-Caveat Lector-

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:35:06 -0800 (PST)
From: Party of Citizens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
     [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [THE-DIALECTIC-OF-THE-DIALECTIC] "Jews alone are responsible for
    the murder of over 6 million Christians"

Dear Governor General:

Your office represents decorum and propriety in Canada. If Mr. Byfield
correctly quoted your husband as below, could we accept the subject line
above as equally qualified to be "good speak" in Canada? In any case, you
see how much we need an updated Wiener Book. Do you think one could be
issued under your auspices? We wouldn't want the public to think of you as
"lily livered". "Lily livered" was not proscribed as was "yellow coward"
in the original Wiener Book.

The subject line statement could be said in the context of Stuart Kahan's
book, published by mainstream Morrow Publ. as a biography PRAISING his
uncle Kaganovich, arguably the main person responsible for the holocaust
of >6 million Ukrainians from 1932-33. Most of them were Christians. Kahan
says most of that original 1917 government in Russia were Jews. So the point
here is that this isn't even "revisionist" history. It is mainstream.
And people could make the statement put forward in the subject line in
good conscience as no doubt your husband made his statement against
Christians. We need a new book on goodspeak, badspeak and nospeak in
Canada. Could you please help the citizens of Canada and BC to get one?
Perhaps it could be called "Equilibrium II".

POC

On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, Party of Citizens wrote:

> The next time you talk to Zundel, Mr. Fromm, ask him if he ever removed
> anyone from his online discussions, ie CENSORED them, because he did not
> like what they said. Censorship is rampant in your circles. EVERY
> culture/society/nation on this planet has a code of totem and taboo, of
> goodspeak, badspeak and nospeak. Every such social-political entity has
> its censorship. Byfield's rant is naive to the point of stupidity. Go
> right ahead and ignore the reality of something which Doug Christie would
> recognize as part of the COMMON LAW were he not a quack lawyer. That
> reality of totem and taboo is something Jerry Wiener started to hammer out
> with his book on politically correct and incorrect speech in Canada when
> he was multicult minister under Mulroney. We need a new and improved
> Wiener Book. Meanwhile, add Byfield to you, Christie and Zundel for group
> therapy at the Toronto Centre for Dialectical Psychiatry. Your ego
> problems are maladaptively blinding you to social-political REALITY.
>
> Take the cure!
>
> Zandu Goldbar
> Learned Elder of Zion
>
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, C-FAR wrote:
>
> > February 13, 2004
> > Cultural divide
> > By LINK BYFIELD -- Calgary Sun
> >
> > However, as we all know, your right to "respect" these days depends
> > entirely on the political status of your particular group.
> >
> > You can say, for instance, "Christians alone are responsible for the murder
> > of six million Jews," as our esteemed First Husband John Ralston Saul wrote
> > in his recently published book On Equilibrium. Was there an "investigation"
> > of this absurd and hateful "dissonance" by the spouse of the Governor
> > General?
> >
> > No, the prime minister replied in Parliament, "this is Canada. He can say
> > what he wants."
> >
> > These demagogues may be ridiculous, but they are not funny. They are a
> > menace to our most fundamental rights, and they must be relentlessly opposed.
> > ----
> > Link Byfield is chairman of the Citizens Centre for Freedom and Democracy.
> > He can be reached by e-mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> ***** Let us talk about what we are not supposed to talk about until we know 
> good-speak from bad-speak; Whitehouse moronspeak from smartspeak. What is the code 
> of totem and taboo under Whitehouse-Orwellian "newspeak" as it was called in 1984? 
> What is "doubleplus ungood crimethink" in Orwell's classic? *****
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>



***** Let us talk about what we are not supposed to talk about until we know 
good-speak from bad-speak; Whitehouse moronspeak from smartspeak. What is the code of 
totem and taboo under Whitehouse-Orwellian "newspeak" as it was called in 1984? What 
is "doubleplus ungood crimethink" in Orwell's classic? *****




Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/THE-DIALECTIC-OF-THE-DIALECTIC/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to