-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 9/6/2004 7:15:01 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The whole UN thing is part of the dialectic and false debate that they lay on us. Its a bone for the right and left to chew on.

Just like the socialist bogey that they have laid on the US population.

It's textbook Hegel.
I am not qualified to argue this point but I would like to draw attention to the fact that the Hegelian dialectic DOES seem manifest in situations of genuine opposition.  In other words, I think there needs to be more to a proof than the fact that it fits a theory.  The fact that the situation fits more than one theory must lead us, ultimately, to verifying - proving one over another.
 
What PROOF do we have, circumstantial or not?  Let me be clear: I do not ask what the U.N. once was but I ask for verification that it is CURRENTLY holding to the same agenda AND that it is being effective in such.
 
Thanks in advance.
 
www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to