Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
--- Begin Message ---
linda,
thanks for the tip on the Kai Bird book; as it happens i am in the process of reading Chaitkin's book! that's where i picked up on the Mallet info...
On Mar 10, 2004, at 9:09 PM, Linda Minor wrote:
Brian,
If you haven't read Kai Bird's amazing book about the Bundy family, I heartily recommend that you do.� I am slowly reading it and find illuminating insights on every page.� It is well written and easy to read, but I have so many irons in the fire right now.
�
I will do further research on your Thyssen information.� With regard to the Mallet information about Schlumberger family, the best reference I've come across is Tony Chaitkin's Treason in America, as I recall without looking it up.
EIR has pointed out that it was this banking family that was attempting to subvert American republicanism in its early stages--probably by subverting Alexander Hamilton's efforts to establish a credible banking system that would allow the common people, as opposed to the oligarchical establishment, from controlling our own destiny.� Aaron Burr was a tool of this elite, evidenced by his marriage to Theodosia Prevost.�
one thing that i find revealing is how consistently Alexander Hamilton is either marginalized or tarred as a shady, corrupt elitist in both establishment and "revisionist" american histories. it was EIR's material in part that prompted me to take a second look. i would think one of the reasons why Hamilton is targeted is because the type of protectionist / nation-building policies he and the nationalist-federalists promoted to defend the US against british/european subversion in the early days are so similar to what many developing nations have attempted to do in our era in the face of anglo-american "globalization". and we can't have that, can we?
-brian
--- End Message ---
