-Caveat Lector- www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

http://www.nbc5.com/news/2982509/detail.html??z=dp&dpswid=2265994&dppid=6519
4
White House Says It's 'Working On' Request To Declassify Memo
National Security Adviser: No 'Silver Bullet' Could Have Stopped 9/11

UPDATED: 10:38 p.m. EDT April 8, 2004

WASHINGTON -- A National Security Council representative says the White
House is "working on" a request from the 9/11 Commission.
The panel wants a classified document declassified.

Word of the request came the same day that national security adviser
Condoleezza Rice testified before the commission.

In perhaps the most-anticipated testimony of the 9/11 commission's public
hearing, Rice spoke under oath before cameras Thursday, telling
investigators that "there was no silver bullet that could have prevented"
the worst terrorist strikes in the nation's history.

Under contentious questioning, Rice said the United States -- particularly
at the level of intelligence sharing between local law enforcement, the FBI
and American international counterterror agencies -- was ill-prepared
despite a threat that had been building steadily over two decades, beginning
with the attacks on Marine barracks in Lebanon in the early 1980s and
continuing with the attacks on the USS Cole in 2000.

She said preparation by administrations from both parties over that time was
"insufficient."

In nearly three hours in the witness chair, Rice sternly defended Bush when
Democrats on the commission questioned her assertion that there was nothing
specific or "actionable" that might have clued the administration into
al-Qaida's plan for Sept. 11, 2001.

Several Democratic panel members -- most notably Richard Ben-Veniste and Tim
Roemer -- raised questions about an Aug. 6, 2001, classified memo in that
day's presidential daily briefing, or PDB. Panel chairman Thomas Kean has
asked that the PDB be declassified, and the National Security Council
spokesman said later the office "has every intention of doing so."

"Isn't it a fact, Dr. Rice, that the August 6th PDB warned against possible
attacks in this country? And I ask you whether you recall the title of that
PDB?" Ben-Veniste asked.

Rice replied, "I believe the title was, 'Bin Laden Determined to Attack
Inside the United States'."

She said the classified briefing paper prepared for the president was a
"historical" document despite its title, adding that it contained no
"actionable" intelligence -- lacking information that would have alerted
agencies to a specific threat at a specific time and place.

In her prepared statement, Rice spoke in detail about the extensive and
"frustrating" chatter from terrorists planning "something major." The
problem, she said, is that they never had any "when, where, or who."

"We had nothing actionable to tell us that terrorists would use planes as
missiles" to try to "decapitate" our government and kill American civilians,
she said, adding later under questioning that the majority of intelligence
that was more specific hinted at attacks overseas.

Ben-Veniste suggested the PDB reported that "preparations were being made
consistent with hijackings within the United States."

"There was no new threat information," Rice replied. "And it did not, in
fact, warn of any coming attacks inside the United States."

Asked by Ben-Veniste whether is should be declassified, Rice said that the
panel has already had "exceptional access the memo."

 Commission member Bob Kerrey (pictured, right) also had pointed questions
for Rice, suggesting there were more specifics than the administration is
letting on.

Kerrey mentioned a pre-9/11 memo from an FBI field agent about suspicions
that al-Qaida operatives were training at U.S. flight schools, looking to
learn how to fly and not land airliners.

Rice blamed "structural" problems with getting information from field
offices to the higher-ups in the bureau.

Rice Takes Issue With Clarke
After a 30-minute opening statement that didn't mention him much, Rice took
issue with allegations made by former counterterrorism adviser Richard
Clarke, who charged -- among other things -- that the Bush administration
saw al-Qaida as merely an important threat -- not an "urgent one."

Rice told the panel that nothing Clarke proposed would have prevented the
attacks -- and none of the memos he wrote -- including one about Osama bin
Laden -- contained a "warning" or "premonition." She said Clarke wasn't an
expert on Afghanistan or Pakistan, two potential trouble spots the United
States -- including the Clinton administration -- had been focusing on
before Sept. 11, 2001.

Rice said that if the administration had acted on all of Clarke's
recommendations, then it might have gone off in the "wrong direction."

In his testimony last month, Clarke said he repeatedly tried to change the
administration's mind about the urgent threat al-Qaida posed but never got
enough of the president's ear because he answered to Rice.

Rice told 9/11 commissioners on Thursday that if Clarke had wanted to brief
the president, all he had to do was ask.

Rice said Clarke was an "expert in his field, as well as an experienced
crisis manager" with whom she had a good relationship. But she said to her
recollection, Clarke never specifically asked her if he could brief Bush on
what he perceived as terrorism threats.

Families: Rice Testimony Is Start
Testifying in front of an audience that included families of 9/11 victims,
Rice gave no formal apology for the attacks as did Clarke, who drew applause
for saying "I failed you," but described her sorrow as the tragic day
unfolded.

"As an officer of government on duty that day, I will never forget the
sorrow and the anger I felt," she said.

Nikki Stern, who lost her husband in the World Trade Center attacks, said
she was waiting to hear Rice say mistakes were made, but says she didn't
hear that.

Some family members of victims say Rice's testimony seemed less important
than the fact that she had been pushed into public testimony. After nearly
three hours of testimony, Rice stood and turned to greet victims' families.
She offered handshakes to a few at first, then reached out to embrace
others.

Some thanked her for her testimony, but others wanted more. One woman called
out, "I want the full truth." She says she was too flustered to remember
Rice's response.

Bruce DeCell, who lost his son-in-law, said the testimony revealed little.
He added that security holes exposed by the attacks still haven't been
closed. But he said no one president or political party was guilty. He said
the fault "falls on all of them, for the last 25 years."

Anthony Gardner, who lost his brother, said he was glad to see Rice testify.
He just hopes the 9/11 commission's work isn't used to score political
points.

Rice: Terror Policy In Place By Sept. 4
Upon taking office in early 2001, Rice said, confronting terrorists competed
with other foreign policy concerns -- "and the occasional crisis."

But, she said, the administration's top national security advisers completed
work on the first major national security policy directive of the
administration on Sept. 4, 2001. The subject, she said, was "not Russia, not
missile defense, not Iraq, but the elimination of al-Qaida."

She said all elements of national power -- financial, military and
intelligence -- would be brought to bear. She said before the new policy was
used, the Bush administration was in effect using the Clinton team's
policy -- a policy she said was becoming "ineffective" at making progress
against al-Qaida.

"President Bush understood the threat, and he understood its importance,"
she said. "He made clear to me that he did not want to respond to al-Qaida
one attack at a time. He told me he was 'tired of swatting flies'," she
added, responding to claims made last month by former terrorism aide Richard
Clarke.

Kerrey had a heated back-and-forth with Rice over that assertion, asking,
"What flies had he swatted that he would tire?" He said that as he sees it,
the United States only swatted once -- a Clinton-ordered strike on suspected
terrorist camps.

Rice said Bush believed the CIA was going after only individual terrorists,
and that American interests were better served by a broader response against
al-Qaida.

Panel Wants To Understand Pre-9/11 'Choices'
Commission vice chairman Lee Hamilton said the purpose of the hearing was to
"understand the choices that were made" in deciding how to combat terrorism.

Rice said the new administration asked whether targeting bin Laden would
cripple the entire terrorist network. She said the feedback they got,
especially from CIA Director George Tenet, suggested the network would still
go on without bin Laden.

She said the United States was "simply not on a war footing" at the time of
the attacks.

Rice suggested the U.S. policy toward al-Qaida wasn't working at the time
because the country's policies in nations where terrorists had a presence
weren't working. She mentioned Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Clinton Meets With Panel In Private
Former President Bill Clinton testified in private Thursday before the 9/11
commission after Rice's public testimony.

After hearing from Rice, the commission met with Clinton for more than three
hours and said he was "forthcoming and responsive to questions." Bush and
Vice President Dick Cheney are to be questioned soon, also in private.

The White House recently gave Rice the go-ahead to testify publicly after
calls from Democrats and some members of the bipartisan, 10-member panel.

Rice, who testified in private for four hours in February, cited executive
privilege for not agreeing to testify in public earlier, arguing that
sitting presidential advisers don't historically testify in public under
oath for fear of discouraging frank, private discussions with the president
in times of threatened national security.

Panel chairman Thomas Kean said the commission values executive privilege
but pointed out that the Sept. 11 attacks were a uniquely devastating event
in American history that should create an exception.

Kean said commissioners did not seek public testimony from the Bush and
Cheney.

Bush Watches Testimony Live
Her boss was watching.

The White House says Bush watched the live coverage while on vacation at his
ranch in Crawford, Texas.

His aides had said earlier that Bush did not plan to watch the testimony. A
senior administration official had said Bush would get updates from his top
advisers.

In addition to watching the Rice testimony, a spokeswoman said Bush also
spoke by phone Thursday morning with Russian President Vladimir Putin for 20
minutes.

Bush said Rice "will be great." He said she's a smart, capable person who
knows exactly what took place and "will lay out the facts."





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com.  Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/TySplB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

-__ ___ _ ___ __ ___ _ _ _ __
/-_|-0-\-V-/-\|-|-__|-|-|-/-_|
\_-\--_/\-/|-\\-|-_||-V-V-\_-\
|__/_|--//-|_|\_|___|\_A_/|__/

 SPY NEWS is OSINT newsletter and discussion list associated to
Mario's Cyberspace Station - The Global Intelligence News Portal
 http://mprofaca.cro.net

######## CAUTION! #########
 Since you are receiving and reading documents, news stories,
comments and opinions not only from so called (or self-proclaimed)
"reliable sources", but also a lot of possible misinformation collected
by Spy News moderator and subscribers and posted to Spy News
for OSINT purposes - it should be a serious reason (particularly to
journalists and web publishers) to think twice before using it for their
story writing, further publishing or forwarding throughout Cyberspace.

To unsubscribe:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*** FAIR USE NOTICE: This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been 
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Spy News is making it available 
without profit to SPY NEWS eGroup members who have expressed a prior interest in 
receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, 
human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, 
for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this 
constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of 
the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of 
your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright 
owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 -----------------------------------------------

 SPY NEWS home page:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spynews

 Mario Profaca
 http://mprofaca.cro.net/
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spynews/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substanceâ??not soap-boxingâ??please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'â??with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright fraudsâ??is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to