-Caveat Lector- www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

* * * * * * * * * * * * REMINDER * * * * * * * * * * * * *

On the days that I don't publish, like today, you will
receive Bill Bonner's DAILY RECKONING. This will help you
to keep pace with the changes in the markets.  Bonner and
I agree on most things in the field of economics, so the
two letters will reinforce each other.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Decline Of The Old Order

The Daily Reckoning

Paris, France

Wednesday, 22 October 2003

                 ----------------------

*** Our work grows easier -- there a fewer silly ideas to
make fun of...

*** People giving money away...  is it wrong to take it?

*** Nobel Prize winner says no recovery. It's Greenspan's
fault, says Stiglitz. Royal battles...  and more!

                 ----------------------

It is almost like a vacation here at the Daily Reckoning
headquarters.  We still come to office early in the morning
and leave late at time... but our work has grown easier.

Our labor consists of ridiculing the conceits and foolish
ideas in the investment media.  Though stocks are selling
near all-time highs, pundits, economists and analysts have
ceased trying to explain it with comic hypotheses.   Gone
are the absurdities of the late '90s... that the Dow will
go to 36,000... .that the Information Age will make us all
rich... .that Greenspan won't permit a bear market or a
recession.  All that is left is the illusion of
productivity and growth... .and the bedrock belief that God
shines his light upon stocks, the dollar, and the American
system of consumer capitalism.

Why a dollar's worth of earnings in America should be worth
more than a dollar's worth in other countries is never
explained.  And why should a dollar's worth of earnings be
worth more today than it was in 1990... .1980 or 1970 or
1960?  No one even tries to offer an explanation.  That's
just the way it is.  Period.

Not that we know anything different, but we have observed
that when people come to believe they bask in God's special
light, they begin to do odd things.  They give away their
money, for example.  We recall that religious zealots gave
away their farms and houses in the early 19th century,
during what was called 'the Great Awakening.'.  Moved by a
prophesy, they gathered on hilltops and roofs, expecting to
be taken up to heaven all at once.

In today's world's, people are no less credulous.  The
prophets of CNBC have told them that a 'recovery' is
here... .and that 'stocks always go up in the long run.'
And so they give their money away, trusting that they will
soon be sunning themselves in paradise, or Florida.

Back in the late '90s, investors gave their money away to
dot.com hustlers.  Today, they give it away to tech
companies trading at 40 times earnings... if they have
earnings at all.

"Tech companies never have free cash flow, never make any
money and have competitors all over the place," explained
Seth Klarman in Grant's Interest Rate Observer.  "So, I
think they'll be some carnage there... "

Foreign central banks are giving away money too -- by
buying Bush-era U.S. treasury bonds at Eisenhower-era
rates.  With the U.S. budget deficit rising to 5% of GDP...
and the current account deficit approaching 6%,, who can
doubt that buying T-bonds (by foreigners, especially) is a
form self-sacrifice?

"A situation like this which has emerged over the past few
years implies an increasing financial vulnerability of the
United States," explains Antony P. Mueller.  "If the
busying spree by foreign central banks should stop or even
reverse, the impact would affect the dollar exchange rate,
the treasury market and the domestic price level with the
consequences of a sinking dollar, a sharp rise of domestic
interest rates and an increased inflation rate. It is
highly unlikely that the American economy would prove
resilient enough to withstand such a triple blow." See
Antony's article on the Daily Reckoning website:

The End Of Dollar Supremacy?
http://www.dailyreckoning.com/body_headline.cfm?id=3497

Who else is giving away money? Sellers of gold? Buyers of
the dollar?

But what of us?  Is it wrong for us to take advantage of
these poor pilgrims?  Is it immoral for us to take these
naifs' money... .by selling them tech shares or Treasury
bonds?

Au contraire, we feel we must be doing God's own work.
Bearing no false witness and holding no gun to their heads,
we help separate fools from their money.  Besides, only God
knows who is the fool... and only in time will He tell.

Over to you, Addison, for more news:

                 ----------------------

Addison Wiggin, ridiculing the pundits from about 6 feet
away...

- Nothing but good news from the great River-Of-No-Returns,
Amazon.com last night. After the close of the stock market
in New York, Amazon reported a 'small' profit for the third
quarter. We quaffed the announcement with satisfaction,
noting that the third was the same quarter our book
Financial Reckoning Day debuted at Bezo's store, and surely
it's brisk sales help to tip the scales from 'minuscule' to
'small' small. (As always, we're eager to help... )

- It's a shame, though, we had grown used to calling it the
River-Of-No-Returns. Looks like we may have to knock it
off, eh? Wait...  what's this? Maybe we won't.

- Even with annual sales in the vicinity of $4 billion this
year, Scott Rothbort from Lake View Asset Management, by
way of USAToday, says Amazon is not likely to "post a full
year's worth of profit anytime soon." Yesterday, we
Dailyreckoneers, were in awe to discover, having bothered
to take a look, that Amazon's shares had skyrocketed from a
$6 low to a 52-week high of nearly $60 - a 900% gain. Yet,
to the casual onlooker the still have no clear plan for
profits.

- "Amazon is wildly overvalued," says Rothbort. You don't
say...  "River-Of-No-Returns" it is! Amazon's share price
fell 2% on the news.

- Marketwide, the rally kept on a steamin' forward...  even
if supplies of coal appear to be running low. The Nasdaq
and the S&P both posted gains of 15 and 2 points,
respectively. The Dow being the only exception. The grand
old iron horse of Wall Street slowed...  and eventually
through the throttle in reverse for a 30 point loss to
9747.

- "Congratulations on the brisk sales of the book," writes
a reader. "Unfortunately, if it climbs any higher in the
charts, my contrarian discipline will require me to
discount everything it says." We note with satisfaction
that sales have been rather steady, both on Amazon (you're
welcome, Jeffrey) and at bn.com. We're told there is a
table top display at a Borders in Lower Manhattan...  in
fact, the book is now widely available at Borders and brick
and mortar bookstores across the country.

- Another reader, who identifies himself as a private
futures and stocks trader, calls attention to a fact that
has made us somewhat un-easy about the book ourselves. "I
have read 421 books in the last 11 years," he writes  "And
since 1996, I have read 59 books about economics and
investing, a couple written back in the mid and
late-1800s.

- "Of all those books, I just completed what I view as the
most important book I have ever read about economics,
investing and the most likely future of the US and world
economies. Important in the sense, and on a personal level,
that it will likely make a big difference in my own
family's financial survival and future progress.

- "If I could change one thing about the book," [ahhh, we
knew there would be a catch] "it would be the title.
[Financial Reckoning Day] sounds as if it is an emotional
effort to sensationalize the U.S. and world economic
problems of the last 3 years. It is nothing of the kind.

- "It is a serious, thorough and thoughtful history and
analysis of economic, political and military history and
most importantly, human behavior since the French
Revolution. It dissects and analyzes the Japanese economy
since 1980, enlightens and clarifies the actions of Alan
Greenspan since 1987 and specifies in detail the coming
'deleveraging of America.' It is well written, and even
humorous at times. More importantly, Bonner and Wiggin's
effort will, in my opinion, be proved all too accurate."

- And that's just it...  "Financial Reckoning Day" is
gussied up like a teenage librarian on her way to the
senior prom without a date; it's been packaged for the
market as though it were sexy, but in reality it would
prefer to be snuggled at home in a terry-cloth robe
finishing its homework. You can still get a 35% discount by
following this link:

The Least Well-Kept Secret In Financial Publishing
http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/RCKN/FDR

- One of the major themes, of course, is the deleveraging
of America, our trader friend refers to above. We recall, a
few weeks back, attending a luncheon in London offered by
the folks at Arbor Research, with their hotshot analyst Jim
Bianco. Our friend and colleague, Dan Denning put the
question to Jim: "What would happen if the credit quality
of US government debt were to be downgraded?" citing as
possible causes, the Treasury's exposure to derivatives
risk at the behest of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

- "It would never happen," came Bianco's reply, "That would
mean the end of the modern financial system." The answer
was, of course, both matter-of-fact and shocking all at
once. While, Bianco didn't see the possibility, Denning got
to work figuring out how he could judge the quality of US
debt versus that of the banana republic kind.

- Using a calculation he calls the BED Spread, Denning
notes that the Morgan Stanley Government Income Trust - a
trust containing a basket of US government debt, such as
Treasuries and Fannie and Freddie bonds � has converged
with a similar basket of emerging market debt, each of the
last three times he's made the calculation. In short, the
yield on debt issued by Uncle Sam is rising, meaning the
market believes it's becoming more risky, while yields on
emerging market debt are falling...  or becoming less
risky. (More from Denning and the Bed Spread...  in
tomorrow's guest essay. Look for it... )

                 ----------------------

Bill Bonner back in Paris, fresh off the Eurostar from
London...

*** We quote from London's MoneyWeek, edited by our new
friend Merryn Somerset Webb:

"There will be no robust recovery, [according to
Nobel-prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz], and much of
the fault lies with Alan Greenspan, the chairman of the
Federal Reserve... ."

"'More jobs have been lost under Bush than since Herbert
Hoover and the Great Depression,' Stiglitz told The
Observer. 'In the private sector more money has been wasted
though misallocation of capital in the stockmarket bubble
than the government could ever manage.' Neither the recent
tax cut, nor the increase in military spending, will give
the US economy the stimulus it needs.

"The trade deficit has the underlying problem of what will
happen when foreigners decide to stop funding the US
deficit... "

Then, what will Mr. Greenspan do?  More rate cuts?  More
liquidity?  More talk of productivity increases and New
Eras?

No, it will be time for Mr. Greenspan to express his
regrets, blame the Chinese and retire... .

***  'Royals at War!' screams a London tabloid headline
this morning.  The battle rages, according to press
reports, over the latest revelations brought to us from a
former butler to Princess Diana.  This war has been going
on for a long time, we note.  But the British never seem to
get tired of it.  In the latest news, letters from Prince
Philip tell us that he thought his son was mad.  Only a
'crazy man,' he wrote to Diana, 'would leave you for
Camilla.'

*** Here's a sad item. "Man who survived Iraq is gunned
down in LA" says a TIMES headline. "With an annual murder
rate of about 653 -- up 11.1% on 2001 -- the sprawling
slums of Los Angeles are arguably as dangerous a place to
live for young Americans as Baghdad. The murder rate is 4
times the national average and double that of Bogota, the
Colombian capital."

                 --- Advertisement ---

Know How a Stock Will Trade!

I've discovered three indicators that can tell you which
way a stock is likely to trade! Using them, you can make
money in any market. In fact, I've built a stock picking
system around these proven indicators.

And it works... With my MST Trader Alert System, you could
be pulling in gains like 44%, 54%, 103%, 147% and even
455%... in a matter of days. Once you see these indicators
in action, you'll never trade without them.
Find out what they are.
http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/MST/Momentum/



                 ----------------------

The Daily Reckoning PRESENTS: Our favorite British
historian puts today's macro-political and economic puzzle
in historical perspective.


DECLINE OF THE OLD ORDER
by William Rees-Mogg

Early in the 20th century there was much fashionable
concern in Europe about the decline of the West. Many
observers thought that the European lead in 19th century
manufacturing would prove to have been a temporary
advantage, that Europe was suffering from long-term social
decadence, and that Asia would become the dominant
continent by sheer weight of numbers.

This fear was particularly widespread in Germany, where it
not only related to the massive populations of India and
China, but also to Russia, the Asian country that already
had a European presence. Some at least of the Kaiser's
advisors at the start of the First World War thought that
they were fighting a pre-emptive campaign. If they did not
destroy Russia while they could, Russia would simply become
too strong for them.

Most Europeans also took a racist view of the Asian
populations and, as with all racism, there was fear mixed
in with the feeling of racial superiority. In 1914,
everybody feared populations to the east of them. The
Russians feared the "Mongol Hordes" and the Japanese, who
had defeated Russia in the War of 1905, the first war in
which an Asian power proved to have technological
superiority over a European country. It has to be admitted
that the Russian navy in 1905 was astonishingly
incompetent, shooting up some British trawlers in the
Dogger Bank incident before traveling around the world to
be sunk by the Japanese at Port Arthur.

The Germans and the Austro-Hungarian Empire feared the Slav
populations of Russia and the Balkans. That fear led the
Austrians to want to take the excuse to crush Serbia in
1914. The French and British feared the Germans. Only the
Americans were too far away across the Atlantic to fear
anybody in particular.

We all know that Asia did not come to dominate the world of
the 20th century. There was a decline of the West, in that
Europe started two World Wars and was a major victim of
both of them. But the rising power turned out not to be
Asia but the United States, which became the leading world
power during the Second World War, replacing the British
Empire, and the leading technological power even earlier,
from the rise of the twin giants, electricity and the
automobile.

To the historian of 500 years' time, there may well seem to
have been a nearly continuous period of English speaking
world leadership, which will probably be dated from the
Seven Years' War, when France lost Canada and India and
failed to crush the rising power of Russia under Frederick
the Great. The British period lasted from 1759 to 1914 --
despite the separation from the American colonies after
1776. The baton was passed between 1914 and 1945, and the
United States has carried the baton since 1945. The
combined period of English speaking hegemony has been about
250 years, and all forecasts of the decline of American
power have thus far proved premature.

In the first half of the 20th century, Asia notably failed
to take advantage of the decline of Europe, though between
1900 and 1945 Europe manifestly did decline. Between 1945
and the present day, Europe has recovered to a certain
degree, but there is absolutely no sign of Europe regaining
the relative position of 1900. The European Union is a big
economy but has high costs, middle-rank technology -- most
of Europe's exports are of products invented before 1900 --
and very limited defense capacity. Yet Asia, like Europe,
has so far been developing under the ultimate security of
the U.S. defense umbrella.

Russia proved that the communist model, though quite
efficient at the task of fighting the Second World War, was
not sufficiently variable or competitive to be economically
viable in peacetime. China made the same mistake. The
Japanese invasion cost China one generation of development,
and the victory of Chairman Mao and the Communist
Revolution cost another. China is still 50 years behind
where she should have been if development had not been
interrupted.

Japan's great mistake was Pearl Harbor, and it set back
Japanese development, which was well ahead of the Chinese
before 1900, by a generation. For these reasons the major
Asian powers, as well as India, which had adopted a
relatively benign form of British Social Democracy, failed
to take advantage of the opportunity that was presented by
Europe's acts of powerful self-destruction.

However, both demography and arithmetic are on Asia's side,
as they always were. The combined population of China,
India, Russia and Japan, the big four of Asian powers,
amount to about 2.6 billion people, close to half the
world's population. The combined population of the European
Union and the United States, even if Canada and Mexico are
added in, comes to less than a billion. The North Atlantic
powers have a population that is not more than a third of
the Asian four. The European population is relatively
elderly, and birth rates in Europe are extremely low. These
are factors of decline. For the next 30 years at least, the
major Asian countries will have much lower costs than the
North Atlantic group, though at some still-distant point,
they will catch up, as Japan has already done.

The educational standards of the brightest and best
students in the Asian countries are extremely high. China
has always believed in educating an elite -- the Mandarin
class in the old China -- and that policy has been followed
again. These Chinese students are privileged, extremely
well taught, and strongly motivated. The top 10% of Chinese
high school students are probably well ahead of their U.S.
or European counterparts. The same may be seen in other
Asian countries, as it would most notably be in some small
countries like Singapore. All four of the big countries
have developed a substantial middle class that is still
growing in number, and, as in Western democracy,
governments have to be able to satisfy the wants of these
middle class people, as consumers as well as citizens. Only
China is still a directed society, and the conditions on
which the Chinese Communist Party holds power are those of
performance. Only so long as they satisfy the Chinese
people will they be able to remain in office.

The next 50 years will see the great Asian advance, unless
it is interrupted by political divisions, war, or other
disasters. The Chinese economy will be generally comparable
to the United States by 2050. Japan, which is a more
advanced economy, is the major external investor in the
development of Chinese industry. The Chinese economy will
grow about twice as fast as the American. India will take
longer but is already a major exporter of IT services.

Inside Asia the growth potential will probably be led by
China, with India second and Russia and Japan third. In
global competition, the order will be Asia first, America
second, Europe third.

Unless Europe can find a way to become more competitive,
which is proving very difficult on the continent, European
living standards may actually decline from high costs,
fixed regulations, and an ageing population.  Asia is a
major area of investment opportunity. The United States is
likely to keep the technological and defense lead.

Best regards,


William Rees-Mogg
for The Daily Reckoning

Editor's note: Leading political editor William Rees-Mogg
is the former Editor-in-Chief for The Times of London and a
member of the House of Lords. He is a frequent contributor
to: Strategic Investment. And editor of the excellent
three-volume "Case For Gold". For more information go to:

The Case For Gold
http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/905STCFG/W905D952/


------------------------------------------------------

The Daily Reckoning is a free daily e-mail service
brought to you by the authors of the Wall Street Journal
Best-seller: "Financial Reckoning Day: Surviving the Soft
Depression of the 21st Century" (John Wiley & Sons).

For a limited time only, you can purchase Financial
Reckoning Day for a 30% discount! You'll
have to hurry if you want to catch it...

See: The Least Well Kept Secret In Financial Publishing
http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/RCKN/FDR/

------------------------------------------------------
MAKE YOUR OPINIONS COUNT! Visit our Discussion Board at
http://www.agora-inc.com/forums/index.cfm?cfapp=3
and submit your views or read what others are saying.
Our writers and contributors also welcome your questions
and comments. Simply reply with the word 'Question' or
'Comment' in the Subject of your e-mail.

------------------------------------------------------
If you'd like, please e-mail this issue of the Daily
Reckoning to a friend:

http://www.dailyreckoning.com/emailfriend.cfm?id=6988

------------------------------------------------------
ADDRESS CHANGE? WISH TO CANCEL? You can administer your
account online. Simply go to Subscriber Services at:

http://www.dailyreckoning.com/subsvcs.cfm
------------------------------------------------------


*******
Please note: We sent this e-mail to:
    RA Millegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
because you or someone using your e-mail address subscribed to this service.

*******
To manage your e-mail subscription, use our web interface at:
    http://www.agoramail.net/Home.cfm?List=RealityC
Or to end your e-mail subscription, send a blank e-mail to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To cancel or for any other subscription issues, write us at:
    Order Processing Center
    Attn: Customer Service
    P.O. Box 925
    Frederick, MD 21705

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to