Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
--- Begin Message --- -Caveat Lector- Israeli Intelligence led the US
and the UK to launch on Iraq
By Richard H. Curtiss
Arab News
http://www.aljazeerah.info/
WASHINGTON, 19 December 2003 â Itâs no secret that much of the news reported in Israelâs Hebrew-language media never reaches the mainstream American press, for the simple reason that items unfavorable to Israel generally are not translated. And, because very few Israelis break this self-imposed censorship, items from the Hebrew press that do appear may be much more newsworthy than their anemic English translations indicate.
It was a bit stunning, therefore, to read an article in Strategic Assessment, the quarterly bulletin issued by the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies at Tel Aviv University. The report, titled âThe War in Iraq: An Intelligence Failure?â was written by Shlomo Brom, a brigadier general in the Israeli Army reserves, and said what no one seems to have dared publish since President George W. Bush decided to wage war on Iraq. Shockingly, it told the full truth about the American and British intelligence âsourcesâ making the case for war.
In fact, according to Brom, these sources were utterly compromised by Israeli intelligence, which made the case for starting the war and kept it going as long as necessary. The retired general described Israel as a âfull partnerâ in US and British intelligence failures that exaggerated Iraqâs nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs in the lead up to the US-led invasion.
Israeli intelligence sources and political leaders provided âan exaggerated assessment of Iraqi capabilities,â raising âthe possibility that the intelligence had been manipulated,â wrote Brom, former deputy chief of planning for the Israeli Army.
Brom said his remarks were directed at Israelâs Military Intelligence, Air Force Intelligence and the Mossad intelligence agency. Similar allegations have surfaced from US and British sources following months of futile efforts to uncover evidence of Iraqâs pre-war weapons programs.
In a Dec. 5 article, Washington Post correspondent Molly Moore quoted from the report: ââIn the questioning of the picture painted by coalition intelligence, the third party in this intelligence failure, Israel, has remained in the shadows...A critical question to be answered is whether governmental bodies falsely manipulated the intelligence information in order to gain support for their decision to go to war in Iraq, while the real reasons for this decision were obfuscated or concealed.ââ
Articles by Laura King of the Los Angeles Times, Peter Enav of Salon.com.News, and the Associated Press also appeared on the report.
Brig. Gen. Bromâs criticism of the Israeli intelligence community â which many Americans believe to be one of, if not the worldâs best â was unusual. Like many retired intelligence officers, Brom, who retired after a 25-year career, most likely continued to be privy to a great deal of sensitive government information.
According to Brom, Israeli intelligence âbadly overestimated the Iraqi threat to Israel and reinforced the American and British belief that the weapons existed.â
Attributing the poor intelligence to a lack of professionalism and poor supervision, Brom wrote, âEven if Iraq had any Scud missiles left, I canât understand how Israeli intelligence officers came to believe they threatened Israel, particularly when they hadnât been used in more than 10 years. Itâs a clear example of how an inability to think clearly is undermining the Israeli intelligence community.â
âBrom also cited bitter memories of the 1973 Middle East war,â Enav reported, âwhen Israeli intelligence failed to anticipate an attack by Egypt and Syria, and the country suffered thousands of casualties.â
As Brom observed in his report, âIsraeli intelligence agencies have tended to overstate the threat the country faces ever since 1973.â
Wrote The Postâs Moore, âThe study did not cite specific exchanges of intelligence. Israeli officials frequently told foreign journalists before the war that Israel and the United States were sharing information, particularly regarding Iraqi missiles and non-conventional weapons that could possibly be used against Israel. The report accused intelligence agencies of being blinded by a one-dimensional perception of Saddam Hussein.â
Moore continued, âAt the heart of this perception lay the colorful portrait of an embodiment of evil, a man possessed by a compulsion to develop weapons of mass destruction in order to strike Israel and others, regardless of additional considerations.â
âWhen âIsraeli intelligence became aware that certain items had been transferred by the head of the regime from Iraq to Syria,â Moore quoted the report as saying, âIsraeli intelligence immediately portrayed it â including in leaks to the media â as if Iraq was moving banned weapons out of Iraq in order to conceal them.ââ
Brom criticized Israeli intelligence for failing to include the more probable scenario that Saddam Hussein and his aides were moving cash or family members out of the country in the face of an impending attack.
âThe study noted,â Moore wrote, âthat Israeli and US governments have disagreed over the past decade on the âweight of various threats in the Middle East.â The report said Israel has generally claimed that Iran poses a more serious threat than Iraq, because the latter was âcontained and under control.ââ
Moore further quoted the Brom report as saying that âOnce the Bush administration decided to take action against Iraq, it was more difficult for Israel to maintain its position that dealing with Iraq was not the highest priority, especially when it was obvious that the war would serve Israelâs interests.â
One thing is certain. Israelâs competing intelligence services soon will begin â if they havenât already â to write scenarios explaining why it will be necessary to bomb Iranian weapons technology, and a whole new virtual weapons industry will materialize. The reason, of course, is to focus international attention on yet another ârogue state,â so as not to have to deal with the real problem, making peace with Palestinians. How much longer can this flight from reality be allowed to last?
â Richard H. Curtiss is the executive editor of the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs Magazine
www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substanceânot soap-boxingâplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'âwith its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsâis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
--- End Message ---
