-Caveat Lector- www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

World Socialist Web Site www.wsws.org

http://wsws.org/articles/2003/oct2003/cali-o02.shtml


WSWS : News & Analysis : North America

California Governor Gray Davis and the politics of law and order

By Shannon Jones
2 October 2003

Back to screen version| Send this link by email | Email the author

The right-wing character of the administration of Gray Davis, who faces an
October 7 recall election, is underscored by the Democratic governor’s
close links to California’s huge prison and law enforcement apparatus.

Despite California’s $38 billion budget deficit, the prison system escaped
with only a tiny overall reduction in funding in the recently approved state
budget. The corrections budget included $160 million for a new
department headquarters and $220 million for a new death row unit at San
Quentin prison.

Davis’s 2003-04 budget also maintained funds for a new maximum security
prison in Delano, now set to open in 2005. Cuts in the prison budget were
almost all in the area of prisoner welfare and rehabilitation, including a
reduction in funding for literacy and vocational programs and the
elimination of 500 substance abuse treatment beds.

The same budget included a large pay increase for prison guards, while
other state employees, such as college teachers and health care workers,
took layoffs and pay freezes. Under the terms of the new compensation
agreement, by 2006 the average pay of a prison guard will be three times
that of a starting public school teacher.

The fact that Davis insists on expanding the state’s prison system under
conditions of a virtual financial meltdown says a great deal about the social
base upon which his administration rests. It is also a telling exposure of the
Democratic Party, which has systematically adapted itself to the program
of the Republican right, abandoning its previous connection to policies of
liberal reform and competing with its rival big business party for the mantle
of law-and-order “toughness.”

The 2003-2004 California budget allocates some $5.2 billion for the prisons.
By comparison, California community colleges will get $4.4 billion and the
University of California system just $2.9 billion. A total of only $14 billion is
allocated for health care, under conditions where more than 7 million
Californians lack health insurance.

The growth of California’s prison population has been astounding, even by
US standards. In 1976 California had just 19,600 inmates and it spent six
times more on higher education than prisons.

Since 1980 California has built 23 prisons and only one new university.
California currently incarcerates more than 160,000 people. Its prison
system is the third largest in the world behind China and the United States
as a whole. More people are held in jail in California than in France,
Germany, Japan, the Netherlands and Singapore combined. More young
black and Latino men are in prison than are attending college.

Cheap labor

The Davis administration has sought to give corporations access to
California prisons as a source of cheap labor. The state allows companies
to set up operations behind prison walls and offers them tax incentives
and lower workers compensation charges. It also permits them to forego
payment of sick leave and retirement, vacation and medical benefits.

A notice on the State of California web site extols the benefits of inmate
labor, declaring: “The California Department of Corrections’ Joint Venture
Programs are located in over 30 California prisons and provide a unique
opportunity for today’s progressive business leaders. The Joint Venture
Program offers an untapped labor market for you, the employer, and
serves as a link between qualified businesses and highly motivated inmate
employees. Businesses can set up operations inside California State Prisons
and hire inmates at competitive wages.”

The claim that this program of forced prison labor in some way helps
prepare inmates for life on the outside is dispelled by an examination of
figures on recidivism. A higher percentage of prison inmates, once
released, returns to jail in California than in any other US state. According
to one study, 58 to 62 percent of the state’s parolees return to prison
within two years. The national average is a 10 to 15 percent return rate
over three to five years.

One of the reasons for the high recidivism rate in California is the
exceptionally brutal regime in the state’s prisons, which is geared to
humiliating and degrading prisoners, not at rehabilitating them. This is
exemplified by conditions at Corcoran State Prison. In a six-year period
between 1989 and 1995, guards at Corcoran shot more than forty
prisoners, killing seven. In 1998 California investigated allegations that
prison guards at Corcoran set up gladiator-style fights between prisoners,
pitting rival gangs against each other as a form of entertainment.

Eight guards were eventually brought to trial. The refusal of fellow guards
to testify against the defendants, which led to their acquittal, provoked
Amnesty International to accuse authorities of abetting a cover-up. The
human rights group wrote: “The shootings during the period of the
gladiator fights raise serious questions about the failure to ensure a safe
environment for inmates and staff and about the use of lethal force on
prisoners.” It noted that between 1988 and 1994 more prisoners were shot
by guards in California than in the rest of the country.

In his campaigns for governor in 1998 and 2002 Davis received $3.4 million in
donations from the California Correctional Peace Officers Association
(CCPOA), including a check last year for $251,000—the largest single
contribution he has ever received from an organization.

In his 2000 election campaign Davis boasted that he funded all grades of
law enforcement at the highest levels ever. In addition to the prison
guards, Davis won the endorsement of almost every major police
organization, including the California Highway Patrol and the Los Angeles
Police Protective League, whose members have been the subject of a
series of high- profile corruption and police brutality prosecutions.

The law-and-order policies of the Davis administration orient it toward
some of the most backward and reactionary social elements, which in turn
form a crucial base of support. At the same time Davis and the Democratic
Party as a whole have increasingly alienated the Democrats’ traditional
base among workers, the poor, minorities and immigrants.

Davis has essentially continued the reactionary law-and-order policies of
his predecessor, Pete Wilson, a Republican who oversaw a vast expansion
of the prisons. The numbers held in California penitentiaries grew by some
60 percent during Wilson’s two terms in office.

California resumed capital punishment in 1992 after a 25-year moratorium,
and Davis has overseen several executions.

The “three strikes law and you’re out” law—which mandates sentences of
25 years to life for all three-time felons, even those convicted of
nonviolent and petty offenses—has led to a large influx of long-term
prisoners. This, combined with the wholesale jailing of sellers and users of
drugs, during the 1990s gave California the fastest growing prison
population in the United States.

In California, reportedly 50 percent of third strikes are for minor offenses.
In one well- publicized case, a man received a 25-year to life sentence for
stealing a bottle of vitamins. The US Supreme Court refused to hear his
appeal. In another case, a homeless man received a 25-year to life
sentence for trying to steal food.

The two Republican replacement candidates in the special recall
election—film actor Arnold Schwarzenegger and State Senator Tom
McClintock—who are baying for further budget cuts, have not suggested
any reductions in the prison budget. Nor has the major Democratic
replacement candidate, Lieutenant Governor Cruz Bustamante.

Davis and Bustamante was well as McClintock and Schwarzenegger support
the continuation of the three-strikes law, aptly described by advocates of
prison reform as a job security program for prison guards.

Meanwhile, Davis has overruled the state parole board in more than 200
cases, denying release to prisoners deemed to be no longer a threat to
society. His refusal to grant parole to women convicted of killing abusive
spouses prompted an appeal by prisoner rights groups to the California
Supreme Court.

The malignant growth of the prison system in California and the US as a
whole is an expression of a social order in deep crisis, one that is capable
of only the most reactionary and repressive responses to social problems
such as poverty, deteriorating education, lack of affordable housing and
lack of access to health care.







Copyright 1998-2003
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved
Forwarded for your information.  The text and intent of the article
have to stand on their own merits.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do
not believe simply because it has been handed down for many genera-
tions.  Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and
rumoured by many.  Do not believe in anything simply because it is
written in Holy Scriptures.  Do not believe in anything merely on
the authority of teachers, elders or wise men.  Believe only after
careful observation and analysis, when you find that it agrees with
reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it." The Buddha on Belief,
from the Kalama Sutra




www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to