Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
--- Begin Message --- -Caveat Lector- www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
--- Begin Message --- -Caveat Lector-www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.911 In Plane Site or 911 with Blurred Vision?
By Judy Andreas
www.rightiswrong.com/leftout.php
When I first learned about Dave Von Kleist�s documentary, "911 In Plane Site," I was very excited. People I respected were calling it �the smoking gun.� I was familiar with the work of Joyce Reilly, Dave's wife, and had the utmost respect for her courage. Mr.Von Kleist was making the rounds of internet talk shows and stating a compelling case that seemed to refute the official story of the U.S Government�s version in the 911 Commission Report as well as the story that was covered by the US media from that tragic day until the present. My excitement led me to purchase four copies of the video, sight unseen, to share with friends and family.
The first time I viewed the video I was impressed. It was all that I thought it would be and more. I excitedly shared it with my friends. Later, at the 911 event at the Manhattan Center, I heard Mr.Von Kleist speak and was even more convinced that he was �the real deal� . I introduced myself to him and applauded his work, telling him that I�d bought several copies of his video. He looked me straight in the eye and his "thank you" had the ring of sincerity. My previous article, �An Evening In Pursuit of the Truth,� contained a glowing report of both Von Kleist and his video.
The printing of that article generated lots of letters of response. Among the letters were those containing disturbing information about Von Kleist�s video. Such information stated that there was at least one forgery and other questionable content. I did not want to believe what I was hearing, but I have always considered myself a truth seeker and, as such, I had to open myself to the reality that the truth is most often not as I�d imagined. With this new data in mind, I watched the video a second time, and yet, I still had not lost the hope that the critics were wrong.
The first part of the video, in which Von Kleist addressed the Pentagon attacks, was still powerful and just as convincing upon the second viewing. The footage was clear and the questions asked were valid. How could a plane 125 ft wide and 155 ft long fit into a hole which was only 16 ft across? Why was there no wreckage or crater from �Flight 77� on the lawn of the Pentagon? How could a 757 exit the Pentagon�s 3rd ring and leave a hole approximately 16 ft across with no visible wreckage. Then Dave made an ironic comment. He cast doubt on anyone who would obfuscate, detract or distort any footage of the evidence of 911, claiming that such a person or group would lend themselves to involvement or even guilt in the events of September 11, 2001. It is �ironic� in light of the evidence that has surfaced since the early viewing of the film
The next part of the film showed footage of a plume of smoke that was observed on a building that was 50-60 stories high on the North side of the Towers, while both Towers were still standing. This video was allegedly shown live on CNN one time and was never shown again. Von Kleist stated that this was a critical piece of evidence revealing that the official story was not true. He asked �How could a plume of smoke be rising from the base if neither tower had collapsed?� During my first viewing, I had nodded my head in agreement, but by now I had been robbed of my gullibility by the research of people like Brian Salter, www.questionsquestions.net and Angie d�Urso, www.angieon911.com. On his website, Brian had clearly demonstrated all the falsifications and weaknesses of �the plume� evidence. Dave Von Kleist�s words screamed in my ear��words such as �obfuscation,� �detraction� and �distortion,� followed by his claim that �anyone who was guilty of doing such things would lend themselves to involvement or even guilt in the events of 911. Does that only apply to the government�s lies and distortions, or is it equally applicable to books and videos produced by people in the truth movement? I am not saying that Von Kleist intentionally duped us, but, when I sent him a letter asking him about the more questionable parts of the video, the silence was deafening. Next I checked his website and there was no mention of a revised film. (something that Brian Salter has been following) Since Von Kleist has been quoted as admitting to the unfortunate plume of doom, I would�ve hoped that he would�ve printed a story on the site. I wonder if he is still selling the misleading videos, without any disclaimer regarding the inaccuracies?
I have not lost hope that Dave Von Kleist will do the right thing. Maybe he was sent faulty information by people who were looking to discredit the movement and make certain that "conspiracy" still remains a victim of word abuse. On the other hand, one of the most promising pieces of evidence refuting the Government�s tale of what happened on September 11, 2001, may have gone up in smoke.
Judy Andreas can be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rightiswrong.com/leftout.php
Chuck Zlatkin
P.O Box 821
JAF Station
New York, NY 10116-0821
212-726-1385Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
--- End Message ---
--- End Message ---
