-Caveat Lector-

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/2747153.stm
Tuesday, 11 February, 2003, 12:49 GMT
Economists attack Bush's 'madness'


Joseph Stiglitz: Bush package simply won't work

More than 400 economists, led by 10 Nobel prize

winners, have criticised President George W Bush's economic policy in the
US press.

In a full-page advertisement in the New York Times newspaper, the
economists said that proposed tax cuts would not help the economy in
the short term.

 When you are designing a tax programme, you look for the biggest bang
for the buck


Joseph Stiglitz
They also said the

planned cuts would benefit rich people the most.

Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz told the BBC's World Business Report that Mr
Bush's plans were "fiscal madness, fiscal irresponsibility".

President George W Bush could spend less than a sixth of what he is
planning to on stimulating the economy, Mr Stiglitz said.

"When you are designing a tax programme, you look for the biggest bang
for the buck," he said.

"So rather than spending $600bn on the tax proposal that Bush has, the
kind of proposals I'm talking about would cost under $100bn and deliver
enormous amounts, directly and in the short run, without delivering huge
long-run deficits."

Trouble

Mr Stiglitz is a well-known thorn in the side of more conservative
economists.

Formerly a senior figure in both the World Bank and the International
Monetary Fund, he stepped down in order to criticise both agencies, and
the US too, for their policies towards the developing world.

He is also a staunch critic of the current White House - and a signatory of
Tuesday's advert in the New York Times.

The campaign is backed by the Economic Policy Institute, a liberal
Washington DC think tank.

Retrograde step

Mr Stiglitz was at pains to stress that far from improving the situation, the
package Mr Bush is pushing would make things worse by stocking up
massive deficits for the future.

The tax cuts would mostly benefit taxpayers who are already wealthy, and
are therefore the most unlikely immediately to spend their windfall -
which, he said, is what the economy needs.

More than half Mr Bush's planned spending is devoted to removing tax on
share dividends, but most taxpayers are already exempt through holdings
in pension funds and similar vehicles, he said.

"You should get money out to people who will spend it and spend it
quickly," he said.

"So that means getting money to the unemployed, who have had their
consumption cut back, so that would make a big difference."

A proper stimulus package would also give money to the individual states,
almost all of whom are experiencing a revenue crunch as the tax take falls
and so - under balanced budget rules - must slash spending.






 WATCH/LISTEN






 ON THIS STORY








Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz
"There's a growing consensus in America today that Bush's economic
programme is just misguided"










See also:



07 Feb 03 | Business
Nobel winners attack Bush
economics

04 Feb 03 | Americas
Bush plans huge military
spend

18 Feb 03 | Business
US economy hits the brakes

07 Jan 03 | Business
Bush unveils tax-cutting

package

14 Aug 02 | Hardtalk
IMF critic hits out

11 Oct 01 | Business
Nobel prize winner criticises

Bush

10 Oct 01 | Business
IMF critic wins Nobel
economics prize

Internet links:



Economic Policy Institute


The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

Top Business stories now:



Hacker breaches credit card
security

Job losses escalate at
Reuters

New SEC chief pledges
tough line

Oil prices push higher

Rwanda denies DRC

plundering

Overseas sales drive Wal-
Mart

Congo's finance minister
resigns

Blair keeps euro options
open


Links to more Business
stories are at the foot of the page.






 E-mail this story to a friend
Forwarded for your information.  The text and intent of the article
have to stand on their own merits.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do
not believe simply because it has been handed down for many genera-
tions.  Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and
rumoured by many.  Do not believe in anything simply because it is
written in Holy Scriptures.  Do not believe in anything merely on
the authority of teachers, elders or wise men.  Believe only after
careful observation and analysis, when you find that it agrees with
reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it." The Buddha on Belief,
from the Kalama Sutra

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to