-Caveat Lector- "I pledge Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to the REPUBLIC for which it stands, one Nation under God,indivisible,with liberty and justice for all."
visit my web site at http://www.voicenet.com/~wbacon My ICQ# is 79071904 for a precise list of the powers of the Federal Government linkto: http://www.voicenet.com/~wbacon/Enumerated.html ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 06:41:13 -0700 From: Media Research Center <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MRC Alert: CNN Trumpets How 'Bush is Sinking!' & 'May Be Beatable in 2004' ***Media Research Center CyberAlert*** 9:40am EDT, Tuesday September 23, 2003 (Vol. Eight; No. 175) The 1,581st CyberAlert. Tracking Liberal Media Bias Since 1996 > CNN Trumpets How "Bush is Sinking!" & "May Be Beatable in 2004" > Liasson Reveals NPR Listeners Think Braun "Says Sensible Things" > Media's "Falsely Bleak Picture" in Iraq "Emboldens Our Enemy" > ABC Points Out How Spending is Soaring Under President Bush > Bush Tells Hume He Avoids Media Bias By Avoiding News Media #### Distributed to more than 14,000 subscribers by the Media Research Center, bringing political balance to the news media since 1987. The MRC is the leader in documenting, exposing and neutralizing liberal media bias. Visit the MRC on the Web: http://www.mediaresearch.org. CyberAlerts from this year are at: http://www.mediaresearch.org/archive/cyber/welcome.asp For 2002: http://www.mediaresearch.org/archive/cyber/archive02.asp Subscribe/unsubscribe information, as well as a link to the MRC donations page, are at the end of this message. When posted, this CyberAlert will be readable at: http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2003/cyb20030923.asp #### 1) CNN's Judy Woodruff led Monday's Inside Politics by trumpeting "striking new evidence that President Bush may be beatable in 2004." Bill Schneider gleefully related: "Judy, President Bush is sinking! Last month the President's job approval rating was at 60 percent. Now it's dropped to 50, his lowest rating ever." Making an illogical comparison, the CNN announcer at the top of the half hour had contrasted Bush's plight with the "huge leap forward" for Carol Moseley Braun, the last-place Democrat who had simply made her hopeless presidential campaign official 2) The kind of people who listen to NPR think that left-wing Democratic presidential candidate Carol Moseley Braun "says sensible things." On FNC's Special Report with Brit Hume on Monday night, NPR White House correspondent Mara Liasson inadvertently provided evidence that NPR appeals to liberals as she related how NPR listeners praise Braun. Fred Barnes suggested that the media have "invested their hopes and dreams in Wesley Clark." 3) A Democratic Congressman from Georgia who just returned from a visit to Iraq, in a Monday op-ed in the Atlanta Journal- Constitution, condemned the news media for its excessively negative drumbeat. U.S. Representative Jim Marshall asserted: "I'm afraid the news media are hurting our chances. They are dwelling upon the mistakes, the ambushes, the soldiers killed, the wounded....Fair enough. But it is not balancing this bad news with 'the rest of the story,' the progress made daily, the good news. The falsely bleak picture weakens our national resolve, discourages Iraqi cooperation and emboldens our enemy." 4) The news media regularly push for more and more government spending to solve every problem, but on Sunday night ABC offered a refreshing criticism of President Bush -- taking him on from the right for approving of massive new and higher spending. Jake Tapper pointed out that despite candidate Bush's promise that "big government is not the answer," under President Bush "the size of government is bigger" as "discretionary spending on transportation and other non-military items increased by 21 percent under Mr. Bush. And a taxpayer group says pork barrel spending is up 48 percent since 2001." Tapper recalled how "at about this point in his term, Ronald Reagan had vetoed 22 spending bills from Congress," but "President Bush has vetoed none." 5) President George W. Bush has discovered a way to avoid being influenced by liberal media bias: He avoids reading newspapers or watching television news. During Brit Hume's interview with Bush aired Monday night on Fox and FNC, Bush revealed how he relies on his staff for "objective" news summaries since "a lot of times there's opinions mixed in with news" from the usual media outlets. "We won't disagree with that sir," Hume quipped in response. Correction: Though the previous paragraph correctly listed the contrasts amongst the networks, at a later point the September 18 CyberAlert incorrectly substituted "ABC" for "NBC." The paragraph read: "While CBS and NBC devoted full stories to blaming Bush for having long let stand the mis-impression that Hussein was involved and characterized Bush's comment as contradicting Vice President Cheney's recent remarks, Jennings refrained from a full story, did not suggest Bush was culpable for long misleading people and portrayed the very same Cheney comments on Meet the Press, which ABC and CBS saw Bush as contradicting, as in line with Bush's new assertion." That last line should have read: "...which CBS and NBC saw Bush as contradicting, as in line with Bush's new assertion." > 1) CNN's Judy Woodruff led Monday's Inside Politics by trumpeting "striking new evidence that President Bush may be beatable in 2004." Bill Schneider gleefully related: "Judy, President Bush is sinking! Last month the President's job approval rating was at 60 percent. Now it's dropped to 50, his lowest rating ever." Making an illogical comparison, the CNN announcer at the top of the half hour had contrasted Bush's plight with the "huge leap forward" for Carol Moseley Braun, the last-place Democrat who had simply made her hopeless presidential campaign official: "It's enough to make the President stop in his tracks [skidding sound effect]. Mr. Bush hits a new low in our new poll even as one of his would-be rivals makes a huge leap forward." Viewers were then treated to a clip of Braun at her announcement event: "I am uniquely qualified to do the job of President." Highlighting how the CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll found Clark would beat Bush by three points but that Bush would beat Dean by the identical three-point margin, Schneider discounted Bush's lead over Dean by describing it as a "statistical dead heat," a caveat he did not add when reporting Clark's lead. Schneider asserted: "Right now General Clark is running three points ahead of President Bush in a trial heat for 2004 [49 to 46 percent]. It's the best showing of any Democrat. The weakest Democrat against Bush is Howard Dean who runs three points behind. But even that is a statistical dead heat [49 to 46 percent]." Woodruff set up the lead story on her September 22 show: "Striking new evidence that President Bush may be beatable in 2004. Our senior political analyst, Bill Schneider, is here with our just-released poll numbers. Bill, what is happening to the President?" Schneider excitedly explained: "Judy, President Bush is sinking! Last month the President's job approval rating was at 60 percent. Now it's dropped to 50, his lowest rating ever. The President has lost the most support among men, down 17 points since August. The gender gap has simply disappeared. Men are no longer more favorable to Bush than women. Men are more sensitive than women are to the jobs issue. Nearly three million jobs have been lost since 2000, and so far those tax cuts do not seem to generate any new jobs. President Bush is paying a price for that with men." Woodruff asked: "So is it the economy, Bill, that is driving the President's ratings down?" Schneider: "It's a major factor. The Newsweek poll just released shows disapproval of the President's handling of the economy rising sharply over the past month. It's now 57 percent negative. Voters are also souring on Iraq. Two weeks ago, just after the President addressed the nation on Iraq, and requested $87 billion to pay for Iraq's reconstruction, 58 percent of Americans believed Iraq was worth going to war over. Now that suddenly dropped to 50 percent. The public is split over whether the war in Iraq was worthwhile now that they see the difficulty and the cost." Woodruff: "All right. So if that's the President's picture, what about for the Democrats? What's it look like over there?" Schneider: "General Wesley Clark is surging. He picked exactly the right moment to declare, when President Bush looks vulnerable and Democrats are casting a ballot for a winner. Within five days of entering the race, General Clark has vaulted to the top of the Democratic list, ahead of Howard Dean, John Kerry, Dick Gephardt and Joe Lieberman with all the other candidates in single digits. Bush looks beatable, Clark looks electable [on screen, 22 percent for Clark, 13 percent for Dean and Kerry and Gephardt at 11 percent]." Woodruff: "So are you saying Clark looks like he can win more than any of the other Democrats?" Schneider: "Well, yes, but it's not a huge difference. Right now General Clark is running three points ahead of President Bush in a trial heat for 2004 [49 to 46 percent]. It's the best showing of any Democrat. The weakest Democrat against Bush is Howard Dean who runs three points behind. But even that is a statistical dead heat [49 to 46 percent]. Clark's advantage over Dean is that he runs five points ahead of Bush among men. For Democrats, to find a candidate who appeals to men is a breakthrough -- Judy." Woodruff turned to John King at the White House: "John, are they concerned there at all, or what do they make of these numbers?" King explained: "One thing they say the President has to do is keep about his business, which is one reason he very quickly scheduled a trip to Virginia today to assess some of the hurricane damage. They say here at the White House that this is a cycle that often affects presidents a year before they run for re-election. They say Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton suffered similar dips like this and went on to easily win second terms..." For CNN's online rundown of the poll, "Bush down, Clark up: President virtually tied with five Democratic challengers," see: http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/09/22/elec04.poll.bush.clark/index.html > 2) The kind of people who listen to NPR think that left-wing Democratic presidential candidate Carol Moseley Braun "says sensible things." On FNC's Special Report with Brit Hume on Monday night, NPR White House correspondent Mara Liasson inadvertently provided evidence that NPR appeals to liberals as she related how NPR listeners praise Braun. Fred Barnes suggested that the media have "invested their hopes and dreams in Wesley Clark." During the roundtable on the September 22 FNC program, Liasson pointed out positive feedback for Braun from NPR listeners: "We get a lot of responses from listeners at NPR talking about how well she does in debates, 'she has a lovely demeanor, she says sensible things.' She definitely adds to those conversations." A bit earlier, Fred Barnes, Executive Editor of the Weekly Standard, observed: "It's not just Democrats who have invested their hopes and dreams in Wesley Clark -- it's a lot of the media." > 3) A Democratic Congressman from Georgia who just returned from a visit to Iraq, in a Monday op-ed in the Atlanta Journal- Constitution, condemned the news media for its excessively negative portrait of the situation in that nation. U.S. Representative Jim Marshall noted that the goal in Iraq is to "establish reasonable security and foster the creation of a secular, representative government with a stable market economy that provides broad opportunity throughout Iraqi society." But, the member of House Armed Services Committee who is a combat veteran of Vietnam, regretted how the media have become an impediment: "I'm afraid the news media are hurting our chances. They are dwelling upon the mistakes, the ambushes, the soldiers killed, the wounded, the Blumbergs [a soldiers who was killed]. Fair enough. But it is not balancing this bad news with 'the rest of the story,' the progress made daily, the good news. The falsely bleak picture weakens our national resolve, discourages Iraqi cooperation and emboldens our enemy." An excerpt from Marshall's September 22 op-ed which was highlighted on Monday by the DrudgeReport ( www.drudgereport.com ) "Falsely bleak reports reduce our chances of success in Iraq" read the headline over the piece. The excerpt: On Sept. 14, I flew from Baghdad to Kuwait with Sgt. Trevor A. Blumberg from Dearborn, Mich. He was in a body bag. He'd been ambushed and killed that afternoon. Sitting in the cargo bay of a C 130E, I found myself wondering whether the news media were somehow complicit in his death. News media reports about our progress in Iraq have been bleak since shortly after the president's premature declaration of victory.... But there will be more Blumbergs killed in action, many more. So it is worth doing only if we have a reasonable chance of success. And we do, but I'm afraid the news media are hurting our chances. They are dwelling upon the mistakes, the ambushes, the soldiers killed, the wounded, the Blumbergs. Fair enough. But it is not balancing this bad news with "the rest of the story," the progress made daily, the good news. The falsely bleak picture weakens our national resolve, discourages Iraqi cooperation and emboldens our enemy. During the conventional part of this conflict, embedded journalists reported the good, the bad and the ugly. Where are the embeds now that we are in the difficult part of the war, now that fair and balanced reporting is critically important to our chances of success?... Throughout Iraq, American soldiers with their typical "can do" attitude and ingenuity are engaging in thousands upon thousands of small reconstruction projects, working with Iraqi contractors and citizens.... Zogby International recently released the results of an August poll showing hope and progress. My own unscientific surveys told me the same thing. With virtually no exceptions, hundreds of Iraqis enthusiastically waved back at me as I sat in the open door of a helicopter traveling between Babylon and Baghdad. And I received a similar reception as I worked my way alone, shaking hands through a large crowd of refinery workers just to see their reaction. We may need a few credible Baghdad Bobs to undo the harm done by our media. I'm afraid it is killing our troops. END of Excerpt For Marshall's piece in full: http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/opinion/0903/22international.ht ml?urac=n&urvf=10642377116960.8839345774896111 Marshall's House Web site has also posted the piece: http://www.house.gov/marshall/pr03-09-22.html Marshall represents the 3rd district which comprises much of central Georgia. > 4) The news media regularly push for more and more government spending to solve every problem, such as the ongoing demand for a prescription drug entitlement, and swoop in from the left with dire tales of desperation whenever the rate of increase in spending on a program falls slightly, normally falsely portrayed as "spending cuts." But on Sunday night, ABC offered a refreshing criticism of President Bush -- taking him on from the right for approving of massive new and higher spending. Setting up a piece by Jake Tapper, World News Tonight/Sunday anchor Terry Moran noted that federal government spending is "growing very fast." Tapper pointed out that despite candidate Bush's promise that "big government is not the answer," under President Bush "the size of government is bigger" as "discretionary spending on transportation and other non-military items increased by 21 percent under Mr. Bush. And a taxpayer group says pork barrel spending is up 48 percent since 2001." Tapper recalled how "at about this point in his term, Ronald Reagan had vetoed 22 spending bills from Congress," but "President Bush has vetoed none." Moran introduced the September 21 story: "Well, whoever wins the presidency of 2004 will be in charge of a government that's growing very fast. This month, for example, the Bush administration announced it is expanding the Commerce Department, adding a new assistant secretary for manufacturing, an office of industry analysis and an unfair trade practices team. And that's just one department. Is the era of big government back? Well, here's ABC's Jake Tapper." Tapper began: "Candidate Bush had strong words on the subject of big government." President George W. Bush, October 17, 2000 debate: "I trust people. I don't trust the federal government." Bush, at Republican convention, August 13, 2000: "Big government is not the answer." Tapper: "But under President Bush, the size of government is bigger. A recent study shows there are one million more government workers today than in 1999, more than 12 million total, the most since the Cold War ended [source listed on screen: NYU/Brookings Institution]." Professor Paul C. Light, Wagner School of Public Service, New York University: "If Bush managed the Texas Rangers like he's managing government, you'd just see this whole group of people on the field, including lots and lots of coaches, lots of deputy coaches, and under deputy coaches and assistant deputy coaches. But you wouldn't be winning very many baseball games." Tapper: "The cost of government is also up. Discretionary spending on transportation and other non-military items increased by 21 percent under Mr. Bush. And a taxpayer group says pork barrel spending is up 48 percent since 2001. At about this point in his term, Ronald Reagan had vetoed 22 spending bills from Congress. President Bush has vetoed none. Some growth in the government work force is in response to September 11th. But the fastest growth is in the jobs not related to defense and terrorism." Chris Edwards, Cato Institute: "President Bush's actions haven't matched his words. In fact, he's asked for very large spending increases in areas like education and farm subsidies, transportation and veterans affairs and, of course, defense." Tapper concluded: "Soon Mr. Bush is expected to sign prescription drug legislation, the biggest government health care program since the 1960s. And after that, a major highway bill. Jake Tapper, ABC News, Washington." Going forward, it would be nice if we could see a few more stories on ABC about the burden on taxpayers of creating a prescription drug entitlement than pieces focusing on elderly victims who cannot afford drugs and who demand others pay for them. > 5) President George W. Bush has discovered a way to avoid being influenced by liberal media bias: He avoids reading newspapers or watching television news. During Brit Hume's interview with Bush aired Monday night on Fox and FNC, Bush revealed how he relies on his staff for "objective" news summaries since "a lot of times there's opinions mixed in with news" from the usual media outlets. "We won't disagree with that sir," Hume quipped in response. Hume conducted his interview Sunday at the White House and during the first hour of prime time on Monday night Fox aired the hour-long "A Conversation with the President." It re-ran on FNC Monday night at midnight EDT/11pm CDT/10pm MDT/9pm PDT. The session ended with Hume wondering about Bush's news habits: "How do you get your news?" Bush: "I get briefed by Andy Card and Condi Rice in the morning. They come in and tell me. In all due respect, you've got a beautiful face and everything [both laugh]. I really don't. I glance at the headlines just to kind of get a flavor for what's moving. Rarely read the stories and get briefed by people who probably read the news themselves. Like Condi, in her case, the National Security Adviser is getting her news directly from the participants on the world stage." Hume: "Has that been your practice since day one or is that a practice that you've adopted?" Bush: "Since day one." Hume: "Really?" Bush: "Yeah, yeah. You know, look I have great respect for the media. I mean our society is a good, solid democracy because of a good, solid media, but I also understand that a lot of times there's opinions mixed in with news." Hume: "We won't disagree with that sir." Bush: "I appreciate people's opinions, but I'm more interested in news and the best way to get the news is from objective sources and the most objective sources I have are people who are on my staff who tell me what's happening in the world." I don't have the option of avoiding the news media but, in a way, CyberAlert is to CyberAlert subscribers what Andy Card and Condoleezza Rice are to Bush: The filter which cleanses the bias from the news. -- Brent Baker >>> Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon contributions which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax- deductible donation. Be sure to fill in "CyberAlert" in the field which asks: "What led you to become a member or donate today?" For the secure donations page: https://secure.mediaresearch.org/Donation/Order/MediaResearch25-27/mck-cgi/mrcdonate.asp To subscribe to CyberAlert, send a blank e-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the link at the very bottom of this message. Send problems and comments to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web site by subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every weekday afternoon. To subscribe, go to: http://www.mediaresearch.org/cybersub.asp#webnews <<< ==================================================================== Update your profile here: http://mrccyberalert.u.tclk.net/survey/?bUrD57.a6Hlsy.d2JhY29u Unsubscribe here: http://mrccyberalert.u.tclk.net/survey/?bUrD57.a6Hlsy.d2JhY29u.u Delivered by Topica Email Publisher, http://www.email-publisher.com/ www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
