-Caveat Lector-

  Print this article |   Close this window
Pyongyang: We'll put a torch to New York
By Shane Green, Herald Correspondent in Tokyo
March 8 2003

North Korea would launch a ballistic missile attack on the United States if
Washington made a pre-emptive strike against the communist state's
nuclear facility, the man described as Pyongyang's "unofficial spokesman"
claimed yesterday.

Kim Myong-chol, who has links to the Stalinist regime, told reporters in
Tokyo that a US strike on the nuclear facility at Yongbyon "means nuclear
war".

"If American forces carry out a pre-emptive strike on the Yongbyon facility,
North Korea will immediately target, carry the war to the US mainland," he
said, adding that New York, Washington and Chicago would be "aflame".

A pre-emptive strike on Yongbyon is one of the strategic options in the
crisis over North Korea's nuclear arms program. The US has deployed 24
long-range bombers to the Pacific base of Guam capable of launching such
a strike.

Mr Kim, who has written a text studied by North Korean military leaders,
predicted North Korea would restart its reprocessing plant to make
weapons-grade plutonium this month.

A nuclear weapon would be produced by the end of next month, with
another five by the end of the year,
he said. This was on top of a suspected nuclear arsenal of 100 weapons.

The ultimate aim of North Korea's leader, Kim Jong-il, was the
"neutralisation of the American factor" in the region, Mr Kim said.

This would be achieved by striking a non-aggression pact with the US or
becoming an "official" nuclear power, thereby making the US nuclear
umbrella in the region irrelevant. "Both ways, Kim Jong-il is a winner," Mr
Kim said.

"By the end of the year, I predict Bush will be in Pyongyang suing for
peace," Mr Kim said. While his comments are extreme, they match the
heated and belligerent rhetoric of North Korea, which has previously
warned of nuclear war and turning the cities of its enemies into a "sea of
ashes".

The Bush Administration yesterday made renewed calls on China and other
countries in the region to help broker a solution to the crisis. In his live
televised press conference, Mr Bush said North Korea's nuclear program
was a regional issue.

"I say 'regional' because there's a lot of countries that have got a direct
stake into whether or not North Korea has nuclear weapons," Mr Bush
said. "We've got a stake as to whether North Korea has nuclear weapons.
China clearly has a stake as to whether or not North Korea has a nuclear
weapon."

The Bush Administration is pushing for multilateral talks with North Korea
but the communist state wants direct talks with Washington.

In the meantime, diplomatic activity is continuing behind the scenes. "We
have a number of diplomatic initiatives under way - some of them very, very
quietly under way - to see if we cannot get a multilateral dialogue
started," the US Secretary of State, Colin Powell, told a US Senate
Committee.

Yesterday the US also flagged the possible withdrawal of its 37,000 troops
from South Korea, part of the rethink of a deployment in place since the
end of the Korean War in 1953.

The US Defence Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, said the US was consulting
with South Korea and he suspected "we'll end up making some adjustments
there".

"Whether the forces come home or whether they will move further south
of the [Korean] peninsula or whether to some neighbouring area are the
kinds of things that are being sorted out," he said at a "town hall" meeting
in Germany.

This story was found at:
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/03/07/1046826533281.html
Forwarded for your information.  The text and intent of the article
have to stand on their own merits.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do
not believe simply because it has been handed down for many genera-
tions.  Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and
rumoured by many.  Do not believe in anything simply because it is
written in Holy Scriptures.  Do not believe in anything merely on
the authority of teachers, elders or wise men.  Believe only after
careful observation and analysis, when you find that it agrees with
reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it." The Buddha on Belief,
from the Kalama Sutra

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to