-Caveat Lector-

------- Forwarded message follows -------
To:                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:                   Christopher Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:                SNET: THE BIG LIE: So Big, So Bold, So Often Told, Masses 
Believe it!
Date sent:              Sat, 22 Mar 2003 18:42:37 -0700
Send reply to:          [EMAIL PROTECTED]



                          "There's a sucker born every minute"
                                     - P.T, Barnum

            THE BIG LIE: So Big, So Bold, So Often Told, Masses Believe it!

                                       WSWS.org

                           The twenty lies of George W. Bush
                                   By Patrick Martin
                                     20 March 2003

 Monday night's 15-minute speech by President Bush, setting a 48-hour deadline for war
 against Iraq, went beyond the usual distortions, half-truths, and appeals to fear and
     backwardness to include a remarkable number of barefaced, easily refuted lies.

      The enormous scale of the lying suggests two political conclusions: the Bush
administration is going to war against Iraq with utter contempt for democracy and 
public
  opinion, and its war propaganda counts heavily on the support of the American media,
 which not only fails to challenge the lies, but repeats and reinforces them endlessly.

Without attempting to be exhaustive, it is worthwhile listing some of the most 
important
    lies and contrasting Bush's assertions with the public record. All of the false
   statements listed below are directly quoted from the verbatim transcript of Bush's
                           remarks published on the Internet.

   Lie No. 1: "My fellow citizens, events in Iraq have now reached the final days of
                                       decision."

The decision for war with Iraq was made long ago, the intervening time having been 
spent
in an attempt to create the political climate in which US troops could be deployed for 
an
attack. According to press reports, most recently March 16 in the Baltimore Sun, at one
  of the first National Security Council meetings of his presidency, months before the
      terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, Bush expressed his
determination to overthrow Saddam Hussein and his willingness to commit US ground 
troops
to an attack on Iraq for that purpose. All that was required was the appropriate 
pretext -
                             supplied by September 11, 2001.

  Lie No. 2: "For more than a decade, the United States and other nations have pursued
         patient and honorable efforts to disarm the Iraqi regime without war."

The US-led United Nations regime of sanctions against Iraq, combined with "no-fly" 
zones
    and provocative weapons inspections, is one of brutal oppression. The deliberate
withholding of food, medical supplies and other vital necessities is responsible for 
the
death of more than a million Iraqis, half of them children. Two UN officials who headed
the oil-for-food program resigned in protest over the conditions created in Iraq by the
sanctions. The CIA used the inspectors as a front, infiltrating agents into UNSCOM, the
original inspections program. The CIA's aim was to spy on Iraq's top officials and 
target
                           Saddam Hussein for assassination.

Lie No. 3: "The Iraqi regime has used diplomacy as a ploy to gain time and advantage. 
It
    has uniformly defied Security Council resolutions demanding full disarmament..."

Iraq has never "defied" a Security Council resolution since the end of the Persian Gulf
  War in 1991. It has generally cooperated with the dictates of the UN body, although
 frequently under protest or with reservations, because many of the resolutions involve
 gross violations of Iraqi sovereignty. From 1991 to 1998, UN inspectors supervised the
destruction of the vast bulk of the chemical and biological weapons, as well as 
delivery
systems, which Iraq accumulated (with the assistance of the US) during the Iran-Iraq 
war,
        and they also destroyed all of Iraq's facilities for making new weapons.

  Lie No. 4: "Peaceful efforts to disarm the Iraqi regime have failed again and again
                     because we are not dealing with peaceful men."

  According to the Washington Post of March 16, referring to the 1991- 1998 inspection
   period: "[U]nder UN supervision, Iraq destroyed 817 of 819 proscribed medium-range
missiles, 14 launchers, 9 trailers and 56 fixed missile-launch sites. It also destroyed
73 of 75 chemical or biological warheads and 163 warheads for conventional explosives. 
UN
inspectors also supervised destruction of 88,000 filled and unfilled chemical 
munitions,
    more than 600 tons of weaponized and bulk chemical weapons agents, 4,000 tons of
  precursor chemicals and 980 pieces of equipment considered key to production of such
                                       weapons."

  Lie No. 5: "The Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal
                                 weapons ever devised."

 The Washington Post article cited above noted that CIA officials were concerned "about
 whether administration officials have exaggerated intelligence in a desire to convince
   the American public and foreign governments that Iraq is violating United Nations
  prohibitions against chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons and long-range missile
  systems." The article quoted "a senior intelligence analyst" who said the inspectors
    could not locate weapons caches "because there may not be much of a stockpile."

Former British Foreign Minister Robin Cook, who resigned from the Blair government 
Monday
  in protest over the decision to go to war without UN authorization, declared, "Iraq
  probably has no weapons of mass destruction in the commonly understood sense of the
term." Even if Iraq is concealing some remnants of its 1980s arsenal, these would 
hardly
 deserve Bush's lurid description, since they are primitive and relatively ineffective.
 "Some of the most lethal weapons ever devised" are those being unleashed by the United
  States on Iraq: cruise missiles, smart bombs, fuel-air explosives, the 10,000- pound
 "daisy-cutter" bomb, the 20,000-pound MOAB just tested in Florida. In addition, the US
             has explicitly refused to rule out the use of nuclear weapons.

Lie No. 6: "[Iraq] has aided, trained and harbored terrorists, including operatives of 
Al
                                        Qaeda."

  No one, not even US government, seriously believes there is a significant connection
between the Islamic fundamentalists and the secular nationalist Ba'athist regime in 
Iraq,
which have been mortal enemies for decades. The continued assertion of an Al Qaeda-Iraq
  alliance is a desperate attempt to link Saddam Hussein to the September 11 attacks.

  It also serves to cover up the responsibility of American imperialism for sponsoring
  Islamic fundamentalist terrorism. The forces that now comprise Al Qaeda were largely
 recruited, trained, armed and set in motion by the CIA itself, as part of a long-term
 policy of using Islamic fundamentalists as a weapon against left-wing movements in the
Muslim countries. This policy was pursued from the 1950s and was escalated prior to and
  during the Soviet intervention in Afghanistan, which ended in 1989. Osama bin Laden
 himself was part of the CIA- backed mujaheddin forces in Afghanistan before he turned
                            against Washington in the 1990s.

Lie No. 7: "America tried to work with the United Nations to address this threat 
because
                      we wanted to resolve the issue peacefully."

  The Bush administration went to the United Nations because it wanted UN sanction for
military action and it wanted UN member states to cough up funds for postwar 
operations,
  along the lines of its financial shakedown operation for the 1991 Persian Gulf War.
  Bush's most hawkish advisors, such as Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and Vice
President Cheney, initially opposed going to the UN because they did not want diplomacy
 to slow down the drive to war. They only agreed after Secretary of State Colin Powell
argued that the pace of the US military buildup in the Persian Gulf gave enough time to
                          get the UN to rubber-stamp the war.

Lie No. 8: "These governments [the Security Council majority] share our assessment of 
the
                        danger, but not our resolve to meet it."

This is belied by virtually every statement on Iraq issued by the governments of 
France,
   Russia, China, Germany and other countries opposed to military action, which have
repeatedly declared that they see no imminent threat from Iraq. Bush brands his 
opponents
 on the Security Council as cowards, as though they were afraid to take action against
  Saddam Hussein. These countries were, in fact, increasingly alarmed - by the United
    States, not Iraq. Insofar as they summoned up resolve, to the shock of the Bush
administration, it was to deny UN support for the war that Washington had already 
decided
                                        to wage.

Lie No. 9: "Many nations, however, do have the resolve and fortitude to act against 
this
 threat to peace, and a broad coalition is now gathering to enforce the just demands of
                                      the world."

  Only three nations are contributing military forces to the war: 250,000 from the US,
40,000 from Britain, and 2,000 from Australia. The other members of the "broad 
coalition"
    are those which have been bribed or browbeaten to allow the US to fly over their
  countries to bomb Iraq, to station troops, ships or warplanes on their territory, or
provide technical assistance or other material aid to the war. None will do any 
fighting.
          All are acting against the expressed desire of their own population.

        Lie No. 10: "The United Nations Security Council has not lived up to its
                      responsibilities, so we will rise to ours."

  Bush defines the UN body's responsibility as serving as a rubber stamp for whatever
action the United States government demands. In relation to the UN, however, the United
States does have definite responsibilities, including refraining from waging war 
without
  Security Council authorization, except in the case of immediate self- defense. Under
Article 42 of the UN Charter, it is for the Security Council, not the US or Britain, to
decide how Security Council resolutions such as 1441 are to be enforced. The US 
decision
to "enforce" its interpretation of 1441 regardless of the will of the Security Council 
is
                           a violation of international law.

   Lie No. 11: "If we must begin a military campaign, it will be directed against the
                lawless men who rule your country and not against you."

The widely reported US military strategy is to conduct an aerial bombardment of Iraq so
  devastating that it will "shock and awe" the Iraqi people and compel the Iraqi armed
forces to surrender en masse. According to one press preview, US and British forces 
"plan
to launch the deadliest first night of air strikes on a single country in the history 
of
  air power. Hundreds of targets in every region of Iraq will be hit simultaneously."
  Estimates of likely Iraqi civilian casualties from the immediate impact of bombs and
 missiles range from thousands to hundreds of thousands, and even higher when the long-
                               term effects are included.

 Lie No. 12: "As our coalition takes their power, we will deliver the food and medicine
                                       you need."

This is particularly cynical, since the immediate consequence of Bush's 48-hour 
ultimatum
 was the withdrawal of all UN humanitarian aid workers and the shutdown of the oil-for-
 food program, which underwrites the feeding of 60 percent of Iraq's population. As for
medicine, the US has systematically deprived the Iraqi people of needed medicine for 
the
past 12 years, insisting that even the most basic medical supplies, like antibiotics 
and
 syringes, be banned as "dual-use" items that could be used in a program of biological
                                        warfare.

 Lie No. 13: "We will tear down the apparatus of terror and we will help you to build a
                         new Iraq that is prosperous and free."

    The goal of the Bush administration is to install a US puppet regime in Baghdad,
initially taking the form of an American military dictatorship. It is no exaggeration 
to
say that the US government has been the leading promoter of dictatorships around from 
the
 world, from Pinochet of Chile to Suharto of Indonesia to Saddam Hussein himself, who,
  according to one recent report, got his political start as an anti-communist hit-man
 working in a CIA-backed plot to assassinate Iraq's left-nationalist President Qasem in
                                         1959.

A classified State Department report described by the Los Angeles Times of March 14 not
only concluded that a democratic Iraq was unlikely to arise from the devastation of 
war,
it suggested that this was not even desirable from the standpoint of American 
interests,
because "anti-American sentiment is so pervasive that elections in the short term could
   lead to the rise of Islamic-controlled governments hostile to the United States."

 Lie No. 14: "Should Saddam Hussein choose confrontation, the American people can know
that every measure has been taken to avoid war and every measure will be taken to win 
it."

This combines a lie and a brutal truth. The Bush administration has taken every 
possible
measure to insure that war takes place, viewing the resumption of UN weapons 
inspections
with barely disguised hostility and directing its venom against those countries that 
have
 suggested a diplomatic settlement with Iraq is achievable. In prosecuting the war, the
Bush administration is indeed prepared to use "every measure," up to an including 
nuclear
                              weapons, in order to win it.

         Lie No. 15: "War has no certainty except the certainty of sacrifice."

  There will be colossal sacrifices for the Iraqi people, and sacrifices in blood and
 economic well-being for the American people as well. But for Bush's real constituency,
the wealthiest layer at the top of American society, there will be no sacrifices at 
all.
Instead, the administration is seeking a tax cut package of over $700 billion, 
including
 the abolition of taxation on corporate dividends. Major US corporations are in line to
      reap hundreds of millions of dollars in profits from the rebuilding of Iraqi
 infrastructure shattered by the coming US assault. These include the oil construction
     firm Halliburton, which Vice President Cheney headed prior to joining the Bush
         administration, and which continues to include Cheney on its payroll.

Lie No. 16: "[T]he only way to reduce the harm and duration of war is to apply the full
            force and might of our military, and we are prepared to do so."

Every aggressor claims to deplore the suffering of war and seeks to blame the victim 
for
    resisting, and thus prolonging the agony. Bush is no different. His hypocritical
  statements of "concern" for the Iraqi people cannot disguise the fact that, as many
administration apologists freely admit, this is "a war of choice" - deliberately sought
        by the US government to pursue its strategic agenda in the Middle East.

Lie No. 17: "The terrorist threat to America and the world will be diminished the 
moment
                           that Saddam Hussein is disarmed."

No one, even in the American military-intelligence complex, seriously believes this. US
 counter-terrorism officials have repeatedly said that a US conquest and occupation of
 Iraq, by killing untold thousands of Arabs and Muslims and inflaming public opinion in
            the Arab world and beyond, will spark more terrorism, not less.

Lie No. 18: "We are now acting because the risks of inaction would be far greater. In 
one
  year, or five years, the power of Iraq to inflict harm on all free nations would be
                              multiplied many times over."

This is belied by the record of the past twelve years, which has seen a steady decline 
in
 Iraqi military power. Saddam Hussein has never been a threat to any "free nation," if
that term has any meaning, only to the reactionary oil sheikdoms of the Persian Gulf 
and
        to neighboring Iran, all ruled by regimes that are as repressive as his.

Lie No. 19: "As we enforce the just demands of the world, we will also honor the 
deepest
                              commitments of our country."

The demands of the world were expressed by the millions who marched in cities 
throughout
  the world on February 15 and March 15 to oppose a unilateral US attack on Iraq. Bush
 seeks to have it both ways - claiming to enforce previous Security Council resolutions
against Iraq ("the just demands of the world"), while flagrantly defying the will of 
the
majority of the Security Council, the majority of the world's governments, and the vast
                            majority of the world's people.

Lie No. 20: "Unlike Saddam Hussein, we believe the Iraqi people are deserving and 
capable
of human liberty... The United States with other countries will work to advance liberty
                               and peace in that region."

  For "the Iraqi people,"substitute "the Egyptian people," "the people of the Arabian
  peninsula," "the Pakistani people" or those of other US-backed dictatorships, not to
mention the Palestinians who live under a brutal Israeli occupation that is supported 
by
Washington. Does the US government believe that any of them are "deserving and capable 
of
human liberty?" When the parliament of Turkey, under the pressure of popular 
opposition,
voted to bar the US from using Turkish territory to invade Iraq, the Bush 
administration
   appealed to the Turkish military to pressure the government into overturning this
                                  democratic decision.

                                           ###

                        ------- End of forwarded message -------
                                         ------
            "But for added amusement, George W. Bush and his friends used to
         tuck firecrackers into the mouths of frogs, throw them in the air, and
         watch them explode." [Linda McQuaig, "Don't let Bush light Iraq fire"
          (12-15-2002) - The Toronto Star - a story told by a childhood friend
              described in a New York Times profile for the 2000 election
                                      campaign.]
                 http://www.all-creatures.org/aip/nl-3nov2000-frogs.html

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to