-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 9/25/2003 3:19:44 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

WASHINGTON - Presidential hopeful Wesley Clark unveiled a $100 billion economic and homeland security plan Wednesday while two primary rivals questioned his commitment to the Democratic Party.


I would also be surprised to find General Wesley Clark (ret) to be a totally committed Democrat.  In my experience (more than you'd think) I found that not only were all men who made the upper strata of military rank to be super conservatives (politically) and therefore Republican in speech and vote, but I am reasonably sure that no one who was not a committed and conservative Republican could be admitted to the super senior ranks.  This is because the generals have always been super committed Republicans, and they (retired and otherwise) must pass on whomever Congress promotes to be a general.  I don't know if that is the law; but it certainly is the practice.  Ask anyone who watched what happened to Bull Simon.  It was really funny to watch the country holding its breath as to what party General Powell would commit.  Believe me there was no possibility of his being a Democrat. 

Wesley Clark either managed to fool the establishment for his entire military career or he's attempting to fool the public now.  I would vote for him in a heartbeat.  Here are the reasons. 

l.  I don't think he's a neo-con.

2.  He was not sitting on his haunches in Congress fighting Bush and Reagan (but not very hard) which is how one has to view most of the candidates. 

3.  He has a chance of winning, if the stupid Dem managers don't try to run him as the Democrat for the war against the Republican for the war.  A Democrat for Americans here at home might do it. 

4.  I'd vote for a Cocker Spaniel to get Nero and his fiddle out of the White House, before the entire country burns down or goes broke (whichever is sooner).

Prudy



www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to