-Caveat Lector- www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-


 http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/EI17Ag01.html

http://www.atimes.com

Central Asia

The ironies of Afghan opium production
By Pierre-Arnaud Chouvy

Driven by war, poverty and chaos, Afghanistan's opium production in the wake of the 
ouster of the Taliban regime at the end of 2001 is increasing dramatically, and seems 
to be the only avenue by which many Afghanis can make a living. Indeed, in a country 
already  characterized by a tortured landscape and harsh climatic conditions, let 
alone generations of war, the commercial production of opium has been the only means 
of subsistence available for many peasants in eastern Afghanistan.

Consecutive years of drought have made matters worse. The Food and Agriculture 
Organization (FAO) recently asserted that since 1978, when the country was on the 
verge of attaining food self-sufficiency, irrigated surfaces have been cut in half. 
Arable land, which before the war corresponded to only 12 percent of the country's 
total area, fell by another 37 percent during the 1990s. Furthermore, Afghanistan 
certainly holds an unfortunate record as the world's most-mined country. The United 
Nations estimates that some 700 square kilometers are contaminated by various 
unexploded ordnance which, according to the World Bank, take a toll of some 500 
victims a month, making any return to the agricultural fields particularly dangerous.

Continuing war has also contributed to the prolonged lack of water for agriculture, 
destroying traditional irrigation channels and displacing significant segments of the 
population. Afghanistan's renowned orchards and the vineyards of the Shomali Plan have 
virtually vanished.

As a result, of the food crops now produced in Afghanistan, wheat, the least 
water-demanding, is the most favored. But the FAO estimates that, in a country where 
food shortages are persistent and where the threat of famine is recurrent, wheat 
acreage has decreased by 10 percent since the fall of the Taliban in the face of 
profit from the opium poppy.

Under such conditions, the World Bank estimates that 7 million people, a third of the 
population, suffered from hunger in 2001, partly because of the drought that prevailed 
in 2000 and 2001 and threatened the re-establishment of the cereal production that the 
Taliban regime brought back between 1996 and 1999. By 1998, cereal production had been 
restored to pre-war levels and livestock were increasing again. By the 2000-2001 
drought, however, cereal production had declined by 50 percent and almost 60 percent 
of the cattle had disappeared. However, in 2002, and owing to less difficult climatic 
conditions, Afghanistan produced some 3.6 million tonnes of wheat, 82 percent more 
than in 2001 but still 4 percent less than in 2000.

As for the opium harvest, it once again literally exploded, increasing by 1,400 
percent between 2001 and 2002.

Recent price trends for Afghan opium
The July 2000 edict of Mullah Omar, the ousted supreme head of the Taliban and 
"Commander of the Faithful", proscribed opium poppy cultivation and forced the 2001 
harvest to 185 tonnes, an all-time low. That figure was all the more impressive since 
the country had broken a world record in 1999 when it produced 4,600 tonnes, followed 
by a huge 3,300 tonnes in 2000.

The farm-gate price before the edict averaged US$30 per kilogram of fresh Afghan opium 
(as opposed to dry opium, which is lighter). In March 2001, during the purchasing 
season for recently-collected opium, the average farm-gate price suddenly reached 
$700, reflecting the shortage engineered by the Taliban. After September 11, 
traffickers and local traders, rightly fearing American reprisals against both the 
Taliban and Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda, accelerated the sale of the 2,900 tonnes of 
opium that the UN then estimated to be stored in the north of the country.

Right after September 11, a kilogram of Afghan opium brought only $95 to $120, far 
below the price caused by the Taliban-driven shortages. However, just before American 
military intervention materialized in Afghanistan on October 7, 2001, the price 
skyrocketed, reaching $500 per kilogram. Following the Enduring Freedom operation and 
its air strikes, opium lost some 40 percent of its farm-gate value, an indication of 
the sensitivity of opium to market contingencies. Later, in 2002, and despite a new 
increase in Afghan production, with the harvest estimated at 3,400 tonnes, prices 
reached $600 per kilogram, something that the UN, which estimates production and 
records price fluctuations, has been unable to explain.

Opium production and politico-territorial evolution
The Afghan geopolitical scene is highly complex, and even more so when it comes to 
illicit drugs. To grasp illicit production and trade, one has to take into 
consideration the role that the Taliban played in condoning the opium economy by 
taxing both harvest and trade. This taxation was actually severely denounced in the 
1999 International Narcotics Control Board report. However, such taxation was in 
accordance with Islamic principles known as zakat and usher which have indeed been 
acknowledged by the Taliban authorities themselves.

In 1997, the assistant director of the Pashtani Tjarati Bank, the Taliban's central 
bank in their Kandahar stronghold, was quoted as saying that "a landowner must pay 10 
percent of whatever amount he makes on his crops". Opium merchants also had to pay a 
2.5 percent tax to the Taliban, as they, like any other producers, did to other rulers 
and regimes. These taxes are well known and are Islamic practices that predate the 
Taliban. Zakat, or purification, is the third pillar of Islam and, as a tax levied on 
most assets, concerns every Muslim. Once levied it is redistributed to the poor, the 
rulers and the holy fighters of the jihad. Usher, or tithe, is another Islamic tax 
that is collected on raw agricultural products. Half goes to the poor, with the other 
half split between the local mullahs and the rulers, at that time the Taliban.

Thus, by levying these taxes, the Taliban were doing nothing more than profiting on an 
economic system of production established prior to their arrival on the Afghan 
political scene. It is easy to see how the Taliban, then the rulers of about 85 
percent of the country and controlling up to 96 percent of its poppy fields, benefited 
from these taxes, which are inherent to the Islamic law, or Sharia, that they enforced.

To better understand the political economy of the opium poppy in Afghanistan, it is 
also essential to mention the role in the opium economy that was then held by the 
United Front (or Northern Alliance) led by the late Ahmed Shah Masoud, assassinated on 
September 7, 2001 in his Panjsher Valley stronghold. It has been reported that the 
United Front was also levying taxes on opium, which would make sense considering that 
its own considerable war effort required significant funding.

The United Front outlawed poppy cultivation and heroin manufacture in June 1999, a 
year before the Taliban issued their own ban. However, the United Front clearly failed 
to enforce the ban in their areas, while the Taliban impressively and unexpectedly 
succeeded. Indeed, according to the UN Drug Control Program (UNDCP), up to 150 tonnes 
of opium were most likely collected in 2001 in the areas controlled by the United 
Front.

These areas, being close to Tajikistan, then served, and still do, as an extremely 
convenient springboard to export opiates to Central Asia and Russia. In fact, in the 
United Front-held Badakhshan in northeastern Afghanistan, poppy-sown surfaces were 
estimated to have multiplied by 2.5 times between 2000 and 2001, leading to the 
bountiful 2001 harvest.

That same year, only 35 tonnes of opium were estimated to have been collected in 
Taliban-held areas. In one year, Mullah Omar's edict cut production spectacularly, 
from 3,300 tonnes in 2000. The Taliban nearly rooted out opium production in the areas 
under their control, in contrast to the United Front-held areas.

But the determination shown by the Taliban in 2000 to drastically reduce opium 
production did not seem to last long since as of the beginning of September 2001 - and 
before the September 11 attacks - the Taliban most likely authorized Afghan peasants 
to sow opium poppies again. Or, at the very least, they were thought not to have 
reissued their prohibition, thus leaving the peasants one precious month to obtain the 
indispensable seeds before the October sowing season.

But, on November 13, 2001, the Taliban fled from the capital and Kabul finally awoke 
under the control of the United Front troops. The Taliban nevertheless held the 
southern town of Kandahar until they negotiated their surrender with the US on 
December 6, 2001, one day after the Bonn agreements were signed and the creation of a 
transitory Afghan government was decided, empowering the royalist Hamid Karzai, a 
Pashtun of the Popalzai tribe.

On January 17, 2002, the Afghan transition government declared in turn that poppy 
cultivation as well as the sale and consumption of opium were altogether prohibited in 
Afghanistan, although the poppies sown in the late fall of 2001 were about to bloom 
and, according to the UNDCP, had the potential to produce 1,900 to 2,700 tonnes of 
opium.

This, of course, deeply upset those of the Afghan peasants who had traditionally 
borrowed important sums or benefited from advances against takings in order to be able 
to feed themselves and their families until the harvest season. In Afghanistan, this 
credit system is also frequently resorted to so as to obtain the required opium poppy 
seeds. It is in this sensitive context that, on April 3, 2002, the temporary 
government launched its eradication program and offered $250 in compensation for each 
planted and eradicated jirib ($1,250 per hectare).

However, the poppy growers declared that they could obtain from $1,700 to $3,500 per 
jirib if they collected their opium and sold it at market prices. The dispute between 
the government and the peasants caused some disorder, and even led to armed 
confrontations. In April 2002, one such clash killed eight peasants and wounded 35 
others in the Kajaki district of Helmand province.

Despite these incidents, and others, including the destruction of tractors used for 
eradication by mines in Helmand province, the UNDCP then estimated that 16,500 
hectares of poppies, a third of the total surface planted in 2001-2002, had been 
destroyed within the framework of the eradication program engaged by the transitory 
government (mainly in the provinces of Helmand, Oruzgan, Nangarhar and Kunar).

The Afghan government also estimated that its eradication campaign had affected more 
than one third of the cultivated areas, even though many observers argued that, for 
various reasons, only 10 percent had really been eradicated. In fact it seemed that in 
many cases financial compensation was pocketed by local commanders and governors 
without ever reaching the peasants. In other instances, peasants were compensated 
after having only partially eradicated their opium poppy fields.

Peasants or their local governors reportedly resorted to various other subterfuges to 
profit from both governmental compensation and the sale of opium on the market. That 
is actually all the more plausible when one considers that the UNDCP then forecast 
that the Afghan peasants engaged in the opium poppy economy would fetch approximately 
$1.2 billion at the farm-gate price for their forthcoming 2002 harvest, a huge sum not 
easily turned down in a country as poor as Afghanistan.

The final UNDCP estimates came in October 2002. Although the majority of observers, 
including the UNDCP, expected production of 2,500 tonnes, Afghanistan produced far 
more, perhaps as much as 3,400 tonnes. A M Costa, general manager of the United 
Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (ODC, of which the UNDCP is part), defends the UN 
actions, saying the 2002 harvest was lower than that in 1999, which was carried out 
under the Taliban. The transition government of Hamid Karzai could thus not be held 
responsible for this increase since the last sowing had taken place before its 
empowerment and in the context of the Taliban's fall, a rather chaotic period.

However, even if the yields suddenly increased from 24 kg/ha to 46 kg/ha (partly 
because the poppy growers further resorted to irrigated fields) and explained part of 
the total augmentation, these 3,400 tonnes were far higher than the 185 tonnes of 2001 
when the last harvest was made under the Taliban.

In fact, 2002's 3,400 tonnes match the 3,300 tonnes of 2000, when the Taliban first 
successfully aimed to reduce opium production following the all-time record of 4,600 
tonnes of 1999.

It is now up to Karzai's transition government to try to progressively cut 
Afghanistan's opium harvests. Matching what the Taliban did in 2001 - with 185 tonnes 
of which only 35 were produced in the zones under their control - seems unreachable to 
say the least. Preliminary estimates by the UN for the 2003 harvest show that while 
clear efforts were made to eradicate part of the culture in the main areas of 
production - Helmand, Kandahar, Oruzgan, Nangarhar but not in Badakhshan - opium poppy 
was also planted for the first time in other districts.

There is no doubt whatsoever that in 2003 Afghanistan will top the world's production 
of opium ahead of Myanmar, whose production dropped to 800 tonnes in 2002.

To a certain extent, the future harvests will testify to Karzai's political and 
territorial control on his country, population and factions. They will also make it 
possible to evaluate and judge the success of Western intervention and assistance. It 
is advisable, however, to keep in mind that in the current context of insecurity and 
lack of rebuilding and development, no drastic eradication should be implemented as 
many Afghan peasants have largely invested in this economic activity and depend on it 
for their very survival.

To overcome opium production in Afghanistan, the government and the international 
community must not impose eradication without implementing a broad program of 
alternative and integrated development, both in the regions of opium production and in 
the rest of the country. Such programs must be implemented in a progressive way and, 
most importantly, in stable political and territorial conditions. Long-lasting peace 
combined with political as well as economic development must be achieved if 
Afghanistan is to be successfully rid of its illicit drugs economy and war economy 
nexus.

Pierre-Arnaud Chouvy, PhD, is a geographer and research fellow at CNRS in Paris. He 
produces www.geopium.org.











====begin=sig=KEV/swr=====

"There is a continuum between those
who would express dissent
and those who would do a terrorist act..."
        -FBI Director Robert S. Mueller

And it's exponentially greater than
the "virtual gap" between him and the latter .

"When Fascism comes to America,
it will be wrapped in the American flag."
                                          - Huey Long




                                                   ---
              In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107,
           this material is posted withthout profit or payment
      for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
                                                   ---



           With a system like this, who needs a conspiracy?
   <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<swr>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
                           SHE WHO REMEMBERS
                             Freedom Justice Peace
                            http://sheRemembers.ORG
                    Subscribe to our free swr "newswire":
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/she-who-remembers/messages
          "Don't hate the media, become the media" -Jello Biafra
    <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<swr>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>




One wonders if Dumya uses tranlators instead of
speechwriters. -From early mid-20th century German.
===
"An evil exists that threatens every man, woman,
and child of this great nation. We must take steps
to ensure our domestic security and protect our
homeland."
     - Adolf Hitler, proposing the creation
        of the Gestapo in Nazi Germany.
===
"A dictatorship would be a heck of a lot easier." - George W. Bush
===
With so many conflicting conspiracy theories out there,
it starts to look like somebody's hiding something.
===
 If the world was half as unruly as we are told,
 we would have already disabled those spreading that lie.
===
After 30 years of daily use, the most irresponsible thing
cannabis ever caused me to do is call for its legalization.
===
Abusing drugs is not a crime, abusing drug users is.
===
If you don't have time for the preservation of Freedom,
how can you possibly imagine you are free?
===
If you don't show up now outside the walls,
 you might end up later, inside them.
===
To you he may be just the pResident, but to Jeb & Neil,
he's BIG BROTHER!
===
===
"Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in
England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But,
after all, IT IS THE LEADERS of the country who determine the policy
and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it
is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a
communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be
brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to
do is TELL THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce the
 peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger.
 IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY COUNTRY."

-- Hermann Goering at the Nuremberg Trials
===
===
"Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles
to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful. This is especially
true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond,
whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It
is then that all peoples of the world will plead with world leaders
to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the
unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be
willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted
to them by their world government."

-- Henry Kissinger speaking at Evian, France, May 21, 1992
Bilderburgers meeting. Unbeknownst to Kissinger, his speech was taped
by a Swiss delegate to the meeting.
===
===
"Of all the enemies to public liberty war is, perhaps, the most to be
dreaded because it comprises and develops the germ of every other. War
is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes. And armies,
and debts, and taxes are the known instruments for bringing the many
under the domination of the few. In war, too, the discretionary power of
the Executive is extended. Its influence in dealing out offices, honors,
and emoluments is multiplied; and all the means of seducing the minds,
are added to those of subduing the force of the people. The same
malignant aspect in republicanism may be traced in the inequality of
fortunes, and the opportunities of fraud, growing out of a state of
war...and in the degeneracy of manners and morals, engendered by both.
No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare."
 -- James Madison, April 20, 1795
===
===
"America's drug war is so stupid that if you pay close attention
to just how stupid it is -- it'll drive you to use drugs."
-- Jim Hightower
===
===
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.                                  
                                                                                  
--Aldous Huxley
===
===
===
recommended sites and sounds:

 http://spitfirelist.com/ftr.html                    Dave Emory
 http://sheremembers.org/ftr.ram                                   For the Record
 http://sheremembers.org/swr.ram                                SWR media feed
 http://www.blackopradio.com/archives.html             BlackOp Radio
 http://www.suesupriano.com/                                        Sue Supriano
 http://www.jackherer.com/                  Jack Herer
 http://rense.com                        Jeff rense
 http://gregpalast.com/                      Greg Palast
 http://copvcia.com/                                                            Mike 
Ruppert
 http://drugwar.com/                         Preston Peet
 http://solari.com/                              Catherine Austin Fitts
 http://www.madcowprod.com                   Dan Hopsicker
 http://nomorefakenews.com/                      Jon Rappoport
 http://infowars.com                                                             Alex 
Jones
 http://gulfwarvets.com/                                                         Joyce 
Riley
 http://www.somethingshappening.com                       Roy of Hollywood
 http://www.ctrl.org                                                  Kris Millegan
 http://emperors-clothes.com/                                         Jared Israel
 http://www.druggingamerica.com/                                 Rodney Stitch
 http://www.skolnicksreport.com/                                   Sherman H. Skolnick
 http://www.blackboxvoting.com/                                      Count the Vote!
 http://www.assassinationscience.com/index.html   James H. Fetzer, Ph.D.
 http://radiopower.org/                                                       Leftish 
Radio
 http://www.larouchepub.com/eir_talks/index.html   EIN Weekly Radio Report
 http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/                                9-11 Crimes 
Against Humanity
 http://www.brianwillson.com                                            S. Brian Wilson

                                  $100K Hemp Challenge!
 http://www.hemp4fuel.com/nontesters/hemp4fuel/challenge.html


===
===
When you call yourself an Indian or a Muslim or a Christian or a European, or anything 
else, you are being violent. Do you see why it is violent? Because you are separating 
yourself from the rest of mankind. When you separate yourself by belief, by 
nationality, by tradition, it breeds violence. So a man who is seeking to understand 
violence does not belong to any country, to any religion, to any political party or 
partial system; he is concerned with the total understanding of mankind.

--J. Krishnamurti, Freedom from the Known, pp.51-52
 http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/
===

Mandating Christianity is antichrist
and unconstitutinal!

If you count on swr for cogent info,
please consider offereing your
moral support, in the form of a few tokens, to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  via: https://www.paypal.com
Make your thoughts count!
====end=sig:KEV/swr=====

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
<FONT COLOR="#000099">Buy Remanufactured Ink Cartridges & Refill Kits at MyInks.com 
for: HP $8-20. Epson $3-9, Canon $5-15, Lexmark $4-17. Free s/h over $50 (US & Canada).
</FONT><A HREF="http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=6351";><B>Click Here!</B></A><FONT 
COLOR="#000099">
</FONT><A HREF="http://us.click.yahoo.com/0zJuRD/6CvGAA/qnsNAA/vseplB/TM";><B>Click 
Here!</B></A>
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Please let us stay on topic and be civil.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org
OM


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to