-Caveat Lector-

 The New World Order Exposed! by Victor Thorn
Victor Thorn presents THE NEW WORLD ORDER EXPOSED
Join Lisa Guliani's group at New World Order Corner
Direct comments to Victor at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Direct comments to Lisa at [EMAIL PROTECTED]


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Conservatives Duped By Neo-Cons
by Victor Thorn


NOTE: The Victor Thorn show airs every Monday night � 9:00 pm eastern
standard time � on the Reality Radio Network � www.realityradionetwork.com.

A subtle realization is sweeping across America�s rank-and-file
conservatives. These individuals are beginning to see that they�ve been
duped by neo-cons such as Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, and John R. Bolton
who are now firmly in control of U.S. foreign policy. The reason for their
disillusionment revolves around the neo-cons� origins, and the man who is
known as their patron saint � a German Jewish intellectual named Leo
Strauss.

To show how conservatives have been betrayed by these Straussian neo-cons,
we first need to identify who precisely these individuals are, and where
they came from. In other words, each and every conservative in this country
should be aware of who is supposedly championing their cause. The neo-cons
were originally a small-knit group of liberal Jewish intellectuals and
academics who were followers of Henry �Scoop� Jackson in the Democratic
Party. Yes, you read that correctly. The neo-cons had their roots in the
Democratic Party. But, due to their Zionist loyalties, these men felt that
the Democrats were not adequately supporting the Defense Department, so they
broke away during the Nixon era.

This influential clique, devotees of university professor Leo Strauss with
absolutely no military experience, soon migrated toward think tank groups
such as the PNAC (Project for a New American Century), the AEI (American
Enterprise Institute), and JINSA (the Jewish Institute for National Security
Affairs), and include the likes of Paul Wolfowitz, Henry Kissinger, Dick
Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Perle (aka �the prince of darkness�), John
Bolton, Douglas Feith, plus foreigners such as Ariel Sharon and Afghanistani
Zalmay Khalizad. This list also includes William Kristol (publisher of the
Weekly Standard), William Bennett, author Allan Bloom, and John Podhoretz
(New York Post editorialist).

On the surface, nothing seems out of the ordinary. But once we look at the
Defense Department�s relationship with Professor Leo Strauss, things start
to go awry. Why? Because everything the neo-cons stand for is in direct
opposition to the tenets of authentic conservatism. If you�re not convinced,
read on.

To begin, let me ask this question: how can true fiscal conservatives
support a cabinet that is so economically liberal with our country�s
finances that every Democratic administration before it pales in comparison?
(Also, please note, Republicans control both houses of the Congress.) And I�
m not only talking about defense spending. Every single government
department has had its budget raised dramatically. Every one! The result is
that our federal deficit for 2003 will top $550 billion, and is likely to
top $600 billion in 2004. Our economy is in such a vulnerable position that
Ken Moritsugu, writing for Knight-Ridder newspapers on September 25, 2003,
said, �A dollar crash could devastate the American and global economies.�
And what do the neo-cons want Congress to do? Give them $87 billion more to
spend in Iraq, including $164 million to improve the Iraqi army�s school
curriculum, $100 million for garbage trucks, and $400 million for two new
prisons priced at $50,000/bed! (Source: Alan Fram, Associated Press) This
isn�t fiscal conservatism, its outright insanity.

Likewise, conservatives adhere to a constitutionally limited government with
rights spelled-out by our Founding Fathers. Yet here is what Leo Strauss,
neo-con godfather, has to say about this concept: �Essential truth about
human society and history should be held by an elite and withheld from
others who lack the fortitude to deal with truth.� He also wrote,
�Philosophers need to tell noble lies not only to the people at large, but
also to the powerful politicians whom they serve.� Now remember, the
neo-cons see themselves first and foremost as PHILOSOPHERS! Keep this in
mind when you consider the WMD debacle, especially when Shadia Drury writes
in Leo Strauss and the American Right: �Perpetual deception of the citizens
by those in power is critical in Strauss� view.� In a May 22, 2003 article
entitled Leo Lincoln? Thomas J. DiLorenzo added, �Strauss believed in
perpetual deception of the ruled by their rulers if nationalistic objectives
are to be achieved.� In this sense, the only people who are able to
understand the �hidden meaning� of history are THEM � the intellectuals �
while the public at large is kept in the dark about their true political
designs. Does this sound like a constitutional republic with democratic
rule, or more like a New World Order secret society?

Conservatives have to ask themselves: do we really want a system where an
elite few rule (a philosopher-king similar to England�s King George) where
state power and unlimited government keep increasing in the name of
nationalism? Folks, Strauss and his adherents are precisely what our
Founding Fathers warned us against. But according to Leo Strauss, �Those who
are fit to rule are those who realize there is no morality and that there is
only one natural right, the right of the superior to rule over the
 inferior.�

These words are even more chilling when viewed in the context of our current
perpetual war scenario (which many in the Bush administration admit could go
on for 40 or 50 more years). But from my perspective, true conservatives
believe in a strong defense and the containment of our enemies, not an
in-your-face Orwellian nightmare where new antagonists are created each
week. In other words, do we want a combination of strength and prevention,
or as Strauss condones, an �aggressive belligerent foreign policy?�

Jim Lobe takes this sentiment one step further in a May 19, 2003 article,
stating that Strauss believed, �An omnipotent state can only be maintained
if there is an external threat, even if one has to be manufactured.� (Leo
Strauss� Philosophy of Deception) Strauss even went so far as to say, �Are
political entities not compelled to use force and fraud if they are to
prosper?� Joshua Jonah Marshall adds even more damning weight to this
argument in an article for the Washington Monthly about Strauss and the
neo-cons. �It�s okay to be spectacularly wrong, even brazenly deceptive
about the details, so long as you have a moral vision and a willingness to
use force.� Maybe conservatives should start rethinking who they put their
trust in, especially in light of the preponderance of evidence pointing
toward foreknowledge of the 9-11 terrorist attacks both inside and outside
the government, deceit regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction, and Richard
Perle�s deliberate lie to an Italian journalist when he said that Mohammed
Atta met with Saddam Hussein in Baghdad prior to 9-11. What do true
conservatives want � honesty in government, or a rationalization for
�necessary lies� (Strauss)? Or, again as Strauss condones, do we want the
masses to be lied to for our own PROTECTION? But in all honesty, these
people don�t really want to protect us, for Strauss wrote, �Because mankind
is intrinsically wicked, he has to be governed. Such governance can only be
established, however, when men are united � and they can only be united
against each other.� Folks, this is the New World Order�s divide-and-conquer
philosophy at its ugliest and most base � a Machiavellian view that new
enemies must always be created, even if they don�t actually exist. To these
lunatics, Orwellian perpetual war is much more desirable than lasting peace.

But doesn�t plotting man against his fellow man on a continual basis negate
everything that conservatives adhere to in regard to their Christian
beliefs? I�m sorry to break this to you, but Leo Strauss felt that even
though religion was important, they should not be bound by it. Rather, he
saw religion as a propaganda device which the State used to exert more
control over the populace, especially where war was concerned. Karl Marx
once opined that religion was an opiate for the masses, and Leo Strauss
agreed, saying that people needed their opium. William Strauss clarified
Strauss�s views on this subject by writing, �The ostensibly hidden truth is
that expediency works; there is no certain God to punish wrongdoing; and
virtue is unattainable by most people. Machiavelli was right. There is a
natural hierarchy of humans, and rulers must restrict free inquiry and
exploit the mediocrity and vice of ordinary people so as to keep society in
order.� Ladies and gentlemen, do these sound like the thoughts of a
god-fearing Christian conservative, or the ranting of an opportunistic pagan
closer to Hitler than Reagan? And remember, Leo Strauss is the �guiding
light� of the neo-con movement!

Haven�t conservatives been historically suspicious of liberal, secular,
intellectual academics? Well, that�s what the neo-cons are, and here is what
they believe in:

      - Most people cannot be virtuous
      - Most people cannot handle the truth
      - Only the elite have the means for truth
      - The elite should keep the �truth� to only themselves
      - There is no God to punish wrongdoers, thus man (self-appointed
benevolent dictators)          should be the ones to do it
      - There is a natural hierarchy of humans (does this sound reminiscent
of a caste system? If so,          whatever happened to all men being
created equal?)
      - The elite have every right to limit inquiry into their actions
      - Finally, the elite can exploit the masses for their own benefit and
gain

Can you see what they condone? Is it starting to sink in? This isn�t even
remotely close to the hope-filled tenets of our Constitution. Instead, it
reeks of darkness, elitism, and a 1984-style anti-Utopia. Ex-CIA agent
Raymond McGovern recently told us in an interview that everyone in the
George Bush, Sr. cabinet called these fledgling neo-cons the �crazies� and
wanted to keep them far-removed and out-of-sight in a corner. Even the
current CIA is fed-up with their shenanigans and refuse to stay silent about
their lies any longer. (The nonexistent Niger-Iraqi yellowcake uranium
documents are a perfect example.) These warmongering nut-cases are so
extreme that their closest political parallel would be Israel�s Likud Party,
who undoubtedly represent one of the biggest obstacles to peace in the
Middle East. What�s even scarier is that there are still people who
wholeheartedly embrace these individuals and their Brave New World
philosophies.

Luckily, conservatives are beginning to see that these neo-cons are nothing
more than IMPLEMENTERS for the New World Order, and are being used as a
cover story to further their Globalist aims to make the U.N. an overlord for
our perpetual war culture. These evil men don�t believe in democracy,
American sovereignty, or the form of government envisioned by our Founding
Fathers. Instead, they�re promoting an agenda that is far removed from what
everyday conservatives hold dear.

To close, I�ll leave you with two quotes. The first comes from Jeet Heer of
The Boston Globe: �If you read Strass with a skeptical mind, he emerges as a
disguised Machiavelli, a cynical teacher who encouraged his followers to
believe that their intellectual superiority entitles them to rule over the
bulk of humanity by means of duplicity.�

The second originates from Burt Blumert: �Neocons, as ex-Trotskyites, are
bad enough, but those who follow the pro-pagan Leo Strauss are deadly. He
advocated the Big Lie. Forgive me for all the gory details, but these
people � with their other leaders like Bill Buckley and Irving Kristol and
the help of the CIA � perverted the American Right into loving the
welfare-warfare State.�

All the harm and evils that Bill Clinton did to America as a student of
Carroll Quigley, Paul Wolfowitz and his mentor Leo Strauss are doing to the
conservative movement. If you see the correlation between these two forces,
then it�s clear that we need to send these �crazies� packing � the sooner
the better. I just hope that the damage they�ve done hasn�t paved the way
for a Democratic devil like Hillary Clinton to stroll into the Oval Office.







----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to