.  The text and intent of the article
have to stand on their own merits.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do
not believe simply because it has been handed down for many genera-
tions.  Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and
rumoured by many.  Do not believe in anything simply because it is
written in Holy Scriptures.  Do not believe in anything merely on
the authority of teachers, elders or wise men.  Believe only after
careful observation and analysis, when you find that it agrees with
reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it." The Buddha on Belief,
from the Kalama Sutra

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to