-Caveat Lector-
The reward for failure - permanent membership? - JR
 
 
 
<A href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/click%3Bh=v2|3102|3|0|%2a|a%3B7939098%3B0-0%3B0%3B9063222%3B2321-160|600%3B5114514|5132410|1%3B%3B%7Efdr%3D7633314%3B0-0%3B2%3B7112566%3B2321-160|600%3B5127603|5145499|1%3B%3B%3fhttp://gem.compaq.com/gemstore/sites/federal/PDL380.asp?jumpid=ex_R3962_DL380_F22" target=_new></A>
washingtonpost.com

Intelligence Panel Votes To Abolish Term Limits
Senators Seek to Strengthen Oversight of CIA

By Dana Priest
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, May 5, 2004; Page A27

The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, in an admission of its own role in U.S. intelligence failures of the last three years, yesterday voted unanimously to abolish the eight-year term limits imposed when the panel was established 28 years ago, committee members said.

"The world has gotten very chaotic, and we're not governmentally responding to it adequately," said Sen. John D. "Jay" Rockefeller IV (W.Va.), ranking Democrat on the committee. "There's a lot we can do to make ourselves more effective."

The vote, which took place behind closed doors, would represent the broadest change in the history of the panel. The Senate committee and its House counterpart are the only outside bodies with the authority to oversee the secret, $40 billion intelligence community.

The proposed change, which must be passed by the Senate, is contained in the Intelligence Authorization Act markup for 2005 and has the tentative backing of the leadership of both parties, committee sources said, speaking anonymously because of the sensitivity of the subject.

"It is clear to me that change is needed," said Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan.), the committee chairman. The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence is considering similar changes.

Two major inquiries in the last 18 months have revealed the failures of the CIA, FBI and White House to prevent the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and their miscalculation about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. Little attention has been focused on the fact that the congressional oversight committees routinely received information about al Qaeda before the attacks and had the authority to demand more information from the intelligence community on the terrorist threat and on the debate within the intelligence world over Iraq's weapons capabilities.

Several committee members interviewed recently acknowledged that the panels did not work hard enough on these issues. In the fall of 2002, for example, as Congress debated waging war in Iraq, no more than six senators read the 92-page National Intelligence Estimate that laid out the threat from Iraq, as well as the debate within the intelligence agencies over Iraq's biological, chemical and nuclear programs.

During yesterday's committee session, in which the Intelligence Authorization Act was approved, members also agreed to consider other major changes in the way the panel operates. The changes are aimed at increasing senators' understanding of the complex and secret world of intelligence and allowing individual lawmakers to develop greater expertise over particular covert and technological issues.

The contemplated changes include establishing subcommittees, which would spread responsibility among committee members. The panel will also consider expanding the staff from its current 35 aides.

Senators said yesterday that the vote reflected a strong bipartisan consensus to fix their oversight problems.

"I believe that members need the experience that staying on the committee a long time brings," Sen. Mike DeWine (R-Ohio) said. "There's a tough learning curve on this committee. If members are going to really have proper oversight over the intelligence community, you have to have some institutional memory. We probably need to make some other institutional changes as well, but this is a beginning."

The two intelligence committees were created after the 1975 Church committee hearings, which explored CIA torture and abuse overseas. To ensure the panels' independence from the intelligence community, Congress imposed eight-year term limits on committee service.

"It was a noble objective, but it has failed in practice," said Jeffrey H. Smith, a former CIA general counsel and an intelligence expert. Smith said Congress should also consider putting the intelligence committees on the same footing as other major panels, such as Appropriations and Armed Services, given the importance of their work. "It would give them greater clout" in passing budgets and setting strategic priorities for the intelligence community, he said.

The Senate intelligence committee's bill must be passed by the Armed Services Committee, which can change parts of the authorization bill before it goes to the floor for debate.

Given the scandal over the abuse of detainees in Iraq and the faltering of the effort there, "there's a new sense of urgency" on the committee, Rockefeller said.

� 2004 The Washington Post Company


 

www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Attachment: uc.GIF?1.13&wpost&wpost&noscript
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to