-Caveat Lector- www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

http://199.249.170.220/eandp/columns/shoptalk_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=100
0514376
New Revelations Highlight Miller Ink Stain at 'NY Times'
Colin Powell admits being wrong about WMD in Iraq. What about the Gray Lady?

By William E. Jackson Jr.

(May 19, 2004) -- This past Monday, The New York Times published "U.S. and
Iraq Spar Over Who Should Run Corruption Inquiry Into Oil-for-Food Program,"
a jointly-authored piece by Susan Sachs and Judith Miller. Sandwiched into
the story was the observation that, beyond the political question of who
should run such an explosive investigation, there was the practical question
of access to thousands of documents that remain in the hands of individual
Governing Council members "like Ahmad Chalabi ... a former exile who
returned with the strong backing of many Bush administration officials."

Was this an attempt by Judith Miller to distance herself from the Iraqi
National Congress (INC) leader with whom she had such a close working
relationship during the long period of her misreporting on weapons of mass
destruction in Iraq? For Chalabi had been not only the favorite of the
Pentagon to govern Iraq; he was Miller's as well.

That day, the Times also reported Secretary of State Colin Powell's
confession on "Meet the Press" the previous day, near the close of a
staff-interrupted interview with Tim Russert, that he and the CIA had been
fooled by intelligence sources who provided wrong and "deliberately
misleading" information about Iraqi WMD -- such as presented to the UN
Security Council on Feb. 5, 2003. Not included in the paper's brief account
was any mention of the fact that the Times itself had been a conduit for
such bogus information through Miller's reporting at home and abroad, which
heavily relied upon INC defectors either offered by Chalabi or the Bush
administration.

Jack Shafer in Slate subsequently argued that Powell has been more
accountable than the paper of record: "Note to Bill Keller: Colin Powell
Admits He Was Misled About WMD. Why Can't the Times?" Chalabi and his
"heroes in error" had played Miller and The Times for "suckers," as I
observed in a March 10 column here.

Enter Knight Ridder

Also this past Monday, Jonathan Landay of Knight Ridder, a member of the
team that had first reported the Pentagon was paying the INC hundreds of
thousand dollars per year for intelligence, filed a story titled: "White
House Released Claims of Defector Deemed Unreliable by CIA."

It constituted further proof that at the highest levels public and
Congressional support had been manufactured for a preemptive invasion of
Iraq by publicizing the claims of Iraqi defectors, in this case after the
defector was "fluttered" in a lie detector test and had been rejected as
unreliable by U.S. intelligence agencies.

The defector, Saeed al Haideri, claimed he'd worked at illegal chemical,
biological and nuclear facilities around Baghdad. But when members of the
Iraqi Survey Group later took the man -- a Kurd, incidentally -- back to
Iraq, he pointed out facilities known to be associated with conventional
weapons. He couldn't identify a single site associated with illegal weapons.

The White House had used this defector's claims in a background paper, "A
Decade of Deception and Defiance"-- nine months after CIA and DIA officers
had dismissed him as unreliable. Released on Sept. 12, 2002, in conjunction
with a speech the president delivered at the UN, it was billed as the first
major compendium of "specific examples of how Iraqi President Saddam Hussein
has systematically and continually violated 16 United Nations Security
Council resolutions over the past decade." The paper is still available on
the White House Web site.

The lead footnote in the propagandistic document just happened to reference
a Dec. 20, 2001, front-page article in the Times by, guess who, Judith
Miller ("Secret Sites: Iraqi Tells of Renovations at Sites for Chemical and
Nuclear Arms") that was based on an interview with the defector in Bangkok,
Thailand, days after he was turned over to the U.S.

She described a civil engineer who worked on renovating secret biological,
chemical and nuclear weapons facilities. "Mr. Saeed's account gives new
clues about the types and possible locations of illegal laboratories,
facilities and storage sites that American officials and international
inspectors have long suspected Iraq of trying to hide," Miller wrote. Yet,
CIA and DIA experts had already dismissed the proffered defector as
unreliable, based on the showing of deception in a CIA-administered
polygraph. Intelligence officials had debriefed him before he was made
available to the Times.

Who Is to Blame?

The Knight Ridder revelations raise, once again, the nettlesome issue of
where the U.S. government left off and the Times began, or vice versa, in
making the case for Iraqi possession of WMD. There remains the more
disturbing question of whether a Times reporter served as a cat's paw for
the neo-con policymakers in Washington with whom she had close ties.

Yesterday, the Times scored a scoop of its own in Richard Oppel's "U.S. to
Halt Payments to Iraqi Group Headed by a Onetime Pentagon Favorite." Noting
that Ahmad Chalabi had played a crucial role in persuading the Bush
administration that Hussein had to be removed from power, Oppel wrote that
the INC leader had since become a lightning rod for critics of the
administration "who say the United States relied on him too heavily for
prewar intelligence that has since proved faulty. ... Internal reviews by
the United States government have found that much of the information
provided ... before American forces invaded Iraq last year was useless,
misleading or even fabricated."

The irony of this scoop appearing in the Times seems to have escaped the
newspaper's editors.

There are investigations underway into allegations of corruption on the part
of the INC. And it has been reported that Chalabi angered Washington by
refusing to hand over Iraqi intelligence files that its militia seized after
the Pentagon allowed it into Baghdad shortly after the city fell.

A struggle has been raging within the administration over Chalabi's
post-invasion role, with his champions in the Pentagon and Vice President
Dick Cheney's office; and his detractors in the uniformed military, the CIA
and the State Department.

Who at the Times protects Miller from the consequences that should have
flowed from the highly irresponsible reporting she did on WMD in 2002-2003?
At several national newspapers, not to mention the Times itself in the
Jayson Blair case, severe penalties have been imposed on bad journalists for
reporting untruths. However, they were not involved in the glaring conflicts
of interest -- among other negatives -- that characterized Miller's
performance.

An industrious star reporter holding onto her job is one thing. But just
what is the problem that keeps executive editor Keller from ordering a
lengthy editors' note correcting what she wrote based on tainted sources in
the pages of the Times? She was up to her eyeballs in hyping disinformation
resulting from a highly suspect intelligence operation run by a foreign
exile group, which had penetrated the office of Cheney, and which actively
suborned the entry of the United States into a misguided, and destructive,
invasion of Iraq.

------------
William E. Jackson Jr. has been covering this subject for E&P since last
spring. He was executive director of President Jimmy Carter's General
Advisory Committee on Arms Control, 1978-80. After affiliations with the
Brookings Institution and the Fulbright Institute of International
Relations, Jackson writes on national security issues from Davidson, N.C.





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/TySplB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

-__ ___ _ ___ __ ___ _ _ _ __
/-_|-0-\-V-/-\|-|-__|-|-|-/-_|
\_-\--_/\-/|-\\-|-_||-V-V-\_-\
|__/_|--//-|_|\_|___|\_A_/|__/

 SPY NEWS is OSINT newsletter and discussion list associated to
Mario's Cyberspace Station - The Global Intelligence News Portal
 http://mprofaca.cro.net

######## CAUTION! #########
 Since you are receiving and reading documents, news stories,
comments and opinions not only from so called (or self-proclaimed)
"reliable sources", but also a lot of possible misinformation collected
by Spy News moderator and subscribers and posted to Spy News
for OSINT purposes - it should be a serious reason (particularly to
journalists and web publishers) to think twice before using it for their
story writing, further publishing or forwarding throughout Cyberspace.

To unsubscribe:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*** FAIR USE NOTICE: This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been 
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Spy News is making it available 
without profit to SPY NEWS eGroup members who have expressed a prior interest in 
receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, 
human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, 
for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this 
constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of 
the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of 
your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright 
owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 -----------------------------------------------

 SPY NEWS home page:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spynews

 Mario Profaca
 http://mprofaca.cro.net/
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spynews/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substanceâ??not soap-boxingâ??please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'â??with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright fraudsâ??is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to