OCCUPIED AMERICA - Part I - SAYANIM!
I dimly recall quite a fuss back in 1959 (I was quite
young then) about Jack Kennedy and the question of
"dual loyalty". The media declared loudly and
publicly that many people questioned whether Kennedy owed
his first allegiance to the United States, or to the
Vatican.
Even at the tender age of 12, this descendant of
Cromwell's round- heads thought concern about loyalty to
the Pope a bit overblown.
The Pope seemed a "lord spiritual" in every
respect, lacking any of the normal appurtenances of a
"lord temporal", such as a standing army. Indeed,
if one listened to the Pope or any of his Bishops, it was
awfully hard to discern any worldly objective which a
president of that faith might entertain that conflict
with the worldly interests of the United States.
After all, the Vatican did not receive $5 billions per
year in aid from the U.S. Treasury.
Indeed, it was hard to understand why a Catholic should
be treated differently from a Methodist or Presbyterian.
Kennedy's religion (or lack thereof) seemed far more
relevant to the question of his character and the kinds
of moral values that might weigh in his decisions. The
temporal interests of Rome seemed a bit distant.
Further, conspiracies cannot be concealed for long, and
there was no hard evidence of any such thing by the
Catholic Church.
Not so with the Jews!
There clearly is at least one international conspiracy,
and it is run directly by the State of Israel.
Here is a short quote from the book "By Way of
Deception" by Victor Ostrovsky (St. Martin's, 1990),
formerly a Colonel in the Israeli intelligence service
"Mossad."
Beginning on page 86:
"The next day Ran S. delivered a lecture on the
sayanim, a unique and important part of the Mossad's
operation. Sayanim - assistants - must be 100 percent
Jewish. They live abroad, and though they are not lsraeli
citizens, many are reached through their relatives in
Israel. An Israeli with a relative in England, for
example, might be asked to write a letter saying the
person bearing the letter represents an organization
whose main goal is to help save Jewish people in the
diaspora. Could the British relative help in any way?
"There are thousands of sayanim around the world. In
London alone, there are about 2,000 who are active, and
another 5,000 on the list. They fulfill many different
roles. A car sayan, for example, running a rental agency,
could help the Mossad rent a car without having to
complete the usual documentation. An apartment sayan
would find accommodation without raising suspicions, a
bank sayan could get you money if you needed it in the
middle of the night, a doctor sayan would treat a bullet
wound without reporting it to the police, and so on. The
idea is to have a pool of people available when needed
who can provide services but will keep quiet about them
out of loyalty to the cause. They are paid only
costs."
Continuing on page 87
"Suppose during an operation a katsa suddenly had to
come up with an electronics store as a cover. A call to a
sayan in that business could bring 50 television sets,
200 VCRs - whatever was needed - from his warehouse to
your building, and in next to no time, you'd have a store
with $3 or $4 million worth of stock in it."
"Since most Mossad activity is in Europe, it may be
preferable to have a business address in North America.
So, there are address sayanim and telephone sayanim. If a
katsa has to give out an address or a phone number, he
can use the sayan's. And if the sayan gets a letter or a
phone call, he will know immediately how to proceed. Some
business sayanim have a bank of 20 operators answering
phones, typing letters, faxing messages, all a front for
the Mossad."
And on page 88:
"Katsas in the stations are in charge of the sayanim,
and most active sayanim will be visited by a katsa once
every three months or so, which for the katsa usually
means between two and four face-to-face meetings a day
with sayanim, along with numerous telephone
conversations. The system allows the Mossad to work with
a skeleton staff. That's why, for example, a KGB station
would employ about 100 people, while a comparable Mossad
station would need only six or seven."
On page 221, Ostrovsky gives an example of what a Sayan
can be expected to do for Israel's Mossad:
"The Mossad already had considerable information
about the Exocet, thanks in part to a sayan who worked at
Aerospatiale and had passed along details. They had also
conducted a small operation, sending a team to break into
the plant accompanied by a missile expert flown in from
Israel for the occasion. He was taken into the plant
"with handles," and materials brought to him for
his expert opinion. His task was to determine what they
should photograph. The team spent four and a half hours
inside the plant before leaving without a trace."
It is a crime, a felony, for a civilian to participate in
spying operations in this manner.
Israel's Mossad is exposing tens of thousands of Jews
around the world to considerable legal risk, and the
sayanim, being sophisticated business people, surely know
this. If that is so, then why does this system work? Why
is the risk acceptable?
Here is Ostrovsky's answer from Page 87:
"One thing you know for sure is that even if a Jewish
person knows it is the Mossad, he might not agree to work
with you-but he won't turn you in. You have at your
disposal a non-risk recruitment system that actually
gives you a pool of millions of Jewish people to tap from
outside your own borders. It's much easier to operate
with what is available on the spot, and sayanim offer
incredible practical support everywhere."
Now one might suggest that, for example, Great Britain
could use a similar system and recruit among WASPS around
the world. But they don't, because they can't. It takes
an extraordinary degree of racial solidarity and racial
motivation for such a "non-risk recruitment
system" to work properly. Remember, all of these
activities are spying, with long prison terms if caught.
Americans of English, Irish and Italian ancestry may have
some residual loyalties to the old "mother
country." But this residue is nothing like the racial
solidarity of the Jews. Such racial feelings are so
strong and so pervasive among Jews that the Mossad knew
in advance that their recruitment system was
"non-risk." Britain, Ireland, Italy and the
Vatican know better than to try.
While it may be true that Americans of English, Irish and
Italian ancestry have dual loyalties, these white gentile
dual loyalties are nothing like the degree of race-based
loyalty possessed by the overwhelming majority of Jews.
You have it on the authority of Mossad!
Ostrovsky explains, beginning at the bottom of page 122:
"We took the Brits seriously, but everyone in the
building used to say they were probably deluded because
of "the Bitch." That's what they always called
Margaret Thatcher inside the Mossad. They had her tagged
as an anti-Semite. There was one simple question asked
when anything happened: "Is it good for the Jews or
not?" Forget about policies, or anything else. That
was the only thing that counted, and depending on the
answer, people were called anti-Semites, whether
deservedly or not."
The problem is that Jews _do not_ have dual loyalties!
90% of Jews have a single loyalty. The loyalty is not
necessarily to Israel, but to the welfare and power of
Jews generally. That is the only thing that matters. The
only question that ever gets asked is; "How will this
affect Jews?" No other interests are taken into
account at all!
Indeed a corollary of "dual loyalty" is the
goyish notion that if you sacrifice to help others, they
will reciprocate. If someone helps Jews, there should be
a reward.
European gentiles assume that comity and reciprocity are
inherent in the psychological makeup of all humanity. Not
so, according to Ostrovsky (page 231):
"The relationship between the Mossad and Danish
intelligence is so intimate as to be indecent. But it's
not the Mossad's virtue that is compromised by the
arrangement; it's Denmark's. And that's because the
Danish are under the mistaken impression that because
they saved a lot of Jews in World War II, the Israelis
are grateful and they can trust the Mossad."
No matter what you do for Jews and no matter how
assiduously you toady to their interests, they will never
respect yours.
That explains why destructive welfare state policies
thrive despite 40 years of soaring black illegitimacy
rates and the deepening destruction of the black family
and community in America. Does the policy harm blacks! Of
course! But that is irrelevant. Welfare dependence has
created a block that votes 90% for candidates
friendly to the welfare state and to Israel. Would blacks
be better off as tradesmen and entrepreneurs with stable
families? Of course, but then there would be no easy way
to control their votes. The hopeless dependency of most
blacks increases the political power of Jews. That is why
the policy continues.
There is no comity, reciprocity or sense of obligation
(dual loyalty) that causes Jews to moderate their attack
on America's blacks. Now you might ask why Clinton, the
"best friend Israel has ever had at the White
House", would sign welfare reform. The answer is the
same. The white illegitimacy rate has reached 25%.
Millions of white girls in suburban and rural areas are
going on AFDC while their skin-head boyfriends camp with
them at night. There is no way our masters are going to
use the tax dollars at their disposal to finance the
creation of Dr. Pierce's 10 million man army 20 years
from now!
It is one thing to fool 40% of Euro-Americans who
have jobs and pay taxes into believing they can get
something out of the system. It is quite another to
subsidize the creation of a dangerous subculture with
real dollars. Jews just don't make those kinds of
mistakes. Ways can be found within the bureaucracy to
continue welfare to blacks. Hence Hillary Clinton's
campaign to "fix" welfare reform.
A classic illustration of this phenomenon comes from a
book entitled "Special Tasks" (Little-Brown,
1994, 1995) written by Pavel Sudoplatov and his son
Anatoly.
Lieutenant General Pavel Sudoplatov was Joseph Stalin's
NKVD director in charge of stealing atomic secrets. He
reported directly to Beria.
>From page 172:
"The most vital information for developing the first
Soviet atomic bomb came from scientists engaged in the
Manhattan Project to build the American Atomic Bomb -
Robert Oppenheimer, Enrico Fermi, and Leo Szilard."
Robert Oppenheimer was the director in charge of the
Manhattan project.
>From page 186-87:
"When it became clear that the atomic project was a
heavily guarded, top-secret American priority, Eitingon
and I suggested that we use our networks of illegals as
couriers for our sources of information. Vassili Zarubin,
our Washington rezident, instructed Kheifetz to divorce
all intelligence operations from the American Communist
party, which we knew would be closely watched by the FBI,
and to have Oppenheimer sever all contacts with
Communists and left-wingers."
On page 188:
"In 1943, a world-famous actor of the Moscow Yiddish
State Art Theatre, Solomon Mikhoels, together with well
-known yiddish poet Itzik Feffer, toured the United
States on behalf of the Jewish Antifascist Committee.
Before their departure, Beria instructed Mikhoels and
Feffer to emphasize the great Jewish contribution to
science and culture in the Soviet Union. Their assignment
was to raise money and convince American public opinion
that Soviet anti-semitism had been crushed as a result of
Stalin's policies. Kheifetz made sure that the message
they brought was conveyed to Oppenheimer. Kheifetz said
that Oppenheimer, the son of a German-Jewish immigrant,
was deeply moved by the information that a secure place
for Jews in the Soviet Union was guaranteed. They
discussed Stalin's plans to set up a Jewish autonomous
republic in the Crimea after the war was won against
facism."
Beria understood the psychology of unitary loyalty
perfectly!
Continuing on page 189:
"In developing Oppenheimer as a source, Vassili
Zarubin's wife, Elizabeth, was essential. She hardly
appeared foreign in the United States. Her manner was so
natural and sociable that she immediately made friends.
Slim, with dark eyes, she had the classic Semitic beauty
that attracted both men and women, and she was one of the
most successful agent recruiters, establishing her own
illegal network of Jewish refugees from Poland, and
recruiting one of Szilard's secretaries, who provided
technical data."
Oppenheimer's rationale was "fear that the Germans
might produce the first atomic bomb." But all he had
to do to beat the Germans to the punch was to build the
bomb for America. And indeed, that would have been the
natural result of "dual loyalties." He could have
helped Jews and remained loyal to America at the same
time.
But then helping America was not in the calculus at all.
As Beria understood perfectly, he was concerned only with
one unitary question; "How does this affect
Jews?" And the answer was that just as organizing the
blacks and browns to vote their antagonistic racial
interests is critical to maintaining Jewish power over
whites in the 1990's, giving the atomic secrets to Russia
was the one way to reduce the power of whites in America
in the 1940s and 50s. Oppenheimer's naive view (prior to
the creation of the Israeli State) was that a nuclear
armed Russia would provide one more possible haven for
Jews with the power to protect them.
The goyim in our OSS (the forerunner of the CIA) would
have assumed "dual loyalty" and concluded that
Oppenheimer presented no security risk.
They were dead wrong, as Beria clearly understood.
So now the question becomes: - How many sayanim does it
take to "occupy America"?
Is Madeline [Kerbel] Albright (nominee for Secretary of
State) a Sayan?
Is William Cohen (nominee for Secretary of Defense) a
Sayan?
Is William Berger (nominee for National Security Agency
chief) a Sayan?
Is Anthony Lake (nominee to head CIA) a Sayan?
Is Robert Rubin (secretary of Treasury) a Sayan?
Is Alan Greenspan (chairman of the Federal Reserve) a
Sayan?
Are these reasonable questions to ask?
In truth, of course, it is somewhat unlikely that these
people, by far the most powerful group in the United
States, would agree to spend their time schlepping TV
sets for Mossad, or divulging secrets. They can do far
more to serve Jewish interests by guiding U.S. economic,
diplomatic and defense policies to serve Israel and
Jewish interests than they ever could through risky
behaviors like divulging classified data.
In fact, these people are in a far better position to put
pressure on Israel than Israel is to put pressure them.
Are the people named above capable of articulating U.S.
interests (as opposed to Jewish interests) on an
intellectual level?
Of course! Quite skillfully, in fact!
Are they capable of _acting_ upon those interests (our
interests)?
That is a much tougher question. For a majority, it
appears that the answer is clearly "no" if Jewish
insterests might also be involved. The psychological and
emotional ties within the group are so strong, and they
are so powerfully alienated from the white gentile
majority that their decisions and actions will never
match their words. Just as Oppenheimer's actions failed
to square with his words.
Clinton's cabinet and the media moguls who control him
are likely to have their own strong views on the question
"Is it good for Jews, or not?" And they are not
likely to take orders from Israel. Does that mean there
is no "conspiracy'?
Other than the publicly documented spying and extortion
operations run by the State of Israel, there probably
isn't one. Rather, what we have is an obsessive concern
for the interests of Jews and a psychological inability
to represent the interests of others that is shared by
such an overwhelming majority of Jews, that their
uncoordinated actions appear pre-planned.
Colonel Ostrovsky notes in "By way of Deception"
that Israel and its supporters have a concept of the
relation between media and government that is powerfully
at odds with our own Anglo-Saxon tradition that inspired
the First Amendment.
>From page 290:
"As usual in these affairs, the journalism fraternity
in Israel knew about the operation all along-or at least,
they knew what the Mossad and the prime minister's office
wanted them to know - but they agreed to withhold the
story until they were given leave to print it. There is a
committee of editors, called the Vaudat Orchim, of all
the major media outlets in Israel that meets regularly
with government officials for background briefing on
current events. Israeli television is government
controlled, as is all but one rogue radio station, so
that broadcasting is never a problem to control."
The Jewish - SDS flirtation with "free speech" at
Berkeley in the 1960's was a temporary romance of
convenience. Culturally, they are more comfortable with a
"Vaudat Orchim" and controlled news.
Is Laurence Tisch (CEO of CBS,) a Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
Is Robert Sarnoff (RCA and NBC) a Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
How about Jeff Zuker (executive producer of NBC Nightly
news)?
Is Jeff Sagansky (head of CBS entertainment division) a
Sayan? A member of a Vaudat Orchim?
Is Stuart Bloomberg (head of entertainment programming at
ABC) a Sayan? How about Vaudat Orchim?
Is Brandon Tartikoff (Paramount Pictures) a Sayan? Vaudat
Orchim?
Is Gerald Levin (Time Warner Communications) a Sayan?
Perhaps part of a Vaudat Orchim?
Is Michael D. Eisner (Walt Disney Co.) a Sayan? Or a
Vaudat Orchim member?
Is Martin S. Davis (Paramount Communications) a Sayan? Or
a Vaudat Orchim, perhaps?
Is Peter Chernin (20th Century Fox Film Corp.) a Sayan?
Vaudat Orchim?
How about Sandy Grushow (Fox Entertainment)? Sayan?
Vaudat Orchim?
Is Peter Guber (Columbia Pictures Entertainment) a Sayan?
Vaudat Orchim?
Is Sumner Redstone [Murray Rothstein] (Viacom, MTV,
Nickelodeon) a Sayan? A Vaudat Orchim?
Is Lew Wasserman (MCA Inc.) a Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
Is Ron Nessen (MBS radio news) a Sayan? - or a Vaudat
Orchim?
How about Samuel and Donald Newhouse (31 newspapers, 12
broadcast stations, 87 cable systems, Parade, New Yorker,
Vogue, Mademoiselle, Glamour, Vanity Fair, Bride's,
Gentlemen's Quarterly, Self, House & Garden, etc.)?
Sayanim?
Is Arthur Ochs Sulzberger (New York Times, 33 additional
papers, 7 radio and TV broadcasters a cable company and
three book publishers) a Sayan? A Vaudat Orchim?
Is Katherine Meyer Graham (Washington Post, Newsweek) a
Sayan? A Vaudat Orchim?
Is Peter Kann (Dow Jones & Co, Wall Street journal) a
Sayan? A Vaudat Orchim?
How about Mortimer B. Zuckerman (New York Daily News,
U.S. News &World Report, Atlantic Monthly)?
Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
Do these people, and dozens more in similar positions
meet to discuss how to manage the news? Again, the truth
is probably not. Why?
Simple. They already know what messages must be censored
and what events are newsworthy. They already know what to
cover and what to leave on the cutting room floor. Except
on rarest occasions, they do not need to be told what to
do.
Each of these men will have his own passionately held
convictions about what kinds of news and entertainment
for goyim will best serve Jewish interests. These are not
the type of men who would obediently follow instructions
from Isreal. But then the deep racial paranoia and the
intense loathing of Christianity that is taught to most
Jews as children at the dinner table ensures that many
Jews will pursue careers in media (such careers are
"good for Jews") and will know what to do when
they get to the top of a network. They generally do not
need to be told!
And that, gentlemen, is the significance of "unitary
racial loyalty" that exists among 90% of this
world's Jews.
Pat Buchanan once referred to Capitol Hill as
"Israeli Occupied Territory."
Can we justifiably say that we live in "Occupied
America?"
No need to make up your minds yet. Might as well wait for
parts two and three of the "Occupied America"
series.
Then you can be the judge!
Yggdrasil-
www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
