[CTRL] Fwd: [cia-drugs] al qaida in bosnia

Tue, 06 Apr 2004 22:26:28 -0700

-Caveat Lector- www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-
That's true Linda, Clarke is spreading a lot of disinformation about the ant-terrorist efforts particularly of the Clinton administration. His two goals are to discredit Bush (which isn't that hard to do with the truth) and exonerate the Clinton administration which in order to do he has to lie. This, of course, is a defense of his own actions since he was Clinton's top anti-terrorism guru.
 
When Clarke talks about the intensified anti-terror Clinton program he fails to mention that it was directed at "domestic" terrorists, e.g "militias", Ruby Ridge, Waco to the exclusion of middle eastern Islamic terrorists. Both the Clinton and Bush regimes went to extraordinary efforts to shield Saudi Arabia from its involvement in funding terrorism.
 
When John O'Neill (who had been tracking bin Laden since the 1993 WTC FBI/ al Quaeda bombing) started zeroing in on Saudi involvement in the USS Cole bombing in Yemen, Clarke, who was O'Neill's superior and sat on the National Security Council and had been a staunch supporter of O'Neill's pursuit of bin Laden, abandoned O'Neill and left him twisting in the wind. Clarke's emphasis on bin Laden to the exclusion of Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Iran and other supporters of Islamic terrorism was in line with the CFR's 1998 dictum that the Taliban had to go because of its intransigence in negotiations (involving Enron) over the gas and oil pipelines. (I'm sure the Taliban's shutting down of the opium and heroin trade also had something to do with it although not spelled out in the CFR piece laying out the policy), which incidentally was written at James Baker's think tank at Rice University.
 
The Clinton shift to "domestic" terrorism as it defined it shoved to one side 40 boxes of information from interrogations and trial records of the 1993 WTC bombing which would have spelled out the plans of Ramzi Yousef, the alleged mastermind of the WTC bombing as well as the planner behind Bojinka, the 1995 plan uncovered by Philippine authorities which included hijacking US commercial airplanes and flying them into the Pentagon, WTC and Sears tower among other targets. Clarke's apology to the families of the WTC victims was appropriate if for no other reason. Clarke also participated in formulating the FBI's false explanation of the shootdown of TWA 800.
 
As partisan as Salon is, it is understandable why they would spread Clarke's disinformation. But LaRouche's EIR has some very knowledgeable people in it and they should not have allowed further dissemination without at least interjecting some editorial comment about Clarke's obvious falsehoods.
 
JR
 
 
 
 
 
 ----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 8:04 PM
Subject: Re: [cia-drugs] al qaida in bosnia

If the information is not accurate, it's Richard Clarke who's disinforming.  He was the one quoted from the interview with Salon.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jim Rarey
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [cia-drugs] al qaida in bosnia

VMANN:  wasn't 'al qaida' on OUR side in bosnia?
vigilius haufniensis
 
Yes. The narco-terrorist organization KLA in Kosovo was created by the CIA and al Quada and trained by Al Quada. After the U.S. bombed Kosovo and drove out the Serbs, our State Department hired a private contractor (Dyncorp) to train the KLA as the national police force in Kososo. The LaRouche piece is disinformation.
 
JR
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 2:34 PM
Subject: [cia-drugs] al qaida in bosnia

from the last paragraph of this larouche piece:
A: It's possible that the Vice President has spent so little time studying the terrorist phenomenon that he doesn't know about the successes in the 1990s. There were many. The Clinton administration stopped Iraqi terrorism against the United States, through military intervention. It stopped Iranian terrorism against the United States, through covert action. It stopped the al-Qaida attempt to have a dominant influence in Bosnia. It stopped the terrorist attacks at the millennium. It stopped many other terrorist attacks, including on the U.S. embassy in Albania. And it began a lethal covert action program against al-Qaida; it also launched military strikes against al-Qaida. Maybe the Vice President was so busy running Halliburton at the time, that he didn't notice.
 
 
VMANN:  wasnt 'al qaida' on OUR side in bosnia?
vigilius haufniensis


Please let us stay on topic and be civil.-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org
OM




Please let us stay on topic and be civil.-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org
OM




Please let us stay on topic and be civil.-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org
OM





Please let us stay on topic and be civil.-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org
OM


Yahoo! Groups Links
www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to