Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
--- Begin Message ----Caveat Lector- http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/AF74CF2D-47B8-4BE9-BC70-DAF9F716433C. htm Mounting US casualty count takes its toll Ben Duncan , Aljazeera.nerWashington, Friday 03 September 2004 - The number of US troops killed in Iraq is steadily approaching 1000, yet it remains unclear what impact that number will have on public opinion. In early September of last year, the US had lost nearly 300 troops in Iraq and many political experts were questioning how long the American people would accept the slow "drip-drip" of casualties. Conventional wisdom at the time suggested the public might tolerate ongoing fatalities as long as they believed the Bush administration had a definitive exit strategy and a plan for establishing a secure, democratic Iraq. One year and nearly 700 more deaths later, Americans' verdict on the war continues to be mixed. Some analysts say the crossing of the 1000 figure could spark a period of intense public reflection over the current state of US operations in Iraq, after several months during which the issue of casualties fell below the radar screen for many Americans. "It [1000 US casualties] becomes a salient threshold for people rising out of their slumber and taking another look at the situation," Feaver said. "There will be another gut check." Evenly divided As of September, 979 US troops have been killed in Iraq and nearly 7000 wounded. Jay Farrar, vice president of external affairs at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the figure of 1000 casualties could be significant because Americans "tend to want to quantify issues by numbers", and that it's "an easy way to reference in peoples' own minds what something means." "I think when you reach a level of 1000 casualties in a war against a country that presented very little direct threat to the United States, that presents an opportunity for discussion among some people who may have been inclined to question our motives," Farrar said. While a recent survey by the Pew Research Center showed that six in 10 Americans believe President Bush does not have a successful plan for stabilising Iraq, the public appears to be evenly divided over the question of whether the war was worth the costs involved. In a recent NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, 49% of registered voters said removing Saddam Hussein from power had not been worth the cost in terms of money and casualties, while 43% felt it was worth it. In a recent Gallup Poll, however, 49% said the war had been worth fighting and 48% said otherwise. Breaking ranks Farrar said his own research indicated that opposition to the war is growing. "My numbers show that a rising percentage of the American public is starting to question the cost of [the war] in terms of lives and dollars," he said. Lawrence Korb, a former defenxe department official in the Reagan administration and currently a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, said "more people are beginning to say, 'No, this war was not worth the cost'." Korb said the recent statement by retiring Republican Congressman Doug Bereuter that the war in Iraq was "a mistake", is a sign that even some Bush supporters may be breaking ranks. Bereuter, who until recently served as the vice chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, issued a four-page statement criticising the administration's use of faulty prewar intelligence and lamenting the conflict's death toll. "The cost in casualties is already large and growing, and the immediate and long-term financial costs are incredible," said Bereuter, who voted for the congressional resolution authorising the president to invade Iraq. It remains unclear, however, whether Bereuter's statement is in line with mainstream America. Sting of loss Frank Newport, editor and chief of The Gallup Poll company, pointed to his organisation's recent surveys which show that public sentiments about Iraq are increasingly favourable. "The public is gradually becoming somewhat more positive about the US role in Iraq," he said. Whether the growing number of US casualties will sway opinions is less certain, he said. A Gallup Poll conducted on August 23-25 asked voters how their views on the US troop presence in Iraq would change when the number of casualties surpassed 1000. While 37% said it would convince them that the administration should "intensify efforts to withdraw" US forces, 58% said it should not affect US policy towards Iraq. Some experts said the US death toll has not yet reached the level where average American households feel the personal sting of loss. Attitudes "The number of communities that are being impacted [by the casualties] is not so large that it's having an impact on the larger population in the country," Farrar said. Such would appear to be the case for Tim Johnson, a retired construction worker in Maryland who said the US casualty rate has not changed his attitude on the war. "I think the loss of life in Iraq is a tragic thing," Johnson said. "But compared to Vietnam, the casualties are relatively low and I think we needed to get rid of Saddam Hussein." Susan Miller, on the other hand, said she initially supported the war but never expected the US would lose this many troops to the post-combat insurgency. "Given the fact that we haven't found any weapons of mass destruction, I don't think I would have supported the war had I known so many American soldiers would be killed," said Miller, a freelance writer in Virginia. Aljazeera ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> $9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything. http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/TySplB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> -__ ___ _ ___ __ ___ _ _ _ __ /-_|-0-\-V-/-\|-|-__|-|-|-/-_| \_-\--_/\-/|-\\-|-_||-V-V-\_-\ |__/_|--//-|_|\_|___|\_A_/|__/ SPY NEWS is OSINT newsletter and discussion list associated to Mario's Cyberspace Station - The Global Intelligence News Portal http://mprofaca.cro.net ######## CAUTION! ######### Since you are receiving and reading documents, news stories, comments and opinions not only from so called (or self-proclaimed) "reliable sources", but also a lot of possible misinformation collected by Spy News moderator and subscribers and posted to Spy News for OSINT purposes - it should be a serious reason (particularly to journalists and web publishers) to think twice before using it for their story writing, further publishing or forwarding throughout Cyberspace. To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** FAIR USE NOTICE: This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Spy News is making it available without profit to SPY NEWS eGroup members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ----------------------------------------------- SPY NEWS home page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spynews Mario Profaca http://mprofaca.cro.net/ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spynews/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
--- End Message ---
