-Caveat Lector-
This one was one of the most humorous and ignorant pieces of superstitious
tripe spotted -- sealed at the end with the usual sky fairy followers
signet, with the best amoeba level intelligence they could muster, that
Science is "... the theocracy of Satan".
I don't know about you; that's certainly put the bjeezus fear into me; and
for starters I'll be turning off the electricity, water and gas lest I
become a follower of Satan!
On a matter of literary honesty; now if anyone actually bothered to read the
opening volley from the quote attributed to Mencken in context; Mencken is
actually making a humorous jab at the silly and superstitious buffoons such
as this one who wrote this nonsense - he's not supporting them! These
veritable nutters who believe we ought be governed by him and his
all-powerful sky fairy deity who will protect one and all from their evil
cave troll Satan and his evil minions - the dwarfs.
Aside from it's paranoid and superstitious nuttiness; the piece was about as
useful as rubber lips on a woodpecker.
Dave.
----- Original Message -----
From: Kris Millegan
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 8:11 AM
Subject: [CTRL] The Ascendecy of The Scientific Dictatorship
an excerpt from:
The Ascendecy of The Scientific Dictatorship
Phillip Darrel CollinsÂ2004 & Paul David Collins
iUniverse, Inc
2021 Pine Lake Road, Suite 100
Lincoln., NE 68512
ISBN 0-595-31164-4
231 pages
www.iuniverse.com
Foreword
H.L. Mencken, who witnessed the Scopes trial, wrote:
âThere is, it appears, a conspiracy of scientists afoot. Their purpose is to
break down religion, propagate immorality, and so reduce mankind to the
level of the brutes. They are the sworn and sinister agents of Beelzebub who
yearns to conquer the world..."
Hyperbolic though they may sound, Mencken's words were closer to the truth
than, perhaps, even he realized. Few are not acquainted with the timeworn
adage: "Knowledge is power." In the original Latin, the word "science" meant
"knowing" or "knowledge." The "conspiracy of scientists" to which Mencken
referred is, more succinctly, a conspiracy of knowledge. It is a conscious
effort to monopolize, manipulate, distort, and exploit knowledge to the most
evil of ends. H.G. Wells called this conspiracy the "Technocracy." Aldous
Huxley, who was Wells' protege, more succinctly characterized it as a
"scientific dictatorship."
>From the dawn of antiquity to the twilight of the twentieth century, the
hidden manipulators of mankind have sought to perfect their methods of
control. These shadowy puppeteers have been assigned numerous appellations.
Perhaps the most common name ascribed to them is the "Illuminati," which is
Latin for âthose who are illumined." Irrespective of whatever name is
assigned to them, some of their members and agentur comprise a portion of
the Technocracy. Other members of the Technocracy are either self-initiates
(i.e., individuals who recognized the esoteric doctrine underpinning their
belief system and initiated themselves into Illuminism) or just foolish
pawns who have helped to transform science into a whore for the elite. The
Technocracy has also been further divided by factionalism within its own
ranks. For instance, there is division amongst various fascist and communist
variants of the Technocracy. However, despite their disagreements, all of
the Technocracy strives towards a singe goal ... a global "scientific
dictatorship" (i.e., a New World Order).
Before the birth of the Technocracy, the Illuminati's primary combatants in
its epistemological war against humanity were priests and philosophers.
Initially, control was maintained through religious institutions.
Historically, these oligarcbs have been Luciferians, believing themselves to
be the corporeal vessels of an angelic dissident who was unfairly assigned
the defamatory stigma of "Satan." For them, Lucifer is an impersonal force
that they must harness in order to consummate their process of "becoming"
and achieve apotheosis. In truth, they are the pawns of the Adversary
himself. Motivated by an insane and maniacal desire to depose the one true
God, the Illuminati initiated the abortive attempt to construct the Tower of
Babel. Their philosophical scions pursue the same goals today.
Man's estrangement from God, which was the natural consequence of his act of
disobedience in the Garden of Eden, made this form of manipulation even
easier. The clergymen of the elite disseminated propaganda, citing various
deities as the sources of their knowledge. Ignorant of their own Creator,
the masses accepted the state-sanctioned religions of the ruling class. Yet,
this apparatus of control eventually lost its effectiveness. Simply lying to
the masses was not sufficient for the maintenance of their deception. There
always seemed to be a remnant of independent thinkers who would stir up
dissent within the population. Even the polemical trickery of sophists could
not delay the inevitable dissolution of the elite's illusion.
This intrinsic deficiency within the elite's control apparatus was openly
exposed for all to see when a certain carpenter from Nazareth suddenly
appeared. Speaking words that no other tongue had uttered, He dismantled the
lies of the elite's fraudulent priesthood. Those who heard Him and knew Him
were well aware of the fact that He was no mere carpenter. Through this man,
humanity could once again touch and commune with the God that religion had
obfuscated. Recognizing this miraculous person as a threat to their power,
the elite had Him executed. Yet, not even death could conquer the Nazarene
carpenter. To this very day, the tomb of Jesus Christ remains empty.
Desperate to save their declining hegemony, the ruling class modified their
strategy.
The overt promulgation of fictions was abandoned in favor of a more subtle
method of control. If the ruling class could wield an illusory form of
control over knowledge, then they could claim exclusive awareness of its
true nature. After achieving this illusory control, the elite would
promulgate their concepts within
academia and other officially accredited institutions. Contaminated by
virulent strains of thought, the ability of the average person to
independently reason would be effectively sabotaged. Gradually, the elite
began to co-opt the newly emergent methodology of truth discernment ...
science. initially, this new form of "knowledge" appeared to be antithetical
to religion. However, beneath its veil of materialism and naturalism lurked
the very same occult mysticism practiced in Babylon. The following is an
examination of the elite's epistemic autocracy, a "conspiracy of scientists"
that epitomizes the words of Paul the apostle:
For the invisible things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly
seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power
and Godhead; so that they are without excuse. Because that, when they knew
God, they glorified Him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain
in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing
themselves to be wise, they became fools (Romans 1:20-22).
Exposition
As antiquity gave way to modern history, the outward features of the power
elite were renovated to present an epistemic autocracy, a "scientific
dictatorship." Subtly and swiftly, the ruling class seized control of
science and used it as an "epistemological weapon" against the masses. The
history and background of this 11 scientific dictatorship" is a conspiracy,
created and micro-managed by the historical tide of Darwinism, which has its
foundations in Freemasonry.
Conspiracy theorists of both the left and right persuasions consistently
quote former President Eisenhower's reference to the "military industrial
complex" during his farewell address. However, many of them overlook another
important portion of this speech and, thus, fail to grasp the true
dimensions of this conspiracy. In his address, Eisenhower also issued the
following warning:
"Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should,
we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy
could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite"
(Eisenhower's Farewell Address tothe Nation, January 17, 1961).
This is the nature of the conspiracy, as it exists today ... a
"scientific-technological elite." Yes, the conspiracy does involve the
defense industry, which reaps huge profits dialectical conflicts with
covertly manufactured enemies. Yes, it does involve the national security
state, the existence of which is dependent upon the secret maintenance of
adversaries abroad. Yes, it does involve corporations and wealthy
businessmen. Yet, the conspiracy of which Eisenhower spoke does not confine
itself to these interests alone.
The ruling class is not merely waging a war on the rest of humanity for
money and power. It is waging a war of ideas, fought through its ideologues
and philosophical radicals. It is waging a war of knowledge, fought through
an epistemological cartel that will be discussed shortly. Lastly and most
importantly, it is waging a war of science, fought through a technocratic
priesthood that worships what was initially a God-given instrument for the
broadening of human understanding. Ideas ... knowledge ... science ... all
these are inhabitants of the mind, which is the ultimate battlefield. Only
within the mind can the ruling class achieve their final objective: the
recreation of man in the image of their god.
The contamination of science by this priesthood is evident in the field's
adoption of progressively virulent strains of thought ... radical
empiricism, metaphysical naturalism, Malthusianism, Darwinism, radical
environmentalism, behaviorism, etc. Many of these concepts are derivative of
the elite's own occult doctrine, cosmetically renovated to appear as
objective science. All of these concepts correlate in some way and, at some
point, coalesce. Together, they are gradually paving the way for the
re-introduction of the hidden god of the Ancient Mysteries.
The Epistemological Cartel
In The Architecture of Modern Political Power, Daniel Pouzzner exhaustively
outlines a litany of tactics employed by the elite to maintain their
dominance. Among one of them is: "Ostensible control over the knowable, by
marketing institutionally accredited science as the only path to true
understanding" (Pouzzner, 2003, pg. 75). Thus, the ruling class endeavors to
discourage independent reason while exercising illusory power over human
knowledge. This tactic of control through knowledge suppression and
selective dissemination is reiterated in the anonymously authored Silent
Weapons for Quiet Wars:
Energy is recognized as the key to all activity on earth. Natural science is
the study of the sources and control of natural energy, and social science,
theoretically expressed as economics, is the study of the sources and
control of social energy. Both are bookkeeping systems. Mathematics is the
primary energy science. And the bookkeeper can be king if the public can be
kept ignorant of the methodology of the bookkeeping. All science is merely a
means to an end. The means is knowledge. The end is control (Keith, Secret
and Suppressed, p. 203, 1993).
The word "science" is derivative of the Latin word scientia, which simply
means "knowing." Therefore, this elite monopoly of the knowable, which is
enforced through institutional science, could be characterized as an
epistemological cartel. The ruling class has suborned the "bookkeepers"
(i.e., natural and social scientists). Meanwhile, the masses practically
deify the "bookkeepers" of the elite and remain "ignorant of the methodology
of the bookkeeping." The unknown author of Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars
provides an eloquently simple summation: "The means is knowledge. The end is
control. Beyond this remains only one issue: Who will be the beneficiary?"
(Keith, Secret and Suppressed, p. 203, 1993).
In Brave New World Revisited, Aldous Huxley more succinctly defined
this
epistemological cartel; I
The older dictators fell because they could never supply their subjects with
enough bread, enough circuses, enough miracles, and mysteries.
Under a scientific dictatorship, education will really work with the result
that most men and women will grow up to love their servitude and will never
dream of revolution.
There seems to be no good reason why a thoroughly scientific dictatorship
should ever be overthrown (Huxley, Brave New World Revisited, p. 116,
1958).
This is the ultimate objective of the elite: an oligarchy legitimized by
arbitrarily anointed expositors of "knowledge" or, in Huxley's own words, a
"scientific dictatorship." Huxley first presented the "scientific
dictatorship" to the public imagination in his book Brave New World. In
fact, the literary genre of science fiction itself has played a significant
role in programming the masses for their comfortable assimilation into just
such a dictatorship.
Science Fiction: A Means of Predictive
Programming
In Dope, Inc., associates of political dissident Lyndon LaRouche claim that
Huxley's book, Brave New World, was actually a "mass appeal" organizing
document written "on behalf of one-world order" (p. 538, 1992). The United
States is the only place where Huxley's "science fiction classic" is taught
as an allegorical condemnation of fascism (p. 538, 1992). If this is true,
then the "scientific dictatorship" presented within the pages of Brave New
World is a thinly disguised roman a'clef awaiting tangible enactment.
Such is often the case with "science fiction" literature. According to
researcher Michael Hoffman, this literary genre is instrumental in the
indoctrination of the masses into the doctrines of the elite:
Traditionally, "science fiction" has appeared to most people as an
adolescent genre, the province of time-wasting fantasies. This has been the
great strength of this genre as a vehicle for the inculcation of the
ideology favored by the Cryptocracy. As J.H. Towsen points out in Clowns,
only when people think they are not buying something, can the real sales
pitch begin. While it is true chat with the success of NASA's Gemini space
program and the Apollo moon flights, more serious attention and
respectability was accorded "science fiction," nonetheless in its formative
seeding time, from the late 19th century through the 1950s, the predictive
program known as "science fiction" had the advantage of being derided as the
solitary vice of misfit juveniles and marginal adults (Hoffman, p. 205,
2001).
Thus, âscience fiction" is a means of conditioning the masses to accept
future visions that the elite wish to tangibly enact. This process of
gradual and subtle inculcation is dubbed "predictive programming." Hoffman
elaborates: "Predictive programming works by means of the propagation of the
illusion of an infallibly accurate vision of how the world is going to look
in the future" (Hoffman, p. 205, 200 1). Also dubbed "sci-fi inevitabilism"
by Hoffman, predictive programming is analogous to a virus that infects its
hosts with the false belief that it is:
â Useless to resist central, establishment control.
â Or it posits a counter-cultural alternative to such control which is
actually
a counterfeit, covertly emanating from the establishment itself.
â That the blackening (pollution) of earth is as unavoidable as entropy.
â That extinction ('evolution") of the species is inevitable. I
â That the reinhabitation of the earth by the "old gods" (Genesis 6:4),
is our
stellar scientific destiny (Hoffman, p. 8, 200 1).
Memes (contagious ideas) are instilled through the circulation of "mass
appeal" documents under the guise of "science fiction" literature. Once
subsumed on a psychocognitive level, these memes become self-fulfilling
prophecies, embraced by the masses and outwardly approximated through the
efforts of the elite. As this examination of the "scientific dictatorship"
proceeds, the previous list of illusory notions promulgated by sci-fi
predictive programmers will continue to re-surface. Even a casual perusal of
the great body of science fiction would reveal this truism. The genre
constitutes little more than a collection of allegorized versions of the
elite's occult Darwinian doctrine. The sci-fi concepts of utopia and
dystopia are really Hegelian terms for the same thing: a socialist
totalitarian system.
The sci-fi genre invariably extends itself into the realm of occult, which
thematically underpins the doctrines of the elite. Carl Raschke expounds
upon the close ties between the two:
The snug relationship between occult fantasy and the actual practice of the
occult is well established in history. Writers such as H.P. Lovecraft and
Edgar Rice Burroughs, progenitor of the Tarzan and Jane tales, were
practicing occultists.
L. Ron Hubbard, architect of the controversial religion known as
Scientology, openly and consciously decided to convert his science fiction
work into a working belief system upon which a "church" was set up. Science
fiction, "Science fantasy," pure fantasy, and the world of esoteric thought
and activity have all been intimately connected historically (Raschke, p.
303, 1990).
Just as Hubbard's sci-fi novels paved the way for his "church" of
Scientology, the science fiction genre as a whole is paving the way for a
new theocracy. Raschke elaborates further on the religious dimensions of
science fiction:
Increasingly, science fiction with its vistas of the technological future
intertwines with the neopagan and the medieval. The synthesis was first
achieved with polished artistry in Lucas' Star Wars trilogy (Raschke, p.
398, 1990).
As the vision of the elite is subliminally encoded within the public mind
through sci-fi predictive programming, the Luciferian religion of the ruling
class is also unconsciously subsumed. One major sci-fi proselyte of
Luciferianism was Gene Roddenberry, creator of Star Trek. In an interview,
Roddenberry candidly espoused a core precept of the Luciferian religion:
"As nearly as I can concentrate on the question today, I believe I am God;
certainly you arc, I think we intelligent beings on this planet are all a
piece of God, are becoming God" (Alexander, p. 568, 1994).
Of course, this reiterates an older lie, whispered by the serpent in Eden:
"...ye shall be as gods" (Genesis 3:5). It is at the core of Luciferianism
and its doctrine of "becoming." This is the occult concept of "becoming,"
which the elite disseminated on the popular level as Darwinism. Evolution is
the means by which this purported transformation of man into God is to
occur. The science fiction genre has been central to the indoctrination of
the masses into evolutionary thought.
For instance, the science fiction of H.G. Wells would play an important role
in promulgating the concept of evolution. J.P. Vernier explains:
Science fiction is admittedly almost impossible to define; readers all think
they know what it is and yet no definition will cover all its various
aspects. However, I would suggest that evolution, as presented by Wells,
that is a kind of mutation resulting in the confrontation of man with
different species, is one of the main themes of modern science fiction
(Suvin & Philmus, p. 859 1977).
If this concept of "predictive programming" seems fantastic, examine the
case of H.G. Wells a little closer. Wells was mentored by T.H. Huxley,
grandfather of Aldous. In turn, Wells would tutor Aldous and his brother,
Julian. All of these men were Darwinians and members of the Freemasonic
Lodge (the significance of which will be revealed shortly). J.P. Vernier
reveals Wells' religious adherence to the concept of evolution and its
inspiration on him as an author of science fiction:
The impact of the theory of evolution on his [Wells'] mind is well known: it
was the first felt when he attended the Lectures of T.H. Huxley, at South
Kensington, in 1884 and 1885, and, ten years later, evolution was to provide
him with the fundamental theme of his "scientific romances" and of many of
his short stories (Suvin & Philmus, p. 70, 1977). 1
Wells would author several "mass appeal" tracts disguised as science fiction
novels. Most notable of these novels was The Shape of Things to Come.
Deceased researcher Jim Keith offered the following assessment of Wells' The
Shape of Things to Come:
Again: Interestingly, deceptively, the book is presented as a work of
science fiction, but within its pages is Wells' best guess of how the New
World Order would come to pass, from a 1930s perspective.
While primarily a work of propaganda that pushes the one-world worldview of
Wells and other internationalists during the first half of this century, the
book is particularly revealing in that it also exposes many of the
strategies that are to be employed (Keith, Mind Control, World Control p.
13, 1997).
Of course, not all of Wells' prophecies were 100% accurate. In his
examination of The Shape of Things to Come, Keith concluded that: Wells was
no prophet as regards to his timeline, only a science fiction writer privy
to the plans of men with an interest in promoting the coming of the
dictatorial world-state. His crystal ball is somewhat cloudy on certain
details (Keith, Mind Control World Control p. 16,1997).
However, Wells' roman a'clef did exhibit a strange degree of precision. Jim
Keith enumerated the various instances of uncanny accuracy in Wells' The
Shape of Things to Come. Among one of the synchronicities Keith found in the
text was Wells' description of the elite's primary apparatus for the
amalgamation of the world's economic systems:
Not surprisingly Wells places the City of London-the international center of
banking culture-and its financial credit as responsible for knitting
together world economic life over the previous hundred years. With these
innovations in communications and finance, but also with the frustrations
and wars inherent (so he says) in the existence of independent national
states and sovereignties, came about the gradual dawning of the idea of the
World-state (Keith, Mind Control World Control, p. 14, 1997).
Another instance of uncanny accuracy was Wells' prognostications concerning
a second global war and a proliferation of infectious diseases:
Wells has World War 11 beginning in 1940 in Poland, over an imagined slight
taken by a Nazi over the actions of a Pole of Jewish origin. He
characterizes World War II as it was, as an orgy of violence, and has the
fighting end in
1949âstaying remarkably close to the actual dates of the conflictâonly to be
followed by another scourge, that of rampant disease, "The Raid of the
Germs."
Given the present-day climate of AIDS, Ebola, Mad Cow disease, and other
resistant viral strains-and the persistent rumors of the military
engineering of those same diseases-perhaps Wells' dating in this particular
should have been moved forward a few years (Keith, Mind Control World
Control, p. 16, 1997).
One of the most elucidating revelations found in The Shape of Things to Come
was the group that Wells claimed would be central to the formation of a
oneworld government:
Wells places responsibility for the creation of the New World Order in the
lap of scientists of the future [emphasis.-ADDED], the group he dubs the
"Technocracy" (Keith, Mind Control, World Control P. 16, 1997).
Wielding "ostensible control over the knowable," the scientists of this
"Technocracy 11 implement a Fabian strategy of "gradual ideological
assimilation" (Keith, World Control, Mind Control, pp. 16-17, 1997).
incrementally, this network of scientists engineers the amalgamation of
nation-states into a global government.
It is interesting that Wells would employ the appellation of "Technocracy'
in regards to one world order and global government. American engineer W.H.
Smith coined the term in 1919. Generally, it refers to a system of
government ruled by so-called "experts," particularly scientists. Oxford
Professor Carroll Quigley also wrote about an autocracy of "experts,"
suggesting that a cognitive elite: "...will replace the democratic voter in
control of the political system" (Quigley, p. 866, 1966). Of this democracy
of experts, Wells stated:
The world's political organization will be democratic, that is to say, the
government and direction of affairs will be in immediate touch with and
responsive to the general thought of the educated whole population (wells,
The Open Conspiracy, p. 26, 2002).
Literary critic and author W. Warren Wagar comments on this statement:
Read carefully. He did not say the world government would be elected by the
people, or that it would even be responsive to the people-just to those who
were "educated" (Wells, The Open Conspiracy, p. 26, 2002).
Again, the Huxlian theme of a "scientific dictatorship" emerges. This is the
future that the masses have been conditioned to accept through predictive
programming.
The New Theocracy
How did the "scientific dictatorship" of the twentieth century begin? In
earlier centuries, the ruling class controlled the masses through more
mystical belief systems, particularly Sun worship (Pike, p. 593, 1942). Yet,
this would all change. In Saucers of the Illuminati, Jim Keith documents the
shift from a theocracy of the Sun to a theocracy of "science":
Since the Sun God (and his various relations, including sons and wives)
were, after several thousands years of worship, beginning to fray around the
edges in terms of believability, and a lot commoners were beginning to
grumble that this stuff was all made up, the Illuminati cam; up with a new
and improved version of their mind control software that didn't depend upon
the Sun God or Moon Goddess for ultimate authority (Keith, Saucers of the
Illuminati, p. 78P 1999).
Priests and rituals were soon supplanted by a new breed of "bookkeepers" and
a new "methodology of bookkeeping." Keith elaborates:
As the Sun/Moon cult lost some of its popularity, "Scientists" were quick to
take up some of the slack. According to their propaganda, the physical laws
of the universe were the ultimate causative Factors, and naturally, those
physical laws were only fathomable by the scientific (i.e. Illuminati) elite
(Keith, Saucers of the Illuminati, pp. 78-79, 1999).
This consciously induced paradigm shift facilitated the emergence of the
elite's new theocracy. Examining the revolutionary faith that underpinned
the movement to establish a global "scientific dictatorship," James
Billington reveals the new catalytic force through which man would attempt
to achieve apotheosis:
A recurrent mythic theme for revolutionaries-early romantics, the young
Marx, the Russians of Lenin's time-was Prometheus, who stole fire front the
gods for the use of mankind. The Promethean faith of revolutionaries
resembled in many respects the general belief that science would lead men
out of darkness into light [emphasis-ADDED] (Billington, p. 6,1980).
This Promethean faith, which has underpinned a majority of contemporary
crusades to establish a socialist totalitarian world government, revered
science as the ultimate source of truth. Scientific terminology supplanted
the overtly mystical vernacular of the elite's occult doctrines and became
the chief facilitator of humanity's deification. Jim Keith provided an
eloquently simple summation of this project in epistemic renovation:
Now the Illuminati restored their waning dominance with their promotion of
the arcane wisdom of Bunsen burners, stupefying mesmerism and electricity,
and they no longer-at least at the present time-needed to draw their powers
from mystical associations of stars and planets. Their vision of the
universe and society, as fostered by the British Royal Society led. note:
which shall be examined shortly] and other Illuminati-conceived groupings,
became the predominant worldview. The main tenet of their new religion,
Science led. note: spelled with a capital S to differentiate it from the
established science of the "Goyim." which acknowledges God and nature's
subordination to Him], was that whether you understood it or not, it was
always Right. Not so different a creed than the programs that preceded it
(Keith, Saucers of the Illuminati, p. 79,1999).
The official state-sanctioned religion of this theocracy was scientism. In
his article "The Shamans of Scientism," Michael Shermer describes scientism
as:
... a scientific worldview that encompasses natural explanations for all
phenomena, eschews supernatural and paranormal speculations, and embraces
empiricism and reason as the twin pillars of a philosophy of life
appropriate for an Age of Science (Shermer, 2002).
At the heart of the Promethean faith is the belief that the investigational
methods of the natural sciences should be ecumenically imposed upon all
fields of inquiry. This is scientism. This epistemology ostensibly eschews
the supernatural and the mystical. Yet, paradoxically, scientism is
underpinned by two forms of mysticism: empiricism and materialism. The
occult features of these two foundational concepts shall be examined
shortly.
One ideologue who adhered to the Promethean faith was Freemason and Fabian
socialist H.G. Wells. For Wells, the species of Homo sapiens was analogous
to Prometheus (Wagar, p. 76, 1961). In The Undying Fire, Wells distilled the
Promethean faith in an allegorical form. W. Warren Wagar provides a synopsis
of Wells' allegory:
In the symbolic prologue to The Undying Fire, he [Wells] even likened the
opposition of essence and existence to the interplay of good and evil. God
was here represented as the inscrutable creator, who created things perfect
and exact, only to allow the intrusion of a marginal inexactness in things
through the intervention of Satan. God corrected the marginal uniqueness by
creation at a higher level, and Satan upset the equilibrium all over again.
Satan's intervention permitted evolution, but the ultimate purpose of God
was by implication a perfect and finished and evolved absolute unity (Wagar,
p. 104-5, 1961).
According to Wells, this "absolute unity" would represent the culmination of
the evolutionary process: "The dialectic of good and evil was the method of
evolution, from absolute and perfect nonbeing to absolute and perfect
all-being" (Wagar, p. 105, 1961). Wells dubbed this "perfect all-being" the
"Mind of the Race" or "racial mind" (Wagar, p. 101, 1961). This Wellsian
concept of an "evolved absolute unity" is redolent of the collectivism
intrinsic to elitist doctrine. Wagar elaborates on the inherent collectivism
of the "racial mind" doctrine:
It was at once the capstone and the mortar of his [Wells'] faith: a belief
in the emergence in human evolution of a collective racial being with the
collective racial mind, which gathered the results of the individual mental
effort into a single fund of racial wisdom and grew gradually toward organic
consciousness of itself. Individuals could escape the frustration inherent
in the fact of their individuality and mortality only by consecrating their
lives to the service of the Mind of the Race (Wagar, p. 100-101, 1961).
Wells believed that the final coalescence of human consciousness into a
"racial mind" would result in the emergence not of a mere man, but of
perfected Man with a capitalized M (Wagar, p. 104, 1961). The M is
capitalized to denote the purported divinity that is dormant within
humanity. Yet, this Weltanschauung did not exclusively belong to Wells. It
virtually mirrored Masonic doctrine. No doubt, Wells' preoccupation with a
"racial mind" and humanity's evolutionary ascent towards apotheosis echo the
mythology of his Freemasonic heritage. In The Meaning of Masonry, W.L.
Wilmshurst alleges that:
In all Scriptures and cosmologies the tradition is universal of a "Golden
Age," an age of comparative innocence, wisdom and spirituality, in which
racial unity [emphasis-ADDED, ed. note: This is not a reference to concord
in race relations and should be understood in the Wellsian context of a
unified consciousness] and individual happiness and enlightenment prevailed;
in which there was that open vision for want of which a people perisheth,
but in virtue of which men were once in conscious conversation with the
unseen world and were shepherded, taught and guided by the "gods" or
discarnate superintendents of the infant race, who imparted to them the sure
and indefeasible principles upon which their spiritual welfare and evolution
[emphasis-ADDED, ed. note: The Masonic concept of "becoming," which would
later be disseminated on the popular level as Darwinism] depended
(Wilmshurst, p. 173, 1980).
However, Wilmshurst contends that a peregrination of human consciousness
away from the "racial mind" caused humanity to fall from its former glory:
The tradition is also universal of the collective soul [emphasis-ADDED, ed.
note: A reiteration of Wells' "racial mind" theme] of the human race having
sustained a Fall,- a moral declension from its true path of life and
evolution [emphasis-ADDED, ed. note: Yet another reference to the occult
doctrine of "becoming, [which would later assume the appellation of
Darwinism], which has severed it almost entirely from its creative source,
and which, as the ages advanced, has involved its sinking more and more
deeply into physical conditions, its splitting up from unity employing a
single language into a diversity of conflicting races of different speeches
and degrees of moral advancement [emphasis-ADDED, ed. note: Notice the
overtly collectivist theme of this portion of the lamentation), accompanied
by a progressive densification of the material body and a corresponding
darkening of the mind and atrophy of the spiritual consciousness
(Wilmshurst, p. 173, 1980).
Thus, Masonry concerns itself with the facilitation of evolution and the
"restoration" of Man's former glory. Wilmshurst proceeds to reveal the chief
means by which this so-called "restoration" will be achieved:
Unable to effect its [Man's] own recovery it required skilled scientific
[emphasis-ADDED] assistance from other sources to bring about its
restoration. Whence could come that skill and scientific [emphasis-ADDED]
knowledge if not from the Divine and now invisible world, from those "gods"
and angelic guardians of the erring race of whom all ancient traditions and
sacred writings tell? Would not that regenerative method be properly
described if it were called, as in Masonry it is called, a "heavenly
science" [emphasis-ADDED], and welcomed in the words that Masons in fact
use, Hail, Royal Art!" (Wilmshurst, p. 175, 1980).
It is the religious conviction of the Masonic Lodge and its elite masters
that science will enable humanity to regain its lost divinity. Thus, the
ruling class has bestowed absolute primacy upon science and strives for its
universal imposition upon all fields of inquiry. Herein is a core doctrine
of scientism. This form of epistemological imperialism is not to be confused
with legitimate science. Researcher Michael Hoffman makes this distinction
in his book Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare:
Science, when practiced as the application of man's God-given talents for
the production of appropriate technology on a human scale, relief of misery
and the reverential exploration and appreciation of the glory of Divine
Providence as revealed in nature, is a useful tool for mankind. Scientism is
science gone mad, which is what we have today (Hoffman, p. 49, 2001).
Hoffman further elaborates on the folly of scientism:
The reason that science is a bad master and dangerous servant and ought not
to be worshipped, is that science is not objective. Science is fundamentally
about the uses of measurement. \Vhat does not fit the yardstick of the
scientist is discarded. Scientific determinism has repeatedly excluded some
data from its measurement and fudged other data, such as Piltdown Man, in
order to support the self-fulfilling nature of its own agenda, be it
Darwinism or "cut, burn and poison" methods of cancer "treatment" (Hoffman,
p. 49, 2001).
Indeed, biases and presuppositions pervade the very fabric of the elite's
cpistemic autocracy. Academia itself has become the official church for this
cult of epistemological selectivity. In Jesus Among Other Gods, Christian
philosopher Ravi Zacharias reveals the enormous prejudicial hurdles of
scientism. During a casual conversation with a few scholars, one scientist
makes a shocking confession:
I asked them a couple of questions. "If the Big Bang were indeed where it
all began [which one can fairly well grant, at least to this point in
science's thinking], may I ask what preceded the Big Bang?" Their answer,
which I had anticipated, was that the universe was shrunk down to a
singularity.
I pursued, "But isn't it correct that a singularity as defined by science is
a point at which all the laws of physics break down?"
"That is correct,- was the answer.
âThen, technically, your starting point is not scientific either."
There was silence, and their expressions betrayed the scurrying mental
searches for an escape hatch. But I had yet another question.
I asked if they agreed that when a mechanistic view of the universe had held
sway, thinkers like Hume had chided philosophers for taking the principle of
causality and applying it to a philosophical argument for the existence of
God. Causality' he warned, could not be extrapolated from science to
philosophy.
Now," I added, When quantum theory holds sway, randomness in the subatomic
world is made a basis for randomness in life. Are you not making the very
same extrapolation that you warned us against?"
Again there was silence and then one man said with a self-deprecating smile,
"We scientists do seem to retain selective sovereignty over what we allow to
be transferred to philosophy and what we don't" (Zacharias, p. 64, 2000).
This "selective sovereignty," vigorously enforced by the epistemic autocracy
of the elite, has effectively marginalized dissenters and consummated the
apotheosis of the "bookkeepers". Hoffman explains:
The cryptocracy has successfully harnessed to its own ends the huge
potential for promoting secret political-occult agendas to the public, by
presenting them as unassailable, "objective scientific truth." Since the
bogey of "Science" instills in secularists a sort of blind reverence,
opponents of political and occult agendas promoted through the propaganda of
scientism, are quickly stigmatized as "Neanderthal," especially with regard
to their opposition to Darwinism, a dogma proved false by Norman Macbeth in
his magisterial Darwin Retried and exposed as a cult by Gertrude Himmelfarb
in Darwin (Hoffman, p. 49, 2001).
Suddenly, "ostensible control over the knowable" becomes the Divine
Providence of god-like "bookkeepers." Meanwhile, their opponents become
heretics and are "burned at the stake" (i.e., marginalized. by academia and
other secular institutions). Hoffman states:
The doctrine of man playing god reaches its nadir in the philosophy of
scientism which makes it possible the complete mental, spiritual and
physical enslavement of mankind through technologies such as satellite and
computer surveillance; a state of affairs symbolized by the "All Seeing Eye"
above the unfinished pyramid on the U.S. one dollar bill (Hoffman, p.50,
2001).
This ritualistic enthronement and deification of the elite's "bookkeepers"
reveals the Luciferian foundation of scientism. Reiterating the contentions
of Hoffman, William Cooper explains:
The WORSHIP (a lot different from STUDY) of knowledge, science
femphasis-ADDED], or technology is Satanism in its purest form, and its god
is Lucifer. Its secret symbol is the all-seeing eye in the pyramid (Cooper,
p. 70, 1991).
In other words, the "scientific dictatorship" represents the highest
aspirations of the Adversary himself. It is the theocracy of Satan.
-----
Onwards to the utmost of futures!
Om
K
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
All My Relations.
Omnia Bona Bonis,
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substanceânot soap-boxingâplease! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'âwith its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright fraudsâis used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
