-Caveat Lector-
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?disc=203188;article=2930;title=KPFK-fm%20Chat


Alex Constantine
Will the Read J.F. Berlet Please Stand Up?
Thu Mar 18, 2004 11:22am
69.111.14.230

EXCERPT FROM
âWILL THE REAL JOHN FOSTER âCHIPâ BERLET PLEASE STAND UP?â
BY ACE HAYES
Portland Free Press

Part Two
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
âIN THE SAN FRANCISCO WEEKLY, HE SAID HE WAS DOING âRESEARCH IN COOPERATION WITH THE ADL.â IN ISRAELI FOREIGN AFFAIRS, IT WAS PHRASED, âI HAD QUITE A CORDIAL PROFESSIONAL RELATIONSHIP WITH THE ADL.â IN THE VILLAGE VOICE HE JUST DROPPED BY âTO DISCUSS OUR WORKâ WITH DCE SUALL. WHILE IN THE NEW YORK TIMES, BERLET HAD NO RELATIONSHIP WITH ADL OR SUALL WHATSOEVER -- BEYOND TWO INFORMAL VISITS IN THE PAST FIFTEEN YEARS.

âSO WHICH IS THE REAL JOHN FOSTER BERLET? THE ONE WHO HAD THE âCORDIAL PROFESSIONAL RELATIONSHIPâ WITH ADL, THE ONE âDOING RESEARCH IN COOPERATION WITH ADLâ THE ONE WHO DROPS BY TO DISCUSS RESEARCH ON A COMMON TARGET, OR THE ONE ATTACKING DCE SUALL IN THE FOURTH VERSION OF THE BERLET STORY IN ONLY 30 DAYS?

âHOW ODD! OR IS IT?

âTHE ADL-FBI-CIA-AD NAUSEAM SPY SCANDAL IS ABOUT TO BUST WIDE OPEN.... BERLET HAS COVERT RELATIONSHIPS BEYOND THE ADL SUPER-SPOOK, SUALL.... ACCORDING TO BERLET IN HIS INTERVIEW WITH IFA, HE WAS GIVEN A WARNING âSEVERAL YEARS AGO [BY] âA SENIOR ADL OFFICIAL [THAT THERE WERE] PEOPLE IN THE ADL WHO REPORTED DIRECTLY TO SUALL AND IT WOULD BE WISE TO ASSUME THAT INFORMATION WOULD BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE FBI, CIA AND MOSSAD.â GIVEN THAT MR. BERLET ADMITS TO KNOWING FOR YEARS THAT ANY INFORMATION WHICH WENT TO THE ADL WAS ALSO GOING TO THE FBI, CIA AND MOSSAD:

âWHY DID HE CONTINUE TO PASS INFORMATION TO THE ADL? WHY DID HE CONTINUE TO SPY FOR ADL? WHY DID HE NOT PUBLISH HIS KNOWLEDGE OF ADL SPYING FOR FBI, CIA AND MOSSAD, AND WHAT MORAL RIGHT DOES HE HAVE FOR ATTACKING OTHER PEOPLE WHO ARE ONLY DOING EXACTLY WHAT HE ADMITS TO HAVING DONE?

âTHE NEW YORK CITY FORWARD PUBLISHED AN ARTICLE, âLETTER FROM BOSTON,â BY DALE MILLER ON 22 JAN. 93 WHICH BLOWS MR. BERLETâS COVER IN ADDITION TO THAT OF HOLLIS MOSHERâS -- THE NOMINAL SUBJECT OF THE ARTICLE.

âHOLLIS MOSHER GOES BACK TO THE [ANTI-COMMUNIST] CRUSADE OF THE â50s WHEN HE HELPED âINDICT SEVEN COMMUNIST PARTY FUNCTIONARIESâ IN SUFFOLK COUNTY. WHEN HE WAS NOT PLAYING INFORMANT FOR THE FBI, HE âHAS BEEN USEFUL AS A CONDUIT IN PASSING INFORMATION TO WATCHDOG ORGANIZATIONS, SUCH AS POLITICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES (PRA) OF CAMBRIDGE, MASS.â FURTHER, BERLET ADMITS TO BEING THE CONDUIT FOR INFORMATION FROM MOSHER TO ADL. âMR. BERLET SAID, â... HE TOLD US WHO HE WAS AND WHAT HE DID. LITTLE BY LITTLE, HE BEGAN SHOWING US THINGS. AS HE BEGAN TO SEE HOW WE OPERATE, HE BEGAN TO BRING US PUBLICATIONS.â

âTHIS IS CONFIRMED IN THE SAME ARTICLE BY LEONARD ZAKIN, ADLâS NEW ENGLAND REGION EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. âALTHOUGH MR. ZAKIN SAYS THE ADL HAS NOT DEALT WITH MR. MOSHER, HE EXPRESSED HIGH REGARD FOR MR. BERLET AND PRA.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
END PART TWO

====
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?disc=203188;article=2933;title=KPFK-fm%20Chat

Alex Constantine
The Bottom Line: J.F. Berlet's CIA Ties
Thu Mar 18, 2004 11:41am
69.111.14.230


Groups search result 5 for john foster "chip" berletÂ
Search Result 5From: Daniel L. Brandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Subject: Ace Hayes on Chip Berlet
Newsgroups: alt.journalismView: (This is the only article in this thread) | Original FormatDate: 1996/04/20

>From the Portland Free Press, PO Box 1327, Tualatin OR 97062
(Subscriptions: $15/year ) March/April 1996, pp. 10-11.

More Berlet Stonewalling
by Ace R. Hayes

[Editor's Note: The following fax was transmitted to John Foster
"Chip" Berlet at his place of employment, Political Research
Associates (PRA), 8 March 1996:

"Dear Mr. Berlet:

"It seems that you have had sufficient time to respond to the
questions contained in my letter of November 1995.

"Should I take it that I can quote you as `no comment'?

"The letter will be published with or without your formal response.

"However, I thought you should have another chance to reply.

"Sincerely, Ace R. Hayes

"P.S. Your `Militia Nation' (1 March 1996 Internet) is one hell of
a conspiracy theory. It reads like an FBI report."

No response has issued from behind PRA's barricade of arrogant
silence. Perhaps there is an explanation which will only become
obvious when the people of America replace Imperial government with
a democracy which releases all public documents to the public.
Secret Police employment and pay-off records will be of special
interest.

The FBI Counter-Intelligence Program (COINTELPRO) has merely had a
name change, according to retired FBI agent Wesley Swearingen in
his book "FBI Secrets: An Agent's Expose" (South End Press, 1995).
Thus, the proposition that COINTELPRO is alive and well has serious
supporting evidence. It is ironic that Berlet is quoted in this
book praising it while attacking everyone who wants to prosecute
Secret Police death-squad members. These jack-booted storm troopers
are, he claims, being "scapegoated" along with Jews, welfare
mothers and gays. This is absurd on its face.

When people read the letter Berlet refuses to answer -- perhaps
others will want to ask the same questions. COINTELPRO is as
dangerous to democracy, liberty and justice today as it has always
been. Those who protect COINTELPRO by diverting attention toward
pseudo-threats are equally dangerous to America's democratic values.

Documentation for the questions asked in this letter to Berlet,
November 1995, can be found in previous issues of PFP, as follows:
"Berlet for Beginners," July/August 1995, and "The Beacon Fund,"
November/December 1995. ]


November 1995

Dear Mr. Berlet:

Having finally met you, I find you to be a far less dangerous
character than I had expected. Indeed, you were so underwhelming,
I was almost disappointed. Playing word games and doing parlor
tricks for the local rubes adds to your charm.

So, let me give you the chance to answer some charges, questions
and issues you have dodged for so long.

Item #1) Why did you attend a cabal of Imperial spooks at John
Train's pad with John Rees? How many such Secret Service sit-downs
have you attended in the past twenty years?

Item #2) Do you or have you worked for the ADL or not? Be specific.

Item #3) Why have questions about "Beacon Fund" been stonewalled?

Item #4) What is your documentation for your 24 April 1995 attack
against me on Internet? Whom have I "scapegoated"? What is the
denotation of "conspiracism"?

Item #5) What is the documentation that the IRS has audited PRA?

Item #6) What was your relationship with CIA agent Sal Ferrera at
College Press Service?

Item #7) Have you or will you repudiate the use of your report,
"Clouds Blur the Rainbow," by the FBI for an investigation of a
legal political organization?

Item #8) Spotlight, 6 November 1995, has done a positive review of
Holly Sklar's new book, "Chaos or Community," and offers it for
sale through "Liberty Library." Does this mean that, as the Pope of
PC, you will now have to excommunicate Ms. Sklar for the crime of
being "wooed" by the Right? (Copy enclosed.)

Item #9) The expose on "Feds, Fun and Fascism" was in "Soldier of
Fortune." The cover-up for same comes from the entire ADL apparat:
SPLC, CDR, PRA, NWCAMH, CHD, MHRN, et al. (Copy enclosed.)

As a person who once despised SoF and supported ADL, I am annoyed
that I now have to read SoF for serious investigative journalism
and must hold everything put out by ADL and its pseudo-pods as
probable COINTELPRO psyops. I resent being lied to by the Left.
I expect to be lied to by the Right and Middle.

You yourself said, "...they [ADL] linked up with [the] right-wing,
reactionary, paranoid infrastructure of intelligence agents, local
police and private right-wing spies, which has been revealed
repeatedly over the years...

"In fact, all over the country ADL's been spying on leftists for
many years.

"It's inappropriate for ADL to say that it's defending the rights
of all people, including Arab-Americans against bigotry, and it's
spying on the Arab-Americans and handing the files over into a
quasi-public-private spy network. You can't do that. It's flatly
unethical; it's immoral." (Interview transcript, 23 July 1993,
KPFA Berkeley, Calif.)

Since you profess such concern with ethics and morals, why don't
you do a major expose of ADL as an Imperial State "private"
spy-and-lie op?

(I noted that your 1993 remarks about ADL came in the middle of the
ADL spy scandal in San Francisco. However, since the lid on the
scandal has been resecured, you have been back in bed with ADL,
e.g., Portland, Oregon, "Freedom From Fear" conference, October
1995. I, therefore, expect you will find some excuse to avoid the
above challenge.)

Item #10) Do you know a person calling himself "Paul de Armond"?
He claims to know you "fairly well." I am enclosing a copy of some
of his ad hominem ravings.

I want you to either publicly repudiate his name-calling or I will
have to assume that "hate speech" by your friends is acceptable to
you.

Item #11) Your name appears next to the name Bill Lemmer in the
first issue of Public Eye in 1977. Lemmer, a coordinator for the
VVAW [Vietnam Veterans Against the War], was the star government
witness in the Gainsville 8 trial in 1973. He testified that he
had been an FBI informant since 1971. This was widely reported in
mainline media. Why were you working with him in 1977?

Item #12) Your selection of associations over the years is bizarre,
at best. You were promoting CIA-financed writings at the National
Students Association -- after it was exposed as CIA funded. You
worked with CIA agent Sal Ferrera at the College Press Service. You
worked with FBI informant Bill Lemmer at Public Eye. You attended
secret spy meetings with John Rees of the John Birch Society. You
are in and out of bed with ADL so often no one can be sure whether
you are still in love or not. You even joined "Chicago Area Friends
of Albania" when CIA was setting up such front groups by the dozens.
Do you make such choices all by yourself or do you have a control
officer?

Your response to these questions would be appreciated.

And, on a personal note, it was really rather stupid of you to
advise everyone at Laughing Horse and those who will watch the
event on cable TV that I had your "secret" home address -- although
I wonder why I bother to advise you on how not to make a fool of
yourself. I suppose it is because I really hold no animus for you
personally. I am, however, outraged by your political disinformation
campaign which only serves the interests of the Imperial State. If
you ever decide to oppose the real fascism of the Imperial State,
as is being done by the 15 organizations reported on the first page
of this issue of the Free Press [November/December 1995], I would
be pleased.

END





Click here to receive daily updates





To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om 2">

Reply via email to