-Caveat Lector-
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 13:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Party of Citizens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Co-op Radio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Redeye CFRO-102.7 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Independent Community TV Co-operative <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [BCPOLITICS] Campbell's macabre journey to dark, secret places
"An investigative thriller which takes us on a macabre journey to dark,
secret places."
-Toronto Star
(said of Gordon Thomas's classic: "Journey into Madness: Medical Torture
and the Mind Controllers"
Under "culpable homicide" in Black's Law Dictionary, (c) "by causing that
human being by threats or fear of violence or by deception to do anything
that causes his death; (d) by wilfully frightening that human being, in
the case of a child or sick person". Now apply those definitions to the
IDENTIFIABLE GROUPS targeted by Campbell for destruction of their mental
health and secondarily (in most cases) their physical health, to such an
extent that death can reasonably be expected to result on a probability
basis. Targeted groups include poor people and elderly people as Tieleman
columns remind us. See if that isn't in effect a violation of the
anti-genocide/anti-hate laws by following the POC links below. See if it
isn't "(b) criminal negligence" as a category of culpable homicide.
It is not merely "cut backs" that he is practicing. Campbell's script
comes right out of Thomas. He is using medical torture for mind control
against targeted, identifiable groups. A "cut back" is the 10% or so NDP
reduction in welfare shortly after the last NDP government took power. The
"CITIZENS" of BC had better study closely the difference between that and
what Campbell's unprecedented 'policies' are about. Start with the POC
links.
POC
********* <http://www.geocities.com/partyofcitizens> **********
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Franklin Wayne Poley wrote:
> Dear Dr. Campbell:
>
> Could you please reply to Ingram-L (as Premier Campbell did once before,
> eg on Indian land claims) and tell us what you are going to do to remedy
> this affliction which is imposed on thousands of Vancouverites?
> Is it criminal? Before the dust settles I will put odds on it being judged
> by the courts as criminal.
>
> I also note your comment on Fanny Keefer that you will "do anything to
> save a life". LIVES WILL BE LOST THE LONGER THE CAMPBELL CAMPAIGN OF
> PATIENT ABUSE CONTINUES. That is common sense. For example, how many
> suicides and missing persons who have lost their lives from various causes
> has it spawned already? MHR's Exit Surveys have failed to locate 2/3 of
> those "exiting" from MHR. Are they like the 48 missing women from V6A who
> are thought to be among the Pickton victims? Perhaps you could ask VPD to
> investigate a random sample of the 2/3 missing from MHR to find out if
> they have become further victims of crime by the Campbell campaign of
> patient abuse.
>
> FWP
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 11:09:58 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Franklin Wayne Poley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: JMTwigg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: John Twigg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: AFPWD Re: [BCPOLITICS] MHR is knowingly inducing mental illness in
> its clientelle
>
> Thank you for your comments and support, Mr. Twigg:
>
> I was asked on the advocates_ list about what they could do further to
> deal with this problem so I said one thing I would do is prepare some
> information on DSM and adjustment disorders for their use.
>
> First, DSM is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for psychiatrists. I
> think they all use it it their practices. It is firstly a medical document
> but it has so many legal and political ramifications that the rest of
> society needs to study it as well. Of course if anyone has a medical
> question on DSM they should go to their doctor. If they have a legal
> question they should go to their lawyer. But we as members of the "body
> politic" also need to know what it says.
>
> Adjustment disorders get their own chapter. "The essential feature
> of this disorder is a maladaptive reaction to a psychosocial stressor
> ...." we are told. In this case the "psychosocial stressor" constitutes
> the abusive and assaultive procedures which Premier Campbell is
> instituting through his MHR. Now let's be careful about that word
> "maladaptive". DSM does not say 'abnormal' or 'outside the norm'. In fact
> it explicitly gives us an OR sentence to clarify that these reactions may
> or may not be "in excess" of the norm. "The maladaptive nature of the
> reaction is indicated either by impairment in occupational (including
> school) functioning or in usual social activities or relations with others
> OR by symptoms that are in excess of a normal and expectable reaction to
> the stressor". Let's put it this way. If Client X, as a result of an
> abusive MHR interview becomes frightened, anxious, angry etc. that may be
> a normal (within the norm) but malaptive reaction to the stressor.
>
> Psychologists emphasize the importance of LOCAL norms in such cases. The
> reaction may be maladaptive because it impairs the subject's ability to
> think as clearly and rationally as possible and make the best decisions.
> It is not a contradiction to say that it is a NORMAL MALADAPTIVE reaction.
>
> The "OR" which I put in blocks above allows for other symptoms which are
> "in excess of a normal and expectable reaction". What might that be? Well,
> if a client jumps through the glass of an MHR window in the course of an
> interview I would call that "in excess", ie an ABNORMAL MALADAPTIVE
> reaction.
>
> The NORMAL MALADAPTIVE reactions to MHR procedures are too lengthy to
> present here. I expect that the full range of stress reactions could be
> evoked in at least minimal form by procedures which would have been deemed
> criminal had they been carried out at Woodlands, Riverview, etc. In the
> 80's I had referrals from the old Victims of Crime Program. I know what
> the symptoms are of those who are victims of crime. I expect that the
> Campbell's MHR victims will react as victims of crime irrespective of his
> having found what he thinks is a loophole in the law to carry out a
> CAMPAIGN OF ABUSE AND ASSAULT. In the institutions, his campaign would
> have immediately led to charges, at least under Section 215 of the
> Criminal Code, ie failure to provide necessities of life. The same
> unfortunate victims who would have been victims of crime, reacting
> psychologically as victims of crime can be no less expected to react this
> way just because they are living in the community. The human psyche reacts
> to psychosocial stressors as they are presented and not to "loopholes in
> the law".
>
> Medical doctors have a major responsibility to alleviate pain. Pain is
> psychological. It is subjective, though it may have an obvious physical
> origin. DSM is helping psychiatrists to diagnose a condition of
> psychological pain. That pain can be within the norm or outside the norm.
> As DSM says, "It is assumed that the disturbance will remit soon after the
> stressor ceases...." In other words, if Campbell were to stop his campaign
> of patient abuse tomorrow, we could expect to see remission of most of the
> symptoms he is knowingly inducing. Responsibility for a cure rests with
> the body politic and not the patients who are the victims of abuse.
>
> The first piece of advise I can give is to follow the exemplary lead of GL
> (I'll just give his initials) who presented a courageous account of the
> stress that Campbell's abuse had imposed on him on Shaw TV News. GL was
> talking specifically about the disability review (which he said required
> four hours of his psychiatrists' time) though other aspects of the
> campaign of patient abuse are more extreme psychosocial stressors. He said
> people are "scared out of their minds" and are "really frightened". There
> is nothing ab-normal or outside the norm for the reactions in quotes. They
> are expected reactions, QUITE NORMAL. People at Riverview would be "scared
> out of their minds" by being told that their necessities of life, eg food
> and shelter are soon to be discontinued and they are naturally scared out
> of their minds when they are living in the community.
>
> I am sure that Campbell's campaign of patient abuse will spawn litigation
> in years to come, especially when fatalities are linked to it as common
> sense says will happen. The wheels of justice grind slowly but they grind
> exceedingly fine. Campbell and his gang of thugs will be brought to
> justice and some of the charges in court may well be criminal. The lawyers
> will likely find that he and his accomplice, Plant, have not found every
> loophole to use for patient abuse. In other words, Campbell, Plant et al
> are more evil than they are clever.
>
> So the first piece of political advice I can give is to follow GL's lead
> and take careful note of your symptoms in reaction to MHR's abusive and
> assaultive procedures. WRITE THEM DOWN WITH DATES in a diary. Some day you
> will have a chance to present them in a suitable hearing or court to those
> who want to bring the perpetrators to justice.
>
> FWP
>
> cc Dulce McCallum via Jane Holland
>
> To be continued....
>
>
>
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, JMTwigg wrote:
>
> > I'm sending this to a few opinion leaders in hopes it might help knock some
> > more Coquihalla-like sense into the Campbell Liberals.
> >
> > It would be one thing to kick thousands of people off of welfare if there
> > were thousands of jobs waiting to be filled for lower-skilled people with
> > poor work habits and other problems of the marginalized but to do so at a
> > time when the economy is still weak and short of such jobs is quite another
> > thing, and a very cruel and counterproductive thing too.
> >
> > It should be obvious to people in power that the recent climb in property
> > crimes and robbery-with-violence crimes is a direct result of misguided
> > welfare cuts and other misguided social-policy cuts and changes (e.g. day
> > care subsidies cut, drug bills for seniors hiked and more user-pay in
> > general, etc.) amidst an economic downturn but apparently it is not obvious
> > to them.
> >
> > In order for our society to function well we need a decent well-fare system,
> > not a bare-bones safety net that only catches some of the people some of the
> > time and fewer and fewer people as time goes by.
> >
> > Think of the case of a troubled and marginal-skilled woman with STDs - if
> > she is cut off of welfare because she is deemed to be employable (apparently
> > so the government can vainly meet its budget targets) she becomes much more
> > likely to resort to prostitution or other forms of promiscuity in order to
> > earn a living, but in the process she spreads diseases that will be
> > increasingly costly and damaging to society. Now think of troubled and
> > marginal-skilled men, maybe from an ethnic minority and/or with social
> > problems - when they are cut off of well-fare they become much more likely
> > to resort to break-end-enters, purse-snatchings, drug-dealing, gang-crimes
> > and more (eg homosexual prostitution, again with disease factors) - all of
> > which also cost society.
> >
> > No, the Campbell Liberals' plans to balance the budget on the backs of the
> > poor is a mean-spirited counter-productive disaster probably even more
> > costly and damaging than the Coquihalla privatization could have been. (I
> > say could have because there are some complex business factors that could
> > have made it worthwhile but which were poorly explained, but which also
> > could have been abused, i.e. federal tax writeoffs and asset-sale
> > commissions to pals in the private sector.)
> >
> > It is even more insane when we see how the CampLibs have money to burn in
> > other areas that they deem to be more important, such as the multi millions
> > of dollars being paid to consultants on things like the Premier's Pet Web
> > Portal project, the Coquihalla privatization, the giveaway of the fast
> > ferries, the forest trade talks, treaty talks and who knows what else behind
> > their thick walls of paranoiac secrecy.
> >
> > Anyway, please consider the information below and see if we can't get the
> > Campbell Liberals to adopt a more humane and effective approach to welfare
> > reform, and to lots of other policy areas that they're botching up now too.
> >
> > JT
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Franklin Wayne Poley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 11:29 AM
> > Subject: [INGRAM] [COMMITMENT-ESSENTIAL-SERVICES] MHR is knowingly inducing
> > mental illness in its clientelle (fwd)
> >
> >
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 14:56:27 -0700 (PDT)
> > > From: Franklin Wayne Poley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: [COMMITMENT-ESSENTIAL-SERVICES] MHR is knowingly inducing mental
> > > illness in its clientelle
> > >
> > > Hello Jane:
> > >
> > > Could you please forward this to Dulce McCallum for her consideration?
> > > Pardon my, at times, intemperate language. Frankly I don't even have words
> > > to express my dismay at what MHR is doing.
> > >
> > > FWP
> > >
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---
> > >
> > > Subject: Ref: 68748 (fwd)
> > >
> > > I have clipped the following from Mr. Wharton's latest propaganda piece.
> > > This is one of the most outrageous attempts to cover up for systemic abuse
> > > by MHR. Systemic abuse by MHR has long meant that there is an
> > > administative core which is acting with malice toward the client
> > > population. This problem was not rooted out even by the excellent
> > > investigative work by former Ombudsman Dulce McCallum. Post-2001 that
> > > malignant administrative core has met an even more malignant group of
> > > elected overseers who set policy and major program details.
> > >
> > > MHR DOES NOT "review all clients on a case-by-case basis". That is a
> > > bold-faced lie. But let the facts speak for themselves. Take a sample of
> > > employable unemployed (the people facing a total severing of funds and
> > > eviction in a few months) and ask them if MHR has solicited medical
> > > histories. Ahh, but a previous email from Mr. Wharton contains the
> > > additional lie that MHR does not know how many employable unemployed it
> > > has on its caseload. Strange, when they have been assigned to front line
> > > workers for interviews and lifestyle/vocational DIRECTIONS (This is not
> > > really "counselling". It is not counselling when you hold a gun to
> > > someone's head and tell them what they will do next. The "gun" is the
> > > threat of immediate severance of funding and homelessness). But the lie is
> > > convenient now because MHR cannot survey people it cannot find on its
> > > caseload.
> > >
> > > Why should medical histories be solicited? Because as an article in
> > > "Transition" from May/June/July of 2002 tells us poor people suffer from
> > > more general health problems than other Canadians by far. MHR knows that.
> > > So why does it not use so much as a medical history check list which can
> > > be filled out by a client in 10 minutes and scored by computer? ALL MHR
> > > clients should be asked to submit medical histories as they did at
> > > MHR-Woodlands.
> > >
> > > The ludicrous part of the material below is that after we are lied to
> > > (again) we are told how compassionate and professionally responsible MHR
> > > is with respect to those suffering from MENTAL HEALTH problems in
> > > particular. Do Mr. Coell and Mr. Wharton really expect us to believe this?
> > > Do they take us for utter fools?
> > >
> > > MHR IS DELIBERATELY AND KNOWINGLY DAMAGING THE MENTAL HEALTH OF ITS
> > > CLIENTELLE. Nothing in the history of the Woodlands-MHR administration was
> > > as sick and sadistic and psychopathic as this.
> > >
> > > MHR is INDUCING what I call 'situational disorders', targeting MHR
> > > clientelle by the thousands. In DSM terminology, they are called
> > > "ADJUSTMENT DISORDERS". Adjustment Disorders are MEDICALLY DIAGNOSABLE
> > > ILLNESSES. Typical associated symptoms are given by DSM, eg anxiety,
> > > depression and maladaptive acting out. And there are many others. People
> > > who are told in writing, by web site and in an interview that they are
> > > about to be without funding for food, shelter and clothing in a matter of
> > > months are apt to get upset don't you think? ALL IT TAKES IS COMMON SENSE
> > > to realize this so how can MHR say it does not know what it is doing?
> > >
> > > How much "upset" are they apt to get? I would say that few statements
> > > could be as HATEFUL as being told that your life is not worth so much as
> > > the proverbial "crumbs from the table" at government expense: not one
> > > cent. Few statements could demean a life so much as that, said to people
> > > of low self-esteem, the poorest of the poor, the most vulnerable of BC's
> > > citizenry. It is as disgustingly banal as it is cowardly. THE IMPACT CAN
> > > REASONABLY BE EXPECTED TO BE DEVASTATING.
> > >
> > > How many clients have suffered adjustment disorders of anxiety attacks and
> > > panic as a result and in the panic removed themselves from MHR funding and
> > > financial support? How many then went missing? I would say that the shock
> > > of MHR's denigrating the lives of people to this degree could even be
> > > considered as PSYCHOLOGICALLY TRAUMATIC. And what about post-traumatic
> > > stress disorders as a result? How many lives has MHR taken by
> > > post-traumatic stress disorder? How many people have relapsed into old
> > > mental health problems long considered to be resolved, as a result of MHR
> > > policies? Addiction? Alcoholism? And a host of mental health problems too
> > > numerous to list here. But rest assured that MHR does not care to follow
> > > up these people because it has KNOWINGLY AND DELIBERATELY INDUCED THESE
> > > ILLNESSES AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS KNOWN TO CAUSE DEATH.
> > >
> > > Wharton crows elsewhere about the 1/3 of MHR clients located in Exit
> > > Surveys. What about the "missing persons" in the 2/3? How many of them
> > > have been caused to "go missing" from society in general? How many are
> > > actually MISSING PERSONS WHO SHOULD NOW BE ON POLICE FILES like the dozens
> > > of missing women from V6A? How many have become victims of crime like
> > > those women or suicide or other causes of death linked to homelessness and
> > > MHR policies? Why not a police investigation to find a random sample of
> > > MISSING PERSONS, the persons caused to "go missing" by MHR? Let the facts
> > > speak for themselves.
> > >
> > > But let's start with the easy one: MHR's self-professed compassion for the
> > > mentally ill. I will say it again: THESE MONSTERS HAVE KNOWINGLY INDUCED
> > > MENTAL ILLNESS IN A POPULATION OF THOUSANDS. These are medically
> > > diagnosable illnesses. So let the facts speak. Just take a sample from the
> > > employable unemployed population which Wharton says MHR cannot locate
> > > though they are clearly identified in the file records of MHR, and give
> > > them suitable tests.
> > >
> > > The MHR campassion for the mentally ill is such an outrageous and obvious
> > > lie that I am astonished he and his bosses (Coell, Campbell et al) would
> > > put it forward. Do those with compassion for the mentally ill knowingly
> > > induce mental illness in a population? Do those with compassion for the
> > > mentally ill deliberately ignore medical histories in general,
> > > including mental health histories, while lying to the public that such
> > > medical considerations are factored in as Mr. Wharton has said? Do those
> > > with compassion for the mentally ill threaten the physical and mental
> > > health of their clientelle, many of whom have mental health histories, and
> > > are still employable unemployed, by saying they will force them into
> > > homelessness in a matter of months? Is a state of homelessness likely to
> > > enhance or diminish mental health, even for people with perfect general
> > > health?
> > >
> > > But MHR is not going to voluntarily do this because some of its actions
> > > are so extreme as to be deemed CRIMINAL. So we need an independent
> > > investigatory body and why not ask Dulce McCallum to do it again? This
> > > time with MHR in general and not MHR-Woodlands alone.
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -
> > >
> > > Franklin Wayne Poley
> > > Dear Mr. Poley:
> > >
> > > The ministry exempted 5,000 clients with mental health disorders from the
> > > review. These 5,000 clients were part of the 19,000 clients who received
> > > letters requesting more information. These clients were contacted by
> > their
> > > employment and assistance worker (EAW), and were sent letters confirming
> > > that they did not need to be reassessed.
> > >
> > > The ministry reviewed all clients on a case-by-case basis. Exemptions
> > were
> > > made if additional information was subsequently submitted by a client
> > after
> > > the ministry's initial file review. Where information was insufficient,
> > > clients were asked to complete and submit a PWD Designation Review form to
> > > ensure that the ministry had the complete, up-to-date information needed
> > on
> > > each client to properly and fairly assess the client's file in terms of
> > the
> > > new criteria for persons with disabilities.
> > >
> > > During the Review period, the Canadian Mental Health Association (CMHA)
> > > entered into a Contribution Agreement with the ministry to provide
> > outreach
> > > services to assist clients who were completing the PWD Designation Review
> > > form. If a client appeared to be in need of assistance with the Review
> > > process, the EAW referred the client to CMHA. Through these outreach
> > > services, the ministry ensured that all clients had their forms completed.
> > > The ministry also conducted a follow-up with all clients who had not
> > > submitted their completed forms before the extended deadline, to ensure
> > that
> > > they receive any assistance they might require.
> > >
> > >
> > > Andrew Wharton
> > > Assistant Deputy Minister
> > > Policy and Research Division
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Section 36 of the Charter portion of the Canadian Constitution says that
> > governments are "committed...(to) providing essential services of reasonable
> > quality to all Canadians". What does this mean?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > In August, 2001, the popular Ingram show was cancelled, suddenly and
> > without explanation. It was the only televised challenge to the
> > social-political establishment of BC. Why did this happen? What can be done
> > to remedy this assault against our by-Constitution "democratic society"?
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > According to <http://www.gov.bc.ca> some 3/4 of British Columbians were Internet
> > users by 2001. In 5 years or so, the new EDD, "Electronic Direct Democracy" will
> > be fully developed and the CITIZENS' PARLIAMENT will hold the reins of power daily
> > over the Victoria Parliament. The 1996 Recall and Initiative Act enables CITIZENS
> > to recall even the Premier.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> In August, 2001, the popular Ingram show was cancelled, suddenly and without
> explanation. It was the only televised challenge to the social-political
> establishment of BC. Why did this happen? What can be done to remedy this assault
> against our by-Constitution "democratic society"?
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Toner for Your Printer or Fax at LaserTonerSuperstore.com-Save 55%!
We have your brand: HP, IBM, Canon, Xerox, Apple and many more for less!
http://www.LaserTonerSuperstore.com
http://us.click.yahoo.com/YmQqWC/qicGAA/ySSFAA/XgSolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
According to <http://www.gov.bc.ca> some 3/4 of British Columbians were Internet users
by 2001. In 5 years or so, the new EDD, "Electronic Direct Democracy" will be fully
developed and the CITIZENS' PARLIAMENT will hold the reins of power daily over the
Victoria Parliament. The 1996 Recall and Initiative Act enables CITIZENS to recall
even the Premier.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
