-Caveat Lector-

http://home.talkcity.com/AcademyDr/robtlee/
http://home.talkcity.com/AcademyDr/robtlee/biow8.html

Historical Point of Reference

As an historical point of reference, consider the following discussion which
occurred during a Department of Defense appropriation hearing in 1969:






DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 1970



United States Senate Library



HEARINGS before a SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON

APPROPRIATIONS



HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES



Ninety-First Congress



First Session



Subcommittee on Department of Defense



George H. Mahon, Texas, Chairman

Robert L.F. Sikes, Florida, Glenard P. Lipscomb, California

Jamie D. Whitten, Mississippi William E. Minshall, Ohio

George W. Andrews, Alabama, John J. Rhodes, Arizona

Daniel J. Flood, Pennsylvania Glenn R. Davis, Wisconsin

John M. Slack, West Virginia, Joseph P. Addabbo, New York

Frank E. Evans, Colorado



Temporarily assigned H.B. 15090



PART 5



RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION



Department of the Army



Statement of Director, Advanced Research Project Agency

Statement of Director, Defense Research and Engineering

__________












Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations



U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 1969

UNITED STATES SENATE LIBRARY



129



TUESDAY, JULY 1, 1969



SYNTHETIC BIOLOGICAL AGENTS



There are two things about the biological agent field I would like to
mention. One is the possibility of technological surprise. Molecular biology
is a field that is advancing very rapidly and eminent biologists believe
that within a period of 5 to 10 years it would be possible to produce a
synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for
which no natural immunity could have been acquired.



MR. SIKES. Are we doing any work in that field?



DR. MACARTHUR. We are not.



MR. SIKES. Why not? Lack of money or lack of interest?



DR. MACARTHUR. Certainly not lack of interest.



MR. SIKES. Would you provide for our records information on what would be
required, what the advantages of such a program would be. The time and the
cost involved?



DR. MACARTHUR. We will be very happy to. The information follows:



The dramatic progress being made in the field of molecular biology led us to
investigate the relevance of this field of science to biological warfare. A
small group of experts considered this matter and provided the following
observations:



1. All biological agents up to the present time are representatives of
naturally occurring disease, and are thus known by scientists throughout the
world. They are easily available to qualified scientists for research,
either for offensive or defensive purposes.


2. Within the next 5 to 10 years, it would probably be possible to make a
new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects
from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it
might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon when
we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.



3. A research program to explore the feasibility of this could be completed
in approximately 5 years at a total cost of $10 million.



4. It would be very difficult to establish such a program. Molecular biology
is a relatively new science. There are not many highly competent scientists
in the field., almost all are in university laboratories, and they are
generally adequately supported from sources other than DOD. However, it was
considered possible to initiate an adequate program through the National
Academy of sciences - National Research Council (NAS-NRC, and tentative
plans were made to initiate the program. However decreasing funds in CB,
growing criticism of the CB program, and our reluctance to involve the NAS
NRC in such a controversial endeavor have led us to postpone it for the past
2 years.



It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such
research should not be undertaken lest it lead to yet another method of
massive killing of large populations. On the other hand, without the sure
scientific knowledge that such a weapon is possible, and an understanding of
the ways it could be done. there is little that can be done to devise
defensive measures. Should an enemy develop it there is little doubt that
this is an important area of potential military technological inferiority in
which there is no adequate research program." [152]



This is the transcript of that hearing verbatim. Discussed was possibility
of creating agents refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes
upon when we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious
disease, i.e., an immunodeficiency-causing agent

http://home.talkcity.com/AcademyDr/robtlee/biow8.html

--
Forwarded for info and discussion from the New Paradigms
Discussion List, not necessarily endorsed by:
***********************************
Lloyd Miller, Research Director for A-albionic Research (POB 20273,
Ferndale, MI 48220), a ruling class/conspiracy research resource for the
entire political-ideological spectrum.  Quarterly journal, book sales,
rare/out-of-print searches, New Paradigms Discussion List, Weekly Up-date
Lists & E-text Archive of research, intelligence, catalogs, & resources.
      To Discuss Ideas:
       mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]      http://msen.com/~lloyd/
      For Ordering Info & Free Catalog:
       mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]    http://a-albionic.com/
      For Discussion List:
       mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
       text:  subscribe prj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   **FREE RARE BOOK SEARCH: <http://a-albionic.com/search.html> **
   Explore Our Archive:  <http://a-albionic.com/a-albionic.html>
Please Patronize PRJ's Advertisers: http://home.msen.com/~daugh/store.htm
Many Pay Even If You Just Look and Don't Buy!  Video Finder, Free catalogs,
Health Products, Sweepstakes, Etc.
***********************************

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to