-Caveat Lector-

"I pledge Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to
the REPUBLIC for which it stands,  one Nation under God,indivisible,with
liberty and justice for all."

 visit my web site at
http://www.voicenet.com/~wbacon My ICQ# is 79071904
for a precise list of the powers of the Federal Government linkto:
http://www.voicenet.com/~wbacon/Enumerated.html

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:11:07 -0800
From: Media Research Center <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MRC Alert: CBS Touts Anti-Bush Anger in Florida,
     But It's Greater Elsewhere

             ***Media Research Center CyberAlert***
   11:10am EST, Wednesday March 10, 2004 (Vol. Nine; No. 41)
 The 1,678th CyberAlert. Tracking Liberal Media Bias Since 1996

> CBS Touts Anti-Bush Anger in Florida, But It's Greater Elsewhere
> CBS's Pitts Castigates "Nasty" Bush, Paints Kerry as the Victim
> ABC Focuses on U.S. Human Rights Breaches, Not Good Treatment

    #### Distributed to more than 14,000 subscribers by the Media
Research Center, bringing political balance to the news media
since 1987. The MRC is the leader in documenting, exposing and
neutralizing liberal media bias. Visit the MRC on the Web:
http://www.mediaresearch.org. CyberAlerts from this year are at:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/archive/cyber/welcome.asp
For 2003: http://www.mediaresearch.org/archive/cyber/archive03.asp
    Subscribe/unsubscribe information, as well as a link to the
MRC's PayPal donation page, are at the end of this message.
    When posted, this CyberAlert will be readable at:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2004/cyb20040310.asp ####

1) CBS's Byron Pitts on Tuesday night trumpeted how exit polls
showed that "Democratic voters are angry at the Bush
administration, particularly in one state." That would be Florida
where "Democrats want revenge" for the 2000 election, but while 49
percent of Florida Democratic primary voters on Tuesday, when
asked their view of Bush, indeed said they are "angry," that's a
lower percentage than primary voters this year in Rhode Island,
New York, Connecticut and Delaware. Nonetheless, Pitts touted how
the anger and quest for revenge "comes up at all of John Kerry's
Florida rallies." He then showed a woman asking Kerry: "What can
we do to prevent them from stealing the election again?" Pitts
also very bizarrely claimed that "in a rare move for a sitting
President, Mr. Bush has campaigned extensively in Florida" -- as
if an incumbent campaigning in a tight state is unusual.

2) "It's shaping up to be the longest and nastiest campaign in
history," CBS's Byron Pitts charged Monday after a clip of John
Kerry denouncing tax loopholes and right before running a
soundbite in which President Bush simply conveyed a comment about
a policy position taken by Kerry. Bush's supposedly "nasty"
remark: "He's for good intelligence. Yet he was willing to gut the
intelligence services. And that is no way to lead a nation in a
time of war." Instead of castigating Kerry's other shots at Bush
on jobs and handling of pre-9/11 intelligence, Pitts endorsed
their credibility and painted Kerry as the victim as Pitts passed
along how Kerry warned, without any substantiation, that the Bush
team will "attack my character and even my wife's."

3) Several of those released recently from detention at Guantanamo
Bay professed how they were treated well ("I am lucky I went
there, and now I miss it") and on Monday night CBS looked at how
"conditions are improving" in Afghanistan with U.S. soldiers
ingratiating themselves with villagers, road-building and "more
Afghan children in school than at any time in the country's
history," but on Monday night CNN's Anderson Cooper picked up on
how Terry Waite, a hostage in Iran in 1979-80, "accuses the U.S.
now of using 'terrorist tactics'" in "the way it treats detainees"
at Guantanamo Bay. And on Tuesday night, ABC's Peter Jennings
devoted a full story to how "the international organization, Human
Rights Watch, accused U.S. forces in Afghanistan of mistreating
prisoners and violating international law."


    > 1) CBS's Byron Pitts on Tuesday night trumpeted how exit
polls showed that "Democratic voters are angry at the Bush
administration, particularly in one state." That one state would
be Florida where "Democrats want revenge" for the 2000 election,
but while 49 percent of Florida Democratic primary voters on
Tuesday, when asked their view of Bush, indeed said they are
"angry," that's the same percent as voters in California and a
lower percentage than primary voters this year in Rhode Island,
New York, Connecticut and Delaware. So, contrary to Pitts'
implication, Florida Democrats are not excessively angry toward
Bush compared to Democrats in other states.

    Nonetheless, Pitts touted how the anger and quest for revenge
"comes up at all of John Kerry's Florida rallies." He then showed
a woman asking Kerry: "What can we do to prevent them from
stealing the election again?" Pitts very bizarrely claimed that
"in a rare move for a sitting President, Mr. Bush has campaigned
extensively in Florida" -- as if an incumbent campaigning in a
state where the polls show a close race is somehow unusual.

    Pitts also failed to remind viewers how in 2002 the anger of
Democrats didn't translate into victory since Governor Jeb Bush
handily beat his Democratic opponent by 13 points.

    Anchor John Roberts set up the March 9 CBS Evening News story,
as taken down by MRC analyst Brad Wilmouth: "In Florida and three
other Southern states, a lot of voters going to the polls in
today's presidential primaries have yet another issue on their
minds. It's an issue that's making Democratic voters angry. And
Byron Pitts reports why John Kerry couldn't be happier about it."

    Pitts began from Florida: "For John Kerry, with victory
tonight a foregone conclusion, today's four Southern primaries
serve as part coronation and part rehearsal for the general
election."
    Jose Gamas, Florida voter: "With Bush everything is going
backwards. I don't see anything good."
    Pitts: "And according to today's CBS News exit poll,
Democratic voters are angry at the Bush administration,
particularly in one state."
    Edna Justice, Florida voter: "What happened here in Florida
was really one of the worst things I've ever seen."
    Pitts: "Seventy-five-year-old Edna Justice of Palm Beach
County Florida, she remembers the 2000 election which Mr. Bush
famously won by just over 500 votes. Four years later, Democrats
want revenge."
    Justice: "I hate what happened and the President that we have
now and what he has done to us."
    Pitts: "It's an issue that comes up at all of John Kerry's
Florida rallies."
    Unidentified woman at rally: "What can we do to prevent them
from stealing the election again?"
    Pitts: "And one that he promises to address in November."
    Kerry: "Not only do we want a record level of turnout to vote,
we want a guarantee that every vote is counted, and we will do
that."
    Donna Brazile, Democratic Strategist: "The anger that many
Democrats are now feeling about George Bush will turn into
passion. That passion will, of course, energize Democrats,
motivate Democrats to get out."
    Pitts: "And the Bush brothers, President George W. Bush and
Florida Governor Jeb Bush, have taken notice. In a rare move for a
sitting President-"
    George W. Bush at Daytona 500 a couple of weeks ago:
"Gentlemen, start your engines."
    Pitts: "-Mr. Bush has campaigned extensively in Florida."
    Pitts: "Republicans and Democrats could spend up to $25
million in Florida alone. That's nearly a million dollars for each
of the state's 27 electoral votes -- one-tenth of what's needed to
win the presidency. For all their bickering, both parties agree:
The road to the White House goes through Florida. Byron Pitts, CBS
News, Miami."

    CNN has posted the exit polls taken during all of the
Democratic primaries this year. To a question about how they view
President Bush, 49 percent of Florida Democratic primary voters
chose the "angry" option. See:
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/primaries/pages/epolls/FL/index.html

    That isn't that much greater than the 43 percent in Texas:
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/primaries/pages/epolls/TX/index.html

    Florida's 49 percent was identical to how California Democrats
felt. See:
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/primaries/pages/epolls/CA/index.html

    Delaware Democrats were slightly more angry, at 51 percent:
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/primaries/pages/epolls/DE/index.html

    In Rhode Island, 57 percent said they were "angry." See:
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/primaries/pages/epolls/RI/index.html

    In New York, the same 57 percent:
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/primaries/pages/epolls/NY/index.html

    In Connecticut, 58 percent:
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/primaries/pages/epolls/CT/index.html

    In all the links above, to find the "angry" question, you'll
need to scroll a bit more than half way down the pages.



    > 2) "It's shaping up to be the longest and nastiest campaign
in history," CBS's Byron Pitts charged Monday after a clip of
Senator John Kerry denouncing tax loopholes and right before
running a soundbite in which President Bush simply conveyed a
comment about a policy position taken by Kerry. Bush's supposedly
"nasty" remark: "He's for good intelligence. Yet he was willing to
gut the intelligence services. And that is no way to lead a nation
in a time of war."

    Instead of castigating Kerry's other shots at Bush on jobs and
the handling of pre-9/11 intelligence, Pitts endorsed their
credibility and painted Kerry as the victim as Pitts passed along
how Kerry warned, without any substantiation, that the Bush team
will "attack my character and even my wife's."

    Pitts asserted: "Troubling issues for Mr. Bush: jobs, the war
in Iraq and continued questions about his administration's
handling of the intelligence prior to the September 11th attacks,
a theme his rivals hit hard today."
    Kerry: "If the President of the United States can find the
time to go to a rodeo, he can find the time to do more than one
hour in front of a commission that is investigating what happened
to America's intelligence."
    Pitts then concluded: "Kerry told supporters earlier today he
expects the Bush team will, quote, 'attack my character and even
my wife's.' Expect the mud to fly both ways for eight long
months."

    The next morning, the MRC's Brian Boyd noticed, Pitts
continued his complaints about "nastiness" in the presidential
contest, as if candidates should not be allowed to criticize each
other. Pitts insisted on the March 9 Early Show:
    "Both men predict a bitter and nasty fall campaign and no
place will that be truer than in Florida where Kerry told
supporters, Republicans will attack his character even his wife's.
The Massachusetts Senator hopes to raise nearly $80 million
between now and next summer. That's still well short of the $100
million Mr. Bush already has in the bank, in what will be the
costliest and likely the nastiest race in history."

    Over on Tuesday's Today, co-host Ann Curry, the MRC's Geoff
Dickens observed, was taken aback by Bush "bashing his opponent"
about a Senate vote taken nine years ago -- as if that is somehow
out of bounds. During a session with Tim Russert, Curry played
this clip from Bush about how Kerry pushed for a cut in
intelligence funding: "His bill was so deeply irresponsible that
he didn't have a single co-sponsor in the United States Senate.
Once again Senator Kerry is trying to have it both ways. He's for
good intelligence yet he was willing to gut the intelligence
services."

    Curry then lamented: "An incumbent President bashing his
opponent about a bill from nine years ago that never even came to
a vote."

    Now the March 8 CBS Evening News story in full. Anchor John
Roberts introduced it: "In the presidential campaign, the outcome
of primaries tomorrow in four Southern states is not in any doubt,
and the battle for the South in November is already in high gear.
CBS's Byron Pitts reports tonight President Bush opened fire today
from his home state of Texas, while Senator John Kerry came out
charging in the battleground state of Florida."

    Pitts began, over video of a man at a Kerry rally wearing a
Bush mask: "Today in Florida on the campaign trail, Halloween came
early."
    Senator John Kerry: "I told you this campaign is growing like
crazy, folks."
    Pitts: "And it's not just the unflattering Halloween mask but
the unflattering tone that's already made March feel like late
October."
    Kerry: "I will close the stupid, insulting, disgraceful tax
loopholes."
    Pitts: "It's shaping up to be the longest and nastiest
campaign in history."
    President George W. Bush: "He's for good intelligence. Yet he
was willing to gut the intelligence services. And that is no way
to lead a nation in a time of war."
    Pitts: "The latest polls show Senator Kerry beating President
Bush in Florida by six points, the state Mr. Bush famously won by
just over 500 votes in 2000."
    Bush in Texas: "If you can't count on your home state in
politics, you're in deep trouble."
    Pitts: "Troubling issues for Mr. Bush: jobs, the war in Iraq
and continued questions about his administration's handling of the
intelligence prior to the September 11th attacks, a theme his
rivals hit hard today."
    Kerry: "If the President of the United States can find the
time to go to a rodeo, he can find the time to do more than one
hour in front of a commission that is investigating what happened
to America's intelligence."
    Pitts concluded: "Kerry told supporters earlier today he
expects the Bush team will, quote, 'attack my character and even
my wife's.' Expect the mud to fly both ways for eight long months.
Byron Pitts, CBS News, West Palm Beach, Florida."

    For a picture and bio of Pitts:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/10/09/broadcasts/main524933.shtml



    > 3) Several of those released recently from detention at
Guantanamo Bay professed how they were treated well and on Monday
night the CBS Evening News looked at how "conditions are
improving" in Afghanistan with U.S. soldiers ingratiating
themselves with villagers, road-building and "more Afghan children
in school than at any time in the country's history," but on
Monday night CNN's Anderson Cooper picked up on how Terry Waite, a
hostage in Iran in 1979-80, "accuses the U.S. now of using
'terrorist tactics'" in "the way it treats detainees at the U.S.
Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba." And on Tuesday night, ABC's
Peter Jennings devoted a full story to how "the international
organization, Human Rights Watch, accused U.S. forces in
Afghanistan of mistreating prisoners and violating international
law."

    ABC's Mike Lee related the allegations of how "the U.S.
military has used 'cowboy-like' excessive force when arresting
Afghans." He focused on one Afghan man who claimed he was sent to
Guantanamo Bay and forced to sign a confession though he was
really innocent. Lee ominously concluded: "The Human Rights Watch
report warns that many other Afghans out there are angry over how
they've been treated and may be less willing to help in the war
against terrorism."

    Lee ignored a 12 to 13-year-old Afghan boy, who upon his
release from Guantanamo Bay, told London's left-wing Guardian
newspaper, a paper you'd think Peter Jennings would find
authoritative: "I am lucky I went there, and now I miss it. Cuba
was great." The boy cited the delicious food, how he liked
snorkeling in the ocean and proclaimed that "Americans are great
people, better than anyone else," so, "if I could be anywhere, I
would be in America. I would like to be a doctor, an engineer --
or an American soldier."

    A month ago, a 15-year-old released from Guantanamo informed
London's Sunday Telegraph that "they gave me a good time in Cuba.
They were very nice to me, giving me English lessons." An elderly
Afghan man let go last fall praised his treatment: "They treated
us well. We had enough food. I didn't mind [being detained]
because they took my old clothes and gave me new clothes."

    "Cuba? It was great, say boys freed from US prison camp,"
declared the headline over the March 6 Guardian story which the
FNC's Brit Hume highlighted in his "Grapevine" segment on Monday
night. An excerpt from the article by James Astill:

Asadullah strives to make his point, switching to English lest
there be any mistaking him. "I am lucky I went there, and now I
miss it. Cuba was great," said the 14-year-old, knotting his brow
in the effort to make sure he is understood.

Not that Asadullah saw much of the Caribbean island. During his
14-month stay, he went to the beach only a couple of times -- a
shame, as he loved to snorkel....

He spent a typical day watching movies, going to class and playing
football. He was fascinated to learn about the solar system, and
now enjoys reciting the names of the planets, starting with Earth.
Less diverting were the twice-monthly interrogations about his
knowledge of al-Qaida and the Taliban. But, as Asadullah's answer
was always the same -- "I don't know anything about these people"
-- these sessions were merely a bore: an inevitably tedious
consequence, Asadullah suggests with a shrug, of being held
captive in Guantanamo Bay.

On January 29, Asadullah and two other juvenile prisoners were
returned home to Afghanistan. The three boys are not sure of their
ages. But, according to the estimate of the Red Cross, Asadullah
is the youngest, aged 12 at the time of his arrest. The second
youngest, Naqibullah, was arrested with him, aged perhaps 13,
while the third boy, Mohammed Ismail, was a child at the time of
his separate arrest, but probably isn't now.

Tracked down to his remote village in south-eastern Afghanistan,
Naqibullah has memories of Guantanamo that are almost identical to
Asadullah's. Prison life was good, he said shyly, nervous to be
receiving a foreigner to his family's mud-fortress home.

The food in the camp was delicious, the teaching was excellent,
and his warders were kind. "Americans are good people, they were
always friendly, I don't have anything against them," he said. "If
my father didn't need me, I would want to live in America."

Asadullah is even more sure of this. "Americans are great people,
better than anyone else," he said, when found at his elder
brother's tiny fruit and nut shop in a muddy backstreet of Kabul.
"Americans are polite and friendly when you speak to them. They
are not rude like Afghans. If I could be anywhere, I would be in
America. I would like to be a doctor, an engineer -- or an
American soldier."...

After five months, Naqibullah wrote home for the first time.
Taking this first letter, written on Red Cross notepaper, from his
pocket, he now reads it aloud. "My greetings to beloved family, to
my beloved father, to my beloved uncles, to my beloved cousins, to
my beloved brothers. I am in good health and happy. I am in Cuba,
in a special room, but it is not like a jail. Don't worry about
me. I am learning English, Pashto and Arabic."...

When Asadullah returned to Khoja Angur last month -- at a day's
notice -- the village elders gathered to ask how the Americans had
treated him. When he said they had treated him well, they ruled
that the matter was closed. "We have nothing against the
Americans, they looked after the boy. They taught him English and
other things," said Haji Mohammad Tahir, an elder of the village,
gesturing to Asadullah's drawings of the planets, which were
proudly displayed on the floor....

    END of Excerpt

    For the March 6 Guardian story in full:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/guantanamo/story/0,13743,1163435,00.html

    The February 9 "Best of the Web" column on OpinionJournal.com
linked to a February 8 Sunday Telegraph story headlined, "I had a
good time at Guantanamo, says inmate." An excerpt from the article
by Rajeev Syal:

An Afghan boy whose 14-month detention by US authorities as a
terrorist suspect in Cuba prompted an outcry from human rights
campaigners said yesterday that he enjoyed his time in the camp.

Mohammed Ismail Agha, 15, who until last week was held at the US
military base in Guantanamo Bay, said that he was treated very
well and particularly enjoyed learning to speak English. His words
will disappoint critics of the US policy of detaining "illegal
combatants" in south-east Cuba indefinitely and without trial.

In a first interview with any of the three juveniles held by the
US at Guantanamo Bay base, Mohammed said: "They gave me a good
time in Cuba. They were very nice to me, giving me English
lessons."

Mohammed, an unemployed Afghan farmer, found the surroundings in
Cuba at first baffling. After he settled in, however, he was left
to enjoy stimulating school work, good food and prayer.

"At first I was unhappy...For two or three days [after I arrived
in Cuba] I was confused but later the Americans were so nice to
me. They gave me good food with fruit and water for ablutions and
prayer," he said yesterday in Naw Zad, a remote market town in
southern Afghanistan close to his home village and 300 miles
south-west of Kabul, the capital.

He said that the American soldiers taught him and his fellow child
captives -- aged 15 and 13 -- to write and speak a little English.
They supplied them with books in their native Pashto language.
When the three boys left last week for Afghanistan, the soldiers
looking after them gave them a send-off dinner and urged them to
continue their studies.

"They even took photographs of us all together before we left," he
said. Mohammed, however, said he would have to disappoint his
captors by not returning to his studies. "I am too poor for that.
I will have to look for work," he said....

Mohammed and his fellow juvenile detainees returned to Afghanistan
last week, after the intervention of the International Committee
of the Red Cross. His words of praise for the American soldiers in
Guantanamo Bay echo those of Faiz Mohammed, an elderly Afghan
farmer who was detained at the base for eight months before being
released in October 2002.

"They treated us well. We had enough food. I didn't mind [being
detained] because they took my old clothes and gave me new
clothes," said the farmer, who was partially deaf....

    END of Excerpt

    For the February 8 Sunday Telegraph story in its entirety:
http://news.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/02/08/wguan08.xml

    Instead of focusing on those eyewitness observations of how
they were treated, on Monday's Anderson Cooper 360 on CNN, Cooper
touted: "So one-time hostage accuses the U.S. now of using
'terrorist tactics' -- his words -- in the way it treats detainees
at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Terry Waite, you
may remember was held for nearly five nears in Lebanon, was part
of a group that marched to the White House today, calling for
better treatment of the detainees. More than 600 of them are being
held at Gitmo. Suspects, of course, on the war on terror. Most are
yet to be charged. Five British captives are set to be released.
Waite says the U.S. can't defeat terrorism by adopting their
methods. What exactly does that mean? I asked him."

    Cooper went to a taped interview with Waite who compared U.S.
treatment of Guantanamo detainees with how the Iranians treated
him. Cooper at least challenged him: "But I should point out, sir,
that they do have three meals a day. The U.S. government also says
they have adequate clothing, shelter. They have reading materials,
and they have the means to send and receive mail, albeit perhaps
not as frequent as they would like. The conditions they are being
kept in are far different than the conditions you were being kept
in."

    Cooper followed up: "But these people were combatants in a
war. I mean, they were picked up for the most part on the
battlefields of Afghanistan, a few places elsewhere. I'm not quite
sure -- I mean, some 10,000 people were rounded up. Ultimately,
only some 650, I think, are still being kept at Guantanamo Bay.
I'm not sure what status you think they should be held under."

    A night later, ABC and Peter Jennings displayed no such
skepticism about the concerns of those who claim mistreatment
occurs at Guantanamo Bay and in Afghanistan. Jennings set up a
March 9 World News Tonight story, as transcribed by MRC analyst
Brad Wilmouth:
    "Five British citizens released today from the U.S. prison at
Guantanamo Bay have arrived back in Britain, and four of them were
immediately arrested under the terrorism act there. This week, the
international organization, Human Rights Watch, accused U.S.
forces in Afghanistan of mistreating prisoners and violating
international law. The U.S. denies it, but ABC's Mike Lee, who is
in Afghanistan for us, takes 'A Closer Look.'"

    Lee began his tale of woe, over video of a man using an axe to
hit a piece of wood: "Wazeer Mohammed says that for nearly two
years, he was held at detention camps here in Afghanistan and at
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, before being released without charge. 'I'm a
simple taxi driver,' he told me. 'The Afghan army arrested me at a
checkpoint and turned me over to the Americans.' That was in March
of 2002. Wazeer says he was a prisoner at two U.S. bases here,
where he was blindfolded, shackled, forced to kneel on the ground,
and deprived of sleep. There are other stories like his in the
human rights report. Among the allegations, the U.S. military has
used 'cowboy-like' excessive force when arresting Afghans, that
'ordinary civilians caught up in military operations and arrested
are left in a hopeless situation,' and that U.S. detention
facilities here are shrouded in secrecy and operate �in a climate
of almost total impunity.'"
    John Sifton, Human Rights Watch: "There are serious
allegations of mistreatment, including beatings, kicks, broken
bones, prolonged and severe sleep deprivation, exposure to
freezing temperatures, pretty serious, serious allegations."
    Lee: "In the Afghan capital, the U.S. military disputed the
report."
    Lieutenant Colonel Bryan Hilferty, U.S. military spokesman: "I
reject those charges. We are not using excessive force. This is a
combat zone, and we are applying appropriate rules of engagement
for a combat zone, and we are following the law of armed
conflict."
    Lee: "Ultimately, Wazeer Mohammed was shipped to the U.S.
prison at Guantanamo. He says he was given a Koran and never
beaten, but was always shackled when interrogated about possible
connections to al-Qaeda. 'I was innocent,' he says, 'but they gave
me this document to sign, a confession that I had been captured as
an enemy combatant during armed conflict. I had not. But my choice
was to sign and go home or not sign and stay in Cuba. I signed.'
Wazeer Mohammed is now trying to put his life back together. But
he says that his family has suffered because he could not earn a
living for almost two years. The Human Rights Watch report warns
that many other Afghans out there are angry over how they've been
treated and may be less willing to help in the war against
terrorism. Mike Lee, ABC News, Kabul."

    For a picture and bio of Lee:
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/wnt/WorldNewsTonight/lee_mike_bio.html

    For the press release from Human Rights Watch about the study
Jennings jumped to publicize:
http://hrw.org/english/docs/2004/03/08/afghan8073.htm

    For the table of contents for the report, "'Enduring Freedom:'
Abuses by U.S. Forces in Afghanistan," see:
http://hrw.org/reports/2004/afghanistan0304/

    This wasn't the first time Jennings has used ABC air time to
complain about detainee treatment at Guantanamo Bay:

    -- February 21, 2003 CyberAlert: ABC's Peter Jennings treated
an accused terrorist arrested on Thursday as the victim of an
over-aggressive Justice Department as ABC failed to report how the
man once wished "death" upon America. Jennings referred to "the
government's aggressive campaign in the U.S. against people it
accuses of supporting terrorism" and to what the "government calls
a terrorist group overseas." Jennings also fretted about how "we
learned today that three more prisoners being held by the U.S. at
Guantanamo Bay in Cuba have attempted suicide." Jennings proceeded
to assert that "at least two human rights organizations are
seeking information about the interrogation techniques." See:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2003/cyb20030221.asp#1

    -- September 12, 2003 CyberAlert: ABC News decided to
commemorate the September 11th anniversary of the terrorist
attacks of two years ago by sending Claire Shipman to Guantanamo
Bay -- not to look at how the detainment of dozens of potential
terrorists has successfully prevented additional murderous
attacks, but to fret over the lack of U.S. constitutional rights
and international law protections afforded to the enemy
operatives. Surveying the barbed wire-topped fence surrounding
Camp Delta to keep the prisoners inside, Shipman lamented how "the
wire is perhaps more significant for what it's keeping out --
lawyers, family members and the protections of U.S. and
international law."
http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2003/cyb20030912.asp#1

    Introducing that September 11 story, Jennings noted that "at
last count, there were 660" detained at Guantanamo Bay, "including
three teenagers."

    But now that those three teenagers are out and praising their
treatment they no longer interest Jennings.

    Meanwhile, on Monday night of this week, instead of focusing
on the supposed mistreatment of Afghans, the CBS Evening News ran
a story on the good efforts of the U.S. to improve the lives of
Afghans.

    Lara Logan began her story from Afghanistan with video of
Pakistani troops taking control of a village which had al-Qaeda
members, part of Pakistan's efforts to find Osama bin Laden "and
his followers in the hostile territory along the border with
Afghanistan." In Afghanistan, Logan noted, the Taliban still
manage a few rocket attacks on U.S. forces.

    Logan explained how "the U.S. Army says the face of the war
here has changed to a classic guerrilla insurgency, and they've
adapted their strategy accordingly."

    Over video of U.S. soldiers in a village: "By having a regular
presence in villages like these, the U.S. Army is using their
enemies' own tactics against them, making it extremely difficult
for the enemy to hide behind the local population. Security is the
crucial issue here. So far more than a million Afghans have
registered to vote for the first time in their lives. But national
elections scheduled for June may be delayed, in part, because of
terrorist threats."
    Logan to a member of Afghanistan's National Security Council:
"What would happen if the U.S. military pulled out of this country
tomorrow?"
    Zalmay Rassoul, National Security Council: "I think the system
would collapse. I think terrorists would become active. They'll
take over the country again, and we will go back into square
number one."
    Logan: "Isn't that what the terrorists are waiting for?"
    Rassoul: "Absolutely."
    Logan: "Although the pace of change here has been slow,
conditions are improving. [video from plane or helicopter] A new
road linking the capital to Kandahar in the south is one of the
most visible symbols of progress. And there are now more Afghan
children in school than at any time in the country's history,
including two million girls, who were banned from education under
the Taliban."
    Logan to an Afghan woman: "Do you think women feel that things
are starting slowly to change?"
    Nazeefa Talash, election volunteer: "Yes. Not slowly. I think
fast. I'm very happy."
    Logan: "Future security in Afghanistan will depend on the
Afghans themselves and new national institutions like the army and
police force. But they're still a long way from being ready or
able to stand on their own. Lara Logan, CBS News, Kabul."

    For a picture and bio of Logan:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/12/02/60II/main531421.shtml


-- Brent Baker


    >>> Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon
contributions which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-
deductible donation. To safely and securely donate via PayPal:
https://www.paypal.com/xclick/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&i
tem_name=Media+Research+Center&item_number=Media+Research+Center&n
o_note=1&tax=0&currency_code=USD

    Or, if you can't get the lengthy link into your browser's
address line, go to the MRC's home page
( http://www.mediaresearch.org ) and click on the gold "Support
the MRC" logo in the top right corner. That will take you to the
same place.

    To subscribe to CyberAlert, go to:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/cybersub.asp

    Or, send a blank e-mail to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

    To unsubscribe, use the link at the very bottom of this
message.

    Send problems and comments to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

    You can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web
site by subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every
weekday afternoon. To subscribe, go to:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/cybersub.asp#webnews <<<

====================================================================
Update Your Profile:
   http://www.topica.com/f/?bUrD57.a6Hlsy.d2JhY29u
Unsubscribe:
   http://www.topica.com/f/?bUrD57.a6Hlsy.d2JhY29u.u
Confirm Your Subscription:
   http://www.topica.com/f/?bUrD57.a6Hlsy.d2JhY29u.c
Delivered by Topica:
   http://www.topica.com/?p=T3FOOTER

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to