-Caveat Lector-

"I pledge Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to
the REPUBLIC for which it stands,  one Nation under God,indivisible,with
liberty and justice for all."

 visit my web site at
http://www.voicenet.com/~wbacon My ICQ# is 79071904
for a precise list of the powers of the Federal Government linkto:
http://www.voicenet.com/~wbacon/Enumerated.html

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 08:03:21 -0800
From: Media Research Center <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MRC Alert: Stephanopoulos Pleads to McCain for 'Dream Ticket' with
    Kerry

              ***Media Research Center CyberAlert***
      11am EST, Monday March 8, 2004 (Vol. Nine; No. 40)
 The 1,677th CyberAlert. Tracking Liberal Media Bias Since 1996

> WashPost Reporter Advises Dems "Connect the Dots" Against Bush
> CBS Hypes How "Buffett Says the Bush Tax Cuts Favor the Wealthy"
> Stephanopoulos Pleads to McCain for "Dream Ticket" with Kerry
> CBS's Early Show Doesn't Move On, Leads Friday with Bush TV Ads
> Curry Gushes to Jane Goodall: "You've Given So Many People Hope"
> LA Times Changes "Pro-Life" to "Anti-Abortion" in Opera Review
> Tribute to Ted Kennedy's Liberal Spending Ideals Wins Award
> "Top Ten Signs Hillary Clinton Wants to Be Vice President"

    #### Distributed to more than 14,000 subscribers by the Media
Research Center, bringing political balance to the news media
since 1987. The MRC is the leader in documenting, exposing and
neutralizing liberal media bias. Visit the MRC on the Web:
http://www.mediaresearch.org. CyberAlerts from this year are at:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/archive/cyber/welcome.asp
For 2003: http://www.mediaresearch.org/archive/cyber/archive03.asp
    Subscribe/unsubscribe information, as well as a link to the
MRC's PayPal donation page, are at the end of this message.
    When posted, this CyberAlert will be readable at:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2004/cyb20040308.asp ####

1) Martha Stewart's wrongdoing: Bush's fault. Less tan four hours
after a federal jury in Manhattan convicted Martha Stewart,
Washington Post reporter Ceci Connolly, appearing on FNC, advised
Democrats that, "if they're smart," they will "connect the dots"
amongst people "losing jobs," "high-rollers" and CEOs "getting off
easy" as they "give campaign contributions to President Bush," not
to mention "Cheney with Halliburton."

2) "Warren Buffett says the Bush tax cuts favor the wealthy,"
exclaimed CBS News reporter Mika Brzezinski during a "CBS
MarketWatch Update" aired Sunday night between the first and
second segments of 60 Minutes. CBS considered Buffett's claim,
made in the annual report for Berkshire Hathaway, so important
that they managed to squeeze it into the 15 second update which
didn't even identify Buffett.

3) On Sunday's This Week, ABC's George Stephanopoulos pleaded for
John McCain to accept any potential offer to be John Kerry's
running mate, asserting that for "a lot of Democrats," that would
be "the dream ticked." Stephanopoulos appealed McCain's rejection
of the idea: "So there's no chance you'll re-consider?"
Stephanopoulos then tried to convince McCain he doesn't really
share Bush's views, laying out some areas where they disagree
before demanding: "Why are you supporting President Bush?"
Recalling the 2000 primary campaign battle between McCain and
Bush, Stephanopoulos inquired: "Does John Kerry have to worry that
the Bush team will do to him what they did to you in South
Carolina?"

4) CBS's Early Show on Friday didn't move on, devoting a second
morning of coverage to liberal complaints about the Bush
campaign's TV ads which include a few seconds of scenes from
Ground Zero. "Good morning, I'm Harry Smith," the quad-host
announced at the top of the March 5 show as he touted the lead
story: "President Bush's new campaign ads have triggered a
firestorm over the use of images from 9/11. We'll find out what
the families of the victims have to say about that." News reader
Julie Chen insisted: "There are calls this morning for President
Bush to pull some of his re-election campaign ads off the air."

5) NBC's Ann Curry has a thing for far-left environmental and
peace activist Jane Goodall. On last Wednesday's Today, Curry
gushed to her about how "you have done so much. You've worked
against poverty, AIDS and for peace, human rights and for the
environment." Curry's "question" to Goodall: "Why at the age of 70
do you travel 300 days out of the year working on behalf of this
world that is in such trouble?" After Goodall answered, Curry
swooned: "Wow! You've given so many people hope including those
listening to you this morning."

6) Rote revulsion toward the term "pro-life" by the journalism
community led to an embarrassing gaffe a couple of weeks ago by
the Los Angeles Times. As reported by the LA Observed Web site,
when LA Times reviewer "Mark Swed filed a review of the opera Die
Frau Ohne Schatten at the Music Center," he "wrote that the
Richard Strauss epic is 'an incomparably glorious and goofy
pro-life paean...' But when it ran in the paper, 'pro-life' had
been changed to 'anti-abortion.'"

7) Liberal reporting awarded. Last week Boston Globe reporter
Charles Pierce won a National Headliner Award, in the category
"newspaper magazine writing," for story titled, "Deconstructing
Ted." In that January 5, 2003 piece, Pierce effused: "If she had
lived, Mary Jo Kopechne would be 62 years old. Through his
tireless work as a legislator, Edward Kennedy would have brought
comfort to her in her old age."

8) Letterman's "Top Ten Signs Hillary Clinton Wants to Be Vice
President."


    > 1) Martha Stewart's wrongdoing: Bush's fault. Less tan four
hours after a federal jury in Manhattan convicted Martha Stewart,
Washington Post reporter Ceci Connolly, appearing on FNC, advised
Democrats that, "if they're smart," they will "connect the dots"
amongst people "losing jobs," "high-rollers" and CEOs "getting off
easy" as they "give campaign contributions to President Bush," not
to mention "Cheney with Halliburton."

    During a discussion about Stewart in the panel portion of the
March 5 Special Report with Brit Hume, but anchored by Jim Angle,
after panelist, Charles Krauthammer suggested that Bush can use
the conviction to show he's tough on corporate crime, Connolly,
who moved her hand around in a circle, point by point, to
illustrate "connecting the dots," countered:
    "Some voters already are connecting certain dots and I think
Democrats, if they're smart, will attempt to really connect dots
which go something like this: What we talked about in the first
segment, people are unemployed, losing jobs; wealthy, high-
rollers, CEOs etcetera getting off easy, making a lot of money;
give campaign contributions to President Bush; Cheney with
Halliburton. I think it's possible for Democrats to exploit those
sort of emotional connections that people make out there."



    > 2) "Warren Buffett says the Bush tax cuts favor the
wealthy," exclaimed CBS News reporter Mika Brzezinski during a
"CBS MarketWatch Update" aired Sunday night between the first and
second segments of 60 Minutes. CBS considered Buffett's claim,
made in the annual report for Berkshire Hathaway, so important
that they managed to squeeze it into the 15 second update which
didn't even identify Buffett.

    The complete text of the March 7 "CBS MarketWatch Update"
about 20 minutes into 60 Minutes:
    "Good evening. The board of Martha Stewart Omnimedia meets
tomorrow in the wake of her conviction. Warren Buffett says the
Bush tax cuts favor the wealthy. Earning reports this week from
Echostar, Oracle and Krispy Kreme donuts. And the Dow opens at
10,595. I'm Mika Brzezinski, CBS News."

    Brzezinski earlier anchored the CBS Evening News, which did
not mention the Buffett charge.

    For the AP story on Buffett's comments, an article which
recounts only his comments about corporate tax payments:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040307/ap_on_b
i_ge/buffett_bush_4

    For a picture and bio for Brzezinski:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/10/28/broadcasts/main527208.shtml



    > 3) On Sunday's This Week, ABC's George Stephanopoulos
pleaded for John McCain to accept any potential offer to be John
Kerry's running mate, asserting that for "a lot of Democrats,"
that would be "the dream ticked." Stephanopoulos appealed McCain's
rejection of the idea: "So there's no chance you'll re-consider?"
Stephanopoulos then tried to convince McCain he doesn't really
share Bush's views, laying out some areas where they disagree
before demanding: "Why are you supporting President Bush?"
Recalling the 2000 primary campaign battle between McCain and
Bush, Stephanopoulos inquired: "Does John Kerry have to worry that
the Bush team will do to him what they did to you in South
Carolina?"

    During the March 7 appearance in studio by McCain,
Stephanopoulos played a clip from his November 28, 2002 show in
which he asked McCain about being Kerry's running mate. He
rejected the idea then and did so again: "I do not intend to leave
the Republican Party."
    Stephanopoulos pleaded: "But a lot of Democrats think this is
the dream ticked. So there's no chance you'll re-consider?"
    McCain: "I cannot envision the scenario, George, as I say it's
flattering but no [mumble], leave the Republican Party."
    Stephanopoulos: "Okay, I think that's, you're not quite being
General Sherman, but I think you're clear on it. Let me switch
over to the campaign. When I look through your record, you
disagree with President Bush on tax cuts, you disagreed with him
on the prescription drug coverage, you disagree with him on the
energy bill, you disagree with him on global warming, many other
issues. Why are you supporting President Bush?"

    McCain explained that he agrees with Bush on many issues and
that Bush "led with moral clarity and strength" after 9/11.

    Stephanopoulos moved on to the media-created controversy over
the Bush TV ads, asking McCain if it was "appropriate" to use
images from Ground Zero in the ad.

    Next, Stephanopoulos painted Kerry as the next possible victim
of the Bush attack machine: "It was a tough campaign. Senator
Lindsay Graham of South Carolina said it was the nastiest campaign
he had ever seen. You refused to say that President Bush ran an
honorable campaign and called it 'savagery." Does John Kerry have
to worry that the Bush team will do to him what they did to you in
South Carolina?"
    McCain noted that he and Bush now have a cordial relationship,
and while it will be a nasty campaign, that's "not contained to
either side."

    As recounted in the March 4 CyberAlert, on the March 3 Good
Morning America's ABC's Claire Shipman gushed that the idea of
McCain running with Kerry represents "everybody's wishful thinking
that he might switch parties and join his Vietnam buddy." See:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2004/cyb20040304.asp#3



    > 4) CBS's Early Show on Friday didn't move on, devoting a
second morning of coverage to liberal complaints about the Bush
campaign's TV ads which include a few seconds of scenes from
Ground Zero. "Good morning, I'm Harry Smith," the quad-host
announced at the top of the March 5 show as he touted the lead
story: "President Bush's new campaign ads have triggered a
firestorm over the use of images from 9/11. We'll find out what
the families of the victims have to say about that." News reader
Julie Chen insisted: "There are calls this morning for President
Bush to pull some of his re-election campaign ads off the air."

    CBS, the MRC's Brian Boyd noticed, proceeded to run a story
followed by an interview segment featuring two 9/11 victim family
members, one opposed to the ad and one who saw nothing wrong with
it.

    Julie Chen introduced the story: "There are calls this morning
for President Bush to pull some of his re-election campaign ads
off the air. At issue: scenes from 9/11 which some say are being
exploited for political gain. CBS News correspondent Joie Chen is
at the White House with the latest on this story. Good morning,
Joie."

    Joie Chen explained: "Good morning, Julie. The White House
certainly aimed to re-grab the focus of attention as the
presidential campaign season reaches high gear but Mr. Bush's
first round of re-election commercials came in for some sharp
critique. At the heart of it, a handful of pictures in the midst
of two 30 second commercials."
    Commercial voice: "And some were like no others."
    Chen: "Brief and fleeting images, but to families of some
September 11th victims enough to bring back haunting memories."
    Lorie Van Auken, 9/11 widow: "This was a horrible day and to
rip the scab off that wound is just cruel."
    Harold Schaitberger: "It's disgraceful."
    Chen: "Howard [actual name is Harold] Schaitberger head of the
fire fighters union which has endorsed John Kerry accused the
President of exploiting the sacrifice of first responders."
    Schaitberger: "I recall the President early on saying that he
would never utilize the terrible tragedy of 9/11 for political
purposes."
    Karen Hughes: "This image is a very, very tasteful image."
    Chen: "But in an appearance on The Early Show, a key Bush
advisor insisted that Mr. Bush's leadership in a time of crisis is
a valid campaign theme."
    Hughes, the day before: "September 11th was not just a distant
tragedy, it's a defining event for the future of our country."
    Chen: "And at a campaign stop Thursday, Mr. Bush himself
reminded voters how his presidency was shaped by the events of
September 11th."
    President Bush: "I stood in the ruins of the twin towers. I'll
never forget that day. I remember the workers and the hard-hats
who were shouting 'whatever it takes.' As we all did that day
these men and women searching through the rubble took it
personally. I took it personally."
    Chen concluded: "Now, as you noted, some critics have asked
the President to take those spots of the air. They're set to air
in 17 key states. Others have issued an early warning to the
President not to even think about bringing his campaign to Ground
Zero when his party meets for its nominating convention in New
York City this summer."

    Hannah Storm soon interviewed Patty Casazza, who "lost her
husband, John, in the World Trade Center on September 11th" and
Deena Burnett, whose "husband, Thomas, died on United Airlines
flight 93 that day."

    The March 5 CyberAlert detailed Thursday coverage of the Bush
ads: The Bush campaign may have $100 million to spend, but the
Kerry team has the news media as part of its base, a reality
demonstrated on Thursday, a day John Kerry took off and didn't
even campaign. Based on a single news story in the New York Daily
News quoting a single firefighter and a few members of families
with 9-11 victims, the morning and evening shows on ABC, CBS, CNN
and NBC, as well as CNBC and MSNBC in prime time, picked up the
charge that new Bush campaign TV ads, which very briefly show
images from 9-11, somehow improperly exploit that day for
political gain. In the morning, Karen Hughes was quizzed about it
and in the evening the supposed "controversy" led or was the
number two story on every evening newscast. ABC's Diane Sawyer,
CBS's Harry Smith and CNN's Soledad O'Brien and Paula Zahn
highlighted how the "firefighters union" protested the ad, but
failed to point out how that union long ago endorsed John Kerry.
http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2004/cyb20040305.asp#1



    > 5) NBC's Ann Curry has a thing for far-left environmental
and peace activist Jane Goodall. On last Wednesday's Today, Curry
gushed to her about how "you have done so much. You've worked
against poverty, AIDS and for peace, human rights and for the
environment."

    Curry's "question" to Goodall: "Why at the age of 70 do you
travel 300 days out of the year working on behalf of this world
that is in such trouble?" After Goodall answered, Curry swooned:
"Wow! You've given so many people hope including those listening
to you this morning."

    Curry also gushed over Goodall when she appeared on Today back
in October of 2002. The October 22, 2002 CyberAlert reported: Jane
Goodall's Web site features as the lead item on its home page a
link to its "Roots and Shoots Global Peace Initiative" which
promotes the "teaching of tolerance" in the wake of 9-11
with a link titled, "Beyond Blame: Reacting to the Terrorist
Attack." But on Monday's Today Ann Curry didn't ask Goodall about
any of that. Instead, Curry trumpeted Goodall's agenda: "What is
the greatest lesson you've learned?...What gives you hope
Jane?...What sustains you?...You also travel with the forest
within you, you say?" See:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2002/cyb20021022.asp#4

    Goodall came aboard Today again on March 3 to plug an Animal
Planet cable channel special, "40 Years in Gombe," to air tonight,
March 8:
http://media.animal.discovery.com/fansites/janegoodall/janegoodall.html

    MRC analyst Geoff Dickens caught Curry's fawning approach to
Goodall on the March 5 Today.

    Curry: "But you have done so much. You've worked against
poverty, AIDS and for peace, human rights and for the environment.
You're not giving up even though you just said to me a few moments
ago before this interview started, that, that there is a feeling
that things are being lost. That there's no doubt that we're all
spiraling, as you say, rapidly downwards. Why at the age of 70 do
you travel 300 days out of the year working on behalf of this
world that is in such trouble?"
    Goodall: "Because I have grandchildren and great nephews and I
look at them and I think what we've spoiled since I was their age
and I just have this absolute conviction if we could only get more
hopeful, more working for, for peace when it comes, to save the
environment. We have to give people hope because without hope
people become apathetic. So that when I'm giving a talk in a place
like Hungary where people like me don't go very often all the
students cry and say, 'You're the only person who's given us hope.
Now we feel that we can tackle future.'"
    Curry: "Wow. You've given so many people hope including those
listening to you this morning. Thank you so much for all the work
you've done, Dr. Goodall."



    > 6) Rote revulsion toward the term "pro-life" by the
journalism community led to an embarrassing gaffe a couple of
weeks ago by the Los Angeles Times. As reported by the LA Observed
Web site, when LA Times theater reviewer "Mark Swed filed a review
of the opera Die Frau Ohne Schatten at the Music Center," he
"wrote that the Richard Strauss epic is 'an incomparably glorious
and goofy pro-life paean...' But when it ran in the paper,
'pro-life' had been changed to 'anti-abortion.'"

    (On Thursday night last week Dan Rather also illustrated well
how the media frame the abortion issue to put those in favor of it
in the best light by making them the ones for "rights" and those
on the other side against "rights." On the March 4 CBS Evening
News, Rather teased a story about the release of the late Justice
Harry Blackmun's papers: "U.S. Supreme Court secrets revealed. The
inside story of how close the court came to taking away abortion
rights and a woman's right to choose.")

    Romenesko ( http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=45 ) last
week highlighted the posting by LA Observed about how the
obsession by the LA Times with never allowing the term "pro-life"
to see print led to the embarrassing alteration of the reviewer's
submission.

    This latest instance occurred less than a year after John
Carroll, the Editor of the Los Angeles Times, rebuked his staff
for its biased approach on the abortion issue. As recounted in the
May 29, 2003 CyberAlert, Carroll sent to his staff a memo about a
story he thought demonstrated the "occasional reality" that the LA
Times is a "liberal, 'politically correct' newspaper." Carroll
chastised: "The apparent bias of the writer and/or the desk
reveals itself in the third paragraph, which characterizes such
bills in Texas and elsewhere as requiring 'so-called counseling of
patients.' I don't think people on the anti-abortion side would
consider it 'so-called,' a phrase that is loaded with derision."
Carroll insisted: "We are not going to push a liberal agenda in
the news pages of the Times." See:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2003/cyb20030529.asp#2

    It looks like it's an up hill battle for Carroll.

    Now, an excerpt from the LA observed posting from last week:

Here's why reporters want newspaper corrections to make clear that
an editor is at fault for an error introduced to their copy. Last
week, the L.A. Times' Mark Swed filed a review of the opera "Die
Frau Ohne Schatten" at the Music Center. He wrote that the Richard
Strauss epic is "an incomparably glorious and goofy pro-life
paean..." But when it ran in the paper, pro-life had been changed
to anti-abortion.

Swed was reportedly mortified, since the opera is not remotely
about abortion. On Feb. 25, the Times ran this correction:

"Opera review -- A review of Los Angeles Opera's Die Frau Ohne
Schatten in Tuesday's Calendar section incorrectly characterized
the work as 'anti-abortion.' In fact, there is no issue of
abortion in the opera, which extols procreation."

Swed was again not amused, since his name was on the piece -- he
had been made to look stupid to his readers and to the opera
community. If they thought he had misread the work, it might
affect how opera fans, players and producers regard him in the
future. He apparently demanded a second correction, which ran the
following day:

"Opera review -- A correction in Wednesday's paper about the
review of Los Angeles Opera's Die Frau Ohne Schatten incorrectly
implied that it was the reviewer who characterized the work as
'anti-abortion' in Tuesday's Calendar. As the correction should
have made clear, the lead paragraph submitted by the reviewer was
incorrectly changed to include the term 'anti-abortion.' There is
no issue of abortion in the opera, which extols procreation."
....

    END of Excerpt

    For the LA Observed item in full:
http://www.laobserved.com/archive/001504.html



   > 7) Liberal reporting awarded. Last week Boston Globe reporter
Charles Pierce won a National Headliner Award, in the category
"newspaper magazine writing," for story titled, "Deconstructing
Ted." In that January 5, 2003 piece, Pierce effused: "If she had
lived, Mary Jo Kopechne would be 62 years old. Through his
tireless work as a legislator, Edward Kennedy would have brought
comfort to her in her old age."

    Kopechne drowned while trapped in Kennedy's submerged car off
Chappaquiddick Island in July 1969, an accident Kennedy did not
report for several hours.

    Pierce's tribute to Kennedy's liberalism and big government
solutions to problems won the "Quote of the Year" in the MRC's
"Best Notable Quotables of 2003: The Sixteenth Annual Awards for
the Year's Worst Reporting." See:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/notablequotables/bestof/2003/welcome.asp

    The paragraph in full in which the macabre observation
appeared: "And that's the key. That's how you survive what he's
survived. That's how you move forward, one step after another,
even though your name is Edward Moore Kennedy. You work, always,
as though your name were Edward Moore. If she had lived, Mary Jo
Kopechne would be 62 years old. Through his tireless work as a
legislator, Edward Kennedy would have brought comfort to her in
her old age."

    The MRC's Tim Graham alerted me to the honor bestowed upon
Pierce by the Press Club of Atlantic City. Its Web site explains:
"The National Headliner Awards program is one of the oldest and
largest annual contests recognizing journalistic merit in the
communications industry." The "Headliner Awards in all categories
will be presented at an awards program on May 15, 2004 in Atlantic
City, New Jersey."

    So what did Pierce win? A free hotel room in Atlantic City:
"Hotel rooms are provided, at Headliner Club expense, for first
place winners."

    For a list of the winners in all categories:
http://www.nationalheadlinerawards.com/Winners2004Print.html

    For a March 2 AP story on the awards:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040302/ap_en_ot/headliner_awards_1

    For a picture of Pierce:
http://www.charlespierce.net/chas.html



    > 8) From the March 5 Late Show with David Letterman, the "Top
Ten Signs Hillary Clinton Wants to Be Vice President." Late Show
home page: http://www.cbs.com/latenight/lateshow/

10. The Washington, D.C. TJ Maxx has sold out of pantsuits.

9. She's practicing sitting around doing nothing.

8. Instead of pretending to be from New York, she's pretending to
be from key battleground states Ohio, Florida and Michigan.

7. Bragged to reporters the next "Hillary-Gate" is going to be off
the hizzook.

6. Says she wants to be the first female Vice President since
Gore.

5. Just purchased a large amount of Halliburton stock.

4. Called Century 21 to ask about listings for undisclosed
locations.

3. Well, there's the "Kerry/Clinton" tattoo.

2. Firing up the ol' paper shredder.

1. If it would help she'd have sex with Bill.



    # Dan Rather is back in Baghdad for the CBS Evening News this
week.


-- Brent Baker


    >>> Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon
contributions which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-
deductible donation. To safely and securely donate via PayPal:
https://www.paypal.com/xclick/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&i
tem_name=Media+Research+Center&item_number=Media+Research+Center&n
o_note=1&tax=0&currency_code=USD

    Or, if you can't get the lengthy link into your browser's
address line, go to the MRC's home page
( http://www.mediaresearch.org ) and click on the gold "Support
the MRC" logo in the top right corner. That will take you to the
same place.

    To subscribe to CyberAlert, go to:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/cybersub.asp

    Or, send a blank e-mail to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

    To unsubscribe, use the link at the very bottom of this
message.

    Send problems and comments to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

    You can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web
site by subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every
weekday afternoon. To subscribe, go to:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/cybersub.asp#webnews <<<

====================================================================
Update Your Profile:
   http://mrccyberalert.f.topica.com/f/?bUrD57.a6Hlsy.d2JhY29u
Unsubscribe:
   http://mrccyberalert.f.topica.com/f/?bUrD57.a6Hlsy.d2JhY29u.u
Confirm Your Subscription:
   http://mrccyberalert.f.topica.com/f/?bUrD57.a6Hlsy.d2JhY29u.c
Delivered by Topica.
   http://www.topica.com/

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to