| -Caveat Lector-
mfhr.org /first_Testament
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CHRISTIANS TAKE HOLD: THE NEW TESTAMENT IS TOO JEWISH ROGUE Judith ABR, 2004 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ While watching the media�s blitzkrieg upon Christ�s life this year during the Easter Holiday season (four new Christ stories aired on television and the blockbuster film, "The Passion of Christ," opened up to exhalative reviews) certain possibilities occurred to this author about the real story of Jesus of Nazareth. Among them includes the possibility that large-scale held beliefs about his life warrant far more seasoned, intellectual, historical fact. For instance, take the following notions: I. The First Testament (a Jewish script) is not applicable to Christianity and should not be in the Bible. Consider: A) Jews Defend Their Beliefs. Jews may have instigated the adoption of an edited, altered version of the Torah as the First Testament as a ways and means of controlling Christians. This would also have the added benefit of thwarting wide reaching Christian animosities for their part in the crucifixion of Christ. The crucifixion was an extreme Jewish reaction, one of anger and jealousy towards Christ�s defiant stands against Jewish culture and religion. As an example, consider his belief that one should "turn the other cheek" as opposed to seeking "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth" for betrayal. B) Jews and Good Ole� Boys (the Good Ole� Boy Brits � the "King James" version of the Bible) pushed this version of the New Testament as a way and means of owning, thereby controlling, Christians from the inside out, establishing a way to order or alter historical sequences from Christ on. II. Christian prophets, contrary to Biblical assertions, are not of Jewish origins. Consider: A) Abraham, Moses and Jesus are all three not of Jewish heritage or bloodlines. All depictions of these men do not follow any known physical examples of Jewish people � they do not look Jewish and they do not sound Jewish. All are fairly tall, brown-red hair, brown eyes, nice builds, high facial cheek bones, good looking, and most importantly of very magnanimous personalities � magnetic qualities, kind individuals with a vision for the future of mankind � a sort of calling to assist mankind with the next level of evolution. Analysis: None if them look the least bit like the Jews of today, with the exception perhaps of a few Orthodox (Hasidic) Jews, but certainly these individuals are not even the current-day Orthodox norm. These Biblical men resemble more closely our current-day Irish people in looks and in temperament. Recent publications on the Holy Grain bloodline of Christ support this interpretation and the somewhat accepted fact about Christ and his Merovingian bloodline which left its mark in Ireland and Boston (such as with the high brow Kennedy's, Fitzgerald's etc.) How Ireland became involved with Christ early on is not the question. These men may have come from an entirely different culture than Judaism and from another region of the Middle East. Jews may have wanted to use and capture the powers of these individuals and even throughout time. B) Zoroastrians. These three biblical men may have come from societies such as the Assyrians or Babylonians or Zoroastrians (ancient Persia circa 1400 -1100 B.C.). After all, both Moses and Jesus were known to be adopted by their parents and their historic origins are not certain. The Bible only provides a pre-Jewish interpretation. What is known about these early times is that the Zoroaster followers were especially magnanimous individuals, taken with preaching and had sizable powers over many thousands of followers in the area of Israel. They resembled well Christ�s and Moses� looks and physiques. Their early culture predates Judaism by some five hundred years and their religion is considered the very "first" world class religion of western cultures. They had hundreds of prophets who preached peace and guidelines for living to people in the Middle East (known as the "cradle of civilization" because of its far reaching trade centers) daily for centuries. Besides well-known prophet Zoroaster there was Mazda and many, many others, too many to name here. For more information about Zoroastrians see Mary Boyce�s (U.K. scholar) books on Amazon.com. SYNOPSIS: A great deal more needs to be considered with the history of Christianity and Christ�s life. The Bible is not a historical document nor should it be considered as such. It is a book of philosophy to aid and assist people with structuring and living their lives to the fullest. Its historical information is only a nuance or guidepost for greater contemplation. 1999 - 2003 � Museum for Human Rights. All Rights Reserved.Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om |
