-Caveat Lector-

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/living/articles/2004/09/14/a_medical_cause_for_bushisms/

A medical cause for 'Bushisms'?
By Alex Beam, Globe Columnist  |  September 14, 2004

It is an article of faith with millions of Americans,
most of them on the left, that George W. Bush is
stupid. Many reasonable people think his policies are
ill-advised, but millions more insist Bush must be a
moron because he sounds stupid.

The president's tortured "Bushisms" are chronicled
daily and have been collected in books. Two of the
more notorious are "I know how hard it is for you to
put food on your family" and "Families is where our
nation finds hope, where wings take dream."

But something doesn't compute. Fred Smith, the founder
of Federal Express and a Yale pal of both Bush and
John Kerry, says Bush is five times smarter than
people think he is. Cynics deride what passes for
scholarship at the Harvard Business School, but the
course work for the two-year MBA isn't easy. A grading
curve forces a small number of students to fail, and
Bush didn't fail.

So why does Bush sound stupid? One doctor thinks he
shows signs of "presenile dementia," or an early onset
of Alzheimer's disease.

This summer, Joseph Price, a self-described "country
doctor" in Carsonville, Mich., was reading a long
article in The Atlantic about Bush's speaking style.
Author James Fallows alluded to Bush's malapropisms
and to speculation that Bush had a learning disorder
or dyslexia. But those conditions generally manifest
themselves in childhood. Furthermore, Fallows wrote,
"through his forties Bush was perfectly articulate."

Dr. Price's children happened to have given him a
daily tear-off calendar of "Bushisms" for Christmas.
"They are horrible, but they are also diagnostic,"
Price says. When he read that Bush had spoken clearly
and performed well while debating Texas politician Ann
Richards in 1994, Price thought: "My God, the only way
you can explain that is by being Alzheimer's."

In a letter to be published in The Atlantic's October
issue, Price calls presenile dementia "a fairly
typical Alzheimer's situation that develops
significantly earlier in life. . . . President Bush's
`mangled' words are a demonstration of what physicians
call `confabulation' and are almost specific to the
diagnosis of a true dementia." He adds that Bush
should be "started on drugs that offer the possibility
of retarding the slow but inexorable course of the
disease."

Yes, I asked for a second opinion. University of
Massachusetts neurology professor Dr. Daniel Pollen
thinks it is bootless to speculate about Bush's
condition without a formal neuropsychological
assessment. "I think it's unfair to say somebody has
or does not have a dementia as an analysis based on
his public utterances," says Pollen, who is not a Bush
supporter. Noting that Bush spoke well in his debates
with both Richards and Al Gore, Pollen adds that
Bush's "peak performances are not in the range I would
consider for anybody to have Alzheimer's disease in
the near future."

Suppose Price is right. What effect might his
observation have on the 2004 election? Absolutely
none. The White House isn't going to start speculating
about an incipient medical condition that might make
the president look bad. When I forwarded Price's
comments to the White House, it sent me Bush's 2001
and 2003 physical exams, which show normal
neurological functions. "There is nothing to suggest
that there has been any change from those reports,"
says White House spokeswoman Erin Healy.

There is ample precedent for papering over presidents'
medical shortcomings. Stanford Medical School
professor Herbert Abrams and others have argued that
Ronald Reagan was incapacitated from the day he was
shot in March of 1981 through the succeeding seven
years of his presidency. In their 1988 book,
"Landslide," Jane Mayer and Doyle McManus report that
one White House staffer considered Reagan's condition
so bad in 1987 that he suggested invoking the
transfer-of-power provisions of the 25th Amendment.
That idea went nowhere fast.

As for the Democrats, they have no incentive to
medicalize a condition they so enjoy teeing off on:
Bush's seemingly goofy stupidity. Kerry suggests that
Bush's bicycle has training wheels; Kerry's wife
suggests that people who oppose her husband's health
schemes are idiots. The Democrats would rather feel
superior to their opponents than beat them, and so far
they are doing a very good job.

Alex Beam is a Globe columnist. His e-dress is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to