-Caveat Lector-

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A12774-2003Mar11.html
washingtonpost.com

Rumsfeld Backtracks on British War Role in Iraq

Reuters Tuesday, March 11, 2003; 9:47 PM

By Charles Aldinger

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld on Tuesday
left open the


possibility the United States might invade Iraq without the help of British
forces, then quickly backtracked to quell the firestorm his remarks
touched off.

Pressed by reporters at a news briefing on whether Washington might go
ahead without British military help because of rising political pressure on
Prime Minister Tony Blair, Rumsfeld said it would be a decision for
President Bush to make.

"I think until we know what the (U.N.) resolution is, we won't know the
answer as to what their role will be," Rumsfeld said.

"And to the extent they are able to participate -- in the event that the
president decides to use force -- that would obviously be welcomed. To
the extent they're not, there are work-arounds and they would not be
involved, at least in that phase..."

"That is an issue that the president will be addressing in the days ahead,
one would assume," he said in comments that one U.S. defense official said
later caused "a firestorm" of reaction from British officials.

And, four hours later, Rumsfeld issued a terse two-paragraph written
statement expressing confidence that the forces of America's most
prominent ally would be side-by- side with U.S. troops should an attack
take place.

"In the event that a decision to use force is made, we have every reason
to believe there will be a significant military contribution from the United
Kingdom," he said.

'NO DOUBT OF FULL SUPPORT'

"I have no doubt of the full support of the United Kingdom for the
international community's efforts to disarm Iraq. In my press briefing today,
I was simply pointing out that obtaining a second United Nations Security
Council Resolution is important to the United Kingdom and that we are
working to achieve it."

In London, a spokeswoman for British Prime Minister Tony Blair's office
shrugged off the original remarks and said there had been several phone
calls with Rumsfeld's staff, but could not say when.

"Nothing has changed. We are working to get a second resolution. We are
not yet at the stage of military action. Throughout there has been
complete cooperation between the UK and the U.S. on military planning,"
she told Reuters.

The United States and Britain have more than 250,000 troops gathered in
the Gulf region around Iraq, but British Prime Minister Tony Blair has come
under mounting anti-war pressure at home.

A U.S decision to go it alone would be slap in the face for the beleaguered
Blair who has gone out on a limb and sparked a revolt in his own Labour
Party to support Bush in his hawkish stance on Iraq.

Rumsfeld was asked at the Pentagon briefing by reporters whether the
United States, with about 225,000 of its troops already in the Gulf region
and thousands more on the way, might go ahead without Britain or
whether Britain might scale back its participation.

"This is a matter that most of the senior officials in the government discuss
with the UK on a daily or every other day basis," said the secretary, adding
that he had spoken with British Defense Minister Geoff Hoon by telephone
"about an hour ago."

WILLINGNESS TO COMPROMISE?

Britain has recently appeared to show more willingness at the United
Nations to compromise on a controversial new resolution which might
authorize war against Baghdad.

Rumsfeld seemed to suggest that it stemmed from political pressure. "Their
situation is distinctive to their country and they have a government that
deals with a parliament in their way, distinctive way," he told reporters.

"And what will ultimately be decided is unclear as to their role, that is to
say their role in the event a decision is made to use force. There is the
second issue of their role in a post- Saddam Hussein reconstruction
process, or stabilization process, which would be a different matter."

Britain has committed about 42,000 military personnel, including ground
troops, to the potential war effort but only about 25,000 are in the Gulf
region so far,

© 2003 Reuters
Forwarded for your information.  The text and intent of the article
have to stand on their own merits.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do
not believe simply because it has been handed down for many genera-
tions.  Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and
rumoured by many.  Do not believe in anything simply because it is
written in Holy Scriptures.  Do not believe in anything merely on
the authority of teachers, elders or wise men.  Believe only after
careful observation and analysis, when you find that it agrees with
reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it." The Buddha on Belief,
from the Kalama Sutra

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to