-Caveat Lector- -Caveat Lector-

If Saddam Hussein’s administration did not have WMD, then what did he use against the Kurds in northern Iraq, when he dropped chemical weapons to murder thousands of his own people?    

 

L L Milnes

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Conspiracy Theory Research List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Shannon
Sent:
02 August 2003 15:12
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CTRL] We Already Know the Administration Was Lying

http://www.lewrockwell.com/callahan/callahan113.html


We Already Know the Administration Was Lying
by Gene Callahan

I found Bob Murphy's recent piece on LewRockwell.com to be an excellent analysis of the recent controversy as to whether the Bush administration was guilty of inflating the threat Saddam Hussein presented to the
US. However, I felt that the conclusion understated the actual case against Bush. Murphy wrote: "Until weapons of mass destruction are found in Iraq, and have been verified by independent experts, the US invasion remains immoral and illegal, on the very criteria President Bush himself laid out for it."

This implies that should the
US find weapons of mass destruction (henceforth, WMDs), then Bush is off the hook for lying to us on this issue. But I believe that we already can conclude the administration was lying, whether or not any WMDs or documents proving there were WMDs eventually are unearthed. (Like Murphy, I don't pretend to have any deep knowledge of Iraq's military programs over the last decade. It would neither shock me if it really had developed some very deadly weapons, nor if it had not. I am an "Iraq WMD agnostic." However, I do think it is difficult to explain why, if Hussein would not destroy his WMDs to avert war, he would suddenly destroy them right when they would actually be of use to him.)
 

www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to