-Caveat Lector- www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/03/opinion/03SAT1.html

April 3, 2004
NY Times Editorial

The Mystery Deepens

The Bush administration's handling of the bipartisan commission
investigating the 9/11 tragedy grows worse - and more oddly
self-destructive - with each passing day. Following its earlier attempts
to withhold documents from the panel and then to deny its members vital
testimony, we now learn that President Bush's staff has been withholding
thousands of pages of Clinton administration papers as well.

Bill Clinton authorized the release of nearly 11,000 pages of files on
his administration's antiterrorism efforts for use by the commission.
But aides to Mr. Clinton said the White House, which now has control of
the papers, vetoed the transfer of over three-quarters of them. The
White House held the documents for more than six weeks, apparently
without notifying the commission, and might have kept them indefinitely
if Bruce Lindsey, the general counsel of Mr. Clinton's presidential
foundation, had not publicly complained this week. Yesterday the
commission said the White House had agreed to allow its lawyers to
review the withheld documents, but without guaranteeing any would be
released.

This latest distressing episode followed the White House's pattern of
resisting the commission in private and then, once the dispute becomes
public, reluctantly giving up the minimum amount of ground. Earlier in
the week, Mr. Bush finally agreed to allow Condoleezza Rice, the
national security adviser, to testify under oath - but only after
extracting a commitment that the commission would not seek any further
public testimony from any White House official. After months of
foot-dragging, Mr. Bush also grudgingly agreed to let the panel question
him and Vice President Dick Cheney privately. Last year the Pentagon,
the Justice Department and other agencies stonewalled the commission's
requests for documents until its chairman, Thomas Kean, the former
Republican governor of New Jersey, complained publicly.

Explaining the latest act of obstruction, Scott McClellan, the
president's spokesman, said on Thursday that some documents were
duplicative, unrelated or "highly sensitive." The White House, he said,
had given the commission "all the information they need." Mr. Bush's
staff should not be making that judgment. The commission's 10 members
can be trusted with sensitive material.

Moreover, given the repeated criticism of this administration's
obsessive secrecy on other issues, it is astonishing that it would still
withhold anything that did not pose an immediate and dire threat to
national security. The American people would like to know that they have
a government that freely gives information to legitimate investigations
on matters of grave national interest, not one that fights each
reasonable request until it is exposed and forced to submit. The White
House is serving no public purpose by acting less interested than the
rest of us in having this commission do its vital work. Its ham-handed
behavior is also gravely damaging the entire concept of executive privilege.

Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company | Home | Privacy Policy |
Search | Corrections | Help | Back to Top
------------------------

<http://www.nynewsday.com/news/local/manhattan/sns-ap-sept-11-pelosi,0,36623
65.story?coll=nyc-moreny-headlines>

Planned Bush-Cheney Appearance Criticized

By ERICA WERNER
Associated Press Writer

April 2, 2004, 3:39 PM EST

WASHINGTON -- House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi says it's baffling and
embarrassing that President Bush is appearing before the Sept. 11
commission with Vice President Dick Cheney at his side instead of by
himself.

"I think it speaks to the lack of confidence that the administration has
in the president going forth alone, period," Pelosi, D-Calif., said
Friday. "It's embarrassing to the president of the United States that
they won't let him go in without holding the hand of the vice president
of the United States."

"I think it reinforces the idea that the president cannot go it alone,"
she said. "The president should stand tall, walk in the room himself and
answer the questions."

White House spokesman Ken Lisaius dismissed Pelosi's comments and said
the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, had
expressed appreciation for Bush and Cheney's planned appearance.

"This has been a development that the commission welcomes and said so in
their own statement; so it certainly sets the minority leader apart from
the commission," Lisaius said.

Bush and Cheney agreed this week to a single joint private session with
all 10 commissioners investigating the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
Previously, the administration was offering only private interviews of
Bush and Cheney with the commission chairman and vice chairman. The
commission agreed to the new plan.

Pelosi made her comments during a discussion with several reporters. She
also said it was unfortunate that national security adviser Condoleezza
Rice is giving her commission testimony next Thursday, when the House
won't be in session.

"I think it should've happened much sooner," she said.

Copyright � 2004, The Associated Press
---------------------------

>From the Washington Times (the nation's most pro-Bush, pro-Republican
newspaper)

http://www.washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20040402-064359-3845r.htm

Leak: U.S. knew of Sept. 11 plans

WASHINGTON, April 2, 2004 (UPI) -- The U.S. administration knew of al-Qaida
plans to target buildings with planes months before the attacks of Sept. 11,
2001, a former FBI translator claims.

Sibel Edmonds, a former translator for the FBI with top-secret security
clearance says she spent three hours giving testimony to the panel
investigating the attacks, and told Britain's Independent Friday information
was circulating within the FBI in the spring and summer of 2001 an attack
using aircraft was months away and the terrorists were in place.

She rejected national security adviser Condoleezza Rice's claim there was no
such knowledge as "an outrageous lie."

The newspaper said the Bush administration has sought to silence her and has
obtained a gag order from a court by citing the rarely used "state secrets
privilege."

The 33-year-old a Turkish-American woman who speaks Azerbaijani, Farsi,
Turkish and English said she gave her evidence in Washington Feb. 11.

"I gave (the commission) details of specific investigation files, the
specific dates, specific target information, specific managers in charge of
the investigation. I gave them everything so that they could go back and
follow up. This is not hearsay. These are things that are documented. These
things can be established very easily."



www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to