On Aug 25, 2004, at 4:10 PM, The Webfairy wrote:
If the claim is Eric's source file is the commercially available version
of the NAUDET DVD, I'm saying NO WAY.
NO WAY IN HELL>
I haven't found any description of his techniques, or his source.
The footage is filtered, beautifully, wonderfully filtered.
I'm not saying Eric did it. I sincerely doubt he would be capable of
such a sensitive loving touch.
eric digitized this video directly from the naudet DVD:
<x-tad-bigger>Here is a better quality version of the first impact I created from the Naudet brother's DVD "911". Bear in mind that even DVDs are compressed with the mpeg 2 codec. Additionally, to make it a reasonable file size for the web, this movie has been compressed with the Sorenson 3 codec at full quality from the file I used to do the analysis. Still, the artifacts have been minimized and it looks close enough to the original for casual observation. Note: this has a high data rate and may not play smoothly on all computers.
</x-tad-bigger>http://www.questionsquestions.net/WTC/767orwhatzit.html
you're finished, webfairy.
you've now made yourself into a joke.
anyone with basic competence in digital video, and pro- or pro-sumer grade equipment & software, can digitize and encode the naudet footage off the DVD with the same sort of results that eric got.
i'll leave it to eric to try and figure out what kind of ridiculous mistake created that weirdly mangled frame that you claim is the 'real' naudet video image. i haven't seen anything that good since the old days of wiolawa's invisible solarized reptillian empulse bombers.
but the important point is that you have now stooped to raw, desperate slander and lies. you now show your true colors.
after this, i can hardly imagine that anything more you have to say is even worth responding to.
however, i probably will get from eric a detailed description of his entire procedure and equipment used. then, mabye someone else with time to waste will enjoy creating an identical version of the file and demonstrate that your credibility is less than zero.
-brian
