-Caveat Lector- www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/092004A.shtml
Bush & Co.: War Crimes and Cover-Up
Marjorie Cohn, t r u t h o u t
Monday 20 September 2004

As the election approaches, we are bombarded with stories about swift boats,
dereliction of duty, and who's the most macho leader. Missing from the
discourse is a critical examination of why George W. Bush failed to heed
warnings before September 11, why he sat paralyzed for 7 minutes after being
informed of the attacks, how he subsequently turned Iraq into a deadly
cauldron, and committed - then covered up - war crimes in Afghanistan,
Guantánamo and Iraq.

The central theme of the Republican Convention was Bush's bona fides as a
tough president who will save us from another terrorist attack. Instead of
examining why we went to war with a country that posed no threat to us, the
agenda was replete with rhetoric about fighting the terrorists in Iraq so we
wouldn't have to fight them here.

Significantly absent from the patriotic speeches was the "t" word. Not even
a brief acknowledgement that prisoners in American custody were mistreated.
Torture is on the back burner. Every so often, another official report comes
out, with more disturbing revelations, but never directly implicates Bush,
Cheney or Rumsfeld.

Even the release of Seymour Hersh's new book, Chain of Command: The Road
from 9/11 to Abu Ghraib, has garnered scant attention in the daily fare of
television staples, where most Americans get their news. But Rumsfeld
noticed. Four days before the book's release, without having read it, the
Department of Defense issued a rare but characteristically preemptive attack
on the book.

Rumsfeld testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee that his
department was alerted to the abuse of prisoners at Abu Ghraib in January
2004. Rumsfeld told Bush in February about an "issue" involving mistreatment
of prisoners in Iraq, according to a Senior White House aide.

These claims are disingenuous. The roots of Abu Ghraib, writes Hersh, lie in
the creation of the "unacknowledged" special-access program (SAP)
established by a top-secret order Bush signed in late 2001 or early 2002.
The presidential order authorized the Defense Department to set up a
clandestine team of Special Forces operatives to defy international law and
snatch, or assassinate, anyone considered a "high-value" Al Qaeda operative,
anywhere in the world.

Rumsfeld expanded SAP into Iraq in August 2003. It was Rumsfeld who approved
the use of physical coercion and sexual humiliation to extract information
from prisoners. Rumsfeld and Bush set this system in motion long before
January 2004. The mistreatment of prisoners at Abu Ghraib was part of the
ongoing operation.

Hersch quotes a CIA analyst who was sent to the U.S. military prison at
Guantánamo in late summer of 2002, to find out why so little useful
intelligence had been gathered. After interviewing 30 prisoners, "he came
back convinced that we were committing war crimes in Guantánamo."

By fall 2002, the analyst's report finally reached Gen. John A. Gordon, the
deputy national security adviser for combating terrorism, who reported
directly to national security adviser Condoleezza Rice. Gordon was deeply
distressed by the report and its implications for the treatment of captured
American soldiers. He also thought "that if the actions at Guantánamo ever
became public, it'd be damaging to the president."

Gordon passed the report to Rice, who called a high-level meeting in the
White House situation room. Rumsfeld, who had been encouraging his soldiers
to get tough with prisoners, was present at the meeting. Yet Rice asked
Rumsfeld "what the issues were, and he said he hadn't looked into it." Rice
urged him to look into it: "Let's get the story right," she declared.

A military consultant with close ties to Special Operations told Hersh that
war crimes were committed in Iraq and no action was taken. "People were
beaten to death," he said. "What do you call it when people are tortured and
going to die and the soldiers know it, but do not treat their injuries?" the
consultant asked rhetorically. "Execution," he replied to his own question.

We should have seen it coming. In Bush's January 2003 State of the Union
Address, he said: "All told, more than 3,000 suspected terrorists have been
arrested in many countries, and many others have met a different fate." He
added, "Let's put it this way. They are no longer a problem for the United
States and our friends and allies."

Bush was admitting he had sanctioned summary execution, in direct violation
of international, and United States, law.

The Bush administration has also admittedly engaged in the illegal practice
of rendition, where people are sent to other countries to be tortured. The
C.I.A. acknowledged in testimony before Congress that prior to 2001, it had
engaged in about seventy "extraordinary renditions."

In December 2001, American operatives kidnapped two Egyptians and flew them
to Cairo, where they were subjected to repeated torture by electrical shocks
from electrodes attached to their private parts.

Rapes, sodomy with foreign objects, the use of unmuzzled dogs to bite and
severely injure prisoners, and beating prisoners to death have been
documented at Abu Ghraib. Women beg their families to smuggle poison into
the prisons so they can kill themselves because of the humiliation they
suffered.

Allegations of routine torture have emerged from Mosul and Basra as well.
"Some were burnt with fire, others [had] bandaged broken arms," claimed
Yasir Rubaii Saeed al-Qutaji. Haitham Saeed al-Mallah reported seeing "a
young man of 14 years of age bleeding from his anus and lying on the floor."
Al-Mallah heard the soldiers say that "the reason for this bleeding was
inserting a metal object in his anus."

The army has charged one Sergeant with assault and other crimes, and is
recommending that two dozen American soldiers face criminal charges,
including negligent homicide for mistreatment of prisoners in Afghanistan.

Last week, three Americans, running a private prison, but reportedly working
with the CIA, were convicted of kidnapping and torture and sentenced to 8-10
years in prison by an Afghan court. Afghan police had discovered three men
hanging from the ceiling, and five others were found beaten and tied in a
dark small room.

The Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment, a treaty ratified by the U.S. and thus part of our
binding domestic law, defines torture as follows: the infliction of severe
pain or suffering for the purpose of obtaining a confession, discrimination,
coercion or intimidation.

Torture, inhuman treatment, and willful killing are grave breaches of the
Geneva Conventions, treaties ratified by the United States. Grave breaches
of Geneva are considered war crimes under our federal War Crimes Act of
1996. American nationals who commit war crimes abroad can receive life in
prison, or even the death penalty if the victim dies. Under the doctrine of
command responsibility, a commander can be held liable if he knew or should
have known his inferiors were committing war crimes and he failed to prevent
or stop them.

When John Walker Lindh was captured in Afghanistan in December 2001, his
American interrogators stripped and gagged him, strapped him to a board, and
displayed him to the press. He was writhing in pain from a bullet left in
his body.

Although initially charged with crimes of terrorism carrying life in prison,
John Ashcroft permitted Lindh to plead guilty to lesser crimes that garnered
him 20 years. The condition: Lindh make a statement that he suffered "no
deliberate mistreatment" while in custody. The cover-up was underway.

Lawyers from the Defense and Justice Departments penned lengthy memos and
created a definition of torture much narrower than the one in the Torture
Convention. They advised Bush how his people could engage in torture and
avoid prosecution under the federal Torture Statute.

Relying on advice in these memos, Bush issued an unprecedented order that,
as commander-in-chief, he has the authority to suspend the Geneva
Conventions. In spite of Geneva's requirement that a competent tribunal
decide whether someone qualifies for POW status, Bush took it upon himself
to decide that Al Qaeda and Taliban prisoners in Afghanistan were not
protected by the Geneva Convention on the POWs.

This decision was premised on the reasoning of White House Counsel Alberto
Gonzalez, that "the war against terrorism is a new kind of war, a new
paradigm [that] renders obsolete Geneva's strict limitations on questioning
of enemy prisoners and renders quaint some of its provisions." Quaint!

A still-secret section of the recently-released Fay Report says that
"policies and practices developed and approved for use on Al Qaeda and
Taliban detainees who were not afforded the protection of the Geneva
Conventions, now applied to detainees who did fall under the Geneva
Conventions' protections."

The Schlesinger Report that came out a few weeks ago accused the Pentagon's
top civilian and military leadership of failing to exercise sufficient
oversight and permitting conditions that led to the abuses. Rumsfeld's
reversals of interrogation policy, according to the report, created
confusion about which techniques could be used on prisoners in Iraq.

Rumsfeld has admitted ordering an Iraqi prisoner be hidden from the
International Committee of the Red Cross. Pentagon investigators believe the
CIA has held as many as 100 "ghost" detainees in Iraq. Hiding prisoners from
the Red Cross violates Geneva.

The Schlesinger Report confirmed 5 detainee deaths as a result of
interrogation, and 23 more deaths are currently under investigation.

In May, when the Abu Ghraib scandal was on the front pages, there were
demands for Rumsfeld to resign. But Cheney told Rumsfeld there would be no
resignations. It was blatantly political. We're going to hunker down and
tough it out, Cheney said, so as not to hurt Bush's chances for election in
November.

Maj. Gen. Geoffrey Miller, the American commander in charge of detentions
and interrogations at Abu Ghraib prison, was sent from Guantánamo to Iraq
last fall to transplant his harsh interrogation techniques. Miller recently
conducted an overnight tour of Abu Ghraib for journalists.

He proudly displayed "Camp Liberty" and "Camp Redemption," newly renovated
in response to the torture scandal.

Under the new system in place at Abu Ghraib, an interrogation plan is
submitted to a lawyer for approval before any interrogation begins. The time
required to process prisoners has been reduced from 120 to 50 days. Since
July, 60% of the reviews have led to releases.

Three hundred Iraqi prisoners were released Wednesday. Each walked away with
$25 and a 12-page glossy pamphlet on Iraq's interim government.

But evidence of war crimes by the Bush administration - notably Rumsfeld,
Cheney and Bush - continues to emerge. And in spite of Bush's renunciation
of the International Criminal Court, many people around the world are
clamoring for Bush and his deputies to be held accountable. In the words of
Yale law professor Bruce Ackerman: "It is one thing to protect the armed
forces from politicized justice; quite another, to make it a haven for
suspected war criminals."

Marjorie Cohn, a contributing editor to t r u t h o u t, is a professor at
Thomas Jefferson School of Law, executive vice president of the National
Lawyers Guild, and the U.S. representative to the executive committee of the
American Association of Jurists.










------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->

-__ ___ _ ___ __ ___ _ _ _ __
/-_|-0-\-V-/-\|-|-__|-|-|-/-_|
\_-\--_/\-/|-\\-|-_||-V-V-\_-\
|__/_|--//-|_|\_|___|\_A_/|__/

 SPY NEWS is OSINT newsletter and discussion list associated to
Mario's Cyberspace Station - The Global Intelligence News Portal
 http://mprofaca.cro.net

######## CAUTION! #########
 Since you are receiving and reading documents, news stories,
comments and opinions not only from so called (or self-proclaimed)
"reliable sources", but also a lot of possible misinformation collected
by Spy News moderator and subscribers and posted to Spy News
for OSINT purposes - it should be a serious reason (particularly to
journalists and web publishers) to think twice before using it for their
story writing, further publishing or forwarding throughout Cyberspace.

To unsubscribe:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*** FAIR USE NOTICE: This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been 
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Spy News is making it available 
without profit to SPY NEWS eGroup members who have expressed a prior interest in 
receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, 
human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, 
for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this 
constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of 
the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of 
your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright 
owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 -----------------------------------------------

 SPY NEWS home page:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spynews

 Mario Profaca
 http://mprofaca.cro.net/
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spynews/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to